Giorgio Vallortigara

Advantages of having a lateralized brain

Brain lateralization is common among vertebrates. However, despite its implications for higher–order cognitive functions, almost no empirical evidence has been provided to show that it may confer any advantage to the functioning of the brain. Here, we show in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus domesticus) that cerebral lateralization is associated with an enhanced ability to perform two tasks simultaneously: finding food and being vigilant for predators. This finding suggests that cerebral lateralization enhances brain efficiency in cognitive tasks that demand the simultaneous but different use of both hemispheres.

Possible evolutionary origins of cognitive brain lateralization

Despite the substantial literature on the functional architecture of the asymmetries of the human brain, which has been accumulating for more than 130 years since Dax and Brocas early reports, the biological foundations of cerebral asymmetries are still poorly understood. Recent advances in comparative cognitive neurosciences have made available new animal models that have started to provide unexpected insights into the evolutionary origins and neuronal mechanisms of cerebral asymmetries. Animal model-systems, particularly those provided by the avian brain, highlight the interrelations of genetic, hormonal and environmental events to produce neural and behavioural asymmetries. Novel evidences showing that functional and structural lateralization of the brain is widespread among vertebrates (including fish, reptiles and amphibians) have accumulated rapidly. Perceptual asymmetries, in particular, seem to be ubiquitous in everyday behaviour of most species of animals with laterally placed eyes; in organisms with wider binocular overlap (e.g., amphibians), they appear to be retained for initial detection of stimuli in the extreme lateral fields. We speculate that adjustment of head position and eye movements may play a similar role in mammals with frontal vision as does the choice for right or left lateral visual fields in animals with laterally placed eyes. A first attempt to trace back the origins of brain asymmetry to early vertebrates is presented, based on the hypothesis that functional incompatibility between the logical demands associated with very basic cognitive functions is central to the phenomenon of cerebral lateralization.

Comparative neuropsychology of the dual brain: a stroll through animals' left and right perceptual worlds.

Perceptual asymmetries in humans typically manifest themselves under quite unnatural settings (e.g., tachistoscopic viewing and dichotic listening) and this has put into question their real biological significance. In animals with laterally placed eyes, however, perceptual asymmetries are ubiquitous in the normal, everyday behavior, as revealed by the differential use of the lateral visual field of the left and right eye in a variety of tasks. Data are presented showing how preferential use of the left and right eyes influences visual discrimination learning and detour behavior in chicks; similarities with detour tests performed in fish and evidence for asymmetries in eye use in animals with larger binocular overlap (e.g., anuran amphibians) are discussed. Implications of these perceptual asymmetries on the formation and fate of memory traces are put forward, with examples from unihemispheric sleep and lateralization of spatial memory in chicks. Finally, speculations about the evolutionary origins and possible adaptive advantages of perceptual asymmetries in vertebrates are presented.

The evolution of brain lateralization: a game-theoretical analysis of population structure.

In recent years, it has become apparent that behavioural and brain lateralization at the population level is the rule rather than the exception among vertebrates. The study of these phenomena has so far been the province of neurology and neuropsychology. Here, we show how such research can be integrated with evolutionary biology to understand lateralization more fully. In particular, we address the fact that, within a species, left– and right–type individuals often occur in proportions different from one–half (e.g. hand use in humans). The traditional explanations offered for lateralization of brain function (that it may avoid unnecessary duplication of neural circuitry and reduce interference between functions) cannot account for this fact, because increased individual efficiency is unrelated to the alignment of lateralization at the population level. A further puzzle is that such an alignment may even be disadvantageous, as it makes individual behaviour more predictable to other organisms. Here, we show that alignment of the direction of behavioural asymmetries in a population can arise as an evolutionarily stable strategy when individual asymmetrical organisms must coordinate their behaviour with that of other asymmetrical organisms. Brain and behavioural lateralization, as we know it in humans and other vertebrates, may have evolved under basically ‘social’ selection pressures.

Visually Inexperienced Chicks Exhibit Spontaneous Preference for Biological Motion Patterns

When only a small number of points of light attached to the torso and limbs of a moving organism are visible, the animation correctly conveys the animals activity. Here we report that newly hatched chicks, reared and hatched in darkness, at their first exposure to point-light animation sequences, exhibit a spontaneous preference to approach biological motion patterns. Intriguingly, this predisposition is not specific for the motion of a hen, but extends to the pattern of motion of other vertebrates, even to that of a potential predator such as a cat. The predisposition seems to reflect the existence of a mechanism in the brain aimed at orienting the young animal towards objects that move semi-rigidly (as vertebrate animals do), thus facilitating learning, i.e., through imprinting, about their more specific features of motion.

Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish

When disoriented in environments with distinctive geometry, such as a closed rectangular arena, human infants and adult rats reorient in accord with the large-scale shape of the environment, but not in accord with nongeometric properties such as the colour of a wall. Human adults, however, conjoined geometric and nongeometric information to reorient themselves, which has led to the suggestion that spatial processing tends to become more flexible over development and evolution. We here show that fish tested in the same tasks perform like human adults and surpass rats and human infants. These findings suggest that the ability to make use of geometry for spatial reorientation is an ancient evolutionary tract and that flexibility and accessibility to multiple sources of information to reorient in space is more a matter of ecological adaptations than phylogenetic distance from humans.

Lateralization of response by chicks to change in a model partner

When given a choice test male chicks, Gallus gallus domesticus L., using only their left eye chose to associate with the model with which they lived rather than moderate or large transformations of it. When choosing between a familiar model and a small transformation (45° rotation of a bar on the face of a spherical model) or between a cagemate and a strange chick (from the same batch as those with which the chick lived), left-eyed chicks chose the strange model or chick. Males using both eyes behaved like left-eyed males, suggesting that the right hemisphere here controls normal behaviour. Right-eyed males chose at random, except when transformations were large; they then chose the familiar model. Female chicks under all conditions chose the familiar model, but when given a choice between familiar and strange chicks righteyed females, like right-eyed males, failed to choose. Lateralization is thus not absent in females, but is sometimes masked. These findings and earlier evidence using very different stimuli suggest that the visual systems fed by the left eye are specialized to respond to small changes in any of a variety of stimulus properties.

Population lateralisation and social behaviour: A study with 16 species of fish

We investigated turning responses in 16 species of fish faced with a vertical-bar barrier through which a learned dummy predator was visible. Ten of these species showed a consistent lateral bias to turn preferentially to the right or to the left. Species belonging to the same family showed similar directions of lateral biases. We performed an independent test of shoaling tendency and found that all gregarious species showed population lateralisation, whereas only 40% of the nongregarious species did so. The results provide some support to the Rogers (1989) hypothesis that population lateralisation might have been developed in relation to the need to maintain coordination among individuals in behaviours associated with social life.

Modularity as a Fish (Xenotoca eiseni) Views It: Conjoining Geometric and Nongeometric Information for Spatial Reorientation

When disoriented in a closed rectangular tank, fish (Xenotoca eiseni) reoriented in accord with the large-scale shape of the environment, but they were also able to conjoin geometric information with nongeometric properties such as the color of a wall or the features provided by panels located at the corners of the tank. Fish encoded geometric information even when featural information sufficed to solve the spatial task. When tested after transformations that altered the original arrangement of the panels, fish were more affected by those transformations that modified the geometric relationship between the target and the shape of the environment. Finally, fish appeared unable to use nongeometric information provided by distant panels. These findings show that a reorientation mechanism based on geometry is widespread among vertebrates, though the joint use of geometric and nongeometric cues by fish suggest that the degree of information encapsulation of the mechanism varies considerably between species.

Left–right asymmetries of behaviour and nervous system in invertebrates

Evidence of left-right asymmetries in invertebrates has begun to emerge, suggesting that lateralization of the nervous system may be a feature of simpler brains as well as more complex ones. A variety of studies have revealed sensory and motor asymmetries in behaviour, as well as asymmetries in the nervous system, in invertebrates. Asymmetries in behaviour are apparent in olfaction (antennal asymmetries) and in vision (preferential use of the left or right visual hemifield during activities such as foraging or escape from predators) in animals as different as bees, fruitflies, cockroaches, octopuses, locusts, ants, spiders, crabs, snails, water bugs and cuttlefish. Asymmetries of the nervous system include lateralized position of specific brain structures (e.g., in fruitflies and snails) and of specific neurons (e.g., in nematodes). As in vertebrates, lateralization can occur both at the individual and at the population-level in invertebrates. Theoretical models have been developed supporting the hypothesis that the alignment of the direction of behavioural and brain asymmetries at the population-level could have arisen as a result of social selective pressures, when individually asymmetrical organisms had to coordinate with each other. The evidence reviewed suggests that lateralization at the population-level may be more likely to occur in social species among invertebrates, as well as vertebrates.