Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Geoffrey Bond is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Geoffrey Bond.


The Lancet | 2003

Tolerogenic immunosuppression for organ transplantation

Thomas E. Starzl; Noriko Murase; Kareem Abu-Elmagd; Edward A. Gray; Ron Shapiro; Bijan Eghtesad; Robert J. Corry; Mark L. Jordan; Paulo Fontes; Timothy Gayowski; Geoffrey Bond; Velma P. Scantlebury; Santosh Potdar; Parmjeet Randhawa; Tong Wu; Adriana Zeevi; Michael A. Nalesnik; Jennifer E. Woodward; Amadeo Marcos; Massimo Trucco; Anthony J. Demetris; John J. Fung

BACKGROUND Insight into the mechanisms of organ engraftment and acquired tolerance has made it possible to facilitate these mechanisms, by tailoring the timing and dosage of immunosuppression in accordance with two therapeutic principles: recipient pretreatment, and minimum use of post-transplant immunosuppression. We aimed to apply these principles in recipients of renal and extrarenal organ transplants. METHODS 82 patients awaiting kidney, liver, pancreas, or intestinal transplantation were pretreated with about 5 mg/kg of a broadly reacting rabbit antithymocyte globulin during several hours. Post-transplant immunosuppression was restricted to tacrolimus unless additional drugs were needed to treat breakthrough rejection. After 4 months, patients on tacrolimus monotherapy were considered for dose-spacing to every other day or longer intervals. FINDINGS We frequently saw evidence of immune activation in graft biopsy samples, but unless this was associated with graft dysfunction or serious immune destruction, treatment usually was not intensified. Immunosuppression-related morbidity was virtually eliminated. 78 (95%) of 82 patients survived at 1 year and at 13-18 months. Graft survival was 73 (89%) of 82 at 1 year and 72 (88%) of 82 at 13-18 months. Of the 72 recipients with surviving grafts, 43 are on spaced doses of tacrolimus monotherapy: every other day (n=6), three times per week (11), twice per week (15), or once per week (11). INTERPRETATION The striking ability to wean immunosuppression in these recipients indicates variable induction of tolerance. The simple therapeutic principles are neither drug-specific nor organ-specific. Systematic application of these principles should allow improvements in quality of life and long-term survival after organ transplantation.


Annals of Surgery | 2001

Clinical Intestinal Transplantation: A Decade of Experience at a Single Center

Kareem Abu-Elmagd; Jorge Reyes; Geoffrey Bond; George V. Mazariegos; Tong Wu; Noriko Murase; Rakesh Sindhi; Dolly Martin; Joanne Colangelo; Marsha Zak; Douglas Janson; Mohamed Ezzelarab; Igor Dvorchik; Maria Parizhskaya; Melvin Deutsch; Anthony J. Demetris; John J. Fung; Thomas E. Starzl

ObjectiveTo assess the long-term efficacy of intestinal transplantation under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and the therapeutic benefit of newly developed adjunct immunosuppressants and management strategies. Summary Background DataWith the advent of tacrolimus in 1990, transplantation of the intestine began to emerge as therapy for intestinal failure. However, a high risk of rejection, with the consequent need for acute and chronic high-dose immunosuppression, has inhibited its widespread application. MethodsDuring an 11-year period, divided into two segments by a 1-year moratorium in 1994, 155 patients received 165 intestinal allografts under immunosuppression based on tacrolimus and prednisone: 65 intestine alone, 75 liver and intestine, and 25 multivisceral. For the transplantations since the moratorium (n = 99), an adjunct immunosuppressant (cyclophos-phamide or daclizumab) was used for 74 transplantations, adjunct donor bone marrow was given in 39, and the intestine of 11 allografts was irradiated with a single dose of 750 cGy. ResultsThe actuarial survival rate for the total population was 75% at 1 year, 54% at 5 years, and 42% at 10 years. Recipients of liver plus intestine had the best long-term prognosis and the lowest risk of graft loss from rejection (P = .001). Since 1994, survival rates have improved. Techniques for early detection of Epstein-Barr and cytomegaloviral infections, bone marrow augmentation, the adjunct use of the interleukin-2 antagonist daclizumab, and most recently allograft irradiation may have contributed to the better results. ConclusionThe survival rates after intestinal transplantation have cumulatively improved during the past decade. With the management strategies currently under evaluation, intestinal transplant procedures have the potential to become the standard of care for patients with end-stage intestinal failure.


Annals of Surgery | 2009

Five hundred intestinal and multivisceral transplantations at a single center: major advances with new challenges.

Kareem Abu-Elmagd; Guilherme Costa; Geoffrey Bond; Kyle Soltys; Rakesh Sindhi; Tong Wu; Darlene Koritsky; Bonita Schuster; L Martin; Ruy J. Cruz; Noriko Murase; Adriana Zeevi; William Irish; Maher O. Ayyash; Laura E. Matarese; Abhinav Humar; George V. Mazariegos

Objective:To assess the evolution of visceral transplantation in the milieu of surgical technical modifications, new immunosuppressive protocols, and other management strategies. Summary Background Data:With the clinical feasibility of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation in 1990, multifaceted innovative tactics were required to improve outcome and increase procedural practicality. Methods:Divided into 3 eras, 453 patients received 500 visceral transplants. The primary used immunosuppression was tacrolimus-steroid-only during Era I (5/90–5/94), adjunct induction with multiple drug therapy during Era II (1/95–6/01), and recipient pretreatment with tacrolimus monotherapy during Era III (7/01–11/08). During Era II/III, donor bone marrow was given (n = 79), intestine was ex vivo irradiated (n = 44), and Epstein-Barr-Virus (EBV)/cytomegalovirus (CMV) loads were monitored. Results:Actuarial patient survival was 85% at 1-year, 61% at 5-years, 42% at 10-years, and 35% at 15-years with respective graft survival of 80%, 50%, 33%, and 29%. With a 10% retransplantation rate, second/third graft survival was 69% at 1-year and 47% at 5-years. The best outcome was with intestine-liver allografts. Era III rabbit antithymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab pretreatment-based strategy was associated with significant (P < 0.0001) improvement in outcome with 1- and 5-year patient survival of 92% and 70%. Conclusion:Survival has greatly improved over time as management strategies evolved. The current results clearly justify elevating the procedure level to that of other abdominal organs with the privilege to permanently reside in a respected place in the surgical armamentarium. Meanwhile, innovative tactics are still required to conquer long-term hazards of chronic rejection of liver-free allografts and infection of multivisceral recipients.


Annals of Surgery | 2000

Logistics and Technique for Procurement of Intestinal, Pancreatic, and Hepatic Grafts From the Same Donor

Kareem Abu-Elmagd; John J. Fung; Javier Bueno; Dolly Martin; Juan Madariaga; George V. Mazariegos; Geoffrey Bond; Ernesto P. Molmenti; Robert J. Corry; Thomas E. Starzl; Jorge Reyes

ObjectiveTo assess a technique for simultaneous recovery of the intestine, pancreas, and liver from the same donor. Summary Background DataWith the more frequent use of pancreatic and intestinal transplantation, a procurement procedure is needed that permits retrieval of both organs as well as the liver from the same cadaveric donor for transplantation to different recipients. It is believed by many procurement officers and surgeons, however, that this objective is not technically feasible. MethodsA technique for simultaneous recovery of the intestine, pancreas, and liver was used in 13 multiorgan cadaver donors during a 26-month period, with transplantation of the organs to 33 recipients. The intestine was removed from 11 donors separately and in continuity with the pancreas in the other 2. Six additional pancreases were excised and transplanted separately. Thirteen livers were retrieved, one of which was discarded because of steahorrhea. Ten of the remaining 12 livers were transplanted intact; the other 2 were split in situ and used as reduced-size hepatic allografts in four recipients. ResultsNone of the 11 intestinal, 6 pancreatic, 2 intestinal–pancreatic, or 14 whole or partial liver allografts sustained serious ischemic injury or were lost as a result of technical complications. One liver recipient died 25 months after surgery of recurrent C virus hepatitis. The other 32 recipients had adequate allograft function with a mean follow-up of 8 months. ConclusionIt was possible using the described technique to retrieve intestine, pancreas, and liver allografts safely from the same donor and to transplant these organs to different recipients.


Annals of Surgery | 2012

Long-term survival, nutritional autonomy, and quality of life after intestinal and multivisceral transplantation.

Kareem Abu-Elmagd; Beverly Kosmach-Park; Guilherme Costa; Mazen S. Zenati; L Martin; Darlene A. Koritsky; Maureen Emerling; Noriko Murase; Geoffrey Bond; Kyle Soltys; Hiroshi Sogawa; John G. Lunz; Motaz Al Samman; Nico Shaefer; Rakesh Sindhi; George V. Mazariegos

