Marcello Bagnasco

Minimal persistent inflammation is present at mucosal level in patients with asymptomatic rhinitis and mite allergy

The natural exposure to house dust mites causes sensitization in genetically susceptible patients. Persistent exposure of sensitized patients causes chronic inflammation, and consequently, hyperreactivity, thus promoting the development of clinical features. Recently, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)/CD54 expression on epithelial cells triggered by allergen has been demonstrated and related to the inflammation caused by the allergic reaction. Therefore we evaluated the possible presence of inflammation (i.e., inflammatory cell infiltrate and ICAM-1/CD54 expression on epithelium) at conjunctival and nasal levels in patients with asymptomatic allergic rhinitis caused by mites, in their relatives living in the same environment, and in healthy volunteers. In addition, the possible relationship between inflammation and house dust mite allergen exposure was evaluated. Conjunctival and nasal scrapings of allergic subjects enrolled in the study showed many inflammatory cells. A mild ICAM-1/CD54 expression on conjunctival and nasal epithelium was detectable in allergic subjects, whereas relatives and healthy volunteers showed few inflammatory cells and no ICAM-1/CD54 expression on epithelial cells. A detectable level of house dust mite, sufficient to cause sensitization, was found in all houses. This study demonstrates a minimal persistent inflammation at conjunctival and nasal levels constantly detectable in patients without symptoms who are sensitized to mites and continuously exposed to the natural allergens.

Cetirizine reduces inflammatory cell recruitment and ICAM-1 (or CD54) expression on conjunctival epithelium in both early- and late-phase reactions after allergen-specific challenge ☆ ☆☆ ★ ★★

BACKGROUND Allergen-specific conjunctival challenge (ASCC) is a safe and reproducible experimental model of allergic conjunctivitis and a useful tool in the evaluation of effectiveness and possible mechanisms of action of drugs commonly used in the treatment of allergic diseases. OBJECTIVE The protective effect of cetirizine on inflammatory changes after ASCC was assessed in 12 patients with rhinoconjunctivitis caused by Parietaria judaica in a double-blind study. METHODS After a screening ASCC was performed, patients were randomized into two treatment groups; each patient was given cetirizine (oral tablets) 10 mg twice daily, or matching placebo for 3 1/2 days in off-pollen season. Clinical evaluation (itching, hyperemia, lacrimation, and swelling of eyelids) and cytologic assessment (number of inflammatory cells in conjunctival scraping and evaluation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)/CD54 expression on epithelial cells) were performed at baseline, 30 minutes (i.e., early-phase reaction [EPR]), 6 hours, and 24 hours (i.e., late-phase reaction [LPR]) after ASCC, before and after treatment. RESULTS The EPR clinical events and the EPR total number of inflammatory cells were significantly reduced by cetirizine compared with placebo. The LPR clinical events and inflammatory cell recruitment were reduced by cetirizine in a similar manner. Both eosinophil and neutrophil numbers were decreased by active drug in EPR and LPR. Furthermore, ICAM-1/CD54 expression was significantly reduced by cetirizine in both the EPR and LPR compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that cetirizine has a protective effect on clinical and cellular EPR and LPR events (including ICAM-1/CD54 expression on epithelium) induced by ASCC.

Absorption and distribution kinetics of the major Parietaria judaica allergen (Par j 1) administered by noninjectable routes in healthy human beings.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The clinical effectiveness of noninjectable routes for specific immunotherapy has been demonstrated in many studies, but no data are available on the kinetics of allergens administered by these routes. Therefore we studied the kinetics of the radiolabeled purified major Parietaria judaica allergen (Par j 1) after sublingual, oral, and intranasal administration to healthy human beings. METHODS After tracer administration (10 to 12.5 microg of Par j 1 labeled with iodine 123) to nonallergic volunteers, scintigraphic images were recorded at various times. Blood samples were also obtained at serial intervals to evaluate the absorption and distribution of radioactivity in plasma and to identify circulating radioactive species by molecular exclusion gel chromatography. RESULTS When the sublingual route was used, no circulating radioactivity was detected until the tracer was kept under the tongue. The labeled allergen was rapidly degraded and absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract after swallowing. Plasma radioactivity peaked at about 1.5 to 3 hours and was mostly represented by free radioiodine and small radiolabeled peptides. Some activity not caused by free 123I remained associated with the oral mucosa up to 18 to 20 hours after administration. When the oral route was used, the results were similar to those observed after swallowing the sublingually administered allergen but without any persistence of the tracer in the mouth. When the intranasal route was used, the pattern of plasma radioactivity mimicked that of the sublingual and oral routes, with absorption of activity from the radiolabeled allergen occurring in the gastrointestinal tract after transport to the pharynx by mucociliary clearance. A relevant fraction of the tracer was retained on the nasal mucosa up to 48 hours after administration. CONCLUSION The data in this study provide the first experimental basis for exploring the in vivo kinetics of allergen administered through noninjectable routes for specific immunotherapy in human beings.

Allergic subjects express intercellular adhesion molecule — 1 (ICAMA or CD54) on epithelial cells of conjunctiva after allergen challenge

BACKGROUND Allergic inflammation can be experimentally reproduced in vivo in humans, by means of the conjunctival provocation test with allergen. The allergen stimulation triggers an early clinical response and an almost simultaneous cellular infiltrate. Among the factors that can contribute to the local cellular recruitment, we postulate a possible early involvement of CD54 in the development of inflammation caused by the allergic reaction. METHODS We used a sensitive immunocytochemical immunoenzymatic alkaline phosphatase-monoclonal antialkaline phosphatase technique to detect the possible expression of CD54 molecule on epithelial cells of conjunctiva in 15 allergic subjects and in 15 healthy individuals in basal conditions and after allergen challenge (Parietaria judaica) during the off-pollen season. RESULTS At baseline all studied individuals did not evidence CD54 expression on epithelial cells; 30 minutes after allergen challenge, all the allergic individuals showed a marked expression of CD54 on conjunctival epithelium, whereas none of healthy subjects showed any CD54 expression. First, CD54 expression on conjunctival epithelium after specific provocation test appeared as a specific phenomenon occurring only in sensitized subjects; moreover, it is an immediate event concomitant with the local inflammatory infiltrate. Therefore conjunctival epithelium unexpectedly appeared to be more than a bystander in the allergic reaction; it may be perceived as an active participant interacting with the inflammatory infiltrate. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that CD54 may play a central role in the allergic inflammation and strongly support the concept that maneuvers designed to interact with the adhesion machinery expressed on inflammatory cells and epithelium may be a helpful therapeutic approach.

Topical azelastine reduces eosinophil activation and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression on nasal epithelial cells: An antiallergic activity

BACKGROUND It is well known that allergen-specific nasal challenge (ASNC) is a fruitful tool with which to evaluate antiallergic activity exerted by a drug. Azelastine is a new antihistamine also available in topical form (i.e., nasal spray). OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of azelastine nasal spray on inflammatory changes after ASNC in both the early-phase reaction and the late-phase reaction. METHODS The study had a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, and parallel-group design. Twenty patients with pollen allergy were enrolled out of pollen season. ASNC was performed at baseline (TO) and after 1 week of washout (T7). At T7, 10 patients sprayed azelastine (1 puff) into their nostrils, and 10 patients used placebo. ASNC was performed after 30 minutes. The considered parameters (evaluated during early- and late-phase reactions) were: (1) clinical signs and symptoms, (2) cytologic assessment (neutrophils and eosinophils), (3) assay-of mediators (eosinophil cationic protein and myeloperoxidase), and (4) expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) on nasal epithelial cells. We focused our attention on ICAM-1 because it is the natural ligand of leukocyte functional associated antigen-1 and Mac-1, expressed on eosinophils. In addition, ICAM-1 is expressed on epithelial cells only on allergen exposure (both natural and experimental). RESULTS Placebo did not exert any modification on the considered parameters. After azelastine administration, significant decreases in total symptom score, eosinophilic and neutrophilic infiltration, and ICAM-1 expression were observed during both early- and late-phase reactions. Furthermore, serum eosinophil cationic protein levels decreased during the late-phase reaction, whereas myeloperoxidase was not affected by the treatment. These findings were confirmed by the powerful Kochs split-plot statistical analysis. CONCLUSION Azelastine exerts antiallergic activity, mainly affecting eosinophil function and downregulating ICAM-1 expression, on nasal epithelial cells.

Pharmacokinetics of an allergen and a monomeric allergoid for oromucosal immunotherapy in allergic volunteers

Little is known about the pharmacokinetics of allergens for local immunotherapy. Thus, we studied the pharmacokinetics in allergic volunteers of a commercial allergenic vaccine in orosoluble tablets (LAIS®, Lofarma S.p.A).

ICAM-1 on epithelial cells in allergic subjects: a hallmark of allergic inflammation.

Allergen-specific challenge was first shown to induce ICAM-1 expression on epithelial cells (ECs) of conjunctiva in allergic patients. The data have also been confirmed in the nose. We then checked for the presence of ICAM-1 consequent to natural exposure to allergens. For both conjunctivitis and rhinitis due to pollen we confirmed, during the pollen season, the presence of ICAM-1 on ECs. We demonstrated the endogenous source of ICAM-1 by in situ hybridization both in vitro and in vivo. ICAM-1 could be an activation marker on ECs, or could, enhanced EC susceptibility to bind offending cells such as eosinophils (LFA-1+). ICAM-1 is also a receptor for the vast majority of rhinoviruses, which are known to provoke, mainly in children, asthma attacks. Since we found that mite allergens can induce ICAM-1 on ECs, even during clinical latency, allergy may be considered as a primary event leading to asthma (through rhinovirus infection) and non-specific hyperreactivity.

Adhesion molecules of allergic inflammation: recent insights into their functional roles

Canonica GW, Ciprandi G, Buscaglia S, Pesce G, Bagnasco M. Adhesion molecules of allergic inflammation: recent insights into their functional roles.

Terfenadine and fexofenadine reduce in vitro ICAM-1 expression on human continuous cell lines.

BACKGROUND Epithelial cells and fibroblasts play an important role in allergic inflammation. Modulation of surface expression of adhesion molecules on epithelial cells by antiallergic drugs has been shown by both in vivo and in vitro studies. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect exerted by terfenadine and fexofenadine on adhesion molecules expression (CD54/ICAM-1 and CD29) of a human continuously cultured conjunctival epithelial cell line (WK) and a fibroblast cell line (HEL). METHODS By means of flow cytometry analysis, we evaluated ICAM-1 and CD29 expression by WK and HEL epithelial cells in basal condition (at baseline) or after IFN gamma or TNF alpha stimulation in the presence or in the absence of terfenadine and fexofenadine. We also performed immunoenzymatic assays in order to evaluate soluble ICAM-1 released by WK cells and procollagen type I and III and IL6 released by HEL cells. RESULTS Terfenadine and fexofenadine significantly reduced ICAM-1 basal expression on WK cells at the concentration of 1 microg/mL and 50 microg/mL, respectively. In addition, both terfenadine and fexofenadine were able to decrease soluble ICAM-1 levels in IFN gamma-stimulated WK cells. On HEL fibroblasts, fexofenadine only was able to inhibit ICAM-1 upregulation induced by IFN gamma. Concerning the release of fibroblast products, we observed a dose-dependent decrease of spontaneous IL6 release only in the presence of fexofenadine. CONCLUSION This study shows that terfenadine and fexofenadine exert a biologic effect directly on epithelial cells and fibroblasts reducing ICAM-1 expression and partially reducing soluble ICAM-1 release.

Azelastine eye drops reduce and prevent allergic conjunctival reaction and exert anti‐allergic activity

Background Azelastine is a selective H1‐receptor antagonist, which has previously been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. We have recently demonstrated that nasal azelastine inhibits the clinical and intlammatory events following nasal allergen challenge. Particularly, we focused our attention on ICAM‐1 expression on epithelial cells, since it is the natural ligand of LFA‐1, an adhesion molecule expressed by leucocytes, including eosinophils.