Yolanda Trigo

Latanoprost and brimonidine: therapeutic and physiologic assessment before and after oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy.

PURPOSE To assess, before and during oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug coadministration, latanoprosts and brimonidines hypotensive action in eyes at risk of glaucomatous progression, assessing the effect of each drug on ocular perfusion and visual function. METHODS Twenty consenting adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension underwent a double-masked, bilateral, randomized prospective study. Treatment started with either latanoprost 0.005% in the morning and placebo in the evening, or brimonidine 0.2% twice daily in one eye; after 1 week starting the other in the fellow eye. After another week, oral indomethacin 25 mg four times a day, commenced for 2 more weeks. Intraocular pressure, ocular circulation, and visual function were monitored pretreatment, after unilateral monotherapy (day 7), bilateral ocular therapy (day 14), and coadministered oral indomethacin (day 28). Intrasubject differences (interocular and intraocular relative to baseline) were determined by two-tailed paired t test. RESULTS A loss of the significance of intraocular pressure reduction with brimonidine was noted after oral indomethacin coadministration (-14%; P =.004 for brimonidine alone versus -11%; P =.3 with indomethacin). Significant intraocular pressure reduction with latanoprost persisted despite indomethacin (-25%; P <.0001 for latanoprost alone versus -30%; P <.0001 with indomethacin). Pulsatile ocular blood flow increased 40% with latanoprost, but was unchanged with brimonidine (interdrug difference, P =.004). Midperipheral retinal microcirculation increased 23% (P =.03) with latanoprost. Humphrey perimetry and contrast sensitivity remained consistently at or above baseline with both latanoprost and brimonidine. Indomethacin had no significant effect on ocular perfusion or visual function measures. CONCLUSIONS Circulatory and hydrodynamic findings differed substantially for the two drugs. The loss of significance of intraocular pressure reduction with brimonidine during indomethacin treatment may be clinically important.

Comparative Effects of Latanoprost (Xalatan) and Unoprostone (Rescula) in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Suspected Glaucoma

PURPOSE To compare, in paired eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects, hydrodynamic and visual changes after 1 month of topical latanoprost in one eye and unoprostone in the other. DESIGN Single-center, institutional randomized clinical trial. METHODS After completing a washout period off all topical medication, 25 adults (mean age 54 +/- SEM 2 years) with bilateral open-angle glaucoma or glaucoma suspect status underwent morning (8 to 10 AM) and afternoon (1 to 3 PM) measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP), pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF), contrast, sensitivity, frequency doubling technology, and Humphrey 10-2 perimetry (HVFA II) in both eyes. Each then started unoprostone 0.15% (Rescula) in one randomly assigned eye and latanoprost 0.005% (Xalatan) in the other. Unoprostone was administered at 8 AM and 8 PM and latanoprost at 8 PM with placebo at 8 AM, both from masked bottles. After 28 days, differences were determined for each measured variable by two-tailed paired t test. RESULTS Starting from similar baseline IOP levels, after 1 month of treatment, the mean morning IOP values differed according to the topical agent received (16.2 +/- SEM 0.6 mm Hg for latanoprost vs 17.9 +/- 0.7 mm Hg for unoprostone; P =.001). These morning pressures were 2.6 mm Hg lower than baseline in the eyes receiving latanoprost (P <.0001), and 1.6 mm Hg lower in unoprostone-treated eyes (P =.02). Afternoon values were 3.1 +/- SEM 0.6 lower than corresponding baseline in eyes receiving latanoprost, and 2.4 +/- SEM 0.6 mm Hg in unoprostone-treated eyes (P <.0001 from baseline for both medications; interdrug mean IOP difference; P =.04). Eyes receiving unoprostone showed a 1.7-db improvement in frequency doubling mean deviation (P =.03), the only significant visual function change observed. Pulsatile ocular blood flow increased 30% relative to baseline in eyes receiving latanoprost, (P <.0001) and 16% in eyes receiving unoprostone (P =.05) by the morning of day 28. That afternoon, mean POBF had increased 30% (P <.0001) relative to afternoon baseline values among eyes receiving latanoprost and 18% (P =.03) among those receiving unoprostone (interdrug change difference, P =.05). Humphrey perimetry and contrast sensitivity remained stable with both prostanoids. CONCLUSIONS Both latanoprost and unoprostone produced significant reductions in IOP and increases in POBF, with stable central and perimacular visual function. Latanoprost once daily produced IOP reduction and POBF increases nearly twofold greater than those obtained with unoprostone twice daily. These differences in IOP and POBF change between unoprostone and latanoprost were statistically significant.

Effects of latanoprost and timolol-XE on hydrodynamics in the normal eye

PURPOSE To compare the effects of latanoprost and timolol-XE on ocular pressure and perfusion in healthy adults, with respect to episcleral venous pressure. METHODS A double-masked, placebo-controlled crossover study of weeklong bedtime treatment with one drop of drug, with placebo contralaterally, followed by a 3-week washout and alternate-drug/contralateral-placebo repeat. Intraocular pressure was measured by applanation and by pneumotonometry, providing pulsatile ocular circulatory estimates. Measurements of episcleral venous pressure were obtained (Friberg method). RESULTS Twenty subjects participated (five men, 15 women; mean age, 39 years (range, 21 to 55 years); mean baseline intraocular pressure, 13.4 mm Hg). A greater decrease in intraocular pressure was seen among these subjects the morning after initiating treatment with latanoprost (-2.0 mm Hg; P <.0001) than with timolol-XE (-0.9 mm Hg; P =.051) (latanoprost versus timolol DeltaP =.008). This ocular hypotensive effect remained significant that evening with latanoprost (-3.2 mm Hg; P <.0001) but not with timolol XE (-1.0 mm Hg; P =.2). By the morning of day 8, mean intraocular pressure remained 3.2 mm Hg below baseline with latanoprost and 2.3 mm Hg below baseline with timolol-XE (P <.0001 for both drugs). Neither drug altered episcleral venous pressure. Among a subgroup of nine subjects with comparable intraocular pressure reductions with the two drugs, latanoprost treatment was associated with a 16.7% increase in mean pulsatile ocular blood flow (P =.04) through the weeklong treatment interval, consistently higher than during timolol-XE treatment of the same subjects. CONCLUSION Latanoprost caused an overnight decrease in intraocular pressure in normotensive normal eyes, and both drugs significantly reduced intraocular pressure within 1 week. Intraocular pressure remained higher than episcleral venous pressure throughout treatment with both drugs. Latanoprost was associated with enhanced pulsatile ocular perfusion not seen with timolol-XE treatment.

Dorzolamide Hydrochloride and Visual Function in Normal Eyes

PURPOSE To determine by a pilot study whether standard treatment with the topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dorzolamide hydrochloride influences visual function under normal breathing conditions, during carbon dioxide inhalation, or during hyperventilation, and to establish criteria for future larger-scale studies. METHODS We enrolled 12 normal subjects into this randomized double-masked placebo-controlled crossover study. Each subject was treated with either dorzolamide 2% or placebo, three times daily, for 4 days. After a 2-week washout period, the alternative topical agent was used under identical testing conditions. On day 2 of each treatment phase, contrast sensitivities to sinusoidal gratings of 1 and 4 cycles per degree (cpd) were assessed. On day 4, mean deviation values from full-threshold 10-2 visual fields were obtained. Three sets of each visual function test were obtained before each treatment phase, and in sequence on each testing day, during normal breathing (baseline), inhalation of carbon dioxide-enriched air, and hyperventilation while intraocular pressure was monitored. RESULTS Contrast sensitivity at 4 cpd decreased significantly (P < .01) during carbon dioxide supplementation with placebo but showed no significant change with dorzolamide. The decrease in contrast sensitivity accompanying hyperventilation was attenuated (by nearly 50% at 1 cpd) during dorzolamide treatment. Dorzolamide treatment was associated with higher perimetry mean deviation values under each treatment condition and was statistically significant (P < .05) at baseline. CONCLUSIONS Dorzolamide appears to enhance contrast sensitivity in normal subjects during physiologic hypercapnia and hypocapnia at 4 and 1 cpd, respectively. Also, under normal breathing conditions, dorzolamide therapy increases perimetric light sensitivity.

Comparison of the Frequency Doubling Technology screening algorithm and the Humphrey 24‐2 SITA‐FAST in a large eye screening

Purpose: To compare the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) C20‐1 screening algorithm and the Humphrey Field Analyser II (HFA) 24−2 SITA‐FAST in a large eye screening.

Frequency of sustained glaucomatous-type visual field loss and associated optic nerve cupping in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin.

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of persisting glaucomatous‐type visual field loss in a Midwestern American adult population, in association with four grades of disc cupping.