Glenys A. Hamilton

Changes in health status and quality of life and the impact of uncertainty in patients who survive life-threatening arrhythmias

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe the changes in perception of health status and quality of life from before treatment to 6 months after and the impact of uncertainty on these variables in survivors of life-threatening arrhythmia. DESIGN AND SETTING A descriptive correlational design at a large urban teaching hospital. MEASURES We measured health status, quality of life, and uncertainty before treatment and 6 months after a life-threatening arrhythmia. RESULTS Survivors included 66 men and 15 women, 41 of whom received pharmacologic therapy and 36 of whom received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), completed the Medical Outcomes Survey (SF-36), Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index (QLI), and the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale (MUIS-C) before treatment and 6 months after. There were significant improvements in the mental and physical health composite summaries as measured by the SF36 (P <.01). Conversely, there were significant reductions in the overall score and specifically in socioeconomic and psychological/spiritual quality of life domains as measured by the QLI (P <.05). An increased perception of uncertainty was related to decreased perception of health status and quality of life at both measurement times, with higher correlations 6 months later. CONCLUSIONS Survivors demonstrated improvements in perceived health status, although this did not appear to translate into improvements in the subjective domains of quality of life. The overall quality of life and the domains of psychological/spiritual state and socioeconomic status were lower 6 months after a life-threatening arrhythmia. Uncertainty had a significant impact on these perceptions, identifying an area for nursing interventions.

The value of collaborative governance/staff empowerment.

Objective Collaborative governance is the decision-making process that places the authority, responsibility, and accountability for patient care with the practicing clinician. Background Collaborative governance was introduced as one of nine structures within the patient care services’ professional practice model to facilitate communication and optimize staff participation in decision-making across disciplines. The concept of empowerment was used to evaluate the impact of the collaborative governance structure on members. Methods The purpose of the current study was to compare empowerment and power scores for both members and nonmembers of collaborative governance over a 3-year period. Results Initial survey data (baseline) from 136 staff from across disciplines was returned prior to beginning work on a committee. Study results were based on survey returns from 657 staff over a 3.5-year period. There were no significant differences between collaborative governance members and nonmembers on some demographic variables such as age, but there were significant differences on variables such as work status and education. All empowerment scores were significantly higher at the 2nd and 3rd measurement periods for collaborative governance members as compared to nonmembers. Conclusions Findings suggest that membership on a collaborative governance committee increased staff sense of empowerment and fostered self-growth and organizational development.

Life situation related to the ICD implantation; self-reported uncertainty and satisfaction in Swedish and US samples.

The aim of the study was to describe changes in the life situation related to the ICD implantation of Swedish and US samples with regard to uncertainty and satisfaction. The life situation was measured by reference to the uncertainty caused by the condition and satisfaction with the life situation. Inferential statistics were used to analyse changes within and between the Swedish and US samples. Uncertainty showed a statistically significant difference between the Swedish and US samples before as well as after the ICD implantation. A higher level of uncertainty was indicated for the US sample prior to the ICD implantation and for the Swedish sample following the implantation. In the Swedish sample, satisfaction with life showed a statistically significant difference within the socio-economic domain, indicating a higher degree of satisfaction 3 months after implantation. Satisfaction within the domains of health and functioning, socio-economics and psychological-spiritual showed a statistically significant difference between the Swedish and US samples both before and after ICD implantation, indicating a higher degree of satisfaction in the US sample. The previous study shows that the ICD-patients life situation is changed after the implantation and that it is necessary to provide the patient with information and education based on their own preconditions. The fact that US sample was investigated at a later stage after ICD implantation than the Swedish sample may have influenced the results of the study.

Barriers to ESC guideline implementation: results of a survey from the European Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (CCNAP)

Background: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has a comprehensive clinical guideline development programme, relevant for all clinicians. However, implementation of guidelines is not always optimal. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine nurses’ and allied professionals’ awareness and barriers regarding clinical guideline implementation. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administrated online and in print at EuroHeartCare 2015. A questionnaire was developed which examined awareness and barriers to implementation of ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (2012) and ESC guidelines in general. Results: Of the 298 respondents, 12% reported that the prevention guidelines were used in their practice area. Respondents identified, in order of magnitude, that lack of leadership, workload, time, resources and a perception that they were unable to influence current practice were barriers to the use of the prevention guidelines. When asked to rank barriers to use of any ESC guidelines, time (22%) and leadership (23%) were ranked highest. Conclusions: Implementation of ESC guidelines by nurses, the majority responders in this survey, is a serious problem, requiring urgent improvement to ensure patients receive optimal evidence based care. Issues of leadership, workload, time and resources are significant barriers to guideline implementation. It is of concern that these professionals perceive both that they have little influence on implementation decisions and lack of leadership regarding guideline implementation. Educational and organisational strategies to improve leadership skills are imperative. These will build self-efficacy and empower nurses and allied professionals to advocate for evidence-based care in the clinical environment.