G. Salvadore

Function of the medial meniscus in force transmission and stability.

We studied the combined role of the medial meniscus in distributing load and providing stability. Ten normal knees were loaded in combinations of compressive and shear loading as the knee was flexed over a full range. A digital camera tracked the motion, from which femoral-tibial contacts were determined by computer modelling. Load transmission was determined from the Tekscan for the anterior horn, central body, posterior horn, and the uncovered cartilage in the centre of the meniscus. For the three types of loading; compression only, compression and anterior shear, compression and posterior shear; between 40% and 80% of the total load was transmitted through the meniscus. The overall average was 58%, the remaining 42% being transmitted through the uncovered cartilage. The anterior horn was loaded only up to 30 degrees flexion, but played a role in controlling anterior femoral displacement. The central body was loaded 10-20% which would provide some restraint to medial femoral subluxation. Overall the posterior horn carried the highest percentage of the shear load, especially after 30 degrees flexion when a posterior shear force was applied, where the meniscus was estimated to carry 50% of the shear force. This study added new insights into meniscal function during weight bearing conditions, particularly its role in early flexion, and in transmitting shear forces.

Contact forces in the tibiofemoral joint from soft tissue tensions: Implications to soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty

Proper tension of the knees soft tissue envelope is important during total knee arthroplasty; incorrect tensioning potentially leads to joint stiffness or instability. The latter remains an important trigger for revision surgery. The use of sensors quantifying the intra-articular loads, allows surgeons to assess the ligament tension at the time of surgery. However, realistic target values are missing. In the framework of this paper, eight non-arthritic cadaveric specimens were tested and the intra-articular loads transferred by the medial and lateral compartment were measured using custom sensor modules. These modules were inserted below the articulating surfaces of the proximal tibia, with the specimens mounted on a test setup that mimics surgical conditions. For both compartments, the highest loads are observed in full extension. While creating knee flexion by lifting the femur and flexing the hip, mean values (standard deviation) of 114N (71N) and 63N (28N) are observed at 0° flexion for the medial and lateral compartment respectively. Upon flexion, both medial and lateral loads decrease with mean values at 90° flexion of 30N (22N) and 6N (5N) respectively. The majority of the load is transmitted through the medial compartment. These observations are linked to the deformation of the medial and lateral collaterals, in addition to the anatomy of the passive soft tissues surrounding the knee. In conclusion, these findings provide tangible clinical guidance in assessing the soft tissue loads when dealing with anatomically designed total knee implants.

Laxity and contact forces of total knee designed for anatomic motion: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND Total knee designs that attempt to reproduce more physiological knee kinematics are gaining attention given their possible improvement in functional outcomes. This study examined if a total knee designed for anatomic motion, where the soft tissue balancing was intended to replicate anatomical tibiofemoral contact forces, can more closely reproduce the laxity of the native knee. METHODS In an ex-vivo setting, the laxity envelope of the knees from nine lower extremity specimens was measured using a rig that reproduced surgical conditions. The rig allowed application of a constant varus/valgus (V/V) and internal-external (I/E) torque through the range of motion. After testing the native knee, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was performed using the Journey II bi-cruciate substituting implant. Soft tissue balancing was guided by targeting anatomical compressive forces in the lateral and medial tibiofemoral joints with an instrumented tibial trial. After TKA surgery, the laxity tests were repeated and compared to the native condition. RESULTS The TKA knee closely reproduced the coronal laxity of the native knee, except for a difference at 90° of flexion for valgus laxity. Looking at the rotational laxity, the implant constrained the internal rotation relative to the native knee at 45 and 60° of flexion. The forces on the tibial trial for the neutral path of motion showed higher values on the medial side as the knee flexed. CONCLUSIONS This study suggested that when using an anatomically-designed knee, the soft tissue balancing should also aim for anatomical contact forces, which will result in close to normal laxity patterns.