Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gina Colarelli O'Connor is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gina Colarelli O'Connor.


California Management Review | 2001

Opportunity Recognition and Breakthrough Innovation in Large Established Firms

Gina Colarelli O'Connor; Mark P. Rice

“Every day, I try to go out and grab lightning.” —Terry Fadem, Director, New Business Development, DuPont Corporation


Research-technology Management | 2005

Building a Radical Innovation Competency

Gina Colarelli O'Connor; Alan D. Ayers

OVERVIEW: As growth and profit alternatives continue to erode for many companies, the importance of radical innovation as a mechanism for organization rejuvenation is increasing. Some firms are building entire management systems to enable radical innovation over and over again. They are experimenting with different organizational structures that vary in terms of their relationship with R&D and in terms of how far down the commercialization path they oversee projects. To have a fully developed RI capability, firms find they must manage three sets of activities and ensure that the transitions between them are smooth. These are discovery, incubation, and accelerated growth of new businesses. In addition, firms with different cultures of innovation can all develop RI competencies. This article reports interim results of a three-year longitudinal study of 12 well known, large industrial firms with a declared strategic intent to develop a competency in radical innovation.


Journal of Marketing | 2012

Alliance Portfolio Resource Diversity and Firm Innovation

Anna Shaojie Cui; Gina Colarelli O'Connor

As interfirm collaboration plays an increasingly important role in firm innovation, many firms are engaged in multiple partnerships, forming portfolios of alliances. Research in marketing has predominantly focused on dyadic relationships without considering the important interdependencies among different alliances. This study takes a portfolio approach to examine the resource diversity of multiple alliance partners and its contribution to firm innovation. The authors argue that resource diversity in an alliance portfolio can only benefit innovation when resources and information are shared across alliances. They examine factors that may facilitate or inhibit information and resource sharing across alliances and thus influence the realization of any benefit of portfolio resource diversity. The model identifies various factors along three dimensions, including the composition of an alliance portfolio, alliance management, and the market environment, that moderate the relationship between alliance portfolio resource diversity and firm innovation. This study not only demonstrates the conditions for a firm to benefit from diverse partners but also highlights the importance of coordination among different alliances, suggesting a portfolio approach for alliance research.


decision support systems | 1997

Viewing the WEB as a marketplace: the case of small companies

Gina Colarelli O'Connor; Bob O'Keefe

Abstract Companies have rushed to set up presences on the World Wide Web. In most instances, they are advertising their products and services, and in some instances, are actually delivering them over the Internet. Many of these companies are small, and there is at least anecdotal evidence that small companies are at the forefront of commercial use of the Web. In this paper, we consider various perspectives for assessing the role and use of the Web. We argue that most small companies will view the Web as an electronic marketplace. We consider the attraction of the Web as a marketplace for small companies, and the key strategic drivers that are moving small companies to join the Web. We also suggest a number of inhibitors that will make the Web less attractive for small companies in the future. The result is a model that can be used to understand the position of small companies with respect to the Web. Despite the youth of this new medium, some marketing paradigms common to many entrants are emerging. We discuss these paradigms and give examples of their use. We briefly review some successful cases.


IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management | 2002

Commercializing discontinuous innovations: bridging the gap from discontinuous innovation project to operations

Mark Rice; Richard Leifer; Gina Colarelli O'Connor

Since 1995, a multidisciplinary team of researchers has deployed case study methodology to follow the progress of 12 discontinuous innovation projects in ten large RD (2) assembling a transition team; (3) establishing an oversight board; (4) developing a transition plan; (5) providing transition funding from corporate sources; (6) laying the groundwork for a big market; and (7) engaging senior management champions.


Research-technology Management | 2002

Assessing Transition Readiness for Radical Innovation

Gina Colarelli O'Connor; Richard Hendricks; Mark P. Rice

OVERVIEW: Radical innovation is fraught with risk due to the high levels of uncertainty in creating new technologies and new markets. Add to this the challenge of managing in the context of the large corporate enterprise, replete with its bureaucratic processes and necessary focus on continuous improvement, and it is obvious why successful commercialization of radical innovations through large established companies does not happen more regularly. Having an assessment tool to help manage the transition from R&D project team to business-unit product development team can greatly enhance the probabilities of commercial success.


IEEE Engineering Management Review | 2008

Implementing a Learning Plan to Counter Project Uncertainty

Mark P. Rice; Gina Colarelli O'Connor; Ronald Pierantozzi

This publication contains reprint articles for which IEEE does not hold copyright. Full text is not available on IEEE Xplore for these articles.


Research-technology Management | 2007

Evaluating Radical Innovation Portfolios

Albert S. Paulson; Gina Colarelli O'Connor; Daniel Robeson

OVERVIEW: Radical innovation in large firms is a risky endeavor, exacerbated by high levels of uncertainty and long cycle times. Moreover, management lacks evaluation tools that are appropriate for the degree of ambiguity of the information available from these types of projects. Add to this the difficulties of managing in the context of the large firm where many processes are tuned toward repetition and continuous improvement, and it becomes clear that commercialization of radical innovation (RI) is a difficult proposition at best. Portfolio managers will almost invariably build a team, learn appropriate processes, clarify their mandate within the company, generate initial projects, and begin to enrich their portfolios, only to have their efforts cancelled out due to an unsatisfactory financial return. The “what have you done for me lately?” question plagues these groups, and ends up costing the company investment of resources in opportunities that are never leveraged. Having an evaluation tool to assess the relative values of projects within the context of the entire radical innovation portfolio, and to track changes in the relative value of the portfolio over time, can help RI portfolio managers articulate their contribution to the companys growth strategy and can aid in innovation strategy development.


Journal of Strategic Marketing | 1994

Differences in marketing strategies and operating efficiencies in surviving and failed organizations

Gina Colarelli O'Connor

This study explores differences in marketing strategies and operational tactics that characterize surviving and failing organizations. We examine firms that have existed for at least ten years, so ...


Rae-revista De Administracao De Empresas | 2002

A implementação de inovação radical em empresas maduras

Richard Leifer; Gina Colarelli O'Connor; Mark Rice

There is increasing evidence of the importance of radical or breakthrough innovation to long-term firm success in the competitive marketplace today. Although this recognition has permeated many established companies, there is uncertainty about how to accomplish such innovation. This article is based on a six-year longitudinal study of 12 radical-innovation projects in 10 large, mature companies. The life cycle of radical-innovation projects is unlike those of incremental projects, because of an abundance of uncertainties and discontinuities. These characteristics require that radical-innovation projects be managed quite differently from incremental ones. Seven key strategic imperatives are offered for successfully implementing radical innovation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Gina Colarelli O'Connor's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark P. Rice

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lois S. Peters

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Leifer

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Albert S. Paulson

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Robeson

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Byungchul Choi

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey F. Durgee

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. Ravichandran

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge