Friedrich W. Kreth

Promoter methylation and expression of MGMT and the DNA mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 in paired primary and recurrent glioblastomas

Epigenetic silencing of the O6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter is associated with prolonged survival in glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide (TMZ). We investigated whether glioblastoma recurrence is associated with changes in the promoter methylation status and the expression of MGMT and the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 in pairs of primary and recurrent glioblastomas of 80 patients, including 64 patients treated with radiotherapy and TMZ after the first operation. Among the primary tumors, the MGMT promoter was methylated in 31 patients and unmethylated in 49 patients. In 71 patients (89%), the MGMT promoter methylation status of the primary tumor was retained at recurrence. MGMT promoter methylation, but not MGMT protein expression, was associated with longer progression‐free survival, overall survival and postrecurrence survival (PRS). Moreover, PRS was increased under salvage chemotherapy. Investigation of primary and recurrent glioblastomas of 43 patients did not identify promoter methylation in any of the four MMR genes. However, recurrent glioblastomas demonstrated significantly lower MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 protein expression as detected by immunohistochemistry. In conclusion, reduced expression of MMR proteins, but not changes in MGMT promoter methylation, is characteristic of glioblastomas recurring after the current standards of care.

Intratumoral homogeneity of MGMT promoter hypermethylation as demonstrated in serial stereotactic specimens from anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas

Hypermethylation of the DNA repair gene O6‐methyl‐guanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) has been linked to prolonged survival in glioblastoma patients treated with alkylating agents. It was aimed to analyze prospectively whether the MGMT status of malignant gliomas could be determined from small‐sized stereotactic biopsies (maximum volume: 1 mm3). Special attention was directed towards the intratumoral distribution of the MGMT promoter methylation, the MGMT protein expression and potential correlations between both. Twenty‐five adult patients were included (20 patients with primary World Health Organisation (WHO) Grade III or IV malignant gliomas, 5 patients with secondary malignant gliomas). About 2–4 biopsy specimens per tumor were collected from different sites within the tumor. Promoter methylation of the MGMT gene was assessed by methylation‐specific PCR (MSP) and sodium bisulfite sequencing in each of the collected specimens (overall number of specimens: 69). Both methods were validated for application in small‐sized tissue samples (1 mm3). The MGMT protein expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. The overall MGMT promoter methylation rate was 30% in the de novo group and 80% in the tumor progression group. The success rates of MSP and sequencing were 100% and 80%, respectively. Sequence analysis and MSP exhibited 100% concordant findings. No differences in MGMT promoter methylation were detected between the different samples of each individual tumor in 24 of 25 patients. One false negative result was obtained due to the contamination of the biopsy specimen by necrotic tissue. Tissue samples taken from different sites of each individual tumor (13 tumors investigated) exhibited equal or highly similar MGMT protein expression. No correlation between MGMT protein expression and MGMT promoter methylation was observed. The MGMT promoter methylation status of malignant gliomas can be reliably determined from small‐sized stereotactic biopsies. The methylation profile, as defined by MSP and sodium bisulfite sequencing, constitutes a homogeneous marker throughout malignant gliomas. The lack of correlation between MGMT status and MGMT protein expression needs further evaluation.

Gross total but not incomplete resection of glioblastoma prolongs survival in the era of radiochemotherapy

BACKGROUND This prospective multicenter study assessed the prognostic influence of the extent of resection when compared with biopsy only in a contemporary patient population with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Histology, O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, and clinical data were centrally analyzed. Survival analyses were carried out with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were assessed with proportional hazard models. RESULTS Of 345 patients, 273 underwent open tumor resection and 72 biopsies; 125 patients had gross total resections (GTRs) and 148, incomplete resections. Surgery-related morbidity was lower after biopsy (1.4% versus 12.1%, P = 0.007). 64.3% of patients received radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT plus CT), 20.0% RT alone, 4.3% CT alone, and 11.3% best supportive care as an initial treatment. Patients ≤60 years with a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of ≥90 were more likely to receive RT plus CT (P < 0.01). Median overall survival (OS) (progression free survival; PFS) ranged from 33.2 months (15 months) for patients with MGMT-methylated tumors after GTR and RT plus CT to 3.0 months (2.4 months) for biopsied patients receiving supportive care only. Favorable prognostic factors in multivariate analyses for OS were age ≤60 years [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52; P < 0.001], preoperative KPS of ≥80 (HR = 0.55; P < 0.001), GTR (HR = 0.60; P = 0.003), MGMT promoter methylation (HR = 0.44; P < 0.001), and RT plus CT (HR = 0.18, P < 0.001); patients undergoing incomplete resection did not better than those receiving biopsy only (HR = 0.85; P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS The value of incomplete resection remains questionable. If GTR cannot be safely achieved, biopsy only might be used as an alternative surgical strategy.

Personalized treatment strategies in glioblastoma: MGMT promoter methylation status

The identification of molecular genetic biomarkers considerably increased our current understanding of glioma genesis, prognostic evaluation, and treatment planning. In glioblastoma, the most malignant intrinsic brain tumor entity in adults, the promoter methylation status of the gene encoding for the repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) indicates increased efficacy of current standard of care, which is concomitant and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with the alkylating agent temozolomide. In the elderly, MGMT promoter methylation status has recently been introduced to be a predictive biomarker that can be used for stratification of treatment regimes. This review gives a short summery of epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, and treatment aspects of patients who are currently diagnosed with glioblastoma. The most important molecular genetic markers and epigenetic alterations in glioblastoma are summarized. Special focus is given to the physiological function of DNA methylation–in particular, of the MGMT gene promoter, its clinical relevance, technical aspects of status assessment, its correlation with MGMT mRNA and protein expressions, and its place within the management cascade of glioblastoma patients.

Novel Molecular Stereotactic Biopsy Procedures Reveal Intratumoral Homogeneity of Loss of Heterozygosity of 1p/19q and TP53 Mutations in World Health Organization Grade II Gliomas

We report a molecular stereotactic biopsy technique that combines histopathologic diagnosis with small sample size-adjusted molecular genetic analysis of low-grade gliomas that are ineligible for tumor resection. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of 1p/19q and TP53 mutationswere analyzed in 1-mm3 tissue samples from 42 World Health Organization grade II gliomas (30 astrocytomas, 8 oligoastrocytomas, 4 oligodendrogliomas) using polymerase chain reaction-based microsatellite and sequence analysis. Alternating histological and molecular genetic evaluation within 1-mm steps at different sites within each tumor was performed to determine reproducibility of the results and the intratumoral distribution of the biomarkers. Multiple serial biopsies (range, 2-5 per tumor) taken from distinct intratumoral areas revealed concordant molecular genetic findings and homogeneous distribution of both biomarkers throughout 41 tumors. Contamination by nonneoplastic tissue could be recognized by corresponding histological evaluation and resulted in discordant LOH findings in 1 tumor. The frequency of LOH 1p/19q and TP53 mutations was consistent with the literature; these genetic alterations were found to be mutually exclusive. There was no biopsy-related morbidity. We conclude that determination of the LOH 1p/19q and TP53 status using this molecular stereotactic biopsy technique is safe and reliable in cases of unresectable gliomas.

In human glioblastomas transcript elongation by alternative polyadenylation and miRNA targeting is a potent mechanism of MGMT silencing.

Favorable outcome after chemotherapy of glioblastomas cannot unequivocally be linked to promoter hypermethylation of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene encoding a DNA repair enzyme associated with resistance to alkylating agents. This indicates that molecular mechanisms determining MGMT expression have not yet been fully elucidated. We here show that glioblastomas are capable to downregulate MGMT expression independently of promoter methylation by elongation of the 3′-UTR of the mRNA, rendering the alternatively polyadenylated transcript susceptible to miRNA-mediated suppression. While the elongated transcript is poorly expressed in normal brain, its abundance in human glioblastoma specimens is inversely correlated with MGMT mRNA expression. Using a bioinformatically guided experimental approach, we identified miR-181d, miR-767-3p, and miR-648 as significant post-transcriptional regulators of MGMT in glioblastomas; the first two miRNAs induce MGMT mRNA degradation, the latter affects MGMT protein translation. A regression model including the two miRNAs influencing MGMT mRNA expression and the MGMT methylation status reliably predicts The Cancer Genome Atlas MGMT expression data. Responsivity of MGMT expressing T98G glioma cells to temozolomide was significantly enhanced after transfection of miR-181d, miR-767-3p, and miR-648. Taken together, our results uncovered alternative polyadenylation of the MGMT 3′-UTR and miRNA targeting as new mechanisms of MGMT silencing.

Identification of valid endogenous control genes for determining gene expression in human glioma.

In human glioma, quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR (qPCR) is a frequently used research tool. However, no systematic analysis of suitable reference genes for reliable gene expression analysis has been performed so far. In the current study, we tested 19 commonly used reference genes for their expression stability in human astrocytoma WHO Grade II, astrocytoma WHO Grade III, and glioblastoma (WHO Grade IV) both alone and compared with normal brain. First, equivalence tests for equal expression of candidate genes were applied, and those genes showing differential expression were ruled out from further analyses. Second, expression stability of the remaining candidate genes was determined by the NormFinder software. Generally, glioblastoma exhibited the highest expression levels and largest variability of candidate genes, whereas the opposite was true for normal brain. Even though Normfinder analyses revealed a large number of genes suitable for normalization in each of the tumor subgroups and across these groups, this number was drastically reduced after inclusion of normal brain into the analyses: Only GAPDH, IPO8, RPL13A, SDHA, and TBP were expected not to be differentially expressed; NormFinder analysis indicated favorable stability values for all of these genes, with TBP and IPO8 being the most stable ones. These 5 genes represent different physiological pathways and may be regarded as universal reference genes applicable for accurate normalization of gene expression in human astrocytomas of different grades (WHO Grades II-IV) alone and compared with normal brain, thereby enabling longitudinally designed studies (eg, in astrocytoma before and after malignant transformation).

Epigenetics in human gliomas.

Aberrant epigenetic landscapes and their involvement in genesis and progression of tumors, as well as in treatment responses and prognosis, indicate one of the most emerging fields in cancer research. In gliomas, the most common human primary brain tumors, and in particular in glioblastoma, the most malignant and devastating brain tumor entity in adults, the elucidation of distinct patterns of aberrant DNA methylation, histone modification, and miRNA expression and their interrelationship has fundamentally changed our point of view on these highly heterogeneous tumors. In the current review article, we address the basic principles of epigenetic control in gliomas, their current and putative future role in prognostic and predictive models and possible interactions within the epigenetic network. We discuss diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities appearing at horizon of epigenetic research. Moreover, we present current and propose future clinical workflow models for molecular characterization of malignant gliomas.

[18F]fluoroethyltyrosine-positron emission tomography-based therapy monitoring after stereotactic iodine-125 brachytherapy in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.

Therapy monitoring of glioma after stereotactic iodine-125 brachytherapy (SBT) remains challenging because posttherapeutic changes in magnetic resonance imaging can mimic tumor progression. We evaluated the prognostic value of serial [18F]fluoroethyltyrosine (FET)-positron emission tomographic (PET) scans for therapy monitoring of high-grade glioma (HGG) after SBT. Thirty-three patients with recurrent HGG were included. Serial FET-PET scans were performed prior to therapeutic intervention and at 3-month intervals during the first year after SBT. FET-PET evaluation was performed by both conventional data analysis and kinetic analysis. Prognostic factors were obtained from proportional hazard models. Median local progression-free survival (LPFS) was 11.1 months. Maximal standardized background uptake value (SUVmax/BG) and biologic tumor volume (BTV) differentiated accurately between therapeutic effects and local tumor progression at the 6-month and subsequent examinations. Increasing uptake kinetics at baseline (p < .05) and during follow-up (p < .01) were stringently associated with a longer LPFS. Early increase in FET uptake after SBT is not unequivocally associated with tumor progression; it might be induced by reactive changes and could easily lead to a misclassification of the tumor status (pseudoprogression). Six months after SBT (or later), however, increased SUVmax/BG and BTV values are associated with a worse prognosis. Multivariate analysis stresses the prognostic importance of dynamic studies.

Quality-adjusted survival after tumor resection and/or radiation therapy for elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Abstract.Objective: Prognostic factors are poorly defined for the elderly subpopulation with glioblastoma multiforme and have been exclusively related to conventional survival analysis. In this study an additional quality adjusted survival analysis (QAS) was performed. The prognostic evaluation of both survival- and QAS data after standard treatment were checked for concordant/discordant findings. Their usefulness for estimation of treatment effects and treatment strategies was then evaluated. Methods: 123 patients ≥ 65 years of age with a supratentorial, de novo glioblastoma were included in the current retrospective report. Microsurgery plus radiation therapy (planned tumor dose: 60 Gy) was performed in 58 patients, and radiation therapy alone after stereotactic biopsy (planned tumor dose: 60 Gy) in 65 patients. The functional status of each patient was scored when joining the study and at every follow-up using 15 selected neurological signs and symptoms (NSSs). Gradation of severity of each NSS was performed with subjective weights. Survival time of each patient was adjusted according to any changes in these NSSs to become the Quality Time (Q-TIME). Time intervals spent with side effects of the treatment (TOX) were subtracted from Q-TIME to become the patients QAS (QAS = Q-TIME–TOX). Prognostic factors for both survival and QAS were obtained from the Cox model. Results: Overall survival and QAS were 24 weeks and 10.5 weeks, respectively. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were 5.2 % and 1.7 % in the surgery group and 1.5 % and 1.5 % in the biopsy group, respectively (p > 0.05). Tumor resection gained favorable prognostic importance for patients with midline shift in terms of both survival and QAS (p < 0.0001). Otherwise, radiation therapy alone was as effective as surgery plus radiation therapy (concordant finding). A pretreatment Karnofsky Score (KPS) < 70 was an unfavorable predictor for QAS (p < 0.002) but not for survival (discordant finding). Median QAS for patients with a pretreatment KPS < 70 was only 10 weeks. Age did not reach prognostic relevance. Conclusion: The dramatic decrease of QAS as compared with survival indicates extremely limited posttreatment improvement and/or rapid deterioration of the neurological score after standard treatment for the older subpopulation with glioblastoma multiforme. Supportive treatment should be considered for patients with a pretreatment KPS < 70.