Gianmarco Paris
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gianmarco Paris.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2006
William E. Sponsel; Nancy Chen; Demi Dang; Gianmarco Paris; John R. Graybill; Laura K. Najvar; Lei Zhou; Kwok Wai Lam; Randolph D. Glickman; Frank W. Scribbick
ABSTRACT Paecilomyces lilacinus is a fungal pathogen which is generally resistant to amphotericin B and certain other antifungals and is an uncommon cause of devastating fungal keratitis. In the present studies, we evaluated topical voriconazole as therapy for P. lilacinus keratitis in rabbits. Thirty eyes of 15 rabbits were studied. In five animals, the uninfected left eye was treated twice daily with voriconazole (drug control, uninfected eye). In these same animals, the right eye was infected with P. lilacinus but not treated with voriconazole (infection control eye). By day 5, the infection controls had lesions of >2.4 mm in diameter, with conjunctivitis and severe hypopyon, and were sacrificed. In the other 10 rabbits (voriconazole treatment), the right eyes were infected with P. lilacinus and treated with voriconazole beginning on day 3 after infection. Voriconazole therapy caused lesions to decrease during 8 days of therapy, after which rabbits were sacrificed (11 days postinfection). Hyphal masses were present in the control infected eyes and absent in treated infected eyes. Voriconazole was detected in all tissues of treated eyes. Topical voriconazole is effective treatment for P. lilacinus experimental keratitis, and it penetrates more deeply than the corneal tissue.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2002
William E. Sponsel; Gianmarco Paris; Yolanda Trigo; Melanie Pena; Anke Weber; Keith Sanford; S.J. McKinnon
PURPOSE To assess, before and during oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug coadministration, latanoprosts and brimonidines hypotensive action in eyes at risk of glaucomatous progression, assessing the effect of each drug on ocular perfusion and visual function. METHODS Twenty consenting adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension underwent a double-masked, bilateral, randomized prospective study. Treatment started with either latanoprost 0.005% in the morning and placebo in the evening, or brimonidine 0.2% twice daily in one eye; after 1 week starting the other in the fellow eye. After another week, oral indomethacin 25 mg four times a day, commenced for 2 more weeks. Intraocular pressure, ocular circulation, and visual function were monitored pretreatment, after unilateral monotherapy (day 7), bilateral ocular therapy (day 14), and coadministered oral indomethacin (day 28). Intrasubject differences (interocular and intraocular relative to baseline) were determined by two-tailed paired t test. RESULTS A loss of the significance of intraocular pressure reduction with brimonidine was noted after oral indomethacin coadministration (-14%; P =.004 for brimonidine alone versus -11%; P =.3 with indomethacin). Significant intraocular pressure reduction with latanoprost persisted despite indomethacin (-25%; P <.0001 for latanoprost alone versus -30%; P <.0001 with indomethacin). Pulsatile ocular blood flow increased 40% with latanoprost, but was unchanged with brimonidine (interdrug difference, P =.004). Midperipheral retinal microcirculation increased 23% (P =.03) with latanoprost. Humphrey perimetry and contrast sensitivity remained consistently at or above baseline with both latanoprost and brimonidine. Indomethacin had no significant effect on ocular perfusion or visual function measures. CONCLUSIONS Circulatory and hydrodynamic findings differed substantially for the two drugs. The loss of significance of intraocular pressure reduction with brimonidine during indomethacin treatment may be clinically important.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2002
William E. Sponsel; Gianmarco Paris; Yolanda Trigo; Melanie Pena
PURPOSE To compare, in paired eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects, hydrodynamic and visual changes after 1 month of topical latanoprost in one eye and unoprostone in the other. DESIGN Single-center, institutional randomized clinical trial. METHODS After completing a washout period off all topical medication, 25 adults (mean age 54 +/- SEM 2 years) with bilateral open-angle glaucoma or glaucoma suspect status underwent morning (8 to 10 AM) and afternoon (1 to 3 PM) measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP), pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF), contrast, sensitivity, frequency doubling technology, and Humphrey 10-2 perimetry (HVFA II) in both eyes. Each then started unoprostone 0.15% (Rescula) in one randomly assigned eye and latanoprost 0.005% (Xalatan) in the other. Unoprostone was administered at 8 AM and 8 PM and latanoprost at 8 PM with placebo at 8 AM, both from masked bottles. After 28 days, differences were determined for each measured variable by two-tailed paired t test. RESULTS Starting from similar baseline IOP levels, after 1 month of treatment, the mean morning IOP values differed according to the topical agent received (16.2 +/- SEM 0.6 mm Hg for latanoprost vs 17.9 +/- 0.7 mm Hg for unoprostone; P =.001). These morning pressures were 2.6 mm Hg lower than baseline in the eyes receiving latanoprost (P <.0001), and 1.6 mm Hg lower in unoprostone-treated eyes (P =.02). Afternoon values were 3.1 +/- SEM 0.6 lower than corresponding baseline in eyes receiving latanoprost, and 2.4 +/- SEM 0.6 mm Hg in unoprostone-treated eyes (P <.0001 from baseline for both medications; interdrug mean IOP difference; P =.04). Eyes receiving unoprostone showed a 1.7-db improvement in frequency doubling mean deviation (P =.03), the only significant visual function change observed. Pulsatile ocular blood flow increased 30% relative to baseline in eyes receiving latanoprost, (P <.0001) and 16% in eyes receiving unoprostone (P =.05) by the morning of day 28. That afternoon, mean POBF had increased 30% (P <.0001) relative to afternoon baseline values among eyes receiving latanoprost and 18% (P =.03) among those receiving unoprostone (interdrug change difference, P =.05). Humphrey perimetry and contrast sensitivity remained stable with both prostanoids. CONCLUSIONS Both latanoprost and unoprostone produced significant reductions in IOP and increases in POBF, with stable central and perimacular visual function. Latanoprost once daily produced IOP reduction and POBF increases nearly twofold greater than those obtained with unoprostone twice daily. These differences in IOP and POBF change between unoprostone and latanoprost were statistically significant.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2003
Amjad M. Hammad; Gianmarco Paris; Wichard A.J. van Heuven; Ian M. Thompson; Thomas D. Fitzsimmons
PURPOSE To describe a patient with choroidal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma that spontaneously regressed after nephrectomy. DESIGN Interventional case report. METHOD A 48-year-old Hispanic woman presented with reduced vision in the left eye attributable to an elevated choroidal lesion and associated exudative retinal detachment. Oncology workup revealed a left kidney renal cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastases. The patient underwent primary nephrectomy, without specific treatment of choroidal or pulmonary metastases. RESULTS The metastatic choroidal lesion regressed and the retinal detachment completely resolved, as evidenced by fundus photographs and ultrasonography. CONCLUSIONS Choroidal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma may spontaneously regress after removal of the primary tumor.
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | 2004
Gianmarco Paris; Ming Zhao; William E. Sponsel
Purpose: To determine the efficacy of extensive microsurgical needling revision of failed filtering blebs followed by serial 5‐fluorouracil subconjunctival injections.
International Ophthalmology | 2001
Gianmarco Paris; William E. Sponsel; Sal S. Sandoval; W. Rowe Elliott; Yolanda Trigo; Donald K. Sanford; Joseph M. Harrison
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2000
William E. Sponsel; Gianmarco Paris; Sal S. Sandoval; Donald K. Sanford; Joseph M. Harrison; W. Rowe Elliott; Yolanda Trigo
Archive | 2002
William E. Sponsel; Randolph D. Glickman; Gianmarco Paris; Vanessa Bernal; John R. Graybill
Documenta Ophthalmologica | 2005
Joseph M. Harrison; Randolph D. Glickman; Charles S. Ballentine; Yolanda Trigo; Melanie Pena; Pearl Kurian; Laura K. Najvar; Neeru Kumar; Ankit H. Patel; William E. Sponsel; John R. Graybill; William C. Lloyd; Margaret M. Miller; Gianmarco Paris; Fernando Trujillo; Aaron Miller; Robert F. Melendez
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2004
F. Trujillo; Gianmarco Paris; L. Woodward; J. Graybill; Melanie Pena; L. Najvar; Yolanda Trigo; William E. Sponsel
Collaboration
Dive into the Gianmarco Paris's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs