G.L. Wiegers
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by G.L. Wiegers.
New Phytologist | 2017
Manus P. M. Thoen; Nelson H. Davila Olivas; Karen J. Kloth; Silvia Coolen; Ping Ping Huang; Mark G. M. Aarts; Johanna A. Bac-Molenaar; Jaap Bakker; Harro J. Bouwmeester; Colette Broekgaarden; Johan Bucher; Jacqueline Busscher-Lange; Xi Cheng; Emilie F. Fradin; Maarten A. Jongsma; Magdalena M. Julkowska; Joost J. B. Keurentjes; Wilco Ligterink; Corné M. J. Pieterse; Carolien Ruyter-Spira; Geert Smant; Christa Testerink; Björn Usadel; Joop J. A. van Loon; Johan A. Van Pelt; Casper van Schaik; Saskia C. M. Van Wees; Richard G. F. Visser; Roeland E. Voorrips; Ben Vosman
Summary Plants are exposed to combinations of various biotic and abiotic stresses, but stress responses are usually investigated for single stresses only. Here, we investigated the genetic architecture underlying plant responses to 11 single stresses and several of their combinations by phenotyping 350 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. A set of 214 000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was screened for marker‐trait associations in genome‐wide association (GWA) analyses using tailored multi‐trait mixed models. Stress responses that share phytohormonal signaling pathways also share genetic architecture underlying these responses. After removing the effects of general robustness, for the 30 most significant SNPs, average quantitative trait locus (QTL) effect sizes were larger for dual stresses than for single stresses. Plants appear to deploy broad‐spectrum defensive mechanisms influencing multiple traits in response to combined stresses. Association analyses identified QTLs with contrasting and with similar responses to biotic vs abiotic stresses, and below‐ground vs above‐ground stresses. Our approach allowed for an unprecedented comprehensive genetic analysis of how plants deal with a wide spectrum of stress conditions.
Journal of Experimental Botany | 2016
Karen J. Kloth; G.L. Wiegers; Jacqueline Busscher-Lange; Jan C. van Haarst; Willem Kruijer; Harro J. Bouwmeester; Marcel Dicke; Maarten A. Jongsma
Highlight The transcription factor WRKY22 increases susceptibility to aphids in Arabidopsis via the suppression of salicylic acid signalling.
Pest Management Science | 2016
David Kupesa Mfuti; Sevgan Subramanian; Rob Whm van Tol; G.L. Wiegers; Willem Jan De Kogel; Saliou Niassy; Hannalene du Plessis; Sunday Ekesi; Nguya K. Maniania
Abstract BACKGROUND The effect of spatial separation of the semiochemical Lurem‐TR, which has been found to inhibit conidia of entomopathogenic fungi when put together, on the persistence of conidia of Metarhizium brunneum and M. anisopliae was evaluated in the greenhouse and field in order to develop an autodissemination strategy for the management of Megalurothrips sjostedti on cowpea crop. Influence of spatial separation of the semiochemical on thrips attraction and conidial acquisition by thrips from the autoinoculation device was also investigated in the field. RESULTS Persistence of conidia of M. brunneum and M. anisopliae increased with distance of separation of Lurem‐TR. Direct exposure of fungus without separation from Lurem‐TR recorded the lowest conidial germination as compared with the other treatments. Attraction of thrips to the device also varied significantly according to distance between device and semiochemical, with a higher number of thrips attracted when Lurem‐TR was placed in a container below the device and at 10 cm distance. There was no significant difference in conidial acquisition between spatial separation treatments of conidia and Lurem‐TR. Attraction of other insect pests to the device did not significantly vary between treatments. Positive correlations were found between conidial acquisition and thrips attraction. CONCLUSION This study suggests that spatial separation of fungal conidia from Lurem‐TR in an autoinoculation device could provide a low‐cost strategy for effective management of thrips in grain legume cropping systems.
Plant Methods | 2015
Karen J. Kloth; Cindy J.M. ten Broeke; Manus P. M. Thoen; Marianne Hanhart-van den Brink; G.L. Wiegers; O.E. Krips; L.P.J.J. Noldus; Marcel Dicke; Maarten A. Jongsma
BackgroundPiercing-sucking insects are major vectors of plant viruses causing significant yield losses in crops. Functional genomics of plant resistance to these insects would greatly benefit from the availability of high-throughput, quantitative phenotyping methods.ResultsWe have developed an automated video tracking platform that quantifies aphid feeding behaviour on leaf discs to assess the level of plant resistance. Through the analysis of aphid movement, the start and duration of plant penetrations by aphids were estimated. As a case study, video tracking confirmed the near-complete resistance of lettuce cultivar ‘Corbana’ against Nasonovia ribisnigri (Mosely), biotype Nr:0, and revealed quantitative resistance in Arabidopsis accession Co-2 against Myzus persicae (Sulzer). The video tracking platform was benchmarked against Electrical Penetration Graph (EPG) recordings and aphid population development assays. The use of leaf discs instead of intact plants reduced the intensity of the resistance effect in video tracking, but sufficiently replicated experiments resulted in similar conclusions as EPG recordings and aphid population assays. One video tracking platform could screen 100 samples in parallel.ConclusionsAutomated video tracking can be used to screen large plant populations for resistance to aphids and other piercing-sucking insects.
The Plant Cell | 2017
Karen J. Kloth; Jacqueline Busscher-Lange; G.L. Wiegers; Willem Kruijer; Gonda Buijs; Rhonda C. Meyer; Benedicte R. Albrectsen; Harro J. Bouwmeester; Marcel Dicke; Maarten A. Jongsma
Genome-wide association mapping and protein characterization reveal that the small heat shock-like protein SLI1 restricts phloem feeding by aphids and improves seed set during heat stress. The role of phloem proteins in plant resistance to aphids is still largely elusive. By genome-wide association mapping of aphid behavior on 350 natural Arabidopsis thaliana accessions, we identified the small heat shock-like SIEVE ELEMENT-LINING CHAPERONE1 (SLI1). Detailed behavioral studies on near-isogenic and knockout lines showed that SLI1 impairs phloem feeding. Depending on the haplotype, aphids displayed a different duration of salivation in the phloem. On sli1 mutants, aphids prolonged their feeding sessions and ingested phloem at a higher rate than on wild-type plants. The largest phenotypic effects were observed at 26°C, when SLI1 expression is upregulated. At this moderately high temperature, sli1 mutants suffered from retarded elongation of the inflorescence and impaired silique development. Fluorescent reporter fusions showed that SLI1 is confined to the margins of sieve elements where it lines the parietal layer and colocalizes in spherical bodies around mitochondria. This localization pattern is reminiscent of the clamp-like structures observed in previous ultrastructural studies of the phloem and shows that the parietal phloem layer plays an important role in plant resistance to aphids and heat stress.
Plant Biotechnology Journal | 2004
Nikolay S. Outchkourov; Willem Jan De Kogel; G.L. Wiegers; Magnus Abrahamson; Maarten A. Jongsma
Plant Methods | 2016
Manus P. M. Thoen; Karen J. Kloth; G.L. Wiegers; O.E. Krips; L.P.J.J. Noldus; Marcel Dicke; Maarten A. Jongsma
Plant Biotechnology Journal | 2013
Ting Yang; Geert Stoopen; Manus P. M. Thoen; G.L. Wiegers; Maarten A. Jongsma
Journal of Chemical Ecology | 2012
Ting Yang; Geert Stoopen; G.L. Wiegers; Jing Mao; Caiyun Wang; Marcel Dicke; Maarten A. Jongsma
Structure, Function and Dynamics of Biomolecules used in Pest Management of Horticultural Crops | 2011
R.W.H.M. van Tol; G.L. Wiegers; W.J. de Kogel