Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gastone G. Nussdorfer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gastone G. Nussdorfer.


Pharmacological Reviews | 2007

Nonclassic Endogenous Novel Regulators of Angiogenesis

Domenico Ribatti; Maria Teresa Conconi; Gastone G. Nussdorfer

Angiogenesis, the process through which new blood vessels arise from preexisting ones, is regulated by several “classic” factors, among which the most studied are vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2). In recent years, investigations showed that, in addition to the classic factors, numerous endogenous peptides play a relevant regulatory role in angiogenesis. Such regulatory peptides, each of which exerts well-known specific biological activities, are present, along with their receptors, in the blood vessels and may take part in the control of the “angiogenic switch.” An in vivo and in vitro proangiogenic effect has been demonstrated for erythropoietin, angiotensin II (ANG-II), endothelins (ETs), adrenomedullin (AM), proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide (PAMP), urotensin-II, leptin, adiponectin, resistin, neuropeptide-Y, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), and substance P. There is evidence that the angiogenic action of some of these peptides is at least partly mediated by their stimulating effect on VEGF (ANG-II, ETs, PAMP, resistin, VIP and PACAP) and/or FGF-2 systems (PAMP and leptin). AM raises the expression of VEGF in endothelial cells, but VEGF blockade does not affect the proangiogenic action of AM. Other endogenous peptides have been reported to exert an in vivo and in vitro antiangiogenic action. These include somatostatin and natriuretic peptides, which suppress the VEGF system, and ghrelin, that antagonizes FGF-2 effects. Investigations on “nonclassic” regulators of angiogenesis could open new perspectives in the therapy of diseases coupled to dysregulation of angiogenesis.


The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology | 1999

Orexins stimulate corticosterone secretion of rat adrenocortical cells, through the activation of the adenylate cyclase-dependent signaling cascade.

Ludwik K. Malendowicz; Cinzia Tortorella; Gastone G. Nussdorfer

Orexins-A and B are two novel hypothalamic peptides, which, like leptin and neuropeptide-Y (NPY), are involved in the central regulation of feeding. Since leptin and NPY were found to modulate adrenal function, we have examined whether orexins are able to directly affect rat adrenal steroid secretion. Both orexin-A and orexin-B raised basal corticosterone secretion of dispersed rat zona fasciculata-reticularis (ZF/R) cells, their maximal effective concentration being 10(-8) M. In contrast, orexins did not affect either maximally ACTH (10(-9) M)-stimulated corticosterone production by ZF/R cells or the basal and agonist-stimulated aldosterone secretion of dispersed zona glomerulosa cells. The ACTH-receptor antagonist corticotropin-inhibiting peptide (10(-6) M) annulled corticosterone response of ZF/R cells to ACTH (10(-9) M), but not to orexins (10(-8) M). Orexins (10(-8) M) enhanced cyclic-AMP release by ZF/R cells, and the selective inhibitor of protein-kinase A (PKA) H-89 (10(-5) M) abolished corticosterone responses to both ACTH (10(-9) M) and orexins (10(-8) M). A subcutaneous injection of both orexins (5 or 10 nmol/kg) evoked a clear-cut increase in the plasma concentration of corticosterone (but not aldosterone), the effect of orexin-A being significantly more intense than that of orexin-B. Collectively, these findings suggest that orexins exert a selective and direct glucocorticoid secretagogue action on the rat adrenals, acting through a receptor-mediated activation of the adenylate cyclase/PKA-dependent signaling pathway.


Transplant International | 2005

Tracheal matrices, obtained by a detergent-enzymatic method, support in vitro the adhesion of chondrocytes and tracheal epithelial cells

Maria Teresa Conconi; Paolo De Coppi; Rosa Di Liddo; Simonetta Vigolo; Giovanni Franco Zanon; Pier Paolo Parnigotto; Gastone G. Nussdorfer

Several attemps have been performed to achieve a suitable tracheal replacement for the treatment of different conditions characterized by a lack of sufficient tissue for surgical reconstruction. Actually, tracheal homografts can induce long‐term stenosis and their growth potential is not known. Thus, in this work porcine tracheal matrices have been obtained by a detergent‐enzymatic method. The treatment decreased the antigenicity of matrices which were able to support the in vitro adhesion of both chondrocytes and tracheal epithelial cells. On the contrary, only few cells were observed in tracheal matrices prepared with formalin, Thimerosal, and acetone, suggesting that the long‐term stenosis occuering in vivo is probably because of an insufficient cell ingrowth. In summary, our results indicate that the detergent‐enzymatic method allows us to obtain tracheal matrices which can function as a promising support to achieve an in vitro tissue‐engineered cell‐matrix construct.


Hypertension | 1996

Endothelin Adrenocortical Secretagogue Effect Is Mediated by the B Receptor in Rats

Anna S. Belloni; Gian Paolo Rossi; Paola G. Andreis; Giuliano Neri; Giovanna Albertin; Achille C. Pessina; Gastone G. Nussdorfer

We investigated the gene expression and localization of endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor subtypes ET(A) and ET(B) in the rat adrenal cortex as well as their involvement in the corticosteroid secretagogue effect of ET-1 in vitro. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction with primers specific for ET(A) and ET(B) cDNAs demonstrated the expression of both receptor genes in homogenates of adrenocortical tissue. However, in isolated zona glomerulosa and zona fasciculata cells, only ET(B) mRNA was detected. Autoradiographic examination of the selective displacement of 125I-ET-1 binding by BQ-123 and BQ-788 (specific ligands for ET(A) and ET(B), respectively) indicated that zona glomerulosa possesses both ET(A) and ET(B), whereas zona fasciculata is exclusively provided with ET(B). ET-1 enhanced in a concentration-dependent manner aldosterone and corticosterone secretions of dispersed zona glomerulosa and zona fasciculata cells, respectively. The ET(B) antagonist BQ-788 markedly reduced the secretory response of zona glomerulosa cells and completely suppressed that of zona fasciculata cells, whereas the ET(A) antagonist BQ-123 was ineffective. These findings indicate that in the rat, the adrenocortical secretagogue action of ET-1 is mediated by the ET(B) receptor subtype and that the ET(A) receptor is not directly involved in such an effect.


FEBS Letters | 2003

Ghrelin and growth hormone secretagogue receptor are expressed in the rat adrenal cortex: evidence that ghrelin stimulates the growth, but not the secretory activity of adrenal cells

Paola G. Andreis; Ludwik K. Malendowicz; Marcin Trejter; Giuliano Neri; Raffaella Spinazzi; Gian Paolo Rossi; Gastone G. Nussdorfer

Ghrelin is an endogenous ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS‐R), which has been originally isolated from rat stomach. Evidence has been previously provided that adrenal gland possesses abundant ghrelin‐displaceable GHS‐Rs, but nothing is known about the possible role of ghrelin in the regulation of adrenocortical function. Reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction demonstrated the expression of ghrelin and GHS‐R in the rat adrenal cortex, and high adrenal concentrations of immunoreactive ghrelin were detected by radioimmune assay (RIA). Autoradiography localized abundant [125I]ghrelin binding sites in the adrenal zona glomerulosa (ZG) and outer zona fasciculata (ZF). Ghrelin (from 10−10 to 10−8 M) did not affect either basal steroid hormone (pregnenolone, progesterone, 11‐deoxycorticosterone, corticosterone, 18‐hydroxycorticosterone and aldosterone) secretion from dispersed ZG and zona fasciculata/reticularis (ZF/R) cells (as evaluated by quantitative high pressure liquid chromatography), or basal and agonist‐stimulated aldosterone and corticosterone production from cultured ZG and ZF/R cells, respectively (as measured by RIA). Ghrelin (10−8 and 10−6 M) raised basal, but not agonist‐stimulated, proliferation rate of cultured ZG cells (percent of cells able to incorporate 5‐bromo‐2′‐deoxyuridine), without affecting apoptotic deletion rate (percent of cells able to incorporate biotinylated nucleosides into apoptotic DNA fragments). The tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor tyrphostin‐23 and the p42/p44 mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor PD‐98059 abolished the proliferogenic effect of 10−8 M ghrelin, while the protein kinase A and C inhibitors H‐89 and calphostin‐C were ineffective. Ghrelin (10−8 M) stimulated TK and MAPK activity of dispersed ZG cells, and the effect was abolished by preincubation with tyrphostin‐23 and PD‐98059, respectively. Tyrphostin‐23 annulled ghrelin‐induced activation of MAPK activity. Taken together, the present findings indicate that (i) ghrelin and GHS‐R are both expressed in the rat adrenal cortex, ghrelin binding sites being very abundant in the ZG; (ii) ghrelin does not affect the secretory activity of rat adrenocortical cells, but significantly enhances the proliferation rate of cultured ZG cells, without affecting apoptotic deletion rate; and (iii) the ZG proliferogenic action of ghrelin involves the TK‐dependent activation of the p42/p44 MAPK cascade.


Peptides | 1998

Role of VIP, PACAP, and related peptides in the regulation of the hypothalamo—pituitary–adrenal axis

Gastone G. Nussdorfer; Ludwik K. Malendowicz

Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) are members of a family of regulatory peptides that are widely distributed in the body and share numerous biologic actions. The two peptides display a remarkable amino acid-sequence homology, and bind to a class of G protein-coupled receptors, named PACAP/VIP receptors (PVRs), whose signaling mechanism mainly involves the activation of adenylate-cyclase and phospholipase-C cascades. A large body of evidence suggests that VIP and PACAP play a role in the control of the hypothalamo--pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, almost exclusively acting in a paracrine manner, since their blood concentration is very low. VIP and PACAP are contained in both nerve fibers and neurons of the hypothalamus, and VIP, but not PACAP, is also synthesized in the pituitary gland. Both peptides are expressed in the adrenal gland, and especially in medullary chromaffin cells. All the components of the HPA axis are provided with PVRs. VIP and PACAP enhance pituitary ACTH secretion, VIP by eliciting the hypothalamic release of CRH and potentiating its secretagogue action, and PACAP by directly stimulating pituitary corticotropes. Through this central mechanism, VIP and PACAP may increase mineralo- and glucocorticoid secretion of the adrenal cortex. VIP but not PACAP also exerts a weak direct secretagogue action on adrenocortical cells by activating both PVRs and probably a subtype of ACTH receptors. VIP and PACAP raise aldosterone production via a paracrine indirect mechanism involving the stimulation of medullary chromaffin cells to release catecholamines, which in turn enhance the secretion of zona glomerulosa cells via a beta-adrenoceptor-mediated mechanism. PACAP appears to be able to evoke a glucocorticoid response through the activation, at least in the rat, of the intramedullary CRH/ACTH system. The relevance of these effects of VIP and PACAP under basal conditions is questionable, although there are indications that endogenous VIP is involved in the maintenance of the normal growth and steroidogenic capacity of rat adrenal cortex. However, indirect evidence suggests that these peptides might play a relevant role under paraphysiological conditions (e.g., in the mediation of HPA axis responses to cold and inflammatory stresses) or may be somehow involved in the pathogenesis of Cushing disease or some case of hyperaldosteronism associated with secreting pheochromocytomas.


Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2003

Cardiac fibrosis occurs early and involves endothelin and AT-1 receptors in hypertension due to endogenous angiotensin II.

Teresa Maria Seccia; Anna S. Belloni; Reinhold Kreutz; Martin Paul; Gastone G. Nussdorfer; Achille C. Pessina; Gian Paolo Rossi

OBJECTIVES We investigated if endothelin (ET)-1 and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system play a role in cardiac fibrosis. BACKGROUND Angiotensin II (Ang II) can induce cardiac fibrosis, but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. METHODS Four-week-old transgenic (mRen2)27 rat (TGRen2) received for four weeks a placebo, the mixed ET(A)/ET(B) endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan, the angiotensin II type I receptor (AT-1) antagonist irbesartan, the ET(A) endothelin receptor antagonist BMS-182874, and a combined treatment with irbesartan plus BMS-182874. We measured collagen density on Sirius red-stained serial sections of the left ventricle (LV) with a photomicroscope equipped with specific software and assessed the gene expression of procollagen alpha1(I), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGFbeta1), endothelin converting enzyme, and ET(B) receptor. RESULTS In the placebo group, hypertension was associated with LV hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis (LV weight: 4.0 +/- 0.3 mg/g body weight; collagen density: 2.21 +/- 0.16%), which were all prevented with irbesartan (2.3 +/- 0.1, 1.30 +/- 0.13, p < 0.001), but not with BMS-182874 (4.0 +/- 0.2, 2.41 +/- 0.22). Bosentan also prevented fibrosis (1.39 +/- 0.18) but not hypertension and LV hypertrophy (3.38 +/- 0.27). Combined irbesartan and BMS-182874 treatment prevented LV hypertrophy (2.9 +/- 0.1) but not fibrosis (2.52 +/- 0.16). Collagen density correlated (r = 0.414, p < 0.05) with plasma aldosterone levels. In TGRen2 with LV hypertrophy, the gene expression of ANP and ET(B) but not that of TGFbeta1 and procollagen alpha1(I) was increased. CONCLUSIONS In Ang II-dependent hypertension, cardiac fibrosis was associated with LV hypertrophy and was hindered by both mixed ET(A)/ET(B) blockade and AT-1 blockade. Only the latter treatment prevented both hypertension and LV hypertrophy. Thus, there is a dissociation between the mechanisms of cardiac fibrosis and hypertension, which do and do not entail ET-1, respectively.


International Review of Cytology-a Survey of Cell Biology | 2001

Reciprocal regulation of endothelin-1 and nitric oxide: relevance in the physiology and pathology of the cardiovascular system.

Gian Paolo Rossi; Teresa Maria Seccia; Gastone G. Nussdorfer

The endothelium plays a crucial role in the regulation of cardiovascular structure and function by releasing several mediators in response to biochemical and physical stimuli. These mediators are grouped into two classes: (1) endothelium-derived constricting factors (EDCFs) and (2) endothelium-derived relaxing factors (EDRFs), the roles of which are considered to be detrimental and beneficial, respectively. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and nitric oxide (NO) are the prototypes of EDCFs and EDRFs, respectively, and their effects on the cardiovascular system have been studied in depth. Numerous conditions characterized by an impaired availability of NO have been found to be associated with enhanced synthesis of ET-1, and vice versa, thereby suggesting that these two factors have a reciprocal regulation. Experimental studies have provided evidence that ET-1 may exert a bidirectional effect by either enhancing NO production via ETB receptors located in endothelial cells or blunting it via ETA receptors prevalently located in the vascular smooth muscle cells. Conversely, NO was found to inhibit ET-1 synthesis in different cell types. In vitro and in vivo studies have started to unravel the molecular mechanisms involved in this complex interaction. It has been clarified that several factors affect in opposite directions the transcription of preproET-1 and NO-synthase genes, nuclear factor-KB and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors playing a key role in these regulatory mechanisms. ET-1 and NO interplay seems to have a great relevance in the physiological regulation of vascular tone and blood pressure, as well as in vascular remodeling. Moreover, an imbalance between ET-1 and NO systems may underly the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of systemic and pulmonary hypertension and atherosclerosis.


Peptides | 1997

Role of Adrenomedullin and Related Peptides in the Regulation of the Hypothalamo–Pituitary–Adrenal Axis

Gastone G. Nussdorfer; Gian Paolo Rossi; Giuseppina Mazzocchi

Adrenomedullin (ADM) is a hypotensive peptide, originally isolated from human pheochromocytomas, and then found to be widely distributed in the various body systems. ADM derives from preproadrenomedullin, a 185-amino acid residue prohormone, containing at its N-terminal a 20-amino acid sequence, named proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide (PAMP). ADM and PAMP immunoreactivities have been detected in the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis of humans, rats, and pigs. Adrenal glands possess binding sites for both ADM and PAMP, the former being mainly of the subtype 1 of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors. ADM exerts a direct inhibitory action on angiotensin II- or potassium-stimulated aldosterone secretion of zona glomerulosa cells. This effect is mediated by the CGRP1 receptor and its mechanism probably involves the blockade of Ca2+ influx. In contrast, ADM enhances aldosterone production by in situ perfused rat adrenals and human adrenal slices (containing medullary chromaffin cells), again through the activation of CGRP1 receptors. This aldosterone secretagogue effect of ADM is blocked by the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist l-alprenolol, thereby suggesting that it is indirectly mediated by the release of catecholamines by chromaffin cells. The effects of ADM on adrenal glucocorticoid release are doubtful and probably mediated by the increase in adrenal blood flow rate and the inhibition of ACTH release by pituitary corticotropes. The concentrations reached by ADM and PAMP in the blood rule out the possibility that they act on the HPA axis as circulating hormones. Conversely, their content in both adrenal and hypothalamo-pituitary complex is consistent with a paracrine mechanism of action, which may play a potentially important role in the regulation of fluid and electrolyte homeostasis.


International Review of Cytology-a Survey of Cell Biology | 2007

Leptin and the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Ludwik K. Malendowicz; Marcin Rucinski; Anna S. Belloni; Agnieszka Ziolkowska; Gastone G. Nussdorfer

Leptin, the product of the obesity gene (ob) predominantly secreted from adipocytes, plays a major role in the negative control of feeding and acts via a specific receptor (Ob-R), six isoforms of which are known at present. Evidence has been accumulated that leptin, like other peptides involved in the central regulation of food intake, controls the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, acting on both its central and peripheral branches. Leptin, along with Ob-R, is expressed in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland, where it modulates corticotropin-releasing hormone and ACTH secretion, probably acting in an autocrine-paracrine manner. Only Ob-R is expressed in the adrenal gland, thereby making it likely that leptin affects it by acting as a circulating hormone. Although in vitro and in vivo findings could suggest a glucocorticoid secretagogue action in the rat, the bulk of evidence indicates that leptin inhibits steroid-hormone secretion from the adrenal cortex. In keeping with this, leptin was found to dampen the HPA axis response to many kinds of stress. In contrast, leptin enhances catecolamine release from the adrenal medulla. This observation suggests that leptin activates the sympathoadrenal axis and does not appear to agree with its above-mentioned antistress action. Leptin and/or Ob-R are also expressed in pituitary and adrenal tumors, but little is known about the role of this cytokine in the pathophysiology.

Collaboration


Dive into the Gastone G. Nussdorfer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ludwik K. Malendowicz

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Agnieszka Ziolkowska

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge