Gerard Wain
Westmead Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gerard Wain.
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2007
Katharine Hodgkinson; Phyllis Butow; Glenn E. Hunt; Susan Pendlebury; Kim Hobbs; Gerard Wain
Goals of the workA significant proportion of breast cancer patients experience psychosocial morbidity after treatment, although their longer-term outcomes and supportive care service needs have not been comprehensively documented. The aim of this study was to identify longer-term outcomes and supportive care needs in disease-free breast cancer survivors.Materials and methodsOne hundred seventeen patients who had been diagnosed with breast cancer 2–10 years earlier completed questionnaires to assess psychosocial outcomes including supportive care needs, psychological distress, and quality of life (QoL).Main resultsQoL and depression scores were consistent with community rates although anxiety scores were higher. Approximately two thirds of survivors reported at least one unmet need, most frequently concerning existential survivorship issues, thereby highlighting the unique needs of survivors. Years since diagnosis was not correlated with need levels. Survivors classified as clinically anxious reported over three times as many unmet needs and survivors classified as depressed reported over two and a half times as many unmet needs. Positive outcomes were frequently reported.ConclusionsThe findings have direct clinical relevance: irrespective of years since diagnosis, comprehensive and extended supportive care services are required to identify breast cancer survivors in need of supportive care interventions and remediate high levels of anxiety.
European Journal of Cancer | 2013
Silvia de Sanjosé; Laia Alemany; Jaume Ordi; Sara Tous; Maria Alejo; Susan M. Bigby; Elmar A. Joura; Paula Maldonado; Jan Laco; Ignacio G. Bravo; August Vidal; Núria Guimerà; Paul Cross; Gerard Wain; Karl Ulrich Petry; Luciano Mariani; Christine Bergeron; Václav Mandys; Adela Rosa Sica; Ana Félix; Alp Usubutun; Muhieddine Seoud; Gustavo Hernández-Suárez; Andrzej Nowakowski; Godfrey Wilson; Véronique Dalstein; Monika Hampl; Elena Kasamatsu; Luis Estuardo Lombardi; Leopoldo Tinoco
BACKGROUND Human papillomavirus (HPV) contribution in vulvar intraepithelial lesions (VIN) and invasive vulvar cancer (IVC) is not clearly established. This study provides novel data on HPV markers in a large series of VIN and IVC lesions. METHODS Histologically confirmed VIN and IVC from 39 countries were assembled at the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO). HPV-DNA detection was done by polymerase chain reaction using SPF-10 broad-spectrum primers and genotyping by reverse hybridisation line probe assay (LiPA25) (version 1). IVC cases were tested for p16(INK4a) by immunohistochemistry (CINtec histology kit, ROCHE). An IVC was considered HPV driven if both HPV-DNA and p16(INK4a) overexpression were observed simultaneously. Data analyses included algorithms allocating multiple infections to calculate type-specific contribution and logistic regression models to estimate adjusted prevalence (AP) and its 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Of 2296 cases, 587 were VIN and 1709 IVC. HPV-DNA was detected in 86.7% and 28.6% of the cases respectively. Amongst IVC cases, 25.1% were both HPV-DNA and p16(INK4a) positive. IVC cases were largely keratinising squamous cell carcinoma (KSCC) (N=1234). Overall prevalence of HPV related IVC cases was highest in younger women for any histological subtype. SCC with warty or basaloid features (SCC_WB) (N=326) were more likely to be HPV and p16(INK4a) positive (AP=69.5%, CI=63.6-74.8) versus KSCC (AP=11.5%, CI=9.7-13.5). HPV 16 was the commonest type (72.5%) followed by HPV 33 (6.5%) and HPV 18 (4.6%). Enrichment from VIN to IVC was significantly high for HPV 45 (8.5-fold). CONCLUSION Combined data from HPV-DNA and p16(INK4a) testing are likely to represent a closer estimate of the real fraction of IVC induced by HPV. Our results indicate that HPV contribution in invasive vulvar cancer has probably been overestimated. HPV 16 remains the major player worldwide.
Sexual Health | 2007
Shalini L Kulasingam; Luke B. Connelly; Elizabeth Conway; Jane S. Hocking; Evan R. Myers; David G. Regan; David Roder; Jayne Ross; Gerard Wain
BACKGROUND The cost-effectiveness of adding a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to the Australian National Cervical Screening Program compared to screening alone was examined. METHODS A Markov model of the natural history of HPV infection that incorporates screening and vaccination was developed. A vaccine that prevents 100% of HPV 16/18-associated disease, with a lifetime duration of efficacy and 80% coverage offered through a school program to girls aged 12 years, in conjunction with current screening was compared with screening alone using cost (in Australian dollars) per life-year (LY) saved and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved. Sensitivity analyses included determining the cost-effectiveness of offering a catch-up vaccination program to 14-26-year-olds and accounting for the benefits of herd immunity. RESULTS Vaccination with screening compared with screening alone was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of
Cancer | 2001
Tom P. Manolitsas; Gerard Wain; Katherine E. Williams; Michael Freidlander; Neville F. Hacker
51 103 per LY and
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | 2003
Martin K. Oehler; Gerard Wain; Alison Brand
18 735 per QALY, assuming a cost per vaccine dose of
The Journal of The British Menopause Society | 2003
Martin K. Oehler; Alison Brand; Gerard Wain
115. Results were sensitive to assumptions about the duration of vaccine efficacy, including the need for a booster (
European Journal of Cancer Care | 2011
Janette Perz; Jane M. Ussher; Phyllis Butow; Gerard Wain
68 158 per LY and
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | 2005
Stephen Morrell; Richard Taylor; Sue Zeckendorf; Amanda Niciak; Gerard Wain; Jayne Ross
24 988 per QALY) to produce lifetime immunity. Accounting for herd immunity resulted in a more attractive ICER (
Clinical Cancer Research | 2014
Catherine Emmanuel; Yoke-Eng Chiew; Joshy George; Dariush Etemadmoghadam; Michael S. Anglesio; Raghwa Sharma; Peter Russell; Catherine L. Kennedy; Sian Fereday; Jillian Hung; Laura Galletta; Russell Hogg; Gerard Wain; Alison Brand; Rosemary L. Balleine; Laura E. MacConaill; Emanuele Palescandolo; Sally M. Hunter; Ian G. Campbell; Alexander Dobrovic; Stephen Q. Wong; Hongdo Do; Christine L. Clarke; Paul Harnett; David Bowtell; Anna deFazio
36 343 per LY and
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health | 2001
Richard Taylor; Stephen Morrell; Hassan Mamoon; Gerard Wain
13 316 per QALY) for girls only. The cost per LY of vaccinating boys and girls was