Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Geert Verbong is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Geert Verbong.


Technology Analysis & Strategic Management | 2007

Multi-regime interactions in the Dutch energy sector : the case of combined heat and power technologies in the Netherlands (1970-2000)

Rob Raven; Geert Verbong

Abstract This article is about multi-regime interactions in energy sectors. Multi-regime interactions are interactions between fairly well defined and separated systems of production, intermediation and use. It is argued that multi-regime interactions have been underexposed in previous innovation literature, yet it is hypothesized that multi-regime interactions are critically important for understanding transition processes, and in particular for current transitions in European energy sectors. Based on a case study on combined heat and power (CHP) in the Netherlands, a typology is developed of four types of interaction: competition, symbiosis, integration and spill over.


Innovation-the European Journal of Social Science Research | 2004

Ruling Out Innovations - Technological Regimes, Rules and Failures: The Cases of Heat Pump Power Generation and Bio-gas Production in the Netherlands

Rob Raven; Geert Verbong

Summary Technological regimes are a common concept in innovation literature. We elaborate the concept of technological regimes in terms of rules. Rules tell actors how to behave, while at the same time their behaviour is a source for rules creation. We distinguish different types of rules for different actor groups. These rules can be embedded in both variation and selection environment and they can be hierarchal. Our hypothesis is that rules will generally guide actors into historically grown paths and directions. They tend to favour the incumbent technology over radical innovations. Our two case studies, power generation from heat pumps and bio-gas production from manure, seem to confirm this hypothesis. Both, potentially radical, innovations failed in the Netherlands, while they succeeded elsewhere. The heat pump case clearly endorses our hypothesis that rules from the incumbent regime do guide the development of innovations into specific directions. In the manure digestion case, changing rules from the selection environment directly interacted with the variation environment. Also, the innovation process occurred within the context of multiple regimes. Overall, the notion of rules seems a promising approach to explain success or failure of radical innovations, but a more extended elaboration of the relative importance ofdifferent rules is still needed.


Global energy assessment : towards a sustainable future | 2012

Transitions in energy systems

Anand Patwardhan; Inês L. Azevedo; Tira Foran; Mahesh Patankar; Anand B. Rao; Rob Raven; Constantine Samaras; Adrian Smith; Geert Verbong; Rahul Walawalkar; Riddhi Panse; Saumya Ranjan; Neha Umarji; John Weyant

This chapter examines the theme of transitions in energy systems. It assesses the literature that explores the genesis, growth, and management of transitions. This literature provides a multi-level framework for large-scale, transformative change in technology systems, involving a hierarchy of changes from experiments to niches to technology regimes. The chapter also covers specific innovation systems and experiments in the energy sector that may have the potential for larger impact and could lead to new niches or technology regimes. These experiments include technology-driven innovations in generation and end-use; system-level innovations that could reconfigure existing systems; and business model innovations centered on energy service delivery. Experiments in generation include hybrid systems, where multiple primary energy sources help address issues such as intermittency. Experiments in end-use include technology options for the simultaneous delivery of multiple energy services, or energy and non-energy services. System-level experiments include innovations in storage, distributed generation, and the facilitation of energy efficiency by effectively monetizing savings in energy use. In some of these experiments, technology can lead to changing relationships between actors or changing roles for actors; for example, the process of consumers becoming producers is seen in small-scale biogas projects. These changing relationships present both challenges and opportunities for influencing the transition process. The chapter also discusses policy and institutional issues that affect transitions. Finally, it is seen that although technological research, development, and innovation are important, a wide-scale, equitable, and accessible transformation to energy systems for sustainable development needs to be tackled as a socio-political issue.


Archive | 2001

Een kwestie van lange adem : de geschiedenis van duurzame energie in Nederland

Geert Verbong; A. van Selm; R. Knoppers; Rob Raven


International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control | 2011

Historical variation in the capital costs of natural gas, carbon dioxide and hydrogen pipelines and implications for future infrastructure

K. Schoots; Rodrigo Rivera-Tinoco; Geert Verbong; Bob van der Zwaan


Innovation-management Policy & Practice | 2004

Ruling out Innovations

Rob Raven; Geert Verbong


Papers in Innovation Studies | 2009

Local niche experimentation in energy transitions: a theoretical and empirical exploration of proximity advantages and disadvantages

Lars Coenen; Rob Raven; Geert Verbong


Energy Procedia | 2009

The potential role of Carbon Capture and Storage, under different policy options

Suzanne Vrijmoed; Monique Hoogwijk; Chris Hendriks; Geert Verbong; Fred Lambert


Archive | 2014

Energy and cities in transition.

Geert Verbong; A.J. Wieczorek


Policy | 2010

Sustainability experiments in Asia: innovations shaping alternative development pathways?

Geert Verbong; A.J. Wieczorek; Rpjm Rob Raven; Louis Lebel; Xuemei Bai; Frans Berkhout

Collaboration


Dive into the Geert Verbong's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xuemei Bai

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fred Lambert

Eindhoven University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. Schoots

Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rpjm Rob Raven

Eindhoven University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Suzanne Vrijmoed

Eindhoven University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge