Ishwar Radhakrishnan

Solution Structure of the KIX Domain of CBP Bound to the Transactivation Domain of CREB: A Model for Activator:Coactivator Interactions

The nuclear factor CREB activates transcription of target genes in part through direct interactions with the KIX domain of the coactivator CBP in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. The solution structure of the complex formed by the phosphorylated kinase-inducible domain (pKID) of CREB with KIX reveals that pKID undergoes a coil-->helix folding transition upon binding to KIX, forming two alpha helices. The amphipathic helix alphaB of pKID interacts with a hydrophobic groove defined by helices alpha1 and alpha3 of KIX. The other pKID helix, alphaA, contacts a different face of the alpha3 helix. The phosphate group of the critical phosphoserine residue of pKID forms a hydrogen bond to the side chain of Tyr-658 of KIX. The structure provides a model for interactions between other transactivation domains and their targets.

Solution Structure of a CUE-Ubiquitin Complex Reveals a Conserved Mode of Ubiquitin Binding

Monoubiquitination serves as a regulatory signal in a variety of cellular processes. Monoubiquitin signals are transmitted by binding to a small but rapidly expanding class of ubiquitin binding motifs. Several of these motifs, including the CUE domain, also promote intramolecular monoubiquitination. The solution structure of a CUE domain of the yeast Cue2 protein in complex with ubiquitin reveals intermolecular interactions involving conserved hydrophobic surfaces, including the Leu8-Ile44-Val70 patch on ubiquitin. The contact surface extends beyond this patch and encompasses Lys48, a site of polyubiquitin chain formation. This suggests an occlusion mechanism for inhibiting polyubiquitin chain formation during monoubiquitin signaling. The CUE domain shares a similar overall architecture with the UBA domain, which also contains a conserved hydrophobic patch. Comparative modeling suggests that the UBA domain interacts analogously with ubiquitin. The structure of the CUE-ubiquitin complex may thus serve as a paradigm for ubiquitin recognition and signaling by ubiquitin binding proteins.

Solution structure of Vps27 UIM–ubiquitin complex important for endosomal sorting and receptor downregulation

Monoubiquitylation is a well‐characterized signal for the internalization and sorting of integral membrane proteins to distinct cellular organelles. Recognition and transmission of monoubiquitin signals is mediated by a variety of ubiquitin‐binding motifs such as UIM, UBA, UEV, VHS and CUE in endocytic proteins. The yeast Vps27 protein requires two UIMs for efficient interactions with ubiquitin and for sorting cargo into multivesicular bodies. Here we show that the individual UIMs of Vps27 exist as autonomously folded α‐helices that bind ubiquitin independently, non‐cooperatively and with modest affinity. The Vps27 N‐terminal UIM engages the Leu8–Ile44–Val70 hydrophobic patch of ubiquitin through a helical surface conserved in UIMs of diverse proteins, including that of the S5a proteasomal regulatory subunit. The Leu8–Ile44–Val70 ubiquitin surface is also the site of interaction for CUE and UBA domains in endocytic proteins, consistent with the view that ubiquitin‐ binding endocytic proteins act serially on the same monoubiquitylated cargo during transport from cell surface to the lysosome.

Analysis of an Activator:Coactivator Complex Reveals an Essential Role for Secondary Structure in Transcriptional Activation

Ser-133 phosphorylation of CREB within the kinase-inducible domain (KID) promotes target gene activation via complex formation with the KIX domain of the coactivator CBP. Concurrent phosphorylation of CREB at Ser-142 inhibits transcriptional induction via an unknown mechanism. Unstructured in the free state, KID folds into a helical structure upon binding to KIX. Using site-directed mutagenesis based on the NMR structure of the KID:KIX complex, we have examined the mechanisms by which Ser-133 and Ser-142 phosphorylation regulate CREB activity. Our results indicate that phospho-Ser-133 stablizes whereas phospho-Ser-142 disrupts secondary structure-mediated interactions between CREB and CBP. Thus, differential phosphorylation of CREB may form the basis by which upstream signals regulate the specificity of target gene activation.

Role of Secondary Structure in Discrimination between Constitutive and Inducible Activators

ABSTRACT We have examined structural differences between the proto-oncogene c-Myb and the cyclic AMP-responsive factor CREB that underlie their constitutive or signal-dependent activation properties. Both proteins stimulate gene expression via activating regions that articulate with a shallow hydrophobic groove in the KIX domain of the coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP). Three hydrophobic residues in c-Myb that are conserved in CREB function importantly in cellular gene activation and in complex formation with KIX. These hydrophobic residues are assembled on one face of an amphipathic helix in both proteins, and mutations that disrupt c-Myb or CREB helicity in this region block interaction of either factor with KIX. Binding of the helical c-Myb domain to KIX is accompanied by a substantial increase in entropy that compensates for the comparatively low enthalpy of complex formation. By contrast, binding of CREB to KIX entails a large entropy cost due to a random coil-to-helix transition in CREB that accompanies complex formation. These results indicate that the constitutive and inducible activation properties of c-Myb and CREB reflect secondary structural characteristics of their corresponding activating regions that influence the thermodynamics of formation of a complex with CBP.

Conformational preferences in the Ser133‐phosphorylated and non‐phosphorylated forms of the kinase inducible transactivation domain of CREB

Phosphorylation of Ser133 within the kinase inducible transactivation domain (KID) of the transcription factor CREB potentiates interaction with the KIX domain of coactivator CBP. Heteronuclear NMR spectroscopic analyses reveal that the KID domain is largely unstructured except for residues that comprise the αA helix in the pKID‐KIX complex, which populate helical conformations to a significant extent (>50%). The helical content in the αB region is very small in the non‐phosphorylated form (∼10%) although a small increase is detected upon Ser133 phosphorylation. The intrinsic bias towards helical conformations probably facilitates folding of the KID domain upon binding to KIX while the principal role of the phosphate group appears to be largely in mediating the intermolecular interactions in the pKID‐KIX complex.

Solution structure of the interacting domains of the Mad-Sin3 complex: implications for recruitment of a chromatin-modifying complex.

Gene-specific targeting of the Sin3 corepressor complex by DNA-bound repressors is an important mechanism of gene silencing in eukaryotes. The Sin3 corepressor specifically associates with a diverse group of transcriptional repressors, including members of the Mad family, that play crucial roles in development. The NMR structure of the complex formed by the PAH2 domain of mammalian Sin3A with the transrepression domain (SID) of human Mad1 reveals that both domains undergo mutual folding transitions upon complex formation generating an unusual left-handed four-helix bundle structure and an amphipathic alpha helix, respectively. The SID helix is wedged within a deep hydrophobic pocket defined by two PAH2 helices. Structure-function analyses of the Mad-Sin3 complex provide a basis for understanding the underlying mechanism(s) that lead to gene silencing.

Chemical shift as a probe of molecular interfaces: NMR studies of DNA binding by the three amino-terminal zinc finger domains from transcription factor IIIA

We report the NMR resonance assignments for a macromolecular protein/DNA complex containing the three amino-terminal zinc fingers (92 amino acid residues) of Xenopus laevis TFIIIA (termed zf1-3) bound to the physiological DNA target (15 base pairs), and for the free DNA. Comparisons are made of the chemical shifts of protein backbone1 HN, 15N,13 Cα and13 Cβ and DNA base and sugar protons of the free and bound species. Chemical shift changes are analyzed in the context of the structures of the zf1-3/DNA complex to assess the utility of chemical shift change as a probe of molecular interfaces. Chemical shift perturbations that occur upon binding in the zf1-3/DNA complex do not correspond directly to the structural interface, but rather arise from a number of direct and indirect structural and dynamic effects.

Nuclear magnetic resonance structural studies of intramolecular purine · purine · pyrimidine DNA triplexes in solution: Base triple pairing alignments and strand direction

Recently, P.A. Beal and P.B. Dervan, expanding on earlier observations by others, have established the formation of purine.purine.pyrimidine triple helices stabilized by G.GC, A.AT and T.AT base triples where the purine-rich third strand was positioned in the major groove of the Watson-Crick duplex and anti-parallel to its purine strand. The present nuclear magnetic resonance (n.m.r.) study characterizes the base triple pairing alignments and strand direction in a 31-mer deoxyoligonucleotide that intramolecularly folds to generate a 7-mer (R/Y-)n.(R+)n(Y-)n triplex with the strands linked by two T5 loops and stabilized by potential T.AT and G.GC base triples. (R and Y stand for purine and pyrimidine, respectively, while the signs establish the strand direction.) This intramolecular triplex gives well-resolved exchangeable and non-exchangeable proton spectra with Li+ as counterion in aqueous solution. These studies establish that the T1 to C7 pyrimidine and the G8 to A14 purine strands are anti-parallel to each other and align through Watson-Crick A.T and G.C pair formation. The T15 to G21 purine-rich third strand is positioned in the major groove of this duplex and pairs through Hoogsteen alignment with the purine strand to generate T.AT and G.GC triples. Several lines of evidence establish that the thymidine and guanosine bases in the T15 to G21 purine-rich third strand adopt anti glycosidic torsion angles under conditions where this strand is aligned anti-parallel to the G8 to A14 purine strand. We have also recorded imino proton n.m.r. spectra for an (R-)n.(R+)n(Y-)n triplex stabilized by G.GC and A.AT triples through intramolecular folding of a related 31-mer deoxyoligonucleotide with Li+ as counterion. The intramolecular purine.purine.pyrimidine triplexes containing unprotonated G.GC, A.AT and T.AT triples are stable at basic pH in contrast to pyrimidine.purine.pyrimidine triplexes containing protonated C+.GC and T.AT triples, which are only stable at acidic pH.

HBP1 and Mad1 repressors bind the Sin3 corepressor PAH2 domain with opposite helical orientations.

Recruitment of the histone deacetylase (HDAC)-associated Sin3 corepressor is an obligatory step in many eukaryotic gene silencing pathways. Here we show that HBP1, a cell cycle inhibitor and regulator of differentiation, represses transcription in a HDAC/Sin3-dependent manner by targeting the mammalian Sin3A (mSin3A) PAH2 domain. HBP1 is unrelated to the Mad1 repressor for which high-resolution structures in complex with PAH2 have been described. We show that like Mad1, the HBP1 transrepression domain binds through a helical structure to the hydrophobic cleft of mSin3A PAH2. Notably, the HBP1 helix binds PAH2 in a reversed orientation relative to Mad1 and, equally unexpectedly, this is correlated with a chain reversal of the minimal Sin3 interaction motifs. These results not only provide insights into how multiple, unrelated transcription factors recruit the same coregulator, but also have implications for how sequence similarity searches are conducted.