Gilles Peytavin

Maraviroc plus raltegravir failed to maintain virological suppression in HIV-infected patients with lipohypertrophy: results from the ROCnRAL ANRS 157 study

BACKGROUND Novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor- and protease inhibitor-sparing strategies are needed in long-term-treated patients with lipohypertrophy. Given their potency and their excellent metabolic profile, maraviroc and raltegravir appear to be good candidates for such an approach. METHODS This single-arm study enrolled lipohypertrophic HIV-infected patients with suppressed viraemia and an R5 tropic virus in HIV DNA; they switched from suppressive antiretroviral treatment to maraviroc plus raltegravir. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with treatment success at week 24, defined as no virological failure or treatment discontinuation. To ensure a success rate of at least 80%, a maximum of 10 failures were allowed for 90 patients enrolled. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01420523. RESULTS A total of 44 patients were enrolled; their median age was 55 years, median nadir CD4 cell count was 210 cells/mm(3), median time on antiretroviral treatment was 15 years and median duration of viral suppression was 5.2 years. Seven patients failed maraviroc/raltegravir therapy: five had virological failure and two discontinued treatment due to serious adverse events (one had hepatitis B virus reactivation and one had hypersensitivity syndrome). At failure, raltegravir resistance mutations were detected in 3/5 patients and CXCR4 tropic virus in 2/5. Upon DSMB recommendation, the study was prematurely discontinued on 3 September 2012. Lipid profile and bone mineral density improved with a decrease from baseline values in total cholesterol (-0.56 ± 0.95 mmol/L; P = 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.31 ± 0.81 mmol/L; P = 0.039) and triglycerides (-0.59 ± 1.12 mmol/L; P = 0.001) and an increase in total hip bone mineral density (+0.9 ± 1.5%; P = 0.013) CONCLUSIONS: In long-term-experienced patients, maraviroc/raltegravir therapy lacks virological robustness despite a benefit in lipid profile and bone density.

Using Pharmacokinetic and Viral Kinetic Modeling To Estimate the Antiviral Effectiveness of Telaprevir, Boceprevir, and Pegylated Interferon during Triple Therapy in Treatment-Experienced Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Cirrhotic Patients

ABSTRACT Triple therapy combining a protease inhibitor (PI) (telaprevir or boceprevir), pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN), and ribavirin (RBV) has dramatically increased the chance of eradicating hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, the efficacy of this treatment remains suboptimal in cirrhotic treatment-experienced patients. Here, we aimed to better understand the origin of this impaired response by estimating the antiviral effectiveness of each drug. Fifteen HCV genotype 1-infected patients with compensated cirrhosis, who were nonresponders to prior PEG-IFN/RBV therapy, were enrolled in a nonrandomized study. HCV RNA and concentrations of PIs, PEG-IFN, and RBV were frequently assessed in the first 12 weeks of treatment and were analyzed using a pharmacokinetic/viral kinetic model. The two PIs achieved similar levels of molar concentrations (P = 0.5), but there was a significant difference in the 50% effective concentrations (EC50) (P = 0.008), leading to greater effectiveness for telaprevir than for boceprevir in blocking viral production (99.8% versus 99.0%, respectively, P = 0.002). In all patients, the antiviral effectiveness of PEG-IFN was modest (43.4%), and there was no significant contribution of RBV exposure to the total antiviral effectiveness. The second phase of viral decline, which is attributed to the loss rate of infected cells, was slow (0.19 day−1) and was higher in patients who subsequently eradicated HCV (P = 0.03). The two PIs achieved high levels of antiviral effectiveness. However, the suboptimal antiviral effectiveness of PEG-IFN/RBV and the low loss of infected cells suggest that a longer treatment duration might be needed in cirrhotic treatment-experienced patients and that a future IFN-free regimen may be particularly beneficial in these patients.

Transmitted drug resistance in French HIV-2-infected patients.

We report the first transmitted drug resistance survey study in HIV-2-infected patients living in France. The prevalence of transmitted drug resistance was 5.0% (95% confidence interval, 0.1–9.9) with mutations detected only in protease, not in reverse transcriptase. In this series, 10% of patients displayed X4/dual-mixed viruses. These findings classified the rate of transmitted drug resistance in the HIV-2 French Cohort as low prevalence.

Virological factors associated with outcome of dual maraviroc/raltegravir therapy (ANRS-157 trial)

OBJECTIVES ROCnRAL ANRS-157 was a single-arm study designed to evaluate a switch to a maraviroc (300 mg twice a day) plus raltegravir (400 mg twice a day) regimen in virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01420523). The aim of this work was to investigate the factors associated with virological failure (VF) (5/44 patients) or virological rebound defined as one viral load (VL) >50 copies/mL or VL >1 copy/mL. METHODS At baseline (BL), ultradeep sequencing (UDS) of DNA gp120 V3 and integrase regions and quantification of HIV DNA were performed in PBMCs. Tropism, VL, BL ultrasensitive HIV RNA VL, BL HIV DNA VL, subtype, age, ethnicity, transmission group, AIDS status, nadir CD4 and BL CD4 cell count, time since HIV diagnosis, duration of ART and suppressed viraemia, VL zenith, CD4/CD8 ratio and BL CD8 cell count were investigated as potential factors associated with virological rebound. RESULTS The proportion of patients with VL <1 copy/mL did not evolve over time. Among the 44 included patients, 3 had minority X4-tropic viruses determined by UDS at BL and one of them presented VF. Minority resistant variants in the integrase gene were detected at BL at two positions (E138 and G140) for three patients who did not have VF. Among all studied factors, none was associated with virological rebound. CONCLUSIONS Maraviroc plus raltegravir failed to maintain virological suppression in virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients. However, neither minority viral variants nor ultrasensitive viraemia was found to be a predictive factor of VF or virological rebound in this context.

Tenofovir plasma concentrations related to estimated glomerular filtration rate changes in first-line regimens in African HIV-infected patients: ANRS 12115 DAYANA substudy

OBJECTIVES An open-label randomized trial (DAYANA) was conducted in sub-Saharan settings to evaluate four different regimens containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate as first-line treatment for HIV infection. The objectives of the present substudy were to assess the relationship between trough concentrations of tenofovir in plasma collected after 24 h (C24) and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) calculated by the different formulae that are available. METHODS The criteria for eligibility were those of the DAYANA trial, recruiting naive patients. The four tenofovir regimens were: Group 1, tenofovir/emtricitabine/nevirapine; Group 2, tenofovir/lopinavir/ritonavir; Group 3, tenofovir/emtricitabine/zidovudine; and Group 4, tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz. The C24 of tenofovir was determined using LC-MS/MS. The eGFR was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formulae. RESULTS The median C24 of tenofovir was 42 ng/mL. The C24 of tenofovir was higher with lopinavir/ritonavir than with the other three regimens: at Week 4, 84 ng/mL versus 25 ng/mL; and at Week 48, 81 ng/mL versus 52 ng/mL. The baseline merged eGFR was 98.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) with the CKD-EPI equation. Only the mean changes in eGFR in Group 2 differed from the absolute value of zero (-8.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) with the CKD-EPI equation between baseline and Week 48. The Cockcroft-Gault formula is inappropriate for these African patients because it underestimated the baseline eGFR and overestimated the changes in eGFR between baseline and Week 48. CONCLUSIONS In this population of mostly female HIV-1-infected African patients, tenofovir plasma overexposure was associated with PI/ritonavir and a time-dependent decrease in eGFR, probably via an inhibition of MRP2/MRP4 efflux transporters. The close monitoring over time of the eGFR using MDRD or CKD-EPI calculations and by using other biomarkers of renal disorder should be proposed as an alternative to therapeutic drug monitoring in resource-limited countries.

Cenicriviroc, a Novel CCR5 (R5) and CCR2 Antagonist, Shows In Vitro Activity against R5 Tropic HIV-2 Clinical Isolates.

Background Maraviroc activity against HIV-2, a virus naturally resistant to different HIV-1 antiretroviral drugs, has been recently demonstrated. The aim of this study was to assess HIV-2 susceptibility to cenicriviroc, a novel, once-daily, dual CCR5 and CCR2 antagonist that has completed Phase 2b development in HIV-1 infection. Methods Cenicriviroc phenotypic activity has been tested using a PBMC phenotypic susceptibility assay against four R5-, one X4- and one dual-tropic HIV-2 clinical primary isolates. All isolates were obtained by co-cultivation of PHA-activated PBMC from distinct HIV-2-infected CCR5-antagonist-naïve patients included in the French HIV-2 cohort and were previously tested for maraviroc susceptibility using the same protocol. HIV-2 tropism was determined by phenotypic assay using Ghost(3) cell lines. Results Regarding the 4 R5 HIV-2 clinical isolates tested, effective concentration 50% EC50 for cenicriviroc were 0.03, 0.33, 0.45 and 0.98 nM, similar to those observed with maraviroc: 1.13, 0.58, 0.48 and 0.68 nM, respectively. Maximum percentages of inhibition (MPI) of cenicriviroc were 94, 94, 93 and 98%, similar to those observed with maraviroc (93, 90, 82, 100%, respectively). The dual- and X4-tropic HIV-2 strains were resistant to cenicriviroc with EC50 >1000 nM and MPI at 33% and 4%, respectively. Conclusions In this first study assessing HIV-2 susceptibility to cenicriviroc, we observed an in vitro activity against HIV-2 R5-tropic strains similar to that observed with maraviroc. Thus, cenicriviroc may offer a once-daily treatment opportunity in the limited therapeutic arsenal for HIV-2. Clinical studies are warranted.

Darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy at a low dose (600/100 mg/day) in HIV-1-infected individuals with suppressed HIV viraemia

Background Darunavir/ritonavir is a potent PI with a high genetic barrier and pharmacological robustness favourably investigated as monotherapy. Whether darunavir could be dose reduced in the context of monotherapy deserves investigation. Methods Patients with HIV suppressed viraemia (plasma viral load <50 copies/mL for 12 months) under ART who had switched to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy at 600/100 mg/day between 2013 and 2015 were included in this observational 48 week single-centre study. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with virological success (defined as plasma viral load <50 copies/mL) at week 24. Secondary outcomes included treatment strategy success and resistance. Results Thirty-one patients were included with the following baseline characteristics [median (IQR)]: age 52 years (47-57), CD4+ 649 cells/mm3 (463-813), ART duration 16.3 years (9.2-22.3), nadir CD4+ 195 cells/mm3 (144-261) and duration of HIV suppression 7.8 years (4.8-9.7). Prior to switch, ART consisted of PI monotherapy for 28 of 31 patients [darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg/day (n = 26), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 1) and atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 1)] and a triple drug regimen for 3 of 31 patients. Within the 48 weeks of follow-up, no virological failure occurred and two patients discontinued 600/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir due to side effects at week 16 and 40, leading to a virological suppression rate of 100% (95% CI = 89-100) at weeks 24 and 48. Strategy success rates were 96.8% (95% CI = 83.3-99.9) at week 24 and 93.5% (95% CI = 78.6-99.2) at week 48. Median (IQR) Ctrough values of 800/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir and 600/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir were 1537 ng/mL (1286-1724) and 1255 ng/mL (873-2161), respectively. Conclusions A lower dose of darunavir/ritonavir used as monotherapy (600/100 mg/day) was highly effective in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these data.

Use of PCR Signal and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in a Switch Cohort Study to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Rilpivirine: A W96 Follow-Up.

Objective To assess, in a clinical cohort, the efficacy of switching treatment in virologically-suppressed patients to tenofovir/emtricitabine/rilpivirine as a single-tablet regimen (STR) using the PCR signal of the viral load (VL) assay and plasma drug determination (C24h). Patients and methods An observational single-centre study enrolling patients with VL<50 copies/mL initiating rilpivirine-based STR. C24h and VL were performed until W48 and W96 of STR, respectively. PCRneg was defined as an undetected PCR signal. Medians (IQR) were presented. Results 116 patients were enrolled. At STR baseline, time since first antiretroviral therapy and time of virological suppression were 6 years (2–9) and 17 months (7–43), respectively. Before STR initiation, patients were receiving protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors-based regimen in 44% and 47% of cases, respectively. Historical genotype showed virus resistant to one drug of the STR in 6 patients (5%). At W96, 17 (15%) discontinued STR due to adverse events. The proportion of patients maintaining VL <50 copies/mL on treatment was 98%, 99%, 100%, 100%, 100% and 100% at W12, W24, W36, W48, W72 and W96, respectively. Among them, 70%, 66%, 68%, 59%, 74%, 68% and 60% were PCRneg at baseline, W12, W24, W36, W48, W72 and W96, respectively. Median rilpivirine C24h was 91 ng/mL (57–141, n = 285), with 91% of rilpivirine C24h >50 ng/mL, the target effective concentration. Conclusions In this clinical cohort of virologically-suppressed patients switching to a new STR, most subjects had adequate rilpivirine C24h and displayed a high level of virological suppression with no residual viremia until W96.

Switch as maintenance to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: week 48 results in a clinical cohort

Objectives To assess, in a clinical cohort, the efficacy of switching current ART in virologically suppressed patients to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate as a single-tablet regimen (STR) using the PCR signal of the plasma viral load (pVL) assay and determination of plasma drug concentration ( C 24 ). Patients and methods This was an observational single-centre study enrolling antiretroviral-treated patients with pVL <50 copies/mL initiating elvitegravir-based STR. PCRneg was defined as an undetected PCR signal. Results One hundred and fifty-one patients were enrolled. At STR baseline, the median time since first ART and time of virological suppression were 5 years (IQR 3-9) and 24 months (IQR 9-44), respectively. By week (W) 48, 26 (17%) of the patients had discontinued STR due to adverse events. The proportion of patients maintaining pVL <50 copies/mL on treatment was 98%, 96%, 93% and 97% at W12, W24, W36 and W48, respectively. Five patients (3.3%) experienced a virological failure and emergence of resistance was observed in two of them with the selection of M184V and N155H mutations. At baseline, W12, W24, W36 and W48, 70%, 57%, 72%, 61% and 74% of the patients with pVL <20 copies/mL had a PCRneg, respectively. The median elvitegravir plasma C 24 value was 648 ng/mL (IQR 348-989; n  =   237), with 84% of elvitegravir C 24 values >45 ng/mL, the protein-adjusted IC 95 . Conclusions In this clinical cohort of virologically suppressed patients switching to STR, most subjects had adequate elvitegravir C 24 values with a high proportion maintaining virological suppression with no residual viraemia until W48.