Gabriela Corá-Locatelli

A placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine and gabapentin monotherapy in refractory mood disorders.

There is a pressing need for additional treatment options for refractory mood disorders. This controlled comparative study evaluated the efficacy of lamotrigine (LTG) and gabapentin (GBP) monotherapy versus placebo (PLC). Thirty-one patients with refractory bipolar and unipolar mood disorders participated in a double-blind, randomized, crossover series of three 6-week monotherapy evaluations including LTG, GBP, and PLC. There was a standardized blinded titration to assess clinical efficacy or to determine the maximum tolerated daily dose (LTG 500 mg or GBP 4,800 mg). The primary outcome measure was the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI) for Bipolar Illness as supplemented by other standard rating instruments. The mean doses at week 6 were 274 +/- 128 mg for LTG and 3,987 +/- 856 mg for GBP. Response rates (CGI ratings of much or very much improved) were the following: LTG, 52% (16/31); GBP, 26% (8/31); and PLC, 23% (7/31) (Cochrans Q = 6.952, df = 2, N = 31, p = 0.031). Post hoc Q differences (df = 1, N = 31) were the following: LTG versus GBP (Qdiff = 5.33, p = 0.011); LTG versus PLC (Qdiff = 4.76, p = 0.022); and GBP versus PLC (Qdiff = 0.08, p = 0.70). With respect to anticonvulsant dose and gender, there was no difference between the responders and the nonresponders. The agents were generally well tolerated. This controlled investigation preliminarily suggests the efficacy of LTG in treatment-refractory affectively ill patients. Further definition of responsive subtypes and the role of these medications in the treatment of mood disorders requires additional study.

Clozapine in bipolar disorder: Treatment implications for other atypical antipsychotics

Traditional neuroleptics are often utilized clinically for the management of bipolar disorder. Although effective as antimanic agents, their mood stabilizing properties are less clear. Additionally, their acute clinical side effect profile and long term risk of tardive dyskinesia, particularly in mood disorder patients, portend significant liability. This review focuses on the use of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar disorder focusing on clozapine as the prototypical agent. Although, preclinical research and clinical experience suggest that the atypical antipsychotics are distinctly different from typical antipsychotics, they themselves are heterogeneous in profiles of neuropharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability. The early clinical experience of clozapine as a potential mood stabilizer suggests greater antimanic than antidepressant properties. Conversely, very preliminary clinical experience with risperidone suggests greater antidepressant than antimanic properties and some liability for triggering or exacerbating mania. Olanzapine and sertindole are under investigation in psychotic mood disorders. The foregoing agents and future drugs with atypical neuroleptic properties should come to play an increasingly important role, compared to the older classical neuroleptics, in the acute and long term management of bipolar disorder.

Nimodipine monotherapy and carbamazepine augmentation in patients with refractory recurrent affective illness

Of 30 patients with treatment-refractory affective illness, 10 showed a moderate to marked response to blind nimodipine monotherapy compared with placebo on the Clinical Global Impressions Scale. Fourteen inadequately responsive patients (3 unipolar [UP], 11 bipolar [BP]) were treated with the blind addition of carbamazepine. Carbamazepine augmentation of nimodipine converted four (29%) of the partial responders to more robust responders. Patients who showed an excellent response to the nimodipine-carbamazepine combination included individual patients with patterns of rapid cycling, ultradian cycling, UP recurrent brief depression, and one with BP type II depression. When verapamil was blindly substituted for nimodipine, two BP patients failed to maintain improvement but responded again to nimodipine and remained well with a blind transition to another dihydropyridine L-type calcium channel blocker (CCB), isradipine. Mechanistic implications of the response to the dihydropyridine L-type CCB nimodipine alone and in combination with carbamazepine are discussed.

Metabolism and excretion of mood stabilizers and new anticonvulsants

Abstract1. The mood stabilizers lithium, carbamazepine (CBZ), and valproate (VPA), have differing pharmacokinetics, structures, mechanisms of action, efficacy spectra, and adverse effects. Lithium has a low therapeutic index and is renally excreted and hence has renally-mediated but not hepatically-mediated drug–drug interactions.2. CBZ has multiple problematic drug–drug interactions due to its low therapeutic index, metabolism primarily by a single isoform (CYP3A3/4), active epoxide metabolite, susceptibility to CYP3A3/4 or epoxide hydrolase inhibitors, and ability to induce drug metabolism (via both cytochrome P450 oxidation and conjugation). In contrast, VPA has less prominent neurotoxicity and three principal metabolic pathways, rendering it less susceptible to toxicity due to inhibition of its metabolism. However, VPA can increase plasma concentrations of some drugs by inhibiting metabolism and increase free fractions of certain medications by displacing them from plasma proteins.3. Older anticonvulsants such as phenobarbital and phenytoin induce hepatic metabolism, may produce toxicity due to inhibition of their metabolism, and have not gained general acceptance in the treatment of primary psychiatric disorders.4. The newer anticonvulsants felbamate, lamotrigine, topiramate, and tiagabine have different hepatically-mediated drug–drug interactions, while the renally excreted gabapentin lacks hepatic drug–drug interactions but may have reduced bioavailability at higher doses.5. Investigational anticonvulsants such as oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, and zonisamide appear to have improved pharmacokinetic profiles compared to older agents.6. Thus, several of the newer anticonvulsants lack the problematic drug-drug interactions seen with older agents, and some may even (based on their mechanisms of action and preliminary preclinical and clinical data) ultimately prove to have novel psychotropic effects.

Gabapentin does not alter single-dose lithium pharmacokinetics

Lithium (Li) and gabapentin are both exclusively eliminated by renal excretion. When used in combination, a competitive drug-drug interaction could possibly alter Li renal excretion with important clinical implications considering the rather narrow therapeutic index of Li. This study examined the single-dose pharmacokinetic profiles of Li in 13 patients receiving placebo and then steady-state gabapentin (mean daily dose: 3,646.15 mg). During both phases, a single 600-mg dose of Li was orally administered with serial Li levels obtained at time zero and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were the following: area under the concentration time curve (AUC) for Li, maximal concentration of Li (Li Cmax), and time to reach peak Li concentration (Li Tmax). For patients receiving gabapentin, the mean Li AUC at 72 hours was 9.91+/-3.54 mmol x hr/mL and did not differ significantly from the mean Li AUC of 10.19+/-2.89 mmol x hr/mL for patients receiving placebo. The mean Li Cmax was 0.69+/-0.13 mmol/L for gabapentin patients and did not differ from the mean Li Cmax of 0.72+/-0.15 mmol/L for placebo patients. The mean serum Li Tmax was 1.38+/-0.62 hours for gabapentin patients and did not differ significantly from the mean serum Li Tmax of 1.5+/-0.91 hours for placebo patients. These data indicate that gabapentin treatment at this high therapeutic dose does not cause clinically significant alterations in short-term Li pharmacokinetics in patients with normal renal function. These preliminary data warrant further controlled study in a larger, more heterogenous patient sample and a longer duration of assessment, but they do suggest that these two medications may be administered in combination for the management of bipolar disorder.

Post-dexamethasone cortisol correlates with severity of depression before and during carbamazepine treatment in women but not men: Gender differences in DST on placebo and CBZ

Objective:  Previous studies show a state‐dependent relationship between depression and post‐dexamethasone suppression test (DST) cortisol level, as well as differences in DST response with age and gender.

339. CSF neuropeptide y correlates with anxiety in patients with affective disorders

present in humanswith seasonrdaffectivedisorder(SAD)and if their olfactoryperformancecorrelateswithdepressivescores.Becausepreviousstudiessuggesta predominant righthemisphericdysfunctionin SAD and olfactoryneurons’primaryprojectionsare largely ipsilatersf,we tested olfactory identificationperformance on each side of the nose. Twenty-fourSAD patients and twenty-fourmatched controls were studied using bilateraJphenyl ethyl alcohol detectionthresholdsand urrilaterrdUniversityof PennsylvaniaSmellIdentificationTestwithtwo booklets randorrdypresentedto each nostril, the contrafaterrdnostril beingoccluded.Subjectsratedtheirmoodon the SelfAssessmentMood ScaIe for SAD. Patients’ testing was performedin “depressed”and “improvedon light” state. We foundno differencein olfactoryperformancebetweenpatientaandcontrols,norbetweenpatientsbeforevsatler light treatment. A negative correlationemerged between right-sided identification scores and “typical” depression scores (r=–O.56, p=o.006).A similarnegativecorrelationbetwmr the asymmetryindex (Right -Left)/(Right+Left)and typical depressive scores (r=–O.64, p< O.001)was found.These results add to previousevidenceof right hemisphericinvolvementin mood dysregulation.