Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Glen Herriot is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Glen Herriot.


Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation | 2000

Progress on Altair: The Gemini North Adaptive Optics System

Glen Herriot; Simon L. Morris; Andre Anthony; Dennis Derdall; Dave Duncan; Jennifer Dunn; Angelic Ebbers; J. Murray Fletcher; Tim Hardy; Brian Leckie; A. Mirza; Christopher L. Morbey; M. Pfleger; Scott Roberts; Philip Shott; Malcolm Smith; Leslie Saddlemyer; Jerry Sebesta; Kei Szeto; Robert Wooff; W. Windels; Jean-Pierre Véran

The Gemini Adaptive Optics System, (Altair), under construction at the National Research Council of Canadas Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics is unique among AO systems. Altair is designed with its deformable mirror (DM) conjugate to high altitude. We summarize construction progress. We then describe Altair in more detail. Both the Wavefront sensor foreoptics and control system are unconventional, because the guide star footprint on an altitude-conjugated DM moves as the guide star position varies. During a typical nodding sequence, where the telescope moves 10 arcseconds between exposures, this footprint moves by half an actuator and/or WFS lenslet. The advantages of altitude conjugation include increased isoplanatic patch size, which improves sky coverage, and improved uniformity of the corrected field. Altitude conjugation also reduces focal anisoplanatism with laser beacons. Although the initial installation of Altair will use natural guide stars, it will be fully ready to use a laser guide star (LGS). The infrastructure of Gemini observatory provides a variety of wavefront sensors and nested control loops that together permit some unique design concepts for Altair.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2006

Focus errors from tracking sodium layer altitude variations with laser guide star adaptive optics for the Thirty Meter Telescope

Glen Herriot; Paul Hickson; Brent Ellerbroek; Jean-Pierre Véran; Chiao-Yao She; Richard Clare; Doug Looze

Laser guide star (LGS) adaptive optics systems for extremely large telescopes must handle an important effect that is negligible for current generation telescopes. Wavefront errors, due to improperly focusing laser wavefront sensors (WFS) on the mesospheric sodium layer, are proportional to the square of the telescope diameter. The sodium layer, whose mean altitude is approximately 90 km, can move vertically at rates of up to a few metres per second; a few seconds lag in refocusing can substantially degrade delivered image quality (15 m of defocus can cause 120 nm residual wavefront error on a 30-m telescope.) As well, the range of temporal frequencies of sodium altitude focus, overlaps the temporal frequencies of focus caused by atmospheric turbulence. Only natural star wavefront sensors can disentangle this degeneracy. However, applying corrections with representative focus mechanisms having modest control bandwidths causes appreciable tracking errors. In principle, electronic offsets measured by natural guide star detectors could be rapidly applied to laser WFS measurements, but to provide useable sky coverage, integrating sufficient photons causes an unavoidable time delay, again resulting in potentially serious focus tracking errors. However, our analysis depends on extrapolating to temporal frequencies greater than 1 Hz from power spectra of sodium profile time series taken at 1-2 minute intervals. In principle, with a pulsed laser, (e.g. 3-μs pulses) and dynamic refocusing on a polar-coordinate CCD, this focus tracking error may be eliminated. This result is an additional benefit of dynamic refocusing beyond the commonly recognized amelioration of LGS WFS spot elongation.


Optics Letters | 2006

Temporal variability of the telluric sodium layer

D. Saul Davis; Paul Hickson; Glen Herriot; Chiao-Yao She

The temporal variability of the telluric sodium layer is investigated by analyzing 28 nights of data obtained with the Colorado State University LIDAR experiment. The mean height power spectrum of the sodium layer was found to be well fitted by a power law over the observed range of frequencies, 10 microHz to 4 mHz. The best-fitting power law was found be be 10(beta)nu(alpha), with alpha=-1.79+/-0.02 and beta=1.12+/-0.40. Applications to wavefront sensing require knowledge of the behavior of the sodium layer at kilohertz frequencies. Direct measurements at these frequencies do not exist. Extrapolation from low-frequency behavior to high frequencies suggests that this variability may be a significant source of error for laser guide star adaptive optics in large-aperture telescopes.


Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation | 2003

MCAO for Gemini South

Brent Ellerbroek; Francois Rigaut; Brian J. Bauman; Corinne Boyer; Stephen L. Browne; Richard A. Buchroeder; James W. Catone; Paul Clark; Céline d'Orgeville; Donald T. Gavel; Glen Herriot; Mark Hunten; Eric James; Edward J. Kibblewhite; Iain T. McKinnie; James T. Murray; Didier Rabaud; Leslie Saddlemyer; Jacques Sebag; James Stillburn; John M. Telle; Jean-Pierre Véran

The multi-conjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) system design for the Gemini-South 8-meter telescope will provide near-diffraction-limited, highly uniform atmospheric turbulence compensation at near-infrared wavelengths over a 2 arc minute diameter field-of-view. The design includes three deformable mirrors optically conjugate to ranges of 0, 4.5, and 9.0 kilometers with 349, 468, and 208 actuators, five 10-Watt-class sodium laser guide stars (LGSs) projected from a laser launch telescope located behind the Gemini secondary mirror, five Shack-Hartmann LGS wavefront sensors of order 16 by 16, and three tip/tilt natural guide star (NGS) wavefront sensors to measure tip/tilt and tilt anisoplanatism wavefront errors. The WFS sampling rate is 800 Hz. This paper provides a brief overview of sample science applications and performance estimates for the Gemini South MCAO system, together with a summary of the performance requirements and/or design status of the principal subsystems. These include the adaptive optics module (AOM), the laser system (LS), the beam transfer optics (BTO) and laser launch telescope (LLT), the real time control (RTC) system, and the aircraft safety system (SALSA).


Journal of The Optical Society of America A-optics Image Science and Vision | 2000

Centroid gain compensation in Shack–Hartmann adaptive optics systems with natural or laser guide star

Jean-Pierre Véran; Glen Herriot

In an adaptive optics system with an undersampled Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor (WFS), variations in seeing, laser guide star quality, and sodium layer thickness and range distance all combine to vary WFS centroid gain across the pupil during an exposure. While using the minimum of 4 pixels per WFS subaperture improves frame rate and read noise, the WFS centroid gain uncertainty may introduce static aberrations and degrade servo loop phase margin. We present a novel method to estimate and compensate WFS gains of each subaperture individually in real time for both natural and laser guide stars.


Journal of The Optical Society of America A-optics Image Science and Vision | 2012

Advanced vibration suppression algorithms in adaptive optics systems.

Carlos Correia; Jean-Pierre Véran; Glen Herriot

Vibration suppression in astronomical adaptive optics (AO) systems has gathered great attention in the context of next-generation instrumentation for current telescopes and future Extremely Large Telescopes. Laser tomographic AO systems require natural guide stars to measure the low-order modes such as tip-tilt (TT) and TT-anisoplanatism. To increase the sky coverage, the guide stars are often faint, thus requiring lower temporal sampling frequencies to work on a more favorable signal-to-noise regime. Such sampling frequencies can be of the order of, or even lower than, the range of frequencies where vibrations are likely to appear. Ideally, vibrations affecting the low-order modes could be corrected at the higher laser loop frame rate using an upsampling procedure. This paper compares the most relevant solutions proposed hitherto to a novel multirate algorithm using the linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) approach capable of upsampling the correction to further reduce the impact of vibrations. Results from numerical Monte Carlo simulations span a large range of parameters from pure sinusoids to relatively broad peak vibrations, covering the likely-to-be signals in a realistic AO system. The improvement is shown at sampling frequencies from 20 to 800 Hz, including below the vibration itself, in the example of 29.5 Hz on a Thirty Meter Telescope-like scenario. The multirate LQG ensures the least residual for both faint and bright stars for all the peak widths considered based on telemetry from the Keck Observatory.


Optics Express | 2008

A laser guide star wavefront sensor bench demonstrator for TMT.

Olivier Lardière; Rodolphe Conan; Colin Bradley; Kate Jackson; Glen Herriot

Sodium laser guide stars (LGSs) allow, in theory, Adaptive Optics (AO) systems to reach a full sky coverage, but they have their own limitations. The artificial star is elongated due to the sodium layer thickness, and the temporal and spatial variability of the sodium atom density induces changing errors on wavefront measurements, especially with Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs) for which the LGS elongation is larger. In the framework of the Thirty-Meter-Telescope project (TMT), the AO-Lab of the University of Victoria (UVic) has built an LGS-simulator test bed in order to assess the performance of new centroiding algorithms for LGS Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors (SH-WFS). The design of the LGS-bench is presented, as well as laboratory SH-WFS images featuring 29x29 radially elongated spots, simulated for a 30-m pupil. The errors induced by the LGS variations, such as focus and spherical aberrations, are characterized and discussed. This bench is not limited to SH-WFS and can serve as an LGS-simulator test bed to any other LGS-AO projects for which sodium layer fluctuations are an issue.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2014

NFIRAOS: first facility AO system for the Thirty Meter Telescope

Glen Herriot; David Andersen; Jenny Atwood; Corinne Boyer; Peter W. G. Byrnes; Kris Caputa; Brent Ellerbroek; Luc Gilles; Alexis Hill; Zoran Ljusic; John Pazder; Matthias Rosensteiner; Malcolm Smith; Paolo Spano; Kei Szeto; Jean-Pierre Véran; Ivan Wevers; L. Wang; Robert Wooff

NFIRAOS, the Thirty Meter Telescope’s first adaptive optics system is an order 60x60 Multi-Conjugate AO system with two deformable mirrors. Although most observing will use 6 laser guide stars, it also has an NGS-only mode. Uniquely, NFIRAOS is cooled to -30 °C to reduce thermal background. NFIRAOS delivers a 2-arcminute beam to three client instruments, and relies on up to three IR WFSs in each instrument. We present recent work including: robust automated acquisition on these IR WFSs; trade-off studies for a common-size of deformable mirror; real-time computing architectures; simplified designs for high-order NGS-mode wavefront sensing; modest upgrade concepts for high-contrast imaging.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2004

Adaptive optics requirements definition for TMT

Richard G. Dekany; Matthew Britton; Donald Gavel; Brent Ellerbroek; Glen Herriot; Claire E. Max; Jean-Pierre Véran

The scientific return on adaptive optics on large telescopes has generated a new vocabulary of different adaptive optics (AO) modalities. Multiobject AO (MOAO), multiconjugate AO (MCAO), ground-layer AO (GLAO), and extreme contrast AO (ExAO) each require complex new extensions in functional requirements beyond the experience gained with systems operational on large telescopes today. Because of this potential for increased complexity, a more formal requirements development process is recommended. We describe a methodology for requirements definition under consideration and summarize the current scientific prioritization of TMT AO capabilities.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2008

Progress toward developing the TMT adaptive optical systems and their components

Brent Ellerbroek; Sean M. Adkins; David R. Andersen; Jenny Atwood; Corinne Boyer; Peter Byrnes; Rodolphe Conan; Luc Gilles; Glen Herriot; Paul Hickson; Ed Hileman; Dick Joyce; Brian Leckie; Ming Liang; Thomas Pfrommer; Jean-Christophe Sinquin; Jean-Pierre Véran; L. Wang; Paul Welle

Atmospheric turbulence compensation via adaptive optics (AO) will be essential for achieving most objectives of the TMT science case. The performance requirements for the initial implementation of the observatorys facility AO system include diffraction-limited performance in the near IR with 50 per cent sky coverage at the galactic pole. This capability will be achieved via an order 60x60 multi-conjugate AO system (NFIRAOS) with two deformable mirrors optically conjugate to ranges of 0 and 12 km, six high-order wavefront sensors observing laser guide stars in the mesospheric sodium layer, and up to three low-order, IR, natural guide star wavefront sensors located within each client instrument. The associated laser guide star facility (LGSF) will consist of 3 50W class, solid state, sum frequency lasers, conventional beam transport optics, and a launch telescope located behind the TMT secondary mirror. In this paper, we report on the progress made in designing, modeling, and validating these systems and their components over the last two years. This includes work on the overall layout and detailed opto-mechanical designs of NFIRAOS and the LGSF; reliable wavefront sensing methods for use with elongated and time-varying sodium laser guide stars; developing and validating a robust tip/tilt control architecture and its components; computationally efficient algorithms for very high order wavefront control; detailed AO system modeling and performance optimization incorporating all of these effects; and a range of supporting lab/field tests and component prototyping activities at TMT partners. Further details may be found in the additional papers on each of the above topics.

Collaboration


Dive into the Glen Herriot's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brent Ellerbroek

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Malcolm Smith

National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer Dunn

National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luc Gilles

Montana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Andersen

National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Pazder

National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge