Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Goran B. Klintmalm is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Goran B. Klintmalm.


Transplantation | 2001

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) using calcineurin-based immunotherapy: risk of development and treatment.

Thomas A. Gonwa; Martin L. Mai; Larry Melton; Steven R. Hays; Robert M. Goldstein; Marlon F. Levy; Goran B. Klintmalm

BACKGROUND The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus are both known to be nephrotoxic. Their use in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) has dramatically improved success rates. Recently, however, we have had an increase of patients who are presenting after OLTX with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This retrospective study examines the incidence and treatment of ESRD and