Gerry Ligtenberg

Reduction of Sympathetic Hyperactivity by Enalapril in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure

BACKGROUND Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) reduces the risk of cardiovascular problems in patients with chronic renal failure. This effect may be due in part to a decrease in sympathetic nervous activity, but no direct evidence of such an action is available. METHODS We studied muscle sympathetic-nerve activity in 14 patients with hypertension, chronic renal failure, and increased plasma renin activity before, during, and after administration of the ACE inhibitor enalapril. Ten other patients with similar clinical characteristics were studied before and during treatment with the calcium-channel blocker amlodipine. Normal subjects matched for age and weight were included in both studies. RESULTS At base line, mean (+/-SD) muscle sympathetic-nerve activity was higher in the group of patients who received enalapril than in the control subjects (35+/-17 vs. 19+/-9 bursts per minute, P=0.004). The baroreflex curve, which reflects changes in muscle sympathetic-nerve activity caused by manipulations of blood pressure with sodium nitroprusside and phenylephrine, was shifted to the right in the patients, but baroreflex sensitivity was similar to that in the control subjects (-2.1+/-1.9 and -2.7+/-1.3 bursts per minute per mm Hg, respectively; P=0.36). A single dose of the sympatholytic drug clonidine caused a greater fall in blood pressure in the patients than in the control subjects. Treatment with enalapril normalized blood pressure and muscle sympathetic-nerve activity (at 23+/-10 bursts per minute) in the patients and shifted the baroreflex curve to the left, reflecting normal blood-pressure levels, without significantly changing sensitivity (-2.3+/-1.8 bursts per minute per mm Hg, P=0.96). In the patients who received amlodipine, treatment also lowered blood pressure but increased muscle sympathetic-nerve activity, from 41+/-19 to 56+/-14 bursts per minute (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Increased sympathetic activity contributes to hypertension in patients with chronic renal disease. ACE inhibition controls hypertension and decreases sympathetic hyperactivity.

Withdrawal of Cyclosporine or Prednisone Six Months after Kidney Transplantation in Patients on Triple Drug Therapy: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Study

Uncertainty exists regarding the necessity of continuing triple therapy consisting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine (CsA), and prednisone (Pred) after kidney transplantation (RTx). At 6 mo after RTx, 212 patients were randomized to stop CsA (n = 63), stop Pred (n = 76), or continue triple drug therapy (n = 73). The MMF dose was 1000 mg twice daily, target CsA trough levels were 150 ng/ml, and Pred dose was 0.10 mg/kg per d. Follow-up was until 24 mo after RTx. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 14 (22%) of 63 patients after CsA withdrawal compared with 3 (4%) of 76 in the Pred withdrawal group (P = 0.001) and 1 (1.4%) of 73 in the control group (P = 0.0001). Biopsy-proven chronic rejection was present in one patient in the control group, in nine patients after CsA withdrawal (P = 0.006 versus control group); and in four patients after discontinuation of Pred (NS). Graft loss occurred in two versus one patient after CsA or Pred withdrawal, respectively, and in two patients in the control group (NS). Patients who successfully withdrew CsA had a significantly lower serum creatinine during follow-up. Pred withdrawal resulted in a reduction in mean arterial pressure, and the total cholesterol/HDL ratio increased. In conclusion, rapid CsA withdrawal at 6 mo after RTx results in a significantly increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute and chronic rejection. Pred withdrawal was safe and resulted in a reduction in mean arterial pressure. However, patient and graft survival and renal function 2 yr after RTx were not different among groups.

Enalapril and Losartan Reduce Sympathetic Hyperactivity in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure

The aim of this study was to compare the effects on BP and sympathetic activity of chronic treatment with an angiotensin (Ang)-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and an AngII receptor blocker in hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). In ten stable hypertensive CRF patients (creatinine clearance, 46 +/- 17 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), plasma renin activity (PRA), baroreceptor sensitivity, and 24-h ambulatory BP were measured in the absence of antihypertensive drugs (except diuretics) after 6 wk of enalapril (10 mg orally) and after 6 wk of losartan (100 mg orally). The order of the three phases was randomized. Normovolemia was controlled with diuretics and confirmed with extracellular fluid volume measurements throughout the study. Both enalapril and losartan reduced MSNA (from 33 +/- 10 to 27 +/- 13 and 27 +/- 13 bursts/min, respectively; P < 0.05) and average 24-h BP (from 141 +/- 8/93 +/- 8 to 124 +/- 9/79 +/- 8 and 127 +/- 8/81 +/- 9 mmHg; P < 0.01). PRA was not different during the treatments. The change in BP and the change in MSNA during the treatments were correlated (r = 0.70 and r = 0.63, respectively; both P < 0.05). Baroreceptor sensitivity was not affected by the treatments. This is the first study to compare the effects of ACE inhibition and AngII blockade on MSNA. In hypertensive CRF patients, enalapril and losartan equally reduced BP and MSNA. Differences in modes of action of the two drugs did not result in differences in effects on MSNA, supporting the view that AngII-mediated mechanisms contribute importantly in the pathogenesis of sympathetic hyperactivity in these patients.

Conversion from Cyclosporine to Tacrolimus Improves Quality of Life Indices, Renal Graft Function and Cardiovascular Risk Profile

Long‐term use of cyclosporine after renal transplantation results in nephrotoxicity and an increased cardiovascular risk profile. Tacrolimus may be more favorable in this respect. In this randomized controlled study in 124 renal transplant patients, the effects of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on renal function, cardiovascular risk factors, and perceived side‐effects were investigated after a follow‐up of 2 years. After conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus renal function remained stable, whereas continuation of cyclosporine was accompanied by a rise in serum creatinine from 142 ± 48 μmol/L to 157 ± 62 μmol/L (p < 0.05 comparing both groups). Conversion to tacrolimus resulted in a sustained reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and a sustained improvement in the serum lipid profile, leading to a reduction in the Framingham risk score from 5.7 ± 4.3 to 4.8 ± 5.3 (p < 0.05). Finally, conversion to tacrolimus resulted in decreased scores for occurrence of and distress due to side‐effects. In conclusion, conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in stable renal transplant patients is beneficial with respect to renal function, cardiovascular risk profile, and side‐effects. Therefore, for most renal transplant patients tacrolimus will be the drug of choice when long‐term treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor is indicated.

Improved Cardiovascular Risk Profile and Renal Function in Renal Transplant Patients after Randomized Conversion from Cyclosporine to Tacrolimus

Cyclosporine is considered to contribute to the high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients after renal transplantation. Tacrolimus may be more favorable in this respect, but controlled data are scarce. In this prospective randomized study in 124 stable renal transplant patients, the effects of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on cardiovascular risk factors and renal function were investigated. Follow-up was 6 mo. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA for repeated measurements. The serum creatinine level decreased from 137 +/- 30 micromol/L to 131 +/- 29 micromol/L (P < 0.01). Three months after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus, mean BP significantly decreased from 104 +/- 13 to 99 +/- 12 mmHg (P < 0.001). Serum LDL cholesterol decreased from 3.48 +/- 0.80 to 3.11 +/- 0.74 mmol/L (P < 0.001,) and serum apolipoprotein B decreased from 1018 +/- 189 to 935 +/- 174 mg/L (P < 0.001). Serum triglycerides decreased from 2.11 +/- 1.12 to 1.72 +/- 0.94 mmol/L (P < 0.001). In addition, both rate and extent of LDL oxidation were reduced. The fibrinogen level decreased from 3638 +/- 857 to 3417 +/- 751 mg/L (P < 0.05). Plasma homocysteine concentration did not change. Three months after conversion, plasma fasting glucose level temporarily increased from 5.4 +/- 1.3 mmol/L to 5.8 +/- 1.9 mmol/L (P < 0.05). Conversion to tacrolimus resulted in a significant reduction of the Framingham risk score. In conclusion, conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in stable renal transplant patients has a beneficial effect on renal function, BP, serum concentration and atherogenic properties of serum lipids, and fibrinogen.

Sympathetic Hyperactivity in Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Is Reduced During Standard Treatment

Standard treatment in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients includes an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker. CKD is often characterized by sympathetic hyperactivity. This study investigates the prevalence of sympathetic hyperactivity (quantified by assessment of muscle sympathetic nerve activity [MSNA]) in a sizable group of patients with CKD and assessed whether chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker normalizes increased MSNA. In 74 CKD patients (creatinine clearance 54±31 mL/min), MSNA, blood pressure, and plasma renin activity were measured in the absence of antihypertensive drugs except for diuretics. In a subgroup of 31 patients, another set of measurements was obtained after ≥6 weeks of enalapril (10 mg PO), losartan (100 mg PO), or eprosartan (600 mg PO). Patients as compared with control subjects (n=82) had higher mean arterial pressure (113±13 versus 89±7 mm Hg), MSNA (31±13 versus 19±7 bursts per minute), and log plasma renin activity (2.67±036 versus 2.40±0.32 fmol/L per second; all P<0.001). During angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy (n=31), mean arterial pressure (115±11 to 100±9 mm Hg) and MSNA (33±11 to 25±9 bursts per minute) decreased (both P<0.01) but were still higher than in control subjects (both P<0.01). Multiple regression analysis identified age and plasma renin activity as predictive for MSNA. In conclusion, sympathetic hyperactivity occurs in a substantial proportion of hypertensive CKD patients. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker treatment reduces but does not normalize MSNA.

Moxonidine Normalizes Sympathetic Hyperactivity in Patients with Eprosartan-Treated Chronic Renal Failure

Enalapril and losartan reduce but not normalize sympathetic hyperactivity in patients with hypertensive chronic renal failure (CRF). This study assessed the effect of chronic eprosartan on BP and sympathetic activity, and assessed the effect of moxonidine during chronic eprosartan treatment. In 11 stable patients with CRF (creatinine clearance 47 +/- 10 ml/min), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; peroneal nerve), BP, and baroreceptor sensitivity were measured in the absence of antihypertensive drugs (except diuretics) during chronic eprosartan therapy (600 mg for 6 wk) and in 9 patients after moxonidine (0.2 mg for 6 wk) was added. Normovolemia was controlled by diuretics and confirmed by extracellular fluid volume measurements. BP, heart rate, and MSNA were higher in patients than in 22 controls. During eprosartan therapy, mean arterial pressure (111 +/- 9 to 98 +/- 7 mmHg, P < 0.001), heart rate (71 +/- 10 to 65 +/- 8 bpm, P < 0.001), and MSNA (35 +/- 10 to 27 +/- 8 bursts/min, P < 0.001) decreased. After the addition of moxonidine (n = 9), a further reduction of mean arterial pressure to 89 +/- 7 mmHg (P < 0.05) and of MSNA to 20 +/- 10 bursts/min (P < 0.05) occurred. Sympathetic activity in patients with CRF can be normalized, and angiotensin II-independent sympathetic hyperactivity contributes to the pathogenesis of renal hypertension. Sympathetic hyperactivity is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes, implying that reduction might be beneficial to the patients. The addition of moxonidine to angiotensin II antagonist treatment might be appropriate.

Sympathetic hyperactivity in haemodialysis patients is reduced by short daily haemodialysis.

Objective Haemodialysis patients often have sympathetic hyperactivity. The hypothesis of this study was that a switch from three times weekly to short daily dialysis could affect sympathetic hyperactivity. Methods We studied 11 patients (eight men; aged 46 ± 8 years) stable on haemodialysis for at least 1 year before and 6 months after conversion from three times to six times weekly dialysis without increasing total dialysis time (short daily dialysis). Seven patients were restudied 2 months after switching back to three times weekly haemodialysis. Results Ultrafiltration volume per session decreased from 2.4 ± 1.0 to 1.5 ± 0.6 l (P < 0.05). The extracellular fluid volume (bromide distribution space) did not change. Mean arterial pressure (without medication) decreased from 113 ± 11 to 98 ± 9 mmHg (P < 0.05). Cardiac output (Doppler echocardiography) did not change, but peripheral vascular resistance decreased from 25.4 ± 6.4 to 21.2 ± 3.2 mmHg per min/l (P < 0.05), in conjunction with a decrease in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) from 39 ± 19 to 28 ± 15 bursts/min (P < 0.05). Ambulant 24 h blood pressure decreased and the nocturnal blood pressure dip increased during short daily dialysis. The seven patients who were switched back to alternate day haemodialysis showed a return of the high MSNA and peripheral vascular resistance. Conclusion The study shows that sympathetic hyperactivity in haemodialysis patients is reduced by increasing the frequency of treatment sessions. This is probably because of the decrease in number or magnitude of the fluid fluctuations.

Multifactorial intervention with nurse practitioners does not change cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease

Strict implementation of guidelines directed at multiple targets reduces vascular risk in diabetic patients. Whether this also applies to patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain. To evaluate this, the MASTERPLAN Study randomized 788 patients with CKD (estimated GFR 20-70 ml/min) to receive additional intensive nurse practitioner support (the intervention group) or nephrologist care (the control group). The primary end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. During a mean follow-up of 4.62 years, modest but significant decreases were found for blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, anemia, proteinuria along with the increased use of active vitamin D or analogs, aspirin and statins in the intervention group compared to the controls. No differences were found in the rate of smoking cessation, weight reduction, sodium excretion, physical activity, or glycemic control. Intensive control did not reduce the rate of the composite end point (21.3/1000 person-years in the intervention group compared to 23.8/1000 person-years in the controls (hazard ratio 0.90)). No differences were found in the secondary outcomes of vascular interventions, all-cause mortality or end-stage renal disease. Thus, the addition of intensive support by nurse practitioner care in patients with CKD improved some risk factor levels, but did not significantly reduce the rate of the primary or secondary end points.

Nurse Practitioner Care Improves Renal Outcome in Patients with CKD

Treatment goals for patients with CKD are often unrealized for many reasons, but support by nurse practitioners may improve risk factor levels in these patients. Here, we analyzed renal endpoints of the Multifactorial Approach and Superior Treatment Efficacy in Renal Patients with the Aid of Nurse Practitioners (MASTERPLAN) study after extended follow-up to determine whether strict implementation of current CKD guidelines through the aid of nurse practitioners improves renal outcome. In total, 788 patients with moderate to severe CKD were randomized to receive nurse practitioner support added to physician care (intervention group) or physician care alone (control group). Median follow-up was 5.7 years. Renal outcome was a secondary endpoint of the MASTERPLAN study. We used a composite renal endpoint of death, ESRD, and 50% increase in serum creatinine. Event rates were compared with adjustment for baseline serum creatinine concentration and changes in estimated GFR were determined. During the randomized phase, there were small but significant differences between the groups in BP, proteinuria, LDL cholesterol, and use of aspirin, statins, active vitamin D, and antihypertensive medications, in favor of the intervention group. The intervention reduced the incidence of the composite renal endpoint by 20% (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.66 to 0.98; P=0.03). In the intervention group, the decrease in estimated GFR was 0.45 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year less than in the control group (P=0.01). In conclusion, additional support by nurse practitioners attenuated the decline of kidney function and improved renal outcome in patients with CKD.