Gary S. Dorfman

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 Clinical Evidence Review on Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSEnTo review the evidence about the efficacy and utility of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (CRHM).nnnMETHODSnThe American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened a panel to conduct and analyze a comprehensive systematic review of the RFA literature from Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library.nnnRESULTSnBecause data were considered insufficient to form the basis of a practice guideline, ASCO has instead published a clinical evidence review. The evidence is from single-arm, retrospective, and prospective trials. No randomized controlled trials have been included. The following three clinical issues were considered by the panel: the efficacy of surgical hepatic resection versus RFA for resectable tumors; the utility of RFA for unresectable tumors; and RFA approaches (open, laparoscopic, or percutaneous). Evidence suggests that hepatic resection improves overall survival (OS), particularly for patients with resectable tumors without extrahepatic disease. Careful patient and tumor selection is discussed at length in the literature. RFA investigators report a wide variability in the 5-year survival rate (14% to 55%) and local tumor recurrence rate (3.6% to 60%). The reported mortality rate was low (0% to 2%), and the major complications rate was commonly reported to be between 6% and 9%. RFA is currently performed with all three approaches.nnnCONCLUSIONnThere is a compelling need for more research to determine the efficacy and utility of RFA to increase local recurrence-free, progression-free, and disease-free survival as well as OS for patients with CRHM. Clinical trials have established that hepatic resection can improve OS for patients with resectable CRHM.

Summary of the UPICT Protocol for 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Oncology Clinical Trials

The Uniform Protocols for Imaging in Clinical Trials (UPICT) 18F-FDG PET/CT protocol is intended to guide the performance of whole-body FDG PET/CT studies within the context of single- and multiple-center clinical trials of oncologic therapies by providing acceptable (minimum), target, and ideal standards for all phases of imaging. The aim is to minimize variability in intra- and intersubject, intra- and interplatform, interexamination, and interinstitutional primary or derived data. The goal of this condensed version of the much larger document is to make readers aware of the general content and subject area. The document has several main subjects: context of the imaging protocol within the clinical trial; site selection, qualification, and training; subject scheduling; subject preparation; imaging-related substance preparation and administration; imaging procedure; image postprocessing; image analysis; image interpretation; archiving and distribution of data; quality control; and imaging-associated risks and risk management.

The Translational Research Working Group Developmental Pathways: Introduction and Overview

The Translational Research Working Group (TRWG) was created as a national initiative to evaluate the current status of the National Cancer Institutes investment in translational research and envision its future in an inclusive, representative, and transparent manner. To clarify the challenges facing translational research and facilitate its deliberations, the TRWG conceptualized translational research as a set of developmental processes or pathways focused on various clinical goals. Drawing on the collective knowledge of the TRWG members, six pathways were derived, with two addressing the development of tools designed to characterize an individuals cancer-related health status (biospecimen-based and image-based assessment modalities) and four addressing the development of interventions intended to change cancer-related health status (drugs or biological agents, immune response modifiers, interventive devices, and life-style alterations). The pathways, which share a number of common structural elements, are graphically represented by schematic flowcharts that capture relevant contingencies, decision points, and interdependencies. They are conceived not as comprehensive descriptions of the corresponding real-world processes but as tools designed to serve specific purposes including research program management and research project management, coordination of research efforts, and professional and lay education and communication. Further development of the pathways is encouraged, as is application of the pathway concept to translational research on other diseases.

Workshop on imaging science development for cancer prevention and preemption

The concept of intraepithelial neoplasm (IEN) as a near-obligate precursor of cancers has generated opportunities to examine drug or device intervention strategies that may reverse or retard the sometimes lengthy process of carcinogenesis. Chemopreventive agents with high therapeutic indices, well-monitored for efficacy and safety, are greatly needed, as is development of less invasive or minimally disruptive visualization and assessment methods to safely screen nominally healthy but at-risk patients, often for extended periods of time and at repeated intervals. Imaging devices, alone or in combination with anticancer drugs, may also provide novel interventions to treat or prevent precancer.

Society of Interventional Radiology Interventional Oncology Task Force: Interventional oncology research vision statement and critical assessment of the State of Research Affairs

THE Research Subcommittee of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Interventional Oncology Task Force has undertaken preparation of a vision statement and critical assessment of the state of affairs of research in interventional oncology as a first step in advancing the research agenda of interventional oncology under the aegis of SIR. This document was refined over multiple consensus meetings and adopted by the global SIR Interventional Oncology Task Force at its February 2005 meeting. Further input has been provided by the SIR Foundation during review before publication. In addition to this document, we further envision additional strategy and tactic documents on clinical trials and basic/ translational research, which will include specific milestones to be achieved over the course of our 10-year vision.

Challenges to deep brain stimulation: a pragmatic response to ethical, fiscal, and regulatory concerns

In response to the early success of deep brain stimulation, we offer some common‐sense strategies to sustain the work, addressing the need to do so in a fiscally workable, ethically transparent, and scientifically informed manner. After delineating major threats, we will suggest reforms in both the legislative and regulatory spheres that might remediate these challenges. We will recommend (1) revisions to the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980, which governs intellectual property exchange resulting from federally funded research; (2) revisions to the Association of American Medical Colleges recommendations concerning the management of conflicts of interest when scientists with an intellectual property interest participate in clinical research in tandem; (3) revisions to the Food and Drug Administrations pre‐market approval process for new devices, including a proposal for a mini‐investigational device exemption; and (4) the establishment of a public–private partnership to build ethical and sustainable synergies between the scientific community, industry, and government that would foster discovery and innovation.

The Translational Research Working Group Developmental Pathway for Image-Based Assessment Modalities

The Image-based assessment modality (IM) pathway refers to one of six Translational Research Working Group (TRWG) pathways that, together, describe the core domains of early translational cancer research. This pathway focuses on approaches that are based on the interaction of energy and living organisms to analyze tissue noninvasively so as to reveal properties relevant to the detection, diagnosis, or prognosis of cancer and precancer; or the response of the cancer to therapy. Examples include, but are not limited to, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, as well as contemporary contrast agents designed to probe specific molecular constituents of tumors. The IM pathway is presented as a general outline of the steps required for the effective development, optimization, testing, and validation of image-based modalities. The distinctive features of the IM pathway and issues encountered that represent obstacles to effective and efficient progress through the pathway are discussed. The IM pathway also forms a framework to identify opportunities to address current barriers and is expected to adapt and evolve as the field advances.

The Translational Research Working Group Developmental Pathway for Interventive Devices

The interventive device pathway refers to one of six pathways developed by the Translational Research Working Group (TRWG) that, together, describe the core domains of early translational cancer research. This pathway focuses on the development of devices (as classified by the Food and Drug Administration), designed for local ablation of cancer or precancerous lesions (e.g., radiation therapy, microwave, radiofrequency ablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound systems). This article describes the distinctive features of the pathway and issues that are encountered in the real-world development of interventive devices for the treatment of cancer. The interventive device pathway is envisioned to be a general guideline of the steps required for effective development, optimization, testing, and validation of developing devices, to be dynamic and adaptable, and to form a framework for discussions focused on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of new device development.