George F. Smith
Trinity College, Dublin
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by George F. Smith.
Biodiversity and Conservation | 2008
George F. Smith; Tom Gittings; Mark W. Wilson; L. French; Anne Oxbrough; Saoirse O’Donoghue; John O’Halloran; Daniel L. Kelly; Fraser J.G. Mitchell; Thomas C. Kelly; Susan Iremonger; Anne-Marie McKee; Paul S. Giller
Identification of valid indicators of biodiversity is a critical need for sustainable forest management. We developed compositional, structural and functional indicators of biodiversity for five taxonomic groups—bryophytes, vascular plants, spiders, hoverflies and birds—using data from 44 Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior) plantation forests in Ireland. The best structural biodiversity indicator was stand stage, defined using a multivariate classification of forest structure variables. However, biodiversity trends over the forest cycle and between tree species differ among the taxonomic groups studied. Canopy cover was the main structural indicator and affected other structural variables such as cover of lower vegetation layers. Other structural indicators included deadwood and distances to forest edge and to broadleaved woodland. Functional indicators included stand age, site environmental characteristics and management practices. Compositional indicators were limited to more easily identifiable plant and bird species. Our results suggest that the biodiversity of any one of the species groups we surveyed cannot act as a surrogate for all of the other species groups. However, certain subgroups, such as forest bryophytes and saproxylic hoverflies, may be able to act as surrogates for each other. The indicators we have identified should be used together to identify stands of potentially high biodiversity or to evaluate the biodiversity effects of silvicultural management practices. They are readily assessed by non-specialists, ecologically meaningful and applicable over a broad area with similar climate conditions and silvicultural systems. The approach we have used to develop biodiversity indicators, including stand structural types, is widely relevant and can enhance sustainable forest management of plantations.
Biodiversity and Conservation | 2007
Linda Coote; George F. Smith; Daniel L. Kelly; Saoirse O’Donoghue; Paul Dowding; Susan Iremonger; Fraser J.G. Mitchell
The epiphytes of the trunks and branches of mature Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) trees were studied in twelve plantations containing open spaces (glades, rides and roads) in the east and southwest of Ireland. A pair of trees was studied at each site: one tree at the south-facing edge of an open space and one in the forest interior. Spruce trees were found to support a moderately diverse range of bryophytes and lichens, including two relatively rare bryophyte species. Clear patterns in vertical distribution were identified, with bryophyte richness and cover decreasing and lichen richness and cover increasing from the tree base to the upper trunk. The open spaces themselves did not appear to affect overall epiphyte diversity, with no significant differences in any of the diversity measures between edge and interior trees. The main effect of open spaces was on the epiphyte cover of the edge trees. This was related to increased light levels combined with the presence of live branches from close to ground level on the south sides of the edge trees, which produced optimum conditions for bryophytes at the tree base and lichens in the upper plots. However, this dense side-canopy negatively affected epiphyte diversity on the north sides of the edge trees. Further research is required to assess the effects of open spaces within forestry plantations on epiphyte diversity.
Forest Ecology and Management | 2005
Anne Oxbrough; Tom Gittings; John O'Halloran; Paul S. Giller; George F. Smith
Biodiversity and Conservation | 2008
Erika Buscardo; George F. Smith; Daniel L. Kelly; Helena Freitas; Susan Iremonger; Fraser J.G. Mitchell; Saoirse O’Donoghue; Anne-Marie McKee
Forest Ecology and Management | 2008
L. French; George F. Smith; Daniel L. Kelly; Fraser J.G. Mitchell; Saoirse O’Donoghue; Susan Iremonger; Anne-Marie McKee
Archive | 2005
George F. Smith; G. Gittings; Mark W. Wilson; L. French; Anne Oxbrough; S. O'Donoghue; Josephine Pithon; V. O'Donnell; A-M McKee; Susan Iremonger; John O'Halloran; Daniel L. Kelly; Fraser J.G. Mitchell; Paul S. Giller; Thomas C. Kelly
Biological Conservation | 2007
George F. Smith; Susan Iremonger; Daniel L. Kelly; Saoirse O’Donoghue; Fraser J.G. Mitchell
Archive | 2006
Susan Iremonger; Tom Gittings; George F. Smith; Mark W. Wilson; Anne Oxbrough; Linda Coote; Josephine Pithon; A. O'Sullivan; P. Neville; F.J.G. Mitchel; V. O'Donnell; Thomas C. Kelly; P. Dowding
The restoration of wooded landscapes. Proceedings of a conference, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, UK, 14-15 September 2000. | 2003
George F. Smith; Daniel L. Kelly; Fraser J.G. Mitchell; J. Humphrey; A. Newton; J. Latham; H. Gray; Keith Kirby; E. Poulsom; C. Quine
Archive | 2006
Susan Iremonger; John O'Halloran; Daniel L. Kelly; Mark W. Wilson; George F. Smith; Tom Gittings; Paul S. Giller; Fraser J.G. Mitchell; Anne Oxbrough; Linda Coote; L. French; S. O'Donoghue; A-M McKee; Josephine Pithon; A. O'Sullivan; P. Neville; V. O'Donnell; V. Cummins; Thomas C. Kelly; P. Dowding