George Ferzli
State University of New York System
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by George Ferzli.
Urology | 1997
Adley Raboy; George Ferzli; Peter Albert
OBJECTIVESnWe report our initial experience using laparoscopic instruments and techniques in the performance of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) through an entirely extraperitoneal endoscopic (EE) approach.nnnMETHODSnA 62-year-old man with a Gleason score of 7 and clinical stage T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent EERRP. The procedure was evaluated for achievement of removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles and for complete vesicourethral anastomosis. Operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and pathologic findings were also evaluated.nnnRESULTSnComplete endoscopic removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles was achieved. Endoscopic reconstruction of the bladder neck with a watertight anastomosis was successful. Operative time was 5 hours and 45 minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 600 cc. Hospital stay was 2.5 days. Final pathologic evaluation was a Gleason score of 7 and Stage T2 disease with negative margins.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe initial experience for EERRP is encouraging. Further evaluation to refine the technique and determine its efficacy and role in treating prostate cancer is in order.
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2007
Wilbur B. Bowne; C. B. Morgenthal; A. E. Castro; P. Shah; George Ferzli
Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgical procedure, but the most effective surgical technique remains controversial. The evolution of laparoscopic techniques has allowed reproduction of open preperitoneal repair via an endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach. More recently, the advent of comprehensive training in laparoscopy has allowed TEP to continue evolving as the feasibility of this approach gains recognition as a preferable technique. Once considered very difficult to learn, TEP currently is adequately taught in many surgical training programs. This report reviews the fundamentals and details various modifications that make this procedure more desirable than open procedures and other laparoscopic techniques. A resultant decrease in operative time, cost of the procedure, and morbidity to the patient is routine. In addition, the authors review their institutional experience and examine other current evidence-based data.
Surgical Innovation | 2008
Anita Chiu; Wilbur B. Bowne; Kelley A. Sookraj; Michael E. Zenilman; Abe Fingerhut; George Ferzli
Laparoscopic surgery is a dynamic and integral component of surgical training. In many surgical programs, the surgeon-in-training gradually incorporates the knowledge and skill-sets through a variable spectrum of assistant/ apprentice instruction with different surgical mentors. As a result, this lack of formal and/or standardized instruction may be inconsistent with a structured educational process. In the year 2008, with widespread applications for minimally invasive techniques and technology, contributions from skilled assistants are now increasingly more important for effective and safe operative conduct. Incorporating these challenges into a balanced educational process remains no easy matter. The authors believe the assistants role is vital to all aspects of laparoscopic surgery, no matter how routine or complex. Laparoscopic assistants should participate and contribute directly in the (a) preoperative evaluation and preparation, ( b) patient positioning, (c) operative suite arrangement, ( d) trocar placement, plus important (e) intraoperative maneuvers contingent upon acquired mastery of laparoscopic skills. Understanding these principles plus effective administration of various duties allows for the apprentice in training to progress to more complex procedures and eventual primary surgeon responsibility. In this report, the role of the laparoscopic assistant/apprentice is reviewed, with particular attention focused on requisite fundamentals for evolving laparoscopic surgeons. To date, there are few publications within the world literature that directly address these observations. Important considerations delineating the expectations and goals for the assistant/apprentice, as well as the mentor, during laparoscopic training are provided.
Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery | 1992
George Ferzli; Aziz Massad; Peter Albert
Archives of Surgery | 2006
Wilbur B. Bowne; Kell N. Julliard; Armando E. Castro; Palak Shah; Craig B. Morgenthal; George Ferzli
Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery | 1992
George Ferzli; Joseph Trapasso; Adley Raboy; Peter Albert
Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery | 1993
George Ferzli; Michael Wenof; Alex Giannakakos; Adley Raboy; Peter Albert
Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery | 1992
George Ferzli; Gokhan Ozuner; Michael R. Castellano
Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery | 1992
George Ferzli; Adley Raboy; David Kleinerman; Peter Albert
Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery | 1993
Adley Raboy; Lawrence S. Hakim; George Ferzli; Joseph M. Antario; Peter Albert