Gary V. Burton

Adjuvant chemotherapy and timing of tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND Tamoxifen is standard adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. We assessed the benefit of adding chemotherapy to adjuvant tamoxifen and whether tamoxifen should be given concurrently or after chemotherapy. METHODS We undertook a phase 3, parallel, randomised trial (SWOG-8814, INT-0100) in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer to test two major objectives: whether the primary outcome, disease-free survival, was longer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) given every 4 weeks for six cycles plus 5 years of daily tamoxifen than with tamoxifen alone; and whether disease-free survival was longer with CAF followed by tamoxifen (CAF-T) than with CAF plus concurrent tamoxifen (CAFT). Overall survival and toxicity were predefined, important secondary outcomes for each objective. Patients in this open-label trial were randomly assigned by a computer algorithm in a 2:3:3 ratio (tamoxifen:CAF-T:CAFT) and analysis was by intention to treat of eligible patients. Groups were compared by stratified log-rank tests, followed by Cox regression analyses adjusted for significant prognostic factors. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00929591. FINDINGS Of 1558 randomised women, 1477 (95%) were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. After a maximum of 13 years of follow-up (median 8.94 years), 637 women had a disease-free survival event (tamoxifen, 179 events in 361 patients; CAF-T, 216 events in 566 patients; CAFT, 242 events in 550 patients). For the first objective, therapy with the CAF plus tamoxifen groups combined (CAFT or CAF-T) was superior to tamoxifen alone for the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (adjusted Cox regression hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.91; p=0.002) but only marginally for the secondary endpoint of overall survival (HR 0.83, 0.68-1.01; p=0.057). For the second objective, the adjusted HRs favoured CAF-T over CAFT but did not reach significance for disease-free survival (HR 0.84, 0.70-1.01; p=0.061) or overall survival (HR 0.90, 0.73-1.10; p=0.30). Neutropenia, stomatitis, thromboembolism, congestive heart failure, and leukaemia were more frequent in the combined CAF plus tamoxifen groups than in the tamoxifen-alone group. INTERPRETATION Chemotherapy with CAF plus tamoxifen given sequentially is more effective adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer than is tamoxifen alone. However, it might be possible to identify some subgroups that do not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy despite positive nodes. FUNDING National Cancer Institute (US National Institutes of Health).The most common presentation of breast cancer is an estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumor in postmenopausal women, for whom tamoxifen is the gold standard against which other systemic adjuvant treatments are compared.(1–4) Whether to add chemotherapy to endocrine therapy is attractive in theory(5), but there is no consensus regarding such treatment in postmenopausal women with tamoxifen-responsive disease.(3,4) Individual phase III trials that compared chemotherapy plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone did not show a significant survival benefit in older women.(6–9) A recent meta-analysis of all existing trials based on individual patient data found that the addition of chemotherapy to tamoxifen is only marginally beneficial in older women, in contrast to major survival improvements in premenopausal populations (see Figure 4, reference 10 for the EBCTCG metaanalysis) Figure 4 Southwest Oncology Group trial SWOG-8814 (North American Breast Intergroup 0100) forest plots of hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for major subsets for disease-free survival. Panel A describes the disease-free survival advantage for chemotherapy ... Most individual trials in postmenopausal women tested the addition of regimens based on cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) to tamoxifen(3,4, 6–8, 10), but in certain breast cancer study populations, CMF may be inferior to anthracycline-based regimens(11–16). No clinical trials have shown, however, that anthracycline-based therapy adds to the benefit of tamoxifen specifically in postmenopausal patients with ER+ disease. Moreover, interference with drug-induced cytotoxicity has been found in vitro when tamoxifen is added to cancer cell lines concurrently with chemotherapy(17–20), yet concurrent tamoxifen and CMF has been a common practice in clinical trials. Our two objectives were to determine if chemotherapy, consisting of 6 months of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (AdriamycinR), and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) plus 5 years of tamoxifen, was superior to tamoxifen alone; and to assess if CAF followed by tamoxifen was better than CAF plus concurrent tamoxifen. The CAF program we used was the most dose-intense combination among the commonly used regimens when this trial was designed.(11) This report presents 10-year outcomes for both objectives.

Cisplatin-gemcitabine therapy in metastatic breast cancer: Improved outcome in triple negative breast cancer patients compared to non-triple negative patients.

UNLABELLED Triple negative or basal-like breast cancers lack expression of estrogen, progesterone and HER2neu receptors. There are no specific treatment guidelines for this group of patients, however, it has been postulated that their phenotypic and molecular similarity to BRCA-1 related cancers would confer sensitivity to certain cytotoxic agents like cisplatin (CDDP). The aim of the study was to retrospectively examine the clinical outcome at our institution of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with CDDP and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy who had triple negative breast cancer compared to non-triple negative breast cancer. Thirty-six patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with CDDP and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy, 17 of whom were triple negative (47%) and 19 were non-triple negative (53%). The median progression free survival for triple negative and non-triple negative metastatic breast cancer patients were 5.3 months and 1.7 months respectively (p = 0.058). By multivariate Cox proportional hazard model after adjusting for age, race and menopausal status the risk of progression was reduced by 47% for triple negative compared to non-triple negative metastatic breast cancer patients (HR = 0.53, p = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest an improved outcome for metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients compared to non-triple negative breast cancer patients when treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy.

SWOG S0221: A Phase III Trial Comparing Chemotherapy Schedules in High-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer

PURPOSE To determine the optimal dose and schedule of anthracycline and taxane administration as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A 2 × 2 factorial design was used to test two hypotheses: (1) that a novel continuous schedule of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide was superior to six cycles of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks and (2) that paclitaxel once per week was superior to six cycles of paclitaxel once every 2 weeks in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative early-stage breast cancer. With 3,250 patients, a disease-free survival (DFS) hazard ratio of 0.82 for each randomization could be detected with 90% power with two-sided α = .05. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary outcome. RESULTS Interim analyses crossed the futility boundaries for demonstrating superiority of both once-per-week regimens and once-every-2-weeks regimens. After a median follow-up of 6 years, a significant interaction developed between the two randomization factors (DFS P = .024; OS P = .010) in the 2,716 patients randomly assigned in the original design, which precluded interpretation of the two factors separately. Comparing all four arms showed a significant difference in OS (P = .040) but not in DFS (P = .11), with all treatments given once every 2 weeks associated with the highest OS. This difference in OS seemed confined to patients with hormone receptor-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative tumors (P = .067), with no differences seen with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (P = .90) or HER2-positive tumors (P = .40). CONCLUSION Patients achieved a similar DFS with any of these regimens. Subset analysis suggests the hypothesis that once-every-2-weeks dosing may be best for patients with hormone receptor-negative/HER2-negative tumors.

Is breast conservation therapy a viable option for patients with triple-receptor negative breast cancer?

BACKGROUND Triple-receptor negative breast cancers (TNBC) are aggressive neoplasms that lack estrogen-receptor, progesterone-receptor, and HER-2 expressions. Comparative analysis of breast conservation therapy (BCT) versus mastectomy for TNBC is reported sparsely. We hypothesized that, despite its aggressive behavior, TNBC can be managed with BCT. METHODS Outcomes for 202 patients with TNBC who were treated with BCT or mastectomy were analyzed. Primary endpoints were cancer recurrence and death. Statistical analysis performed included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank, independent samples t test, Cox proportional hazard model, and Chi-square. RESULTS BCT was performed in 30% of patients. Isolated local recurrence rate for BCT and mastectomy was 0% and 10.6%, respectively (P = .02). Isolated regional recurrence rate for BCT and mastectomy was 1.6% and 1.4%, respectively (P = .61). Neither concomitant locoregional and distant recurrence rate (P = .73) nor isolated distant recurrence rate (P = .71) was significantly different between the BCT and mastectomy groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was better for the BCT group than the mastectomy group (89% vs 69%; P = .018); however, this was likely due to the mastectomy group having a larger neoplasm size (T3/T4: 4% BCT vs 27% mastectomy; P = .0002), advanced N-disease (N2/3: 8% BCT vs 25% mastectomy; P = .0003), and advanced stage of disease (stage 3: 8% BCT vs 35% mastectomy; P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, surgical approach had no effect on either disease-free survival (P = .60) or OS (P = .19); only t-stage was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (P = .02), while N-stage was an independent predictor for OS (P = .03). CONCLUSION Despite TNBCs aggressive behavior, breast conservation therapy is a viable option for selected patients with TNBC.

Hyperglycemia-Induced Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein Expression Differs in Breast Cancer ^ Derived Cells and Regulates Paclitaxel IC50

Purpose: We studied the hyperglycemia-induced expression of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) expression and its relevance on the cytotoxic activity of paclitaxel in mammary epithelial–derived cell lines. Experimental Design: Nontumorigenic cells (MCF10A); tumorigenic, nonmetastatic cells (MCF-7/T47D); and tumorigenic, metastatic cells (MDA-MB-231/MDA-MB-435s) were grown either in 5 or 20 mmol/L glucose chronically. Semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR was used to assess TXNIP RNA expression in response to glucose. Reactive oxygen species were detected by CM-H2DCFDA (5-6-chloromethyl-2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate) and measured for mean fluorescence intensity with flow cytometry. Thioredoxin activity was assayed by the insulin disulfide-reducing assay. Proliferation was evaluated using CellTiter96 reagent with 490-nm absorption. Obtained absorbance values were used to calculate the paclitaxel IC50 in 5 or 20 mmol/L glucose using the Chous dose-effect equation. Results: We show that hyperglycemia by itself affects the level of TXNIP RNA in breast cancer–derived cells. TXNIP RNA level differs between nontumorigenic/nonmetastatic, tumorigenic cells (low TXNIP level), and metastatic cells (high TXNIP level). The differences in TXNIP RNA level, in reactive oxygen species level, and in thioredoxin activity are all related. We further show that hyperglycemia is a favorable condition in increasing the paclitaxel cytotoxicity by causing IC50 3-fold decrease in metastatic breast cancer–derived MDA-MB-231 cells. The increased paclitaxel cytotoxicity is associated with an additive effect on the hyperglycemia-mediated TXNIP expression more evident in conditions of hyperglycemia than normoglycemia. Conclusions: Our study opens a new perspective on the relevance of metabolic conditions of hyperglycemia in the biology and treatment of cancer, particularly in view of the epidemic of diabetes.

The Role of Whole-Body Fluorine-18-FDG Positron Emission Tomography in the Detection of Recurrence in Symptomatic Patients with Stages II and III Breast Cancer

BackgroundThe role of whole-body fluorine-18-FDG positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) as an adjunct localize recurrence in stages II and III breast cancer patients who present with clinical suspicion for recurrence is not well established. We report our experience in such a patient population.MethodsA retrospective review of all patients with stages II and III breast cancer who had a whole-body FDG-PET scan was performed.ResultsOf the 23 patients who fit the criteria, 9 had stage II and 14 had stage III breast cancer. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 81%, 100%, and 87%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values for stages II and III were 100% and 83%, respectively, and 100% and 50%, respectively. FDG-PET detected two recurrences that were missed by conventional imagings, but such recurrences were local and amenable for biopsy.ConclusionsIn patients with stages II and III breast cancer who present with a suspicion for recurrent disease, a whole-body FDG-PET scan may be a useful adjunct in the evaluation of recurrence. However, its added benefit over conventional imaging should be questioned.

Primary Intracranial Leiomyosarcoma: Report of a Case and Review of the Literature

A 26-year old man presented with a 3-month history of a progressively enlarging palpable parieto-occipital mass. A CT scan indicated the lesion arose from the dura with bony destruction. A stealth assisted craniotomy was performed with the provisional diagnosis of osteoblastic meningioma. Further histopathologic analysis of the intracranial mass was consistent with leiomyosarcoma. Staging evaluation, including CT and PET scans, demonstrated no other sites of disease. Despite complete surgical resection and radiotherapy to the resection site, the disease recurred locally and systematically 5 months later. Primary intracranial mesenchymal tumors are rare and few cases have been previously reported. Outcomes have been universally poor and current therapeutic approaches appear to have only limited benefit.

Wernicke encephalopathy complicating lymphoma therapy : Case report and literature review

Thiamine deficiency can occur in any disease that results in inadequate intake or excessive loss of vitamin B1. In addition to increased thiamine consumption secondary to high cell turnover, cancer patients frequently have reduced oral intake as a direct result of their cancer or from cancer treatments. However, Wernicke encephalopathy (cerebral Beriberi), a clinical manifestation of thiamine deficiency, has rarely been associated with cancer patients. We report a case of Wernicke encephalopathy in a nonalcoholic patient with lymphoma. Although thiamine deficiency rarely potentiates clinical sequelae in cancer patients, it is important to recognize the risk and the clinical signs and manifestations so that prompt therapy can be initiated to reverse morbidity.

Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Ethnic and Socio-Economic Aspects

Abstract:  Bisphosphonate therapy is an important adjunct to the treatment of patients with bone metastasis. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), a complication related to bisphosphonate therapy, is reported in up to 7% of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The objective of this study was to define the prevalence and to identify risk factors associated with development of ONJ in a predominantly low socio‐economic population. Medical records of patients with a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer with bone metastasis seen between 2002 and 2007 were reviewed. All patients received a minimum of four infusions of zolendronic acid. Data on demographics, insurance status, tobacco use, concurrent therapy, body mass index, and number of zolendronic acid infusions were analyzed. Of the 110 patient analyzed, 10 developed ONJ (9%) with the mean number of zolendronic acid infusions in patients with ONJ of 22.9 ± 17. ONJ was seen more frequently in Caucasian than in African Americans patients (15% versus 2%; p = 0.019). ONJ was associated with older age at diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer (p = 0.02), tobacco use (p = 0.049), but was not associated with SES or duration of therapy. After adjusting for SES, Caucasian patients were 9.1 times more likely to have ONJ when compared with African American patients. (95% CI 1.03–81.7). Our results suggest an increase prevalence of ONJ in Caucasian breast cancer patients. However, as our study population is small, additional studies to confirm this finding are needed.

S0221: Comparison of two schedules of paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

CRA1008 Background: S0221 is a SWOG-coordinated phase III adjuvant chemotherapy intergroup trial in node-positive and high-risk node-negative operable breast cancer which hypothesized that 1) the weekly AC+G regimen is superior to ddAC x 6 and 2) 12 weeks of weekly paclitaxel (wP) is superior to q 2 week paclitaxel x 6 (ddP). METHODS Between December 2003 and November 2010, 2,716 patients were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to 1) AC+G vs ddAC and 2) P 80 mg/m2/week x 12 vs P 175 mg/m2 q 2 weeks x 6. If there was no significant interaction between the factors, the trial was powered to find a disease-free survival hazard ratio (HR) ≤ 0.82 for weekly vs q 2 week for each factor. At the first interim analysis, the AC randomization was halted for futility, and S0221 was closed to accrual 10 November 2010. S0221 reopened 15 December 2010, after which time all patients received 4 cycles of ddAC and randomization to P weekly x 12 and ddP x 6 continued. Accrual halted at a total of 3,294 in January 2012. RESULTS By September 7, 2012, 487 events and 340 deaths had occurred, prompting the third planned interim analysis. The Data Safety and Monitoring Committee recommended reporting the results since the futility boundary was crossed. A Cox model adjusting for the AC arms had a HR = 1.08 (95% CI 0.90-1.28; p=0.42), with the 99.5% CI excluding the original alternative hypothesis that the HR=0.82. There was no significant interaction of the two factors. Estimated 5-year progression-free survivals were 82% for weekly P and 81% for ddP. Toxicity data were available for 1,385 patients treated with ddP and 1,367 treated with weekly P. Grade 5 toxicity occurred in 4 patients on ddP and 2 on weekly P. Percent grade 3-4 toxicity per arm are shown in the Table. CONCLUSIONS Either ddPx6 or weekly P x 12 are acceptable schedules of P administration. The differences in leukopenia likely reflect ascertainment bias against weekly P. If this is accepted, weekly P x 12 produces less overall toxicity than 6 cycles of ddP. Support: NCI grants CA32102, CA38926, CA21115, CA21076, CA77597, CA25224, CA77202, CCSRI15469, and Amgen, Inc. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION NCT00070564. [Table: see text].