Gabriela Zuquim
University of Turku
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gabriela Zuquim.
Biota Neotropica | 2007
Gabriela Zuquim; Flávia R. C. Costa; Jefferson Prado
Zuquim, G., Costa, F.R.C. & Prado, J. Sample effort reduction vs. information retention in inventories of pteridophytes in Central Amazonia. Biota Neotrop. Sep/Dez 2007 vol. 7, no. 3 http://www.biotaneotropica. org.br/v7n3/pt/abstract?article+bn03807032007. ISSN 1676-0603. The large area covered by the Amazonian domain and the limited financial support for biodiversity studies demand efficient research programs. Aiming to evaluate the consequences of reduced sampling effort on the retention of ecological information, we tested how differences in plot width affect the perceived relationship between environmental variation and the composition of the pteridophyte community in Central Amazonia. Measures of slope, canopy openness and soil clay content were taken in 37 terra-firme forest plots. All pteridophyte individuals were identified and mapped according to three sample strips. We tested the effects of environmental variables on pteridophyte composition of 250 x 2.5 meters-plots and on sub-samples of reduced width. The reduction of plot width from 2.5 to 1 m (60% reduction in sampling effort) corresponded to a reduction of 24% of the project’s costs concerning field work expenses. This would reduce the number of sampled species from 52 to 44. The reduction of 20% plot width (from 2.5 to 2 m) would cause a reduction of two (4%) sampled species and a reduction of 8% of the costs. For all tested plot widths, community composition was associated with soil clay content and was not associated with the terrain slope. The effect of canopy openness on pteridophyte species composition was not consistent among sample sizes. These may be related to the relatively lower importance of light availability in determining community structure at the studied spatial scale. We concluded that the smallest plots were informative enough to detect the main gradients of composition and their association to environmental factors. This would allow a reduction in total costs, or the allocation of available budget to more plots, which could increase the power of the statistical analyses, reduce the confidence intervals and increase probability of detecting more species.
Ecology and Evolution | 2017
Gabriel M. Moulatlet; Gabriela Zuquim; Fernando O.G. Figueiredo; Samuli Lehtonen; Thaise Emilio; Kalle Ruokolainen; Hanna Tuomisto
Abstract Amazonia combines semi‐continental size with difficult access, so both current ranges of species and their ability to cope with environmental change have to be inferred from sparse field data. Although efficient techniques for modeling species distributions on the basis of a small number of species occurrences exist, their success depends on the availability of relevant environmental data layers. Soil data are important in this context, because soil properties have been found to determine plant occurrence patterns in Amazonian lowlands at all spatial scales. Here we evaluate the potential for this purpose of three digital soil maps that are freely available online: SOTERLAC, HWSD, and SoilGrids. We first tested how well they reflect local soil cation concentration as documented with 1,500 widely distributed soil samples. We found that measured soil cation concentration differed by up to two orders of magnitude between sites mapped into the same soil class. The best map‐based predictor of local soil cation concentration was obtained with a regression model combining soil classes from HWSD with cation exchange capacity (CEC) from SoilGrids. Next, we evaluated to what degree the known edaphic affinities of thirteen plant species (as documented with field data from 1,200 of the soil sample sites) can be inferred from the soil maps. The species segregated clearly along the soil cation concentration gradient in the field, but only partially along the model‐estimated cation concentration gradient, and hardly at all along the mapped CEC gradient. The main problems reducing the predictive ability of the soil maps were insufficient spatial resolution and/or georeferencing errors combined with thematic inaccuracy and absence of the most relevant edaphic variables. Addressing these problems would provide better models of the edaphic environment for ecological studies in Amazonia.
PhytoKeys | 2017
Gabriela Zuquim; Hanna Tuomisto; Jefferson Prado
Abstract There is urgent need for more data on species distributions in order to improve conservation planning. A crucial but challenging aspect of producing high-quality data is the correct identification of organisms. Traditional printed floras and dichotomous keys are difficult to use for someone not familiar with the technical jargon. In poorly known areas, such as Amazonia, they also become quickly outdated as new species are described or ranges extended. Recently, online tools have allowed developing dynamic, interactive, and accessible keys that make species identification possible for a broader public. In order to facilitate identifying plants collected in field inventories, we developed an internet-based free-access tool to identify Amazonian fern species. We focused on ferns, because they are easy to collect and their edaphic affinities are relatively well known, so they can be used as an indicator group for habitat mapping. Our key includes 302 terrestrial and aquatic entities mainly from lowland Amazonian forests. It is a free-access key, so the user can freely choose which morphological features to use and in which order to assess them. All taxa are richly illustrated, so specimens can be identified by a combination of character choices, visual comparison, and written descriptions. The identification tool was developed in Lucid 3.5 software and it is available at http://keyserver.lucidcentral.org:8080/sandbox/keys.jsp.
Biodiversity and Conservation | 2008
Ricardo Braga-Neto; Regina Luizão; William E. Magnusson; Gabriela Zuquim; Carolina V. Castilho
Ecography | 2014
Hanna Tuomisto; Gabriela Zuquim; Glenda G. Cárdenas
Biodiversity and Conservation | 2009
Gabriela Zuquim; Flávia R. C. Costa; Jefferson Prado; Ricardo Braga-Neto
Biotropica | 2012
Gabriela Zuquim; Hanna Tuomisto; Flávia R. C. Costa; Jefferson Prado; William E. Magnusson; Tania P. Pimentel; Ricardo Braga-Neto; Fernando O.G. Figueiredo
Journal of Vegetation Science | 2014
Gabriela Zuquim; Hanna Tuomisto; Mirkka M. Jones; Jefferson Prado; Fernando O.G. Figueiredo; Gabriel M. Moulatlet; Flávia R. C. Costa; Carlos A. Quesada; Thaise Emilio
Biotropica | 2013
Marcelo P. Pansonato; Flávia R. C. Costa; Carolina V. Castilho; Fernanda Antunes Carvalho; Gabriela Zuquim
Biodiversity and Ecology | 2012
Flávia Fonseca Pezzini; P. H. A. De Melo; D. M. S. De Oliveira; R. X. De Amorim; F. O. G. De Figueiredo; Debora Pignatari Drucker; F. R. De O. Rodrigues; Gabriela Zuquim; Thaise Emilio; Fernandes Costa; W. Magnusson; Américo Sampaio; Anna Paula de Avelar Brito Lima; A. R. De. M. Garcia; A. G. Manzatto; Augusto Nogueira; C. P. Da Costa; C. E. De A. Barbosa; D. Bernardes; C. V. de Castilho; C. N. Da Cunha; C. G. De Freitas; C. De O. Cavalcante; Daniela Brandão; D. De J. Rodrigues; E. C. Da P. R. Dos Santos; Fabricio Beggiato Baccaro; F. Y. Ishida; Fernanda Antunes Carvalho; Gabriel M. Moulatlet