Objective:To assess long-term survival, graft function, and health-related quality of life (QOL) after visceral transplantation. Background:Despite continual improvement in early survival, the long-term therapeutic efficacy of visceral transplantation has yet to be defined. Methods:A prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 227 visceral allograft recipients who survived beyond the 5-year milestone. Clinical data were used to assess outcome including graft function and long-term survival predictors. The socioeconomic milestones and QOL measures were assessed by clinical evaluation, professional consultation, and validated QOL inventory. Results:Of 376 recipients, 227 survived beyond 5 years, with conditional survival of 75% at 10 years and 61% at 15 years. With a mean follow-up of 10 ± 4 years, 177 (92 adults, 85 children) are alive, with 118 (67%) recipients 18 years or older. Nonfunctional social support and noninclusion of the liver in the visceral allograft are the most significant survival risk factors. Nutritional autonomy was achievable in 160 (90%) survivors, with current serum albumin level of 3.7 ± 0.5 gm/dL and body mass index of 25 ± 6 kg/m2. Despite coexistence or development of neuropsychiatric disorders, most survivors were reintegrated to society with self-sustained socioeconomic status. In parallel, most of the psychological, emotional, and social QOL measures significantly (P < 0.05) improved after transplantation. Current morbidities with potential impact on global health included dysmotility (59%), hypertension (37%), osteoporosis (22%), and diabetes (11%), with significantly (P < 0.05) higher incidence among adult recipients. Conclusions:With new tactics to further improve long-term survival including social support measures, visceral transplantation has achieved excellent nutritional autonomy and good QOL.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2005

Intestinal Transplantation under Tacrolimus Monotherapy after Perioperative Lymphoid Depletion with Rabbit Anti‐Thymocyte Globulin (Thymoglobulin®)

Jorge Reyes; George V. Mazariegos; Kareem Abu-Elmagd; Camila Macedo; Geoffrey Bond; Noriko Murase; John Peters; Rakesh Sindhi; Thomas E. Starzl

Modifications in the timing and dosage of immunosuppression can ameliorate the morbidity and mortality that has prevented widespread use of intestinal transplantation (ITx) in children. Thirty‐six patients receiving ITx, aged 5 months to 20 years were given 2–3 mg(kg of rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin (rATG, thymoglobulin®) just before ITx, and 2–3 mg(kg postoperatively (total 5 mg(kg). Twice daily doses of tacrolimus (TAC) were begun enterally within 24 h after graft reperfusion with reduction of dose quantity or frequency after 3 months. Prednisone or other agents were given to treat breakthrough rejection. After 8–28 months follow‐up (mean 15.8 ± 5.3), 1‐ and 2‐year patient and graft survival is 100% and 94%, respectively. Despite a 44% incidence of acute rejection in the first month, 16 of the 34 (47%) survivors are on TAC (n = 14) or sirolimus (n = 2) monotherapy; 15 receive TAC plus low dose prednisone; one each receive TAC plus sirolimus, TAC plus azathioprine and TAC plus sirolimus and prednisone. There was a low incidence of immunosuppression‐related complications. This strategy of immunosuppression minimized maintenance TAC exposure, facilitated the long‐term control of rejection, decreased the incidence of opportunistic infections, and resulted in a high rate of patient and graft survival.


Transplant International | 2009

Evolution of the immunosuppressive strategies for the intestinal and multivisceral recipients with special reference to allograft immunity and achievement of partial tolerance

Kareem Abu-Elmagd; Guilherme Costa; Geoffrey Bond; Tong Wu; Noriko Murase; Adriana Zeevi; Richard L. Simmons; Kyle Soltys; Rakesh Sindhi; William Stein; Anthony J. Demetris; George V. Mazariegos

Introduction of new innovative immunosuppressive strategies has been the milestone of the recent evolution of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. With new insights into the mechanisms of organ engraftment and acquired tolerance, the Pittsburgh tolerogenic protocol was recently introduced and consisted of two main therapeutic principles: recipient pretreatment with lymphoid ablating antibodies and minimal post‐transplant immunosuppression with tacrolimus monotherapy. The reported herein improved survival and the striking ability to wean immunosuppression among the intestinal and multivisceral recipients pretreated with a single‐dose of Thymoglobulin (rATG) or Campath‐1H (alemtuzumab) supports our working hypothesis with successful induction of variable tolerance. It is important, however, that careful monitoring of subtle histologic changes in serial endoscopic‐guided mucosal biopsies be carried out for early diagnosis of allograft immune activation with prompt restoration of the baseline immunosuppressive therapy. Future scientific discoveries with better understanding of the mechanisms of immune tolerance and clinical introduction of reliable assays will increase the chance and safety of achieving complete tolerance among the intestinal and other solid organ recipients. This review will focus on the historic evolution of the immunosuppressive and other management strategies utilized for the intestinal and multivisceral recipients at the University of Pittsburgh with special reference to allograft immunity and the successful achievement of partial tolerance.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2004

Graft Versus Host Disease in Intestinal Transplantation

George V. Mazariegos; Kareem Abu-Elmagd; Ronald Jaffe; Geoffrey Bond; Rakesh Sindhi; L Martin; Camila Macedo; John Peters; Alin Girnita; Jorge Reyes

Our aim was to analyze the clinical course and outcome of patients with graft vs. host disease (GVHD) after intestinal transplantation (ITx). All patients receiving ITx between May, 1990 and December, 2003 were retrospectively reviewed for evidence of GVHD. Two hundred and fifty patients underwent ITx during the study period. Graft vs. host disease was suspected clinically in 23 patients on the clinical basis of presentation such as skin rash, ulceration of oral mucosa, diarrhea, lymphadenopathy, or native liver dysfunction. Fourteen (eight children and six adults) patients (5.6% of total patient population) had GVHD confirmed by histopathological criteria including keratinocyte necrosis (n = 9), epithelial apoptosis of the native gastrointestinal tract (n = 4), and epithelial cell necrosis of oral mucosa (n = 1). Donor‐cell tissue infiltration or extensive peripheral blood donor‐cell chimerism was documented on seven occasions. The majority of cases of GVHD resolved with steroid administration and optimization of tacrolimus immunosuppression.


The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2007

Nutrition and Quality of Life Following Small Intestinal Transplantation

Stephen J. O'Keefe; Maureen Emerling; Darlene Koritsky; Dolly Martin; J Stamos; Hossam M. Kandil; Laura E. Matarese; Geoffrey Bond; Kareem Abu-Elmagd

BACKGROUND:The outcome from small bowel transplantation (SBTx) has improved progressively over the past decade raising questions as to whether indications should be broadened from those currently followed based on “TPN (total parenteral nutrition) failure.”OBJECTIVE AND METHODS:To assess current outcome, we studied the effect of transplantation on nutritional autonomy, organ function, and quality of life (QoL) measured by a validated self-administered questionnaire containing 26 domains and 130 questions, for a minimum of 12 months in a cohort of 46 consecutively transplanted patients between June 2003 and July 2004. The majority of transplanted patients (76%) had intestinal failure because of extreme short bowel, the remainder having either chronic pseudo-obstruction or porto-mesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT). All but the PMVT patients were dependent on home TPN (HPN) (median 2, range 0–25 yr) and had developed serious recurrent infective complications with (25%) or without central vein thrombosis and liver failure. Sixty-one percent received a liver in addition to a small intestine.RESULTS:Follow-up was for a mean of 21 (range 12–36) months. Five patients died, two with chronic graft rejection. All the remaining patients have graft survival with an average of 1.2 (range 0–5) episodes of acute rejection. All patients were weaned from TPN by a median of 18 days (range 1–117 days) and from tube feeding by day 69 (range 22–272 days). There was a significant improvement in overall assessment of QoL and in 13 of 26 of the specific domains examined.CONCLUSION:Our results confirm the claim that a new era has dawned for SBTx, such that, with continued progress, it can potentially become an alternative to HPN for the management of permanent intestinal failure, rather than a last-chance treatment for “TPN failure.”


Transplantation | 2009

Lymphoproliferative disorders and de novo malignancies in intestinal and multivisceral recipients: improved outcomes with new outlooks.

Kareem Abu-Elmagd; George V. Mazariegos; Guilherme Costa; Kyle Soltys; Geoffrey Bond; Rakesh Sindhi; Michael R. Green; Ronald Jaffe; Tong Wu; Darlene Koritsky; Laura E. Matarese; Bonnie Schuster; L Martin; Igor Dvorchik; Michael A. Nalesnik

Background. Early experience with intestinal and multivisceral transplantation was plagued with high risk of rejection and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD). To improve outcome, innovative management and immunosuppressant strategies were sequentially evolved. Methods. With initiation of the program in 1990, serial monitoring of Epstein-Barr-Viral load was introduced in 1994 with adoption of preemptive antiviral therapy. In 1995, cyclophosphamide or daclizumab induction was added to the tacrolimus-steroid-based multiple drug immunosuppressions. Such a conventional approach was replaced in 2001 with a novel immunosuppressive protocol consisting of recipient pretreatment with a single dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab and posttransplant tacrolimus monotherapy. Results. With a total of 395 consecutive primary recipients, de novo malignancy(s) developed in 61 (15%) patients, with PTLD in 52 (13%), and nonlymphoid cancer (NLC) in 13 (3.2%). Malignancy was donor driven in 3 (4.6%) recipients and associated with graft-versus-host disease in 7 (11.4%). Children were at a significantly higher risk (P<0.001) of PTLD, and adults were more vulnerable (P=0.01) to NLC. With multivariate analyses, type of immunosuppression, recipient age, splenectomy, and treatment of rejection were significant PTLD risk factors. Conclusions. Despite pretransplant lymphoid depletion, preemptive antiviral therapy and minimization of posttransplant immunosuppression significantly reduced PTLD morbidity (P=0.0001) and mortality (P=0.001) with no impact on NLC. Patient survival was also improved (P=0.0001) with 91% at 1 year and 75% at 5 years.

Collaboration


Dive into the Geoffrey Bond's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rakesh Sindhi

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kyle Soltys

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jorge Reyes

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Qing Sun

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adriana Zeevi

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge