G.O. Jenkins
British Geological Survey
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by G.O. Jenkins.
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology | 2013
David Gunn; J.E. Chambers; P.R.N. Hobbs; Jonathan Richard Ford; P.B. Wilkinson; G.O. Jenkins; A. Merritt
The Whitby Mudstone Formation has one of the highest landslide densities in the UK with 42 landslides per 100 km2. Landsliding at Hollin Hill in North Yorkshire, UK is complex and continuing, and includes shallow, retrogressive rotational failure on the upper slope, translation, and flow from the base of the Whitby Mudstone Formation over the scarp slope of the Staithes Sandstone Formation. Surface observations augmented by information relating to lithological, moisture and strength variation with depth allowed rapid initial interpretation of the masses affected by movement. These were provided by a single person operating portable probes providing depth logs of cone penetration resistance and soil moisture based upon dielectric property measurements in conjunction with a sampling auger. The gathered information was used to guide the design of further invasive site investigation and the configuration of permanent systems to monitor changes in dynamic moisture distribution and direct movement. At Hollin Hill, the near-surface materials in the upper 5 m interval are distinctly weathered or destructured, predominantly comprising silty clay in the Whitby Mudstone Formation, and fine silty, clayey sand and silty clay in the Staithes Sandstone Formation. Direct and secondary evidence was observed showing high moisture variation to be related to narrow intervals within the upper 5 m. Cyclic variation in moisture has played a key role in the movement and break-up of sliding materials, especially within the prograding lobes resulting from flow over the Staithes Sandstone Formation. Since these observations, permanent monitoring systems have been installed, including electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) arrays, which have successfully mapped the distribution of the Whitby Mudstone and the Staithes Sandstone, but will also be used in time lapse mode to image the near-surface moisture movement driving the landsliding processes. ERT array installations included a large area, low spatial resolution grid designed to investigate the potential coupling between the upper and lower slope hydrogeological processes and a small area, high spatial resolution grid designed to investigate the hydrogeological processes driving the earth flow.
Geological Society, London, Special Publications | 2010
P.R.N. Hobbs; Andrew Gibson; Leo Jones; Catherine Pennington; G.O. Jenkins; Stephen Pearson; Katy Freeborough
Abstract The paper describes recent applications by the British Geological Survey (BGS) of the technique of mobile terrestrial Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) surveying to monitor various geomorphological changes on English coasts and estuaries. These include cliff recession, landslides and flood defences, and are usually sited at remote locations undergoing dynamic processes with no fixed reference points. Advantages, disadvantages and some practical problems are discussed. The role of GPS in laser scanning is described.
Near Surface 2008 - 14th EAGE European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics | 2008
J.E. Chambers; Alan L. Weller; David Gunn; Oliver Kuras; P.B. Wilkinson; Philip I. Meldrum; R.D. Ogilvy; G.O. Jenkins; Andrew Gibson; Jonathan Richard Ford; S.J. Price
Geophysical methods are playing an increasingly important role in the investigation and monitoring of landslides; such methods are proving to be particularly effective for revealing the 3D structure, failures surfaces, and the hydrogeological regimes associated with rock and earth slides. In this paper we present the results of a geoelectrical reconnaissance survey of the Hollin Hill landslide, UK. This work was undertaken in advance of the installation of a permanent geophysical and geotechnical monitoring system, and was designed to assess the suitability of resistivity (resistivity mapping and 2D/3D ERT) and self-potential methods (profiling and mapping) for investigating and monitoring this site. In particular, we were concerned to assess the electrical property contrasts and the magnitude of SP response across the study area. The surveys revealed that there was a good resistivity contrast between the slipped material and sandstone bedrock, which allowed us to use resistivity mapping data and ERT models to define the geometry of the landslide. An SP signature consistent with the movement of groundwater through the landslide was observed at the site, and was used to identify seepage patterns associated with the slipped material.
Geoscientific Model Development | 2018
Andres Payo; Bismarck Jigena Antelo; Martin D. Hurst; Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy; Chris Williams; G.O. Jenkins; Kathryn Lee; David Favis-Mortlock; Andrew Barkwidth; Michael A. Ellis
We describe a new algorithm that automatically delineates the cliff top and toe of a cliffed coastline from a digital elevation model (DEM). The algorithm builds upon existing methods but is specifically designed to resolve very irregular planform coastlines with many bays and capes, such as parts of the coastline of Great Britain. The algorithm automatically and sequentially delineates and smooths shoreline vectors, generates orthogonal transects and elevation profiles with a minimum spacing equal to the DEM resolution, and extracts the position and elevation of the cliff top and toe. Outputs include the non-smoothed raster and smoothed vector coastlines, normals to the coastline (as vector shape files), xyz profiles (as comma-separated-value, CSV, files), and the cliff top and toe (as point shape files). The algorithm also automatically assesses the quality of the profile and omits lowquality profiles (i.e. extraction of cliff top and toe is not possible). The performance of the proposed algorithm is compared with an existing method, which was not specifically designed for very irregular coastlines, and to manually digitized boundaries by numerous professionals. Also, we assess the reproducibility of the results using different DEM resolutions (5, 10 and 50 m), different user-defined parameter sets related to the degree of coastline smoothing, and the threshold used to identify the cliff top and toe. The model output sensitivity is found to be smaller than the manually digitized uncertainty. The code and a manual are publicly available on a GitHub repository.
Archive | 2006
A.S.Y. Mackie; Ceri James; E.I.A. Rees; T. Darbyshire; S.L. Philpott; K. Mortimer; G.O. Jenkins; Angela Morando
Archive | 2007
David Highley; Linda Hetherington; T.J. Brown; D.J. Harrison; G.O. Jenkins
Acta Geologica Sinica-english Edition | 2009
Catherine Pennington; C. Foster; J.E. Chambers; G.O. Jenkins
Proceedings of the Geologists' Association | 2011
G.O. Jenkins; C. Foster; P.M. Hopson
Archive | 2008
P.R.N. Hobbs; G.O. Jenkins
Archive | 2012
J. Ridgway; E.J. Bee; N. Breward; Mark Cave; Simon Chenery; C. Gowing; I. Harrison; E. Hodgkinson; B. Humphreys; M. Ingham; A. Jarrow; G.O. Jenkins; A.W. Kim; Robert Lister; A.E. Milodowski; Stephen Pearson; K. Rowlands; Baruch Spiro; M. Strutt; Paul Turner; Christopher H. Vane