Glenn S. Takimoto

Progesterone regulates transcription of the p21(WAF1) cyclin- dependent kinase inhibitor gene through Sp1 and CBP/p300.

Progesterone has biphasic effects on proliferation of breast cancer cells; it stimulates growth in the first cell cycle, then arrests cells at G1/S of the second cycle accompanied by up-regulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21. We now show that progesterone regulates transcription of the p21 promoter by an unusual mechanism. This promoter lacks a canonical progesterone response element. Instead, progesterone receptors (PRs) interact with the promoter through the transcription factor Sp1 at the third and fourth of six Sp1 binding sites located downstream of nucleotide 154. Mutation of Sp1 site 3 eliminates basal transcription, and mutation of sites 3 and 4 eliminates transcriptional up-regulation by progesterone. Progesterone-mediated transcription is further prevented by overexpression of E1A, suggesting that CBP/p300 is required. Indeed, in HeLa cells, Sp1 and CBP/p300 associate with stably integratedflag-tagged PRs in a multiprotein complex. Since many signals converge on p21, cross-talk between PRs and other factors co-localized on the p21 promoter, may explain how progesterone can be either proliferative or differentiative in different target cells.

An N-terminal Inhibitory Function, IF, Suppresses Transcription by the A-isoform but Not the B-isoform of Human Progesterone Receptors

The B-isoform of human progesterone receptors (PR) contains three activation functions (AF3, AF1, and AF2), two of which (AF1 and AF2) are shared with the A-isoform. AF3 is in the B-upstream segment (BUS), the far N-terminal 164 amino acids of B-receptors; AF1 is in the 392-amino acid N-terminal region common to both receptors; and AF2 is in the C-terminal hormone binding domain. B-receptors are usually stronger transactivators than A-receptors due to transcriptional synergism between AF3 and one of the two downstream AFs. We now show that the N terminus of PR common to both isoforms contains an inhibitory function (IF) located in a 292-amino acid segment lying upstream of AF1. IF represses the activity of A-receptors but is not inhibitory in the context of B-receptors due to constraints imparted by BUS. As a result, IF inhibits AF1 or AF2 but not AF3, regardless of the position of IF relative to BUS. IF is functionally independent and strongly represses transcription when it is fused upstream of estrogen receptors. These data demonstrate the existence of a novel, transferable inhibitory function, mapping to the PR N terminus, which begins to assign specific roles to this large undefined region.

Tamoxifen resistant breast cancer: coregulators determine the direction of transcription by antagonist-occupied steroid receptors☆

Pharmacological antagonists of steroid receptor action had been thought to exert their effects by a passive mechanism driven principally by the ability of the antagonist to compete with agonist for the ligand binding site. However, recent analyses of antagonist-occupied receptor function suggest a more complex picture. Antagonists can be subdivided into two groups, type I, or pure antagonists, and type II, or mixed antagonists that can have variable transcriptional activity based upon differential dimerization and DNA binding properties. This led us to propose that receptor antagonism may not simply be a passive competition for the ligand binding site, but may, in some cases, involve active recruitment of corepressor or coactivator proteins to produce a mixed transcriptional phenotype. We used a yeast two-hybrid screen to identify proteins that interact specifically with antagonist-occupied receptors. Two proteins have been characterized: L7/SPA, a ribosome-associated protein that is localized in both the cytoplasm and nucleus, but with no known extranucleolar nuclear function; and hN-CoR, the human homolog of the mouse thyroid receptor corepressor mN-CoR. In in vivo transcription assays we show that L7/SPA enhances the partial agonist activity of type II mixed antagonists, and that N-CoR and the related corepressor, SMRT, suppresses it. The coregulators do not affect agonists or pure antagonists. Moreover, the net agonist activity seen with mixed antagonists is a function of the ratio of coactivator to corepressor. Based upon these results, we proposed that in breast tumors the inappropriate agonist activity seen with therapeutic antagonists such as tamoxifen is responsible for the hormone-resistant state. To confirm this, we are quantitating coactivator/corepressor ratios in breast tumor cells lines and clinical breast cancers. Results should provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying the progression of breast cancer to hormone resistance, and may suggest strategies for delaying or reversing this process.

The N-terminal Region of the Human Progesterone A-receptor STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND THE INFLUENCE OF THE DNA BINDING DOMAIN

The role of the N-terminal region in nuclear receptor function was addressed by a biochemical and biophysical analysis of the progesterone receptor A-isoform lacking only the hormone binding domain (NT-A). Sedimentation studies demonstrate that NT-A is quantitatively monomeric, with a highly asymmetric shape. Contrary to dogma, the N-terminal region is structured as demonstrated by limited proteolysis. However, N-terminal structure is strongly stabilized by the DNA binding domain, possibly explaining the lack of structure seen in isolated activation domains. Upon DNA binding, NT-A undergoes N-terminal mediated assembly, suggestive of DNA-induced allostery, and consistent with changes in protease accessibility of sites outside the DNA binding domain. Microsequencing reveals that protease-accessible regions are limited to previously identified phosphorylation motifs and to functional domain boundaries.

The N-terminal Region of Human Progesterone B-receptors BIOPHYSICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL COMPARISON TO A-RECEPTORS

To understand the basis for functional differences between the two human progesterone receptors (PR), we have carried out a detailed biochemical and biophysical analysis of the N-terminal region of each isoform. Extending our previous work on the A-isoform (Bain, D. L, Franden, M. A., McManaman, J. L., Takimoto, G. S., and Horwitz, K. B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 7313–7320), here we present studies on the N-terminal region of the B-isoform (NT-B) and compare its properties to its A-receptor counterpart (NT-A). As seen previously with NT-A, NT-B is quantitatively monomeric in solution, yet undergoes N-terminal-mediated assembly upon DNA binding. Limited proteolysis, microsequencing, and sedimentation analyses indicate that the B-isoform exists in a non-globular, extended conformation very similar to that of NT-A. Additionally, the 164 amino acids unique to the B-isoform (BUS) appear to be in a more extended conformation relative to sequences common to both receptors and do not exist as an independent structural domain. However, sedimentation studies of NT-A and NT-B show differences in the ensemble distribution of their conformational states. We hypothesize that isoform-specific functional differences are not due to structural differences, per se. Rather, the transcriptional element BUS, or possibly other transcription factors, causes a redistribution of the conformational ensemble by stabilizing a more functionally active set of conformations in NT-B.

Role of Phosphorylation on DNA Binding and Transcriptional Functions of Human Progesterone Receptors

To study the function of human progesterone receptor (hPR) phosphorylation, we have tested four sets of serine to alanine substitution mutants: 10 serine clusters, located in regions common to both hPR isoforms (the M-series mutants) were mutated in A-receptors and B-receptors; 6 serine clusters located in the B-upstream segment (BUS; the B-series mutants) were mutated individually and collectively and cloned into B-receptors and into BUS-DBD-NLS, a constitutive transactivator, in which the AF3 function of BUS is fused to the DNA binding domain (DBD) and nuclear localization signal (NLS) of hPR. Transcription by most of the M-series mutants resembles that of wild-type A- or B-receptors. Mutation of 3 sites, Ser190 at the N terminus of A-receptors, a cluster of serines just upstream of the DBD, or Ser676 in the hinge region, inhibits transcription by 20-50% depending on cell or promoter context. These sites lie outside the AF1 activation function. M-series mutants are substrates for a hormone-dependent phosphorylation step, and they all bind well to DNA. Progressive mutation of the B-series clusters leads to the gradual dephosphorylation of BUS, but only the 6-site mutant, involving 10 serine residues, is completely dephosphorylated. These data suggest that in BUS alternate serines are phosphorylated or dephosphorylated at any time. However, even when BUS is completely dephosphorylated, both BUS-DBD-NLS and full-length B-receptors remain strong transactivators. Mutant B-receptors also do not acquire the dominant negative properties of A-receptors, and they retain the ability to activate transcription in synergy with 8-Br-cAMP and antiprogestins. We conclude that phosphorylation has subtle effects on the complex transcriptional repertoire that distinguishes the two hPR isoforms and does not influence transactivation mediated by AF1 or AF3, but subserves other functions.

Functional properties of the N-terminal region of progesterone receptors and their mechanistic relationship to structure ☆

Progesterone receptors (PR) are present in two isoforms, PR-A and PR-B. The B-upstream segment (BUS) of PR-B is a 164 amino acid N-terminal extension that is missing in PR-A and is responsible for the functional differences reported between the two isoforms. BUS contains an activation function (AF3) which is defined by a core domain between residues 54-154 whose activity is dependent upon a single Trp residue and two LXXLL motifs. We have also identified sites both within and outside of BUS that repress the strong synergism between AF3 and AF1 in the N-terminal region and AF2 in the hormone binding domain. One of these repressor sites is a consensus binding motif for the small ubiquitin-like modifier protein, SUMO-1 (387IKEE). The DNA binding domain (DBD) structure is also important for function. When BUS is linked to the glucocorticoid receptor DBD, AF3 activity is substantially attenuated, suggesting that binding to a DNA response element results in allosteric communication between the DBD and N-terminal functional regions. Lastly, biochemical and biophysical analyses of highly purified PR-B and PR-A N-terminal regions reveal that they are unstructured unless the DBD is present. Thus, the DBD stabilizes N-terminal structure. We propose a model in which the DBD through DNA binding, and BUS through protein-protein interactions, stabilize active receptor conformers within an ensemble distribution of active and inactive conformational states. This would explain why PR-B are stronger transactivators than PR-A.

Progesterone receptor variants found in breast cells repress transcription by wild-type receptors.

Progesterone, through its nuclear receptors (PR), regulates the development and growth of breast cancers. PR also serve as markers of hormone dependence and prognosis in patients with this disease, and functional PR are required to mediate the antiproliferative effects of progestin therapies. We find that normal and malignant breast cells and tissues can express anomalous forms of PR transcripts. We have isolated four variant PR mRNAs that contain precise deletions of exons encoding sections of the DNA- and hormone-binding domains. The transcripts lack exon 2 (PRΔ2), exon 4 (PRΔ4), exon 6 (PRΔ6), or exons 5 and 6 (PRΔ5,6). On immunoblots, PRΔ4, Δ6, and Δ5, 6 cloned into the background of the PR A-isoform comigrate with similar proteins present in breast tumor extracts; Δ6 and Δ5, 6 are dominant-negative transcriptional inhibitors of wild-type A- and B-receptors. We propose that expression of variant PR can compromise the accuracy of receptor measurements as markers of hormone-dependent cancers, and can modify the responses of tumors to progestin therapies.

Direct binding of progesterone receptor to nonconsensus DNA sequences represses rat GnRH

The mechanisms by which steroid receptors repress gene expression are not well understood. In this report, we show that progesterone receptor (PR), in the presence of progesterone (P) directly represses rat gonadotropin releasing hormone (rGnRH) gene transcription. Deletion analysis studies using transient transfection assays in GT1-7 neuronal cells mapped the effects of P to sequences in the proximal rGnRH promoter between -171 and -73. This DNA sequence lacks any consensus steroid response element binding sites. Cotransfection of a mutant progesterone receptor that lacks a functional DNA binding region (hPRcys) abolished repression of the rGnRH promoter by P. Gel mobility shift assays confirmed that PR directly binds to the DNA fragments -171/-126, -126/-73, and -111/-73, which encompass the negative progesterone response element (nPRE) of the rGnRH promoter. Mutagenesis of the rGnRH nPRE -171/-126 DNA fragment resulted in a loss of PR binding. Thus, direct DNA binding of PR to nonconsensus elements in the proximal rGnRH promoter inhibits rGnRH gene expression.

The leucine zippers of c-fos and c-jun for progesterone receptor dimerization : a-dominance in the A/B heterodimer

Human progesterone receptors (hPR) exist as two isoforms: 120 kDa B-receptors (hPRB) and N-terminally truncated 94 kDa A-receptors (hPRA). When transfected separately, each isoform exhibits different transcriptional properties that are ligand- and promoter-specific. In human target tissues, both receptor isoforms are present, so that a mixture of three dimeric species, A/A, A/B, and B/B, bind to DNA at progesterone response elements (PRE), and regulate transcription. To study the transcriptional phenotype of pure A/B heterodimers uncontaminated by A/A or B/B homodimers, we exploited the property of the leucine zipper (zip) domains of fos and jun, to form pure heterodimers. Chimeric constructs were made linking the zip of either c-fos or c-jun to the C-terminus of hPRB or hPRA (hPR-zip) to produce A-fos, B-fos, A-jun or B-jun. To determine whether the A- or B-isoform is functionally dominant in the A/B heterodimer, cells expressing hPR-zip chimeras were treated with the progestin antagonist RU486, which produces opposite transcriptional effects with the two isoforms. Gel mobility shift and immune co-precipitation assays show that in the presence of RU486 only pure heterodimers form between A-fos/B-jun or A-jun/B-fos, and bind DNA at PREs. Thus, in these pairs, interactions between the extrinsic fos/jun zipper domains override interactions between the intrinsic hPR dimerization domains. We find that under these conditions, antagonist-occupied B-zip homodimers stimulate transcription, while antagonist-occupied A-zip homodimers are inhibitory, and that pure A/B zip heterodimers have the inhibitory transcriptional phenotype of the A-zip homodimers. We conclude that, in pure heterodimers, A-receptors are dominant negative inhibitors of B-receptors. Additionally, the pure PR-zip heterodimers, unlike wild-type receptors, bind a PRE in the absence of hormone but do not activate transcription. Thus, PR dimerization and PRE binding are necessary but, without hormone, not sufficient to activate transcription.