Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Geir Rune Rauset is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Geir Rune Rauset.


Journal of Animal Ecology | 2012

Predicting the potential demographic impact of predators on their prey: a comparative analysis of two carnivore–ungulate systems in Scandinavia

Vincenzo Gervasi; Erlend B. Nilsen; Håkan Sand; Manuela Panzacchi; Geir Rune Rauset; Hans Chr. Pedersen; Jonas Kindberg; Petter Wabakken; Barbara Zimmermann; John Odden; Olof Liberg; Jon E. Swenson; John D. C. Linnell

1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator–prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly. 2. By using periodic Leslie–Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long-term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator–prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer–red fox–Eurasian lynx–human harvest system with those of the moose–brown bear–gray wolf–human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula. 3. The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose λ to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population λ. Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were −0·157, −0·056, −0·031 and −0·006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities. 4. Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation. 5. Our results confirm the complex nature of predator–prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their predation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species.


PLOS ONE | 2014

Activity patterns of eurasian lynx are modulated by light regime and individual traits over a wide latitudinal range

Marco Heurich; Anton Hilger; Helmut Küchenhoff; Henrik Andrén; Luděk Bufka; Miha Krofel; Jenny Mattisson; John Odden; Jens Persson; Geir Rune Rauset; Krzysztof Schmidt; John D. C. Linnell

The activity patterns of most terrestrial animals are regarded as being primarily influenced by light, although other factors, such as sexual cycle and climatic conditions, can modify the underlying patterns. However, most activity studies have been limited to a single study area, which in turn limit the variability of light conditions and other factors. Here we considered a range of variables that might potentially influence the activity of a large carnivore, the Eurasian lynx, in a network of studies conducted with identical methodology in different areas spanning latitudes from 49°7′N in central Europe to 70°00′N in northern Scandinavia. The variables considered both light conditions, ranging from a day with a complete day–night cycle to polar night and polar day, as well as individual traits of the animals. We analysed activity data of 38 individual free-ranging lynx equipped with GPS-collars with acceleration sensors, covering more than 11,000 lynx days. Mixed linear additive models revealed that the lynx activity level was not influenced by the daily daylight duration and the activity pattern was bimodal, even during polar night and polar day. The duration of the active phase of the activity cycle varied with the widening and narrowing of the photoperiod. Activity varied significantly with moonlight. Among adults, males were more active than females, and subadult lynx were more active than adults. In polar regions, the amplitude of the lynx daily activity pattern was low, likely as a result of the polycyclic activity pattern of their main prey, reindeer. At lower latitudes, the basic lynx activity pattern peaked during twilight, corresponding to the crepuscular activity pattern of the main prey, roe deer. Our results indicated that the basic activity of lynx is independent of light conditions, but is modified by both individual traits and the activity pattern of the locally most important prey.


Ecology | 2015

Reproductive patterns result from age‐related sensitivity to resources and reproductive costs in a mammalian carnivore

Geir Rune Rauset; Matthew Low; Jens Persson

Although the effects of individual age, resource availability, and reproductive costs have been extensively studied to understand the causes of variation in reproductive output, there are almost no studies showing how these factors interact in explaining this variation. To examine this interaction, we used longitudinal demographic data from an 18-year study of 53 breeding female wolverines (Gulo gulo), and corresponding environmental data from their individual home ranges. Females showed a typical age-related pattern in reproductive output, with an initial increase followed by a senescent decline in later years. This pattern was largely driven by four processes: (1) physiological/behavioral maturation between ages two and three; (2) age-related differences in the costs of reproduction resulting in an initial increase, and then a declining probability of breeding two years in a row as individuals aged; (3) resource availability (reindeer [Rangifer tarandus] carcass abundance; mostly Eurasian lynx [Lynx lynx] kills) in the months preceding parturition, which influenced the probability of having cubs, but only for individuals that had successfully bred in the previous year; and (4) resource availability also influenced the cost of reproduction in an age-dependent manner, as prime age females that had bred in the previous year were more responsive to resource availability than those at other ages. This study demonstrates that by examining how drivers of reproductive variation interact, we can get a much clearer understanding of the mechanisms responsible for age-related patterns of reproduction. This has implications not only for general ecological theory, but will also allow better predictions of population resnonses to environmental changes or management based on a populations age-structure.


Oecologia | 2013

When species' ranges meet: assessing differences in habitat selection between sympatric large carnivores

Geir Rune Rauset; Jenny Mattisson; Henrik Andrén; Guillaume Chapron; Jens Persson

Differentiation in habitat selection among sympatric species may depend on niche partitioning, species interactions, selection mechanisms and scales considered. In a mountainous area in Sweden, we explored hierarchical habitat selection in Global Positioning System-collared individuals of two sympatric large carnivore species; an obligate predator, the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx), and a generalist predator and scavenger, the wolverine (Gulo gulo). Although the species’ fundamental niches differ widely, their ranges overlap in this area where they share a prey base and main cause of mortality. Both lynx and wolverines selected for steep and rugged terrain in mountainous birch forest and in heaths independent of scale and available habitats. However, the selection of lynx for their preferred habitats was stronger when they were forming home ranges and they selected the same habitats within their home ranges independent of home range composition. Wolverines displayed a greater variability when selecting home ranges and habitat selection also varied with home range composition. Both species selected for habitats that promote survival through limited encounters with humans, but which also are rich in prey, and selection for these habitats was accordingly stronger in winter when human activity was high and prey density was low. We suggest that the observed differences between the species result primarily from different foraging strategies, but may also depend on differences in ranging and resting behaviour, home range size, and relative density of each species. Our results support the prediction that sympatric carnivores with otherwise diverging niches can select for the same resources when sharing main sources of food and mortality.


Oecologia | 2013

Home range size variation in a recovering wolf population: evaluating the effect of environmental, demographic, and social factors

Jenny Mattisson; Håkan Sand; Petter Wabakken; Vincenzo Gervasi; Olof Liberg; John D. C. Linnell; Geir Rune Rauset; Hans Christian Pedersen


Conservation Letters | 2015

Paying for an Endangered Predator Leads to Population Recovery

Jens Persson; Geir Rune Rauset; Guillaume Chapron


Journal of Wildlife Management | 2012

Modeling female brown bear kill rates on moose calves using global positioning satellite data

Geir Rune Rauset; Jonas Kindberg; Jon E. Swenson


Mammalian Biology | 2013

Lethal male-male interactions in Eurasian lynx

Jenny Mattisson; Peter Segerström; Jens Persson; Malin Aronsson; Geir Rune Rauset; Gustaf Samelius; Henrik Andrén


Biological Conservation | 2016

Land sharing is essential for snow leopard conservation

Örjan Johansson; Geir Rune Rauset; Gustaf Samelius; Tom McCarthy; Henrik Andrén; Lkhagvasumberel Tumursukh; Charudutt Mishra


Conservation Letters | 2016

National Parks in Northern Sweden as Refuges for Illegal Killing of Large Carnivores

Geir Rune Rauset; Henrik Andrén; Jon E. Swenson; Gustaf Samelius; Peter Segerström; Andreas Zedrosser; Jens Persson

Collaboration


Dive into the Geir Rune Rauset's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jens Persson

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jenny Mattisson

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Odden

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Henrik Andrén

University of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gustaf Samelius

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John D. C. Linnell

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonas Kindberg

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Segerström

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jon E. Swenson

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ole-Gunnar Støen

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge