Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gijs de Boer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gijs de Boer.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2008

A Focus on Mixed-Phase Clouds: The Status of Ground-Based Observational Methods

Matthew D. Shupe; John S. Daniel; Gijs de Boer; Edwin W. Eloranta; Pavlos Kollias; Charles N. Long; Edward Luke; David D. Turner; Johannes Verlinde

The phase composition and microphysical structure of clouds define the manner in which they modulate atmospheric radiation and contribute to the hydrologic cycle. Issues regarding cloud phase partitioning and transformation come to bear directly in mixed-phase clouds, and have been difficult to address within current modeling frameworks. Ground-based, remote-sensing observations of mixed-phase clouds can contribute a significant body of knowledge with which to better understand, and thereby more accurately model, clouds and their phase-defining processes. Utilizing example observations from the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE), which occurred at the Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Programs Climate Research Facility in Barrow, Alaska, during autumn 2004, we review the current status of ground-based observation and retrieval methods used in characterizing the macrophysical, microphysical, radiative, and dynamical properties of stratiform mixed-phase clouds. In...


Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | 2009

Arctic Mixed-Phase Stratiform Cloud Properties from Multiple Years of Surface-Based Measurements at Two High-Latitude Locations

Gijs de Boer; Edwin W. Eloranta; Matthew D. Shupe

Macro- and microphysical properties of single-layer stratiform mixed-phase clouds are derived from multiple years of lidar, radar, and radiosonde observations. Measurements were made as part of the MixedPhase Arctic Clouds Experiment (MPACE) and the Study of Environmental Arctic Change (SEARCH) in Barrow, Alaska, and Eureka, Nunavut, Canada, respectively. Single-layer mixed-phase clouds occurred between 4% and 26% of the total time observed, varying with season and location. They had mean cloud-base heights between ;700 and 2100 m and thicknesses between ;200 and 700 m. Seasonal mean cloud optical depths ranged from 2.2 up. The clouds existed at temperatures of ;242‐271 K and occurred under different wind conditions, depending on season. Utilizing retrievals from a combination of lidar, radar, and microwave radiometer, mean cloud microphysical properties were derived, with mean liquid effective diameters estimated from 16 to 49 mm, mean liquid number densities on the order of 10 4 ‐10 5 L 21 , and mean water contents estimated between 0.07 and 0.28 g m 23 . Ice precipitation was shown to have mean ice effective diameters of 50‐125 mm, mean ice number densities on the order of 10 L 21 , and mean water contents estimated between 0.012 and 0.031 g m 23 . Mean cloud liquid water paths ranged from 25 to 100 g m 22 . All results are compared topreviousstudies,andpotentialretrievalerrorsarediscussed.Additionally,seasonalvariationinmacro-and microphysical properties was highlighted. Finally, fraction of liquid water to ice mass was shown to decrease with decreasing temperature.


Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems | 2011

Intercomparison of cloud model simulations of Arctic mixed‐phase boundary layer clouds observed during SHEBA/FIRE‐ACE

Hugh Morrison; Paquita Zuidema; Andrew S. Ackerman; Alexander Avramov; Gijs de Boer; Jiwen Fan; Ann M. Fridlind; Tempei Hashino; Jerry Y. Harrington; Yali Luo; Mikhail Ovchinnikov; Ben Shipway

An intercomparison of six cloud-resolving and large-eddy simulation models is presented. This case study is based on observations of a persistent mixed-phase boundary layer cloud gathered on 7 May, 1998 from the Surface Heat Budget of Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) and First ISCCP Regional Experiment - Arctic Cloud Experiment (FIRE-ACE). Ice nucleation is constrained in the simulations in a way that holds the ice crystal concentration approximately fixed, with two sets of sensitivity runs in addition to the baseline simulations utilizing different specified ice nucleus (IN) concentrations. All of the baseline and sensitivity simulations group into two distinct quasi-steady states associated with either persistent mixed-phase clouds or all-ice clouds after the first few hours of integration, implying the existence of multiple states for this case. These two states are associated with distinctly different microphysical, thermodynamic, and radiative characteristics. Most but not all of the models produce a persistent mixed-phase cloud qualitatively similar to observations using the baseline IN/crystal concentration, while small increases in the IN/crystal concentration generally lead to rapid glaciation and conversion to the all-ice state. Budget analysis indicates that larger ice deposition rates associated with increased IN/crystal concentrations have a limited direct impact on dissipation of liquid in these simulations. However, the impact of increased ice deposition is greatly enhanced by several interaction pathways that lead to an increased surface precipitation flux, weaker cloud top radiative cooling and cloud dynamics, and reduced vertical mixing, promoting rapid glaciation of the mixed-phase cloud for deposition rates in the cloud layer greater than about 122610 –5 gk g –1 s –1 for this case. These results indicate the critical importance of precipitation-radiative-dynamical interactions in simulating cloud phase, which have been neglected in previous fixed-dynamical parcel studies of the cloud phase parameter space. Large sensitivity to the IN/crystal concentration also suggests the need for improved understanding of ice nucleation and its parameterization in models.


Journal of Climate | 2012

A Characterization of the Present-Day Arctic Atmosphere in CCSM4

Gijs de Boer; William L. Chapman; Jennifer E. Kay; Brian Medeiros; Matthew D. Shupe; Steve Vavrus; John Walsh

Simulation of key features of the Arctic atmosphere in the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) is evaluated against observational and reanalysis datasets for the present-day (1981‐2005). Surface air temperature, sea level pressure, cloud cover and phase, precipitation and evaporation, the atmospheric energy budget, and lower-tropospheric stability are evaluated. Simulated surface air temperatures are found to be slightly too cold when compared with the 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40). Spatial patterns and temporal variability are well simulated. Evaluation of the sea level pressure demonstrates some large biases, most noticeably an under simulation of the Beaufort High during spring and autumn. Monthly Arctic-wide biases of up to 13 mb are reported.Cloud cover is underpredicted for all but summermonths, and cloud phase is demonstrated to be different from observations. Despite low cloud cover, simulated all-sky liquid water pathsaretoohigh,whileicewaterpathwasgenerallytoolow.Precipitationisfoundtobeexcessiveovermuch oftheArcticcomparedtoERA-40andtheGlobalPrecipitation ClimatologyProject(GPCP) estimates.With some exceptions, evaporation is well captured by CCSM4, resulting in P 2 E estimates that are too high. CCSM4 energy budget terms show promising agreement with estimates from several sources. The most noticeable exception to this is the top of the atmosphere (TOA) fluxes that are found to be too low while surface fluxes are found to be too high during summer months. Finally, the lower troposphere is found to be too stable when compared to ERA-40 during all times of year but particularly during spring and summer months.


Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | 2014

The Sensitivity of Springtime Arctic Mixed-Phase Stratocumulus Clouds to Surface-Layer and Cloud-Top Inversion-Layer Moisture Sources

Amy Solomon; Matthew D. Shupe; Ola Persson; Hugh Morrison; Takanobu Yamaguchi; Peter Caldwell; Gijs de Boer

AbstractIn this study, a series of idealized large-eddy simulations is used to understand the relative impact of cloud-top and subcloud-layer sources of moisture on the microphysical–radiative–dynamical feedbacks in an Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus (AMPS) cloud system. This study focuses on a case derived from observations of a persistent single-layer AMPS cloud deck on 8 April 2008 during the Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign near Barrow, Alaska. Moisture and moist static energy budgets are used to examine the potential impact of ice in mixed-phase clouds, specific humidity inversions coincident with temperature inversions as a source of moisture for the cloud system, and the presence of cloud liquid water above the mixed-layer top. This study demonstrates that AMPS have remarkable insensitivity to changes in moisture source. When the overlying air is dried initially, radiative cooling and turbulent entrainment increase moisture import from the surface layer. When the surface layer is dried in...


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2016

International Arctic Systems for Observing the Atmosphere: An International Polar Year Legacy Consortium

Taneil Uttal; Sandra Starkweather; James R. Drummond; Timo Vihma; Alexander Makshtas; Lisa S. Darby; J. F. Burkhart; Christopher J. Cox; Lauren Schmeisser; Thomas Haiden; Marion Maturilli; Matthew D. Shupe; Gijs de Boer; Auromeet Saha; Andrey A. Grachev; Sara M. Crepinsek; Lori Bruhwiler; Barry Goodison; Bruce McArthur; Von P. Walden; E. J. Dlugokencky; P. Ola G. Persson; Glen Lesins; Tuomas Laurila; John A. Ogren; Robert S. Stone; Charles N. Long; Sangeeta Sharma; Andreas Massling; David D. Turner

AbstractInternational Arctic Systems for Observing the Atmosphere (IASOA) activities and partnerships were initiated as a part of the 2007–09 International Polar Year (IPY) and are expected to continue for many decades as a legacy program. The IASOA focus is on coordinating intensive measurements of the Arctic atmosphere collected in the United States, Canada, Russia, Norway, Finland, and Greenland to create synthesis science that leads to an understanding of why and not just how the Arctic atmosphere is evolving. The IASOA premise is that there are limitations with Arctic modeling and satellite observations that can only be addressed with boots-on-the-ground, in situ observations and that the potential of combining individual station and network measurements into an integrated observing system is tremendous. The IASOA vision is that by further integrating with other network observing programs focusing on hydrology, glaciology, oceanography, terrestrial, and biological systems it will be possible to under...


Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | 2017

Atmospheric Ice Particle Shape Estimates from Polarimetric Radar Measurements and In Situ Observations

Sergey Y. Matrosov; Carl Schmitt; Maximilian Maahn; Gijs de Boer

AbstractA remote sensing approach to retrieve the degree of nonsphericity of ice hydrometeors using scanning polarimetric Ka-band radar measurements from a U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program cloud radar operated in an alternate transmission–simultaneous reception mode is introduced. Nonsphericity is characterized by aspect ratios representing the ratios of particle minor-to-major dimensions. The approach is based on the use of a circular depolarization ratio (CDR) proxy reconstructed from differential reflectivity ZDR and copolar correlation coefficient ρhυ linear polarization measurements. Essentially combining information contained in ZDR and ρhυ, CDR-based retrievals of aspect ratios are fairly insensitive to hydrometeor orientation if measurements are performed at elevation angles of around 40°–50°. The suggested approach is applied to data collected using the third ARM Mobile Facility (AMF3), deployed to Oliktok Point, Alaska. Aspect ratio retrievals were also p...


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2017

Advancing Science and Services during the 2015-16 El Niño: The NOAA El Niño Rapid Response Field Campaign

Randall M. Dole; J. Ryan Spackman; Matthew Newman; Gilbert P. Compo; Catherine A. Smith; Leslie M. Hartten; Joseph J. Barsugli; Robert S. Webb; Martin P. Hoerling; Robert Cifelli; Klaus Wolter; Christopher D. Barnet; Maria Gehne; Ronald Gelaro; George N. Kiladis; Scott Abbott; John Albers; John M. Brown; Christopher J. Cox; Lisa S. Darby; Gijs de Boer; Barbara DeLuisi; Juliana Dias; Jason Dunion; Jon Eischeid; Christopher W. Fairall; Antonia Gambacorta; Brian K. Gorton; Andrew Hoell; Janet M. Intrieri

AbstractForecasts by mid-2015 for a strong El Nino during winter 2015/16 presented an exceptional scientific opportunity to accelerate advances in understanding and predictions of an extreme climat...


Monthly Weather Review | 2016

Understanding Rapid Changes in Phase Partitioning between Cloud Liquid and Ice in Stratiform Mixed-Phase Clouds: An Arctic Case Study

Heike Kalesse; Gijs de Boer; Amy Solomon; Mariko Oue; Maike Ahlgrimm; Damao Zhang; Matthew D. Shupe; Edward Luke; Alain Protat

AbstractUnderstanding phase transitions in mixed-phase clouds is of great importance because the hydrometeor phase controls the lifetime and radiative effects of clouds. In high latitudes, these cloud radiative effects have a crucial impact on the surface energy budget and thus on the evolution of the ice cover. For a springtime low-level mixed-phase stratiform cloud case from Barrow, Alaska, a unique combination of instruments and retrieval methods is combined with multiple modeling perspectives to determine key processes that control cloud phase partitioning. The interplay of local cloud-scale versus large-scale processes is considered. Rapid changes in phase partitioning were found to be caused by several main factors. Major influences were the large-scale advection of different air masses with different aerosol concentrations and humidity content, cloud-scale processes such as a change in the thermodynamical coupling state, and local-scale dynamics influencing the residence time of ice particles. Othe...


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018

Observed aerosol suppression of cloud ice in low-level Arctic mixed-phase clouds

Matthew S. Norgren; Gijs de Boer; Matthew D. Shupe

The interactions that occur between aerosols and a mixed-phase cloud system, and the subsequent alteration of the microphysical state of such clouds, is a problem that has yet to be well constrained. Advancing our understanding of aerosol-ice processes is necessary to determine the impact of natural and anthropogenic emissions on Earth’s climate and to improve our capability to predict future climate states. This paper deals 10 specifically with how aerosols influence ice mass production in low-level Arctic mixed-phase clouds. In this study, a 9-year record of aerosol, cloud and atmospheric state properties is used to quantify aerosol influence on ice production in mixed-phase clouds. It is found that mixed-phase clouds present in a clean aerosol state have higher ice water content by a factor of 1.22 to 1.63 at cloud base than do similar clouds in cases with higher aerosol loading. We additionally analyze radar-derived mean Doppler velocities to better understand the drivers 15 behind this relationship, and conclude that aerosol induced reduction of the ice crystal nucleation rate, together with decreased riming rates in polluted clouds, are likely influences on the observed reductions in IWC.

Collaboration


Dive into the Gijs de Boer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hugh Morrison

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edwin W. Eloranta

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jerry Y. Harrington

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander Avramov

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew S. Ackerman

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ann M. Fridlind

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maximilian Maahn

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yali Luo

Langley Research Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge