Gj Ossenkoppele

CHOP Compared With CHOP Plus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Elderly Patients With Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

PURPOSE To investigate whether the relative dose-intensity of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy could be improved by prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged 65 to 90 years (median, 72 years) with stage II to IV aggressive NHL were randomly assigned to receive standard CHOP every 3 weeks or CHOP plus G-CSF every 3 weeks on days 2 to 11 of each cycle. RESULTS In 389 eligible patients, the relative dose intensities (RDIs) of cyclophosphamide (median, 96.3% v 93.9%; P =.01) and doxorubicin (median, 95.4% v 93.3%; P =.04) were higher in patients treated with CHOP plus G-CSF. The complete response rates were 55% and 52% for CHOP and CHOP plus G-CSF, respectively (P =.63). The actuarial overall survival at 5 years was 22% with CHOP alone, compared with 24% with CHOP plus G-CSF (P =.76), with a median follow-up of 33 months. Patients treated with CHOP plus G-CSF had an identical incidence of infections, with World Health Organization grade 3 to 4 (34 of 1,191 cycles v 36 of 1,195 cycles). Only the cumulative days with antibiotics were fewer with CHOP plus G-CSF (median, 0 v 6 days; P =.006) than with CHOP alone. The number of hospital admissions and the number of days in hospital were not different. CONCLUSION In elderly patients, G-CSF improved the RDI of CHOP, but this did not lead to a higher complete response rate or better overall survival. G-CSF did not prevent serious infections.

A randomized study of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor applied during and after chemotherapy in patients with poor risk myelodysplastic syndromes : a report from the HOVON Cooperative Group

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of filgrastim as an adjunct to induction and consolidation chemotherapy in poor risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Filgrastim was given both during and after chemotherapy with the objective to accelerate hematopoietic repopulation and enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy. In a prospective randomized multicentre phase II trial, a total of 64 patients with poor risk primary MDS were randomized to receive either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim, AMGEN, Breda, The Netherlands) 5 μg/kg/day subcutaneously or no G-CSF in addition to daunomycin (30 mg/m2/days 1, 2 and 3 intravenous bolus) and cytarabine (200 mg/m2 days 1–7, continuous infusion). The overall complete response rate was 63%: 73% for patients receiving filgrastim as compared to 52% in the standard arm (P = 0.08). Overall survival at 2 years was estimated at 29% for patients assigned to the filgrastim arm and 16% for control patients (P = 0.22). The median time for recovery of granulocytes towards 1.0 × 109/l post-chemotherapy was 23 days in the filgrastim-treated patients vs 35 days in the standard arm (P = 0.015). There were no differences in time of platelet recovery, length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic use or infectious complications between the two treatment groups. However the earlier recovery of neutrophils in the filgrastim group was associated with a reduced interval of 9 days between the induction and consolidation cycle. In patients with poor risk MDS the use of filgrastim during and after induction therapy results in a significantly reduced neutrophil recovery time. Further study may be warranted to see if the apparent trend of the improved response to chemotherapy in combination with filgrastim can be confirmed in greater number of patients and to assess the effect of the addition of filgrastim on survival.

Mobilisation of haemopoietic progenitors in CML: a second course of intensive chemotherapy does not improve Ph-negativity in stem cell harvests

We collected peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in 19 early chronic phase CML patients following each of two consecutive cycles of intensive chemotherapy (CT) to evaluate whether an additional cycle of CT would increase Philadelphia (Ph)-negativity of the PBSC harvest. Autologous SCT (autoSCT) was performed if a major cytogenetic response (MCR) of the PBSC harvest was obtained. CT consisted of cytarabine 200 mg/ m2/day (days 1–7)/idarubicin 12 mg/m2/day (days 1–2) (cycle one) and cytarabine 2000 mg/m2/day (days 1–6)/amsacrine 120 mg/m2/day (days 1–3) (cycle two). One patient died of fungal pneumonia after the first cycle. Stem cells were harvested in 18 patients after cycle one and in 16 patients after cycle two. After the first cycle, all patients showed a cytogenetic response of their graft (MCR in eight patients: three complete, five partial), after cycle two, seven patients obtained an MCR (one complete, six partial). Seven patients became eligible for autoSCT. All patients proceeded with IFNα maintenance. Currently, 16 patients are alive. At the latest cytogenetic examination of bone marrow, four patients showed an MCR and four a minor response. In conclusion, although a second cycle of CT may contribute to elimination of leukemia residing in the patient, it appeared to be ineffective in improving the Ph-negativity of the PBSC graft. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 1147–1155.