Ginette Bérubé

The mammalian Cut homeodomain protein functions as a cell-cycle-dependent transcriptional repressor which downmodulates p21WAF1/CIP1/SDI1 in S phase

Cut is a homeodomain transcription factor which has the unusual property of containing several DNA‐binding domains: three regions called Cut repeats and the Cut homeodomain. Genetic studies in Drosophila melanogaster indicate that cut plays important roles in the determination and maintenance of cell‐type specificity. In the present study, we show that mammalian Cut proteins may yet play another biological role, specifically in proliferating cells. We found that the binding of Cut to a consensus binding site varies during the cell cycle. Binding was virtually undetectable in G0 and early G1, but became very strong as cells reached S phase. This was shown to result both from an increase in Cut expression and dephosphorylation of the Cut homeodomain by the Cdc25A phosphatase. We also show that the increase in Cut activity coincides with a decrease in p21WAF1/CIP1/SDI1 mRNAs. In co‐transfection experiments, Cut proteins repressed p21WAF1/CIP1/SDI1 gene expression through binding to a sequence that overlaps the TATA box. Moreover, p21WAF1/CIP1/SDI1 expression was repressed equally well by either Cdc25A or Cut. Altogether, these results suggest a model by which Cdc25A activates the Cut repressor which then downregulates transcription of p21WAF1/CIP1/SDI1 in S phase. Thus, in addition to their role during cellular differentiation, Cut proteins also serve as cell‐cycle‐dependent transcriptional factors in proliferating cells.

The Human Cut Homeodomain Protein Can Repress Gene Expression by Two Distinct Mechanisms: Active Repression and Competition for Binding Site Occupancy

By analogy with other homeodomain proteins conserved in evolution, mammalian Cut proteins are believed, as in Drosophila melanogaster, to play an important role in determining cell type specificity in several tissues. At the molecular level, Cut proteins appear to serve as transcriptional repressors. In this study, we have examined the mechanism by which the human Cut (hCut) protein down-regulates gene expression. The homeodomain and the three regions called Cut repeats are evolutionarily conserved and were previously shown to function as DNA binding domains. The carboxy-terminal region, although it does not show amino acid sequence homology per se, in all cases is enriched in alanine and proline residues, a distinctive feature of some transcriptional repression domains. Our results reveal two distinct modes of repression: competition for binding site occupancy and active repression. On one hand, the composite DNA binding domain formed by Cut repeat 3 and the Cut homeodomain was shown to bind to CCAAT and Sp1 sites within the tk gene promoter and to reduce gene expression, presumably by preventing activation by the corresponding transcription factors. On the other hand, the carboxy-terminal region of mammalian Cut proteins was found to function as an active repression domain in a distance-independent manner. We have further narrowed this activity to two subdomains that can independently repress activated transcription. Finally, we present a model to illustrate the two mechanisms by which Cut proteins repress gene expression.

DNA-BINDING SPECIFICITY OF THE CUT REPEATS FROM THE HUMAN CUT-LIKE PROTEIN

The Drosophila Cut and mammalian Cut-like proteins contain, in addition to the homeodomain, three other DNA-binding regions called Cut repeats. Cut-like proteins, therefore, belong to a distinct class of homeodomain proteins with multiple DNA-binding domains. In this study, we assessed the DNA-binding specificity of the human Cut repeats by performing PCR-mediated random oligonucleotide selection with glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins. Cut repeat 1, Cut repeat 3, and Cut repeat 3 plus the homeodomain selected related yet distinct sequences. Therefore, sequences selected by one of the fusion proteins were often, but not always, recognized by the other proteins. Consensus binding sites were derived for each fusion protein. In each case, however, some selected sequences diverged from the consensus but were confirmed to be high-affinity recognition sites by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. We conclude that Cut DNA-binding domains have broad, overlapping DNA-binding specificities. Determination of dissociation constants indicated that in addition to the core consensus, flanking sequences have a moderate but significant effect on sequence recognition. Evidence from electrophoretic mobility shift assay, DNase footprinting, and dissociation constant analyses strongly suggested that glutathione S-transferase/Cut fusion proteins bind to DNA as dimers. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the DNA-binding capabilities of Cut repeats. In contrast to other studies, we found that the human Cut-like protein does not preferably bind to a site that includes an ATTA homeodomain-binding motif. Here we demonstrate that the native human Cut-like protein recognizes more efficiently a site containing an ATCGAT core consensus flanked with G/C-rich sequences.

S Phase-Specific Proteolytic Cleavage Is Required To Activate Stable DNA Binding by the CDP/Cut Homeodomain Protein

ABSTRACT The CCAAT displacement protein (CDP), the homologue of theDrosophila melanogaster Cut protein, contains four DNA binding domains that function in pairs. Cooperation between Cut repeat 3 and the Cut homeodomain allows stable DNA binding to the ATCGAT motif, an activity previously shown to be upregulated in S phase. Here we showed that the full-length CDP/Cut protein is incapable of stable DNA binding and that the ATCGAT binding activity present in cells involves a 110-kDa carboxy-terminal peptide of CDP/Cut. A vector expressing CDP/Cut with Myc and hemagglutinin epitope tags at either end generated N- and C-terminal products of 90 and 110 kDa, suggesting that proteolytic cleavage was involved. In vivo pulse/chase labeling experiments confirmed that the 110-kDa protein was derived from the full-length CDP/Cut protein. Proteolytic processing was weak or not detectable in G0 and G1 but increased in populations of cells enriched in S phase, and the appearance of the 110-kDa protein coincided with the increase in ATCGAT DNA binding. Interestingly, the amino-truncated and the full-length CDP/Cut isoforms exhibited different transcriptional properties in a reporter assay. We conclude that proteolytic processing of CDP/Cut at the G1/S transition generates a CDP/Cut isoform with distinct DNA binding and transcriptional activities. These findings, together with the cleavage of the Scc1 protein at mitosis, suggest that site-specific proteolysis may play an important role in the regulation of cell cycle progression.

CCAAT Displacement Activity Involves CUT Repeats 1 and 2, Not the CUT Homeodomain

The CCAAT displacement protein, the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster CUT protein, contains four DNA-binding domains: three CUT repeats (CR1, CR2, and CR3) and the CUT homeodomain (HD). Using a panel of fusion proteins, we found that a CUT repeat cannot bind to DNA as a monomer, but that certain combinations of domains exhibit high DNA-binding affinity: CR1+2, CR3HD, CR1HD, and CR2HD. One combination (CR1+2) exhibited strikingly different DNA-binding kinetics and specificities. CR1+2 displayed rapid on and off rates and bound preferably to two C(A/G)AT sites, organized as direct or inverted repeats. Accordingly, only CR1+2 was able to bind to the CCAAT sequence, and its affinity was increased by the presence of a C(A/G)AT site at close proximity. A purified CCAAT displacement protein/CUT protein exhibited DNA-binding properties similar to those of CR1+2; and in nuclear extracts, the CCAAT displacement activity also required the simultaneous presence of a C(A/G)AT site. Moreover, CR1+2, but not CR3HD, was able to displace nuclear factor Y. Thus, the CCAAT displacement activity requires the presence of an additional sequence (CAAT or CGAT) and involves CR1 and CR2, but not the CUT homeodomain.

CDP/Cux Stimulates Transcription from the DNA Polymerase α Gene Promoter

ABSTRACT CDP/Cux (CCAAT-displacement protein/cut homeobox) contains four DNA binding domains, namely, three Cut repeats (CR1, CR2, and CR3) and a Cut homeodomain. CCAAT-displacement activity involves rapid but transient interaction with DNA. More stable DNA binding activity is up-regulated at the G1/S transition and was previously shown to involve an N-terminally truncated isoform, CDP/Cux p110, that is generated by proteolytic processing. CDP/Cux has been previously characterized as a transcriptional repressor. However, here we show that expression of reporter plasmids containing promoter sequences from the human DNA polymerase α (pol α), CAD, and cyclin A genes is stimulated in cotransfections with N-terminally truncated CDP/Cux proteins but not with full-length CDP/Cux. Moreover, expression of the endogenous DNA pol α gene was stimulated following the infection of cells with a retrovirus expressing a truncated CDP/Cux protein. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays revealed that CDP/Cux was associated with the DNA pol α gene promoter specifically in the S phase. Using linker scanning analyses, in vitro DNA binding, and ChIP assays, we established a correlation between binding of CDP/Cux to the DNA pol α promoter and the stimulation of gene expression. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that stimulation of gene expression by CDP/Cux involved the repression of a repressor, our data support the notion that CDP/Cux participates in transcriptional activation. Notwithstanding its mechanism of action, these results establish CDP/Cux as an important transcriptional regulator in the S phase.

DNA Binding by Cut Homeodomain Proteins Is Down-modulated by Protein Kinase C

The Drosophila and mammalian Cut homeodomain proteins contain, in addition to the homeodomain, three other DNA binding regions called Cut repeats. Cut-related proteins thus belong to a distinct class of homeodomain proteins with multiple DNA binding domains. Using nuclear extracts from mammalian cells, Cut-specific DNA binding was increased following phosphatase treatment, suggesting that endogenous Cut proteins are phosphorylated in vivo. Sequence analysis of Cut repeats revealed the presence of sequences that match the consensus phosphorylation site for protein kinase C (PKC). Therefore, we investigated whether PKC can modulate the activity of mammalian Cut proteins. In vitro, a purified preparation of PKC efficiently phosphorylated Cut repeats, which inhibited DNA binding. In vivo, a brief treatment of cells with calphostin C, a specific inhibitor of PKC, led to an increase in Cut-specific DNA binding, whereas phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, a specific activator of PKC, caused a decrease in DNA binding. The PKC phosphorylation sites within the murine Cut (mCut) protein were identified by in vitro mutagenesis as residues Thr415, Thr804, and Ser987 within Cut repeats 1-3, respectively. Cut homeodomain proteins were previously shown to function as transcriptional repressors. Activation of PKC by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate reduced transcriptional repression by mCut, whereas a mutant mCut protein containing alanine substitutions at these sites was not affected. Altogether, our results indicate that the transcriptional activity of Cut proteins is modulated by PKC.

Genome-wide location analysis and expression studies reveal a role for p110 CUX1 in the activation of DNA replication genes.

Proteolytic processing of the CUX1 transcription factor generates an isoform, p110 that accelerates entry into S phase. To identify targets of p110 CUX1 that are involved in cell cycle progression, we performed genome-wide location analysis using a promoter microarray. Since there are no antibodies that specifically recognize p110, but not the full-length protein, we expressed physiological levels of a p110 isoform with two tags and purified chromatin by tandem affinity purification (ChAP). Conventional ChIP performed on synchronized populations of cells confirmed that p110 CUX1 is recruited to the promoter of cell cycle-related targets preferentially during S phase. Multiple approaches including silencing RNA (siRNA), transient infection with retroviral vectors, constitutive expression and reporter assays demonstrated that most cell cycle targets are activated whereas a few are repressed or not affected by p110 CUX1. Functional classes that were over-represented among targets included DNA replication initiation. Consistent with this finding, constitutive expression of p110 CUX1 led to a premature and more robust induction of replication genes during cell cycle progression, and stimulated the long-term replication of a plasmid bearing the oriP replicator of Epstein Barr virus (EBV).

Expression of N-terminally truncated isoforms of CDP/CUX is increased in human uterine leiomyomas.

Genetic analyses and mRNA expression studies have implicated CUTL1 as a candidate tumor‐suppressor gene in uterine leiomyomas and breast cancers. However, modulation of CDP/Cux, the protein encoded by CUTL1, does not agree with this notion. The activity of CDP/Cux, which is the DNA binding subunit of HiNF‐D, was upregulated as normal cells progressed into S phase and constitutively elevated in several tumor cell lines. Activation of CDP/Cux at the G1/S transition involved the proteolytic processing of the protein to generate a shorter isoform. Uterine leiomyomas represent a unique reagent for molecular analysis because they are resected as homogenous tumor tissue together with the adjacent normal myometrium and they are often very large. In the present study, proteins were isolated from 16 pairs of matched tumors and adjacent myometrium and analyzed by Western blot and electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Strikingly, in 11/16 tumors, the steady‐state level of small CDP/Cux isoforms was increased compared to normal control tissue. Where tested, a corresponding increase in CDP/Cux stable DNA binding activity was observed. DNA sequencing analysis of CUTL1 cDNAs from 6 leiomyomas, including 4 with LOH of CUTL1, did not reveal any gross rearrangement or point mutations. Altogether these findings suggest that CUTL1 is probably not the tumor suppressor on 7q22. Moreover, the frequent increase in smaller CDP/Cux isoforms indicates that molecular events associated with the truncation of CDP/Cux proteins may be selected in uterine leiomyomas.

The N-terminal Region of the CCAAT Displacement Protein (CDP)/Cux Transcription Factor Functions as an Autoinhibitory Domain that Modulates DNA Binding

The CCAAT displacement protein/Cut homeobox (CDP/Cux) transcription factor is expressed as multiple isoforms that may contain up to four DNA-binding domains: Cut repeats 1, 2, and 3 (CR1, CR2, CR3) and the Cut homeodomain (HD). The full-length protein, which contains all four DNA-binding domains, is surprisingly less efficient than the shorter isoforms in DNA binding. Using a panel of recombinant proteins expressed in mammalian or bacterial cells, we have identified a domain at the extreme N terminus of the protein that can inhibit DNA binding. This domain was able to inhibit the activity of full-length CDP/Cux and of proteins containing various combinations of DNA-binding domains: CR1CR2, CR3HD, or CR2CR3HD. Since inhibition of DNA binding was also observed with purified proteins obtained from bacteria, we conclude that autoinhibition does not require post-translational modification or interaction with an interacting protein but instead functions through an intramolecular mechanism. Antibodies directed against the N-terminal region were able to partially relieve inhibition. In vivo, the transition between the inactive and active states for DNA binding is likely to be governed by posttranslational modifications and/or interaction with one or more protein partners. In addition, we show that the relief of autoinhibition can be accomplished via the proteolytic processing of CDP/Cux. Altogether, these results reveal a novel mode of regulation that serves to modulate the DNA binding activity of CDP/Cux.