Ghap-Joong Jung

Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Biopsy Using 99mTc tin Colloid in Gastric Cancer

Objective:The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with gastric cancer for the assessment of regional lymph node status. Summary Background Data:SLN is the first draining node from the primary lesion, and it is the first site of lymph node metastasis in malignancy. SLN mapping and biopsy are of great significance in the determination of the extent of lymphadenectomy, allowing patients with gastric cancer to have a better quality of life without jeopardizing survival. Methods:The SLN biopsy was performed in 46 consecutive patients having gastric cancer with a preoperative imaging stage of T1/T2, N0, or M0. Three hours prior to each operation, 99mTc tin colloid (2.0 mL, 1.0 mCi) was endoscopically injected into the gastric submucosa around the primary tumor. Subsequently, serial lymphoscintigraphy was performed using a dual-head gamma camera. After the SLN biopsy had been performed using a gamma probe, all patients underwent radical gastrectomy (D2 or D2+α). The SLN was cut and immediately frozen-sectioned. A paraffin block was then produced for permanent hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results:SLNs were successfully identified in 43 of 46 patients (success rate, 93.5%). On average, 2 (range, 1–8) SLNs were identified per patient. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity of SLN biopsy were 100% (11 of 11), 93.8% (30 of 32), 84.6% (11 of 13), and 100% (30 of 30), respectively. SLNs were located at the level I lymph nodes in 38 (88.4%), the level I+II nodes in 2 (4.7%), and the level II nodes in 3 (7.0%). No micrometastases of SLNs was found on IHC for cytokeratin. Conclusions:SLN biopsy using a radioisotope in patients with gastric cancer is a technically feasible and accurate technique, and it is a minimally invasive approach in the assessment of patient nodal status.

Long term survival results for gastric GIST: is laparoscopic surgery for large gastric GIST feasible?

BackgroundRecently, laparoscopic resection for relatively small sized gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has been widely accepted as minimally invasive surgery. However, no report on the long-term safety and efficacy of this surgery for large sized gastric GISTs has been published to date.MethodsBetween July 1998 and January 2011, 104 consecutive patients who underwent resection for gastric GISTs were enrolled in this retrospective study. We assessed the clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative outcomes, patient survival, and tumor recurrence.ResultsOf the 104 patients with gastric GISTs who were included in the study, there were 47 males and 57 females whose mean age was 59.8 years. Sixty-four patients (61.5%) had symptoms associated with tumor. Ten patients included in the group 1, 49 in the group 2, 15 in the group 3a, 9 in the group 5, 14 in the group 6a, and 7 in the group 6b. There was one minor complication and no mortalities. Recurrence was noted in 5 patients, with a median follow-up period of 49.3 months (range, 8.4 to 164.4). The 5-year overall and disease free survival rates of 104 patients were 98.6% and 94.8%, respectively. When comparing large tumor (5–10 cm) between laparoscopic and open surgery, there were statistically differences in age, tumor size, tumor location, and length of hospitalization. There were no statistical differences in the 5-year survival rate between laparoscopic and open surgery for large tumor (5-10cm).ConclusionLaparoscopic surgery is feasible and effective as an oncologic treatment of gastric GISTs. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery can be an acceptable alternative to open methods for gastric GISTs of size bigger than 5 cm.

Cellular and peritoneal immune response after radical laparoscopy-assisted and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

The aim of this study was to assess cellular and peritoneal immune responses after radical laparoscopic surgery in gastric cancer.

Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopy-Assisted Gastrectomy with Extraperigastric Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer

Gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection has not been generally acceptable because of increased morbidity and mortality in some Western countries. Recently, many surgeons have become interested in laparoscopic gastric surgery for malignant disease as well as benign lesions because laparoscopic surgery itself has been shown to have many advantages over open surgery. The aims of this study are to evaluate the incidence and nature of operative morbidity and mortality after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) with extraperigastric lymph node dissection with respect to surgical experience and to identify factors predictive of complications and death. We reviewed the surgical outcomes of LAG with extraperigastric lymph node dissection in 140 consecutive gastric cancer patients. Clinicopathologic characteristics, operative outcomes, and postoperative morbidities and mortalities were compared after dividing the 140 patients into early (1–70) and late (71–140) groups. And risk factors for morbidity and mortality were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The overall operative morbidity and mortality rates were 18.6% and 0.7%, respectively. Thirty postoperative complications occurred in 26 patients. The minor surgical complication rate in the late group was significantly lower than that in the early group (P = 0.0349). According to univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate the independent predictor of a higher operative morbidity rate, no factor was significantly associated with operative morbidity. We conclude that LAG with extraperigastric lymph node dissection is a technically feasible and acceptable surgical modality for gastric cancer and low morbidity and mortality rates for this procedure can be accomplished by experienced laparoscopic gastric surgeons at large-volume hospitals.

Comparative Analysis of Five-Year Survival Results of Laparoscopy-Assisted Gastrectomy versus Open Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Case-Control Study Using a Propensity Score Method

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and open gastrectomy (OG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) using the case-control method with a sufficient follow-up period. Patients and Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed 89 patients who underwent LAG and 345 patients who underwent OG for AGC between August 1999 and June 2007. A total of 176 matched cases were included in the final analysis. Results: Except for tumor size and reconstruction, there were no statistically significant differences in the clinicopathological parameters between the two groups. Although operation time was significantly longer for LAG than OG (228.3 vs. 183.6 min, p < 0.0001), first flatus time and postoperative hospital stay without complications were significantly shorter in the LAG group (3.2 vs. 3.7 days, p < 0.0001; 7.0 vs. 10.4 days, p < 0.0001, respectively). Operation-related complications occurred in 7 cases (8.0%) in both groups. 13 patients (14.8%) in the LAG group and 15 patients (17.1%) in the OG group had recurrence. There was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year and disease-free survival rates between LAG and OG. Conclusions: LAG for AGC might be considered to be a minimally invasive surgery in some selected cases, although a well-designed prospective study comparing LAG with OG for AGC is needed.

Sutureless Intestinal Anastomosis With the Biofragmentable Anastomosis Ring: Experience of 632 Anastomoses in a Single Institute

PURPOSEUncertainty with the safety of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring makes surgeons hesitate in its widespread use in intestinal surgery. This study was designed to evaluate the validity of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring as a routine anastomotic device in enterocolic surgery.METHODSThe study analyzed the nine-year experience of 632 biofragmentable anastomosis ring anastomoses performed in 617 patients: 525 (83 percent) as elective procedures and 107 (17 percent) as emergency. Three classic types of anastomosis, end-to-end (n = 354), end-to-side (n = 263), and side-to-side (n = 15), were performed with a standard technique.RESULTSAnastomotic sites included ileocolic/ileorectal in 283 patients (45 percent), colorectal in 148 (23 percent), enteroenteric in 101 (16 percent), and colocolic in 100 patients (16 percent). Anastomotic leakage with clinical relevance was observed in five patients (0.8 percent): three elective cases, and two emergency (2 colorectal anastomoses and 1 ileorectal required diversions). Among 13 instances (2.1 percent) with postoperative intestinal obstruction, only 1 required relaparotomy for closed-loop obstruction. Seven patients (1.1 percent; 4 elective cases, and 3 emergency) died postoperatively; no deaths were directly related to the biofragmentable anastomosis ring technique.CONCLUSIONSOur data suggest that the anastomosis using the biofragmentable anastomosis ring is a uniform and highly reliable technique even in high-risk emergency surgery. Along with its clinical validities, clinical application of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring in different types of anastomoses in enterocolic surgery is expected to be expanded with a high level of technical safety.

Comparative Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted versus Open Subtotal Gastrectomy for pT2 Gastric Cancer

Purpose Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is a widely accepted surgery for early gastric cancer. However, its use in advanced gastric cancer has rarely been studied. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and survival outcomes of LADG for pT2 gastric cancer. Materials and Methods Between January 2004 and December 2009, we evaluated 67 and 52 patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy (ODG) and LADG, respectively, with diagnosis of pT2 gastric cancer. The clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and survival were retrospectively compared between the two groups. Results There were statistically significant differences in the proximal margin of the clinicopathological parameters. The operation time was significantly longer in LADG than in ODG (207.7 vs. 159.9 minutes). There were 6 (9.0%) and 5 (9.6%) complications in ODG and LADG, respectively. During follow-up periods, tumor recurrence occurred in 7 (10.4%) patients of the ODG and in 4 (7.7%) patients of the LADG group. The 5-year survival rate of ODG and LADG was 88.6% and 91.3% (p=0.613), respectively. In view of lymph node involvement, 5-year survival rates were 96.0% in ODG versus 97.0% in LADG for patients with negative nodal metastasis (p=0.968) and 80.9% in ODG versus 78.7% in LADG for those with positive nodal metastasis (p=0.868). Conclusion Although prospective study is necessary to compare LADG with open gastrectomy for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy might be considered as an alternative treatment for some pT2 gastric cancer.

Analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes of gastric cancer in younger patients: a case control study using propensity score methods.

AIM To understand the clinicopathological and prognostic features of gastric cancer in younger and older patients. METHODS Between January 2002 and December 2008, 1667 patients underwent curative gastric surgery. For comparative purposes, the patients were divided into two groups: younger patients who were less than 40 years old (112 patients), and older patients who were 40 years old and older (1555 patients). In both groups, propensity scoring methods were used to select patients with similar disease statuses. A total of 224 matched cases, with 112 patients in each group, were included in the final analysis. RESULTS Compared to the older group, the younger group with gastric cancer had a significantly higher percentage of females (P = 0.007), poorly differentiated or signet ring cell carcinoma (P < 0.001), advanced T stage gastric cancer (P = 0.045), and advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage cancer (P = 0.036). The older group with gastric cancer had more comorbidities (P < 0.001). With the exception of the number of lymph node dissection (P < 0.001) and retrieved lymph node (P = 0.010), there were no statistically significant differences between the postoperative outcomes of the two groups. During the follow-up period, there were 19 recurrences in the younger group and 11 recurrences in the older group. The overall five-year survival rates in the younger and older groups were 84.3% and 89.6%, respectively (P = 0.172). There were no significant differences (P = 0.238) in the overall survival of patients with advanced T stage gastric cancer in the two groups, with five-year survival rates of 70.8% in the younger group and 79.5% in the older group. With regard to the age-adjusted survival rate, there was significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.225). CONCLUSION In spite of aggressive cancer patterns in the younger group with gastric cancer, the younger group did not have a worse prognosis than the older group in our study.

Readmissions following elective radical total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: A case-controlled study

BACKGROUND Readmission after gastrectomy is one of the factors that reflect quality of life. Therefore, we analyzed the several factors related to readmissions after total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. METHODS From January 2002 through December 2009, 102 consecutive patients who underwent radical total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. We evaluated the incidence, cause, time point, and type of treatment for readmission after discharge; we compared the readmission and non-readmission groups in regard to clinicopathologic features and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS The readmission rate during the five years after total gastrectomy was 22 of 102 (21.6%). The most common cause for readmission was esophagojejunostomy stricture (5 cases). The treatment given for 31 readmissions included 23 conservative therapies, 3 radiologic or endoscopic interventions, and 5 re-operations. No significant differences were detected in the clinicopathologic feature, postoperative outcomes, or 5-year survival rates between the readmission and non-readmission group. No specific risk factor was found to be associated with readmission. CONCLUSION Although we could not determine a specific risk factor associated with readmission after radical total gastrectomy, prevention of readmission by evaluating the causes and treatments after radical total gastrectomy can improve the patients quality of life.

Endoscopic treatment and risk factors of postoperative anastomotic bleeding after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage, bleeding, and stricture are major complications after gastrectomy. Of these complications, postoperative anastomotic bleeding is relatively rare, but lethal if not treated immediately. METHODS Of 2031 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy (R0 resection) between January 2002 and December 2010, postoperative anastomotic bleeding was observed in 7 patients. The clinicopathological features, postoperative outcomes such as surgical procedures, bleeding sites and, methods used to achieve hemostasis, and the risk factors of anastomotic bleeding of these 7 patients were analyzed. RESULTS Of the 2031 patients, 1613 and 418 underwent distal and total gastrectomy, respectively. The bleeding sites were as follows: Billroth-I anastomosis using a circular stapler (n = 1), Billroth-II anastomosis by manual suture (n = 5), and esophagojejunostomy using a circular stapler (n = 1). All patients were treated with endoscopic clipping or epinephrine injection. There was no further endoscopic intervention or reoperation for anastomotic bleeding. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative anastomotic bleeding is an infrequent but potentially life-threatening complication. Scrupulous surgical procedures are essential for the prevention of postoperative bleeding, and endoscopy was useful for both the confirmation of bleeding and therapeutic intervention.