Ganesan Senthil Kumar

Understanding the antagonism of retinoblastoma protein dephosphorylation by PNUTS provides insights into the PP1 regulatory code

Significance Dephosphorylation of the tumor-suppressor retinoblastoma protein (Rb) leads to its activation. Our structure of the protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) nuclear targeting subunit (PNUTS):PP1 holoenzyme reveals how this reaction is regulated: PNUTS and Rb compete for an identical binding site on PP1. Because PP1 binds PNUTS 400-fold more strongly than Rb, when PNUTS is present, Rb is not dephosphorylated. However, when PNUTS levels are reduced, PP1 binds and dephosphorylates Rb, leading to its activation. This structure also led to the identification of additional common PP1 binding motifs, allowing us to predict how a quarter of the known PP1 regulators bind to PP1. This result is a key advance for understanding the regulation of PP1, which controls >50% of all dephosphorylation reactions. The serine/threonine protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) dephosphorylates hundreds of key biological targets by associating with nearly 200 regulatory proteins to form highly specific holoenzymes. However, how these proteins direct PP1 specificity and the ability to predict how these PP1 interacting proteins bind PP1 from sequence alone is still missing. PP1 nuclear targeting subunit (PNUTS) is a PP1 targeting protein that, with PP1, plays a central role in the nucleus, where it regulates chromatin decondensation, RNA processing, and the phosphorylation state of fundamental cell cycle proteins, including the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), p53, and MDM2. The molecular function of PNUTS in these processes is completely unknown. Here, we show that PNUTS, which is intrinsically disordered in its free form, interacts strongly with PP1 in a highly extended manner. Unexpectedly, PNUTS blocks one of PP1’s substrate binding grooves while leaving the active site accessible. This interaction site, which we have named the arginine site, allowed us to define unique PP1 binding motifs, which advances our ability to predict how more than a quarter of the known PP1 regulators bind PP1. Additionally, the structure shows how PNUTS inhibits the PP1-mediated dephosphorylation of critical substrates, especially Rb, by blocking their binding sites on PP1, insights that are providing strategies for selectively enhancing Rb activity.

Mechanism of CREB recognition and coactivation by the CREB-regulated transcriptional coactivator CRTC2

Basic leucine zipper (bZip) transcription factors regulate cellular gene expression in response to a variety of extracellular signals and nutrient cues. Although the bZip domain is widely known to play significant roles in DNA binding and dimerization, recent studies point to an additional role for this motif in the recruitment of the transcriptional apparatus. For example, the cAMP response element binding protein (CREB)-regulated transcriptional coactivator (CRTC) family of transcriptional coactivators has been proposed to promote the expression of calcium and cAMP responsive genes, by binding to the CREB bZip in response to extracellular signals. Here we show that the CREB-binding domain (CBD) of CRTC2 folds into a single isolated 28-residue helix that seems to be critical for its interaction with the CREB bZip. The interaction is of micromolar affinity on palindromic and variant half-site cAMP response elements (CREs). The CBD and CREB assemble on the CRE with 2:2:1 stoichiometry, consistent with the presence of one CRTC binding site on each CREB monomer. Indeed, the CBD helix and the solvent-exposed residues in the dimeric CREB bZip coiled-coil form an extended protein–protein interface. Because mutation of relevant bZip residues in this interface disrupts the CRTC interaction without affecting DNA binding, our results illustrate that distinct DNA binding and transactivation functions are encoded within the structural constraints of a canonical bZip domain.

Solution structure of the mSin3A PAH2-Pf1 SID1 complex: a Mad1/Mxd1-like interaction disrupted by MRG15 in the Rpd3S/Sin3S complex.

Histone deacetylation constitutes an important mechanism for silencing genes. The histone-deacetylase-associated mammalian Rpd3S/Sin3S corepressor complex plays key roles in repressing aberrant gene transcription from cryptic transcription initiation sites and in mitigating RNA polymerase II progression in intragenic regions of actively transcribed genes. The Sin3 corepressor functions as a molecular adaptor linking histone deacetylases on the one hand, with the chromatin targeting subunits Pf1 and MRG15 on the other. Pf1 also functions as an adaptor by interacting with MRG15 and engaging in multivalent interactions with Sin3 targeting among other domains the two N-terminal paired amphipathic helix (PAH) domains that serve as sites of interaction with sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factors. Here, we structurally and functionally evaluate the interaction between the PAH2 domain of mSin3A and the Sin3 interaction domain 1 (SID1) motif of Pf1 and find the structural aspects to be reminiscent of the interaction between the Mad1/Mxd1 transcription factor and Sin3. Pf1 residues within a highly conserved sequence motif immediately C-terminal to SID1 appear not to be important for the interaction with Sin3 PAH2. Unexpectedly, the MRG15 subunit competes, rather than collaborates, with Sin3 for the Pf1 segment encompassing the two conserved motifs, implying competition between two subunits for another subunit of the same chromatin-modifying complex.

The Differential Regulation of p38α by the Neuronal Kinase Interaction Motif Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, a Detailed Molecular Study

The MAP kinase p38α is essential for neuronal signaling. To better understand the molecular regulation of p38α we used atomistic and molecular techniques to determine the structural basis of p38α regulation by the two neuronal tyrosine phosphatases, PTPSL/PTPBR7 (PTPRR) and STEP (PTPN5). We show that, despite the fact that PTPSL and STEP belong to the same family of regulatory proteins, they interact with p38α differently and their distinct molecular interactions explain their different catalytic activities. Although the interaction of PTPSL with p38α is similar to that of the previously described p38α:HePTP (PTPN7) complex, STEP binds and regulates p38α in an unexpected manner. Using NMR and small-angle X-ray scattering data, we generated a model of the p38α:STEP complex and define molecular differences between its resting and active states. Together, these results provide insights into molecular regulation of p38α by key regulatory proteins.

Structural Basis for Molecular Interactions Involving MRG Domains: Implications in Chromatin Biology

MRG15 is a member of the mortality family of transcription factors that targets a wide variety of multiprotein complexes involved in transcription regulation, DNA repair, and alternative splicing to chromatin. The structure of the apo-MRG15 MRG domain implicated in interactions with diverse proteins has been described, but not in complex with any of its targets. Here, we structurally and functionally characterize the interaction between MRG15 and Pf1, two constitutively associated subunits of the histone deacetylase-associated Rpd3S/Sin3S corepressor complex. The MRG domain adopts a structure reminiscent of the apo state, whereas the Pf1 MRG-binding domain engages two discrete hydrophobic surfaces on the MRG domain via a bipartite motif comprising an α-helix and a segment in an extended conformation, both of which are critical for high-affinity interactions. Multiple MRG15 interactors share an FxLP motif in the extended segment, but equivalent sequence/helical motifs are not readily evident, implying potential diversity in MRG-recognition mechanisms.

The Ki-67 and RepoMan mitotic phosphatases assemble via an identical, yet novel mechanism

Ki-67 and RepoMan have key roles during mitotic exit. Previously, we showed that Ki-67 organizes the mitotic chromosome periphery and recruits protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) to chromatin at anaphase onset, in a similar manner as RepoMan (Booth et al., 2014). Here we show how Ki-67 and RepoMan form mitotic exit phosphatases by recruiting PP1, how they distinguish between distinct PP1 isoforms and how the assembly of these two holoenzymes are dynamically regulated by Aurora B kinase during mitosis. Unexpectedly, our data also reveal that Ki-67 and RepoMan bind PP1 using an identical, yet novel mechanism, interacting with a PP1 pocket that is engaged only by these two PP1 regulators. These findings not only show how two distinct mitotic exit phosphatases are recruited to their substrates, but also provide immediate opportunities for the design of novel cancer therapeutics that selectively target the Ki-67:PP1 and RepoMan:PP1 holoenzymes. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16539.001

Structural Basis for the Regulation of the Mitogen-activated Protein (MAP) Kinase p38α by the Dual Specificity Phosphatase 16 MAP Kinase Binding Domain in Solution

Background: Dual specificity phosphatases play a crucial role in MAP kinase regulation. Results: DUSP16 (MKP7) and p38α interact in a unique manner that is different from other DUSPs. Conclusion: DUSP16 binds p38α via an extended binding surface that includes helix α4. Significance: This study shows that DUSPs interact differently with p38α and lays the structural basis for their differential regulation of MAPKs. Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) fulfill essential biological functions and are key pharmaceutical targets. Regulation of MAPKs is achieved via a plethora of regulatory proteins including activating MAPKKs and an abundance of deactivating phosphatases. Although all regulatory proteins use an identical interaction site on MAPKs, the common docking and hydrophobic pocket, they use distinct kinase interaction motif (KIM or D-motif) sequences that are present in linear, peptide-like, or well folded protein domains. It has been recently shown that a KIM-containing MAPK-specific dual specificity phosphatase DUSP10 uses a unique binding mode to interact with p38α. Here we describe the interaction of the MAPK binding domain of DUSP16 with p38α and show that despite belonging to the same dual specificity phosphatase (DUSP) family, its interaction mode differs from that of DUSP10. Indeed, the DUSP16 MAPK binding domain uses an additional helix, α-helix 4, to further engage p38α. This leads to an additional interaction surface on p38α. Together, these structural and energetic differences in p38α engagement highlight the fine-tuning necessary to achieve MAPK specificity and regulation among multiple regulatory proteins.

Molecular Basis for the Mechanism of Constitutive CBP/p300 Coactivator Recruitment by CRTC1-MAML2 and Its Implications in cAMP Signaling.

The cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) is a signal-dependent transcription factor that exerts its positive effects on gene transcription of a broad range of genes by recruiting coactivators, including CREB-binding protein (CBP), its paralog, p300, and the family of CRTC (CREB-regulated transcriptional coactivators) proteins. Whereas recruitment of CBP/p300 is dependent on CREB phosphorylation at Ser133, recruitment of CRTCs is not. Here we describe how both mechanisms could concurrently drive transcription of CREB targets in a subset of head and neck cancers featuring chromosomal translocations that fuse portions of CRTC1 and CRTC3 genes with that of the Mastermind-like transcriptional coactivator MAML2. We show that a peptide derived from transactivation domain 1 (TAD1) of MAML2 binds to the CBP KIX domain with micromolar affinity. An ∼20-residue segment within this peptide, conserved in MAML2 orthologs and paralogs, binds directly to a KIX surface previously shown to bind to MLL1. The 20-residue MAML2 segment shares sequence similarity with MLL1, especially at those positions in direct contact with KIX, and like MLL1, the segment is characterized by the presence of an ∼10-residue helix. Because CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion proteins are constitutively nuclear, like CREB, our results suggest constitutive recruitment of CBP/p300 to CREB targets that could be further enhanced by signals that cause CREB Ser133 phosphorylation.

Preparation of Phosphorylated Proteins for NMR Spectroscopy

Phosphorylation is a ubiquitous posttranslational modification that is essential for the regulation of many cellular processes. The human genome consists of more than 200,000 phosphorylation sites, whose phosphorylation is tightly controlled by ≥500 kinases and ~200 phosphatases. Given the large number of phosphorylation sites and the key role phosphorylation plays in regulating cellular processes, it is essential to characterize the impact of phosphorylation on substrate structure, dynamics, and function. However, a major challenge is the large-scale production of phosphorylated proteins in vitro for these structural, functional, and dynamic studies. Here, we describe an efficient protocol used routinely in our laboratory for the production of phosphorylated proteins. We also describe the methods used for identifying, characterizing, and separating the resulting phosphorylated proteins for subsequent studies.