Generoso Aliasi
University of Pisa
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Generoso Aliasi.
Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics | 2013
Generoso Aliasi; Giovanni Mengali; Alessandro Antonio Quarta
B ECAUSE of its inherent capability of producing thrust without using any propellant consumption, a solar sail is a particularly attractive option for the generation of so-called artificial equilibrium points (AEPs). These points are of great interest for mission applications because the spacecraft can be used to provide new vantage points for scientific observation [1]. Interesting positions for AEPs are those placed along the segment connecting the two primaries in the neighborhood of the classicalL1 Lagrange point. For example, in the sun-(Earth+moon) system, these L1-type AEPs have been suggested as useful locations for space weather observation missions [2] or for geoengineering missions [3,4]. Because L1-type AEPs are intrinsically unstable [5], a suitable control strategy is required to maintain their desired location. This problem has been addressedwith different approaches, whichmainly consider either a pitch and yaw-angle control, or a solar sail area variation [6]. However, both solutions present some drawbacks. A substantial simplification of the control problem is obtained when the solar sail attitude is maintained fixed, in a passive way, using a conically shaped structure [7]. The propulsive thrust is therefore always in the sun–spacecraft direction, but it can be modulated by varying, within a limited range, the ratio of the solar radiation pressure acceleration to the solar gravitational acceleration, that is, the sail lightness number β. Such a solution is commonly referred to as β control. The original idea of a β control applied to a solar-sail-based mission toward an L1-type AEP is due to Biggs and McInnes [4]. An interesting implementation of a β control makes use of electrochromic material panels (EMPs) [8]. These materials have already been employed in space missions, notably for the attitude control of the Japanese solar sail demonstrator interplanetary kitecraft accelerated by radiation of the sun (IKAROS) [9,10]. The aim of this Note is to explore the capabilities of the emerging EMP technology for the active stabilization of L1-type AEPs using a square solar sail with a fixed attitude. The problem is addressed within an elliptic restricted framework, which is a more realistic model with respect to the classical circular case [4]. The main spacecraft parameters, including the sail side and the total spacecraft mass, are defined by means of a simplified mathematical model, as a function of the main mission requirements in terms of maximum allowed sail lightness number variation and AEP position.
Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets | 2013
Generoso Aliasi; Giovanni Mengali; Alessandro Antonio Quarta
REATINGandmaintainingartificialequilibriumpoints(AEPs)in the restricted three-body problem is a challenging missionscenario in which a propellantless propulsion system exploits itsnatural potential [1]. Indeed, in such a problem, the accelerationresulting from the sum of centrifugal and gravitational forces can bebalanced, for a theoretically unlimited time period, by means of asuitable continuous propulsive thrust.A thorough analysis involving the location and stability of AEPshas been addressed in a recent paper [2], under the assumption thatthe propulsion system provides a purely radial thrust with respect tothe sun, and the thrust modulus is a function of the sun–spacecraftdistance only. In that way, with a unified mathematical model, it ispossibletoanalyzetheperformancesofdifferentpropulsionsystems,as, for example, a photonic solar sail and an electric solar wind sail(ESWS). In particular, an ESWS is known to be able to providea continuous propulsive acceleration by means of Coulomb’sinteraction of a number of positively charged tethers with the solarwind plasma stream [3].As long as the propulsive acceleration is assumed to be radial, asper[2],theESWSnominalplaneisorthogonaltothesun–spacecraftdirection.However,inamoregeneralcase,thespacecraftpropulsiveaccelerationdirectionmaybeinclined(withinprescribedlimits)withrespecttotheradialdirection,andatransversethrustcomponentmaybe generated. The latter, in turn, introduces an additional degree offreedom that can be exploited to expand the region of admissibleAEPs. The study of such a region for an ESWS-based spacecraft isthesubjectofthisNote,forwhichtheaimistoextendtheresultof[2]byremovingtheassumptionoftheradialdirectionforthepropulsiveacceleration. Moreover, this work, dealing with ESWSs, comple-ments the analysis of Baoyin and McInnes [4], which refers tophotonic solar sails.More precisely, to reduce the active attitude control effort, theESWS nominal plane is assumed here to maintain a constantorientation in an orbital reference frame, and the problem ofcalculating the maps of AEPs’ positions as a function of the ESWSattitude and performance is addressed within an elliptical restrictedthree-body problem. A linear stability analysis of AEPs near theLagrange points
Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics | 2012
Generoso Aliasi; Giovanni Mengali; Alessandro Antonio Quarta
A = solar balloon’s surface area, m E = Young’s modulus of the skin, Pa h = auxiliary variable, see Eq. (13) i, ĵ, k = unit vectors of rotating frame K = second-order tensor, see Eq. (5) k = gain ‘ = sun–planet distance (with ‘ ≜ 1 AU), astronomical unit m = mass, kg O = center of mass p = internal pressure, Pa R = solar balloon’s radius, m r = absolute position vector, r krk T = spacecraft equilibrium temperature, K T O; x; y; z = rotating reference frame u = vector, see Eq. (6) W = thermal power flux,W=m W = solar constant, 1350 W=m 2 = coefficient of absorptivity = lightness number = variation = coefficient of emissivity = angular coordinate, deg = planet’s dimensionless mass = skin’s Poisson ratio = dimensionless x coordinate = relative position vector, k k = skin’s tensile stress, Pa ~ = Stefan–Boltzmann constant = coefficient of linear expansion, K 1 ! = angular velocity, rad=s
Archive | 2015
Alessandro Antonio Quarta; Giovanni Mengali; Generoso Aliasi
The remarkable results obtained by the pioneering Deep Space 1 (DS1) mission (Rayman et al. 2000) have demonstrated the practical possibility of using electric thrusters to successfully perform interplanetary robotic missions.
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy | 2011
Generoso Aliasi; Giovanni Mengali; Alessandro Antonio Quarta
Acta Astronautica | 2013
Giovanni Mengali; Alessandro Antonio Quarta; Generoso Aliasi
Acta Astronautica | 2013
Alessandro Antonio Quarta; Giovanni Mengali; Generoso Aliasi
Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics | 2015
Generoso Aliasi; Giovanni Mengali; Alessandro Antonio Quarta
Acta Astronautica | 2015
Alessandro Antonio Quarta; Generoso Aliasi; Giovanni Mengali
Acta Astronautica | 2014
Generoso Aliasi; Giovanni Mengali; Alessandro Antonio Quarta