G. Fuga

Urological Complications After Kidney Transplantation: Experience of More Than 1000 Transplantations

OBJECTIVE Urinary fistulas and stenoses are the most common complications that may require surgical revision after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the incidence of and risk factors for early (within 30 days) or late major urological complications (stenoses and fistulas) after kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study population comprised 1142 consecutive patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 1990 and September 2007. Endpoints were early and late urological complications (stenoses and fistulas). The variables considered upon multivariate and univariate analyses were: recipient age, sex, etiology of renal failure, number (first/second) and type (single/double/combined with other organs) of kidney transplantations, cold ischemia time, type of urinary reconstruction, stent positioning, as well as donor cause of death, sex, age, and serum creatinine and clearance. We also examined the presence of graft polar arteries, acute rejection episodes, and postoperative graft function. RESULTS Among 1142 transplantation performed at our center, 100 patients (8.7%) experienced 107 urological complications: 85 (79.4%) were early (56 fistulas, 29 stenoses) and 22 (20.5%) late (7 fistulas and 15 stenoses). Multivariate analysis for all complications revealed significant associations with male recipient sex (P = .00, HR = 2), while first kidney transplantation was protective (P = .00, HR = .4). Male gender both of the recipient and of the donor was significantly associated with early fistulas (P = .01, HR = 2.5 and P = .02, HR = 2, respectively). First (versus second) kidney transplantation had a protective effect on early stenoses (P = .01, HR = .27). Late fistulas were associated with anastomotic stenting (P = .03) in univariate but not multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis for late stenoses did not demonstrate any significant association with the considered variables; however, the late stenosis cases showed significantly higher recipient and donor ages (P < .05) and a lower donor creatinine clearance (P < .05). The type of urinary anastomosis, stenting, cold ischemia time, presence of polar arterial branches, and type of transplantation did not influence the incidence of urinary fistulas or stenoses. CONCLUSIONS Our data confirmed that older recipients and organs from older donors, especially of male gender, and retransplantations are to be considered risk factors for urological complications. The present analysis cannot suggest any modification of the actual surgical strategy that would prevent urological complications in kidney transplantation.

Analysis of 80 dual-kidney transplantations: a multicenter experience.

INTRODUCTION The use of kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECD) is an attractive strategy to enlarge the pool of organs available for transplantation. Considering the fact that ECD organs have a reduced nephron mass, they are preferentially allocated for dual-kidney transplantation (DKT). Authors have reported excellent results of DKT when pretransplant ECD organs are evaluated for histological scores. The aim of this study was to evaluate DKT donor and recipient characteristics for comparison with DKT posttransplant outcomes versus those of recipients of single-kidney transplantations from expanded criteria (edSKT) and ideal donors (idSKT). We analyzed the potential prognostic factors involved in DKT among a population derived from three transplant centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2001 and 2007, DKT (n = 80) were performed based upon the ECD kidney allocation assessed by biopsy. RESULTS The average donor ages for the DKT, edSKT, and idSKT groups were 68.8 ± 7.8, 65.3 ± 7.2, and 40.1 ± 13.8 years, respectively (P < .001). The number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches was greater in the DKT group (3.1 ± 1.2, P < .05). Patient and graft 5-year survival rates were similar among DKT, edSKT, and idSKT recipients, namely, 97.5% versus 95.8% versus 96.9% and 93.7% versus 87.4% versus 86.9%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine values at discharge were lower in the DKT and idSKT recipients (1.5 ± 0.9 and 1.6 ± 0.7 mg/dL; P < .05) compared with the edSKT group (1.9 ± 0.7 mg/dL). Correlations between supposed prognostic factors and survival among the DKT group noted worse outcomes in reoperation cases (P < .05). CONCLUSION We confirmed that DKT produced successful outcomes. An accurate surgical procedure is particularly important to try to avoid reoperations. In our experience, the use of a biopsy as an absolute criterion to allocate ECD kidneys may be too protective.

Gastrointestinal Perforations Following Kidney Transplantation

This study reports major gastrointestinal (GI) complications among a group of 1611 patients following kidney transplantation. The immunosuppressive regimen changed somewhat during the course of the study but included azathioprine, prednisolone, antilymphocyte globulin, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and sirolimus. Perforations occurred in the colon (n=21), small bowel (n=15), duodenum (n=6), and stomach (n=4). Nearly 50% of the complications occurred while patients were being given high-dose immunosuppression to manage either the early postoperative period or acute rejection episodes. Of the 46 patients affected, 11 (24%) died as a direct result of the GI complication. This high mortality appeared to be related to the effects of the immunosuppression and the associated response to sepsis. Reduction of these complications may be achieved by improved surgical management, preventive measures, prompt diagnosis, and a reduced immunosuppressive protocol.

Aortoiliac surgery concomitant with kidney transplantation: a single center experience

Abstract:  Introduction:  Aortoiliac pathology in kidney allograft recipients is not rare but treatment timing is controversial. As most publications on this topic are case reports it’s difficult to evaluate long‐term outcomes of those clinical challenges. Herein we report long‐term results of these procedures.

Multicenter study on double kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND Marginal organs not suitable for single kidney transplantation are considered for double kidney transplantation (DKT). Herein we have reviewed short and long-term outcomes of DKT over a 7-year experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2001 and 2007, 80 DKT were performed in the transplant centers of Bologna, Parma, and Modena, Italy. Recipient mean age was 61+/-5 years. The main indications were glomerular nephropathy (n=33) and hypertensive nephroangiosclerosis (n=14). Mean HLA A, B, and DR mismatches were 3.1+/-1.2. Donor mean age was 69+/-8 years and mean creatinine clearance was 75+/-27 mL/min. Almost all kidneys were perfused with Celsior solution. Mean cold ischemia time was 17+/-4 hours and mean warm ischemia time was 41+/-17 minutes. Mean biopsy score was 4.4. Immunosuppression was based on tacrolimus (n=52) or cyclosporine (n=26). RESULTS Fifty (62.5%) patients displayed good postoperative renal function. Thirty (37.5%) experienced acute tubular necrosis and required postoperative dialysis treatment; 8 acute rejections occurred. Urinary complications were 13.7% with 8/11 requiring surgical revision. There were 6 surgical reexplorations: intestinal perforation (n=2), bleeding (n=3), and lymphocele (n=1). Two patients lost both grafts due to vascular and infectious complications at 7 or 58 days after transplantation. Two patients underwent intraoperative transplantectomy due to massive vascular thrombosis. Four (5%) patients underwent transplantectomy of a single graft due to vascular complications (n=2), bleeding (n=1), or infectious complications (n=1). Graft and patient survivals were 95% and 100% versus 93% and 97% at 3 versus 36 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS DKT is a safe approach for organ shortage. The score used in this study is useful to determine whether a kidney should be refused or accepted.

Kidney transplantation combined with other organs in Bologna: an update.

BACKGROUND We retrospectively reviewed our experience in combined liver-kidney (L-KT) and heart-kidney (H-KT) transplantations. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1997 and April 2007, we performed 25 L-KT and 5 H-KT. Patient mean age was 51+/-8 years in L-KT and 43+/-11 years in H-KT. The main cause of liver failure was chronic viral hepatitis (14 cases). Etiology of heart failure was dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (4 and 1 patients, respectively). The main causes of renal failure in L-KT were chronic glomerulonephritis (n=8) and polycystic disease (n=7). Etiology of renal failure in H-KT was interstitial nephropathy (n=2), vascular nephropathy (n=2), and chronic glomerulonephritis (n=1). RESULTS Mean follow-up was 32+/-26 months in L-KT and 24+/-17 months in H-KT. Immunosuppression was cyclosporine-based (n=4) or tacrolimus-based (n=21) in L-KT and cyclosporine-based in H-KT. Acute rejection rate was 8% for both liver and kidney in L-KT; 80% (mild) for heart and 40% for kidney in H-KT. In the L-KT group, there was no primary graft nonfunction (PGNF). Two patients experienced liver delayed graft function (DGF); 1 patient required postoperative dialysis. One-year graft and patient survivals were both 84% and overall graft and patient survival was 76%. In the H-KT group, 3 patients needed postoperative dialysis and 1 required a cardiac assistance device for 48 hours; overall graft and patient survival was 100% with good cardiac and renal functions. CONCLUSION Our experience confirmed that H-KT and L-KT are safe procedures, offering good long-term results.

Importance of Renal Mass on Graft Function Outcome After 12 Months of Cadaveric Donor Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND Few studies have measured cadaveric kidney weight to investigate its relation to recipient kidney function related to it. The aim of this study was to evaluate kidney weight (cadaveric donor) and its relationship to creatinine clearance (CrCl) after 12 months posttransplantation. METHODS We evaluated 81 renal transplantation recipients from cadaveric donors. We collected donor and recipient demographic, clinical and anthropometric data. Data about kidney weight were obtained through kidney measurement using an electronic machine at the moment of transplantation. RESULTS The mean kidney weight was 201.4 +/- 10.2 g (200.5 +/- 11.6 g in women and 210.3 +/- 14.1 g in men). Kidney weight correlated with CrCl at 12 months (0.001). The CrCl at 12 months showed a significant correlation of graft weight/recipient weight ratio (P < .01). CONCLUSION The cadaveric donor kidney weight significantly influenced the CrCl at 12 months after transplantation.

Pulsatile perfusion of kidney allografts with Celsior solution.

BACKGROUND Use of pulsatile perfusion (PP) to optimize outcomes in deceased donor renal transplantation remains controversial. This prospective analysis describes all cadaveric renal allografts transplanted at our center that were preserved with PP using Celsior solution. METHODS We used the LifePort Kidney Transporter (Organ Recovery Systems) perfusion machine. Study outcomes included 1-year graft and patient survivals as well as rates of delayed graft function and need for posttransplant dialysis. RESULTS Graft survival for PP was 90% and patient survival 100%. The incidences of delayed graft function was 10% and of posttransplant dialysis, 10%. CONCLUSION These data support the use of PP with Celsior solution.

Hyperimmunized Patients Awaiting Cadaveric Kidney Graft : Is There a Quick Desensitization Possible?

On all kidney waiting lists the 10% to 20% of patients who have antibodies against more than 80% of a panel of HLA antigens (panel reactive antibody [PRA] >80%) are difficult to transplant. The best solution for these patients is to find a compatible donor, ideally a full match, who yields a negative crossmatch test (CMX). If this is not possible, desensitization treatment (high-dose) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasmapheresis (PP) + low-dose IVIG is possible with good results in living donor kidney transplantation mainly if the antibody titer is low. It may also be offered to patients awaiting cadaveric donors too after a long waiting time; however, when applied for several months, it has the obvious disadvantage of giving the patient the risk for long-lasting immunologic weakness without the certitude of finding a kidney. In one of our recent cases of combined liver plus kidney transplantation, a positive CMX became negative 8 hours after the liver operation; the kidney was transplanted with a good result which lasted over 3 years. This observation suggested the possibility of a quick desensitization protocol in selected patients with a large (but not strong) immunization who probably are the majority. Patients sensitized to IVIG and with low titer PRA could be given a single PP + low-dose IVIG (what can be done within the time limit of cadaveric donor kidney transplantation) with good probability of turning an initial positive CMX to negative with the possibility of performing the operation and the advantage of giving the immunosuppression only when the kidney is present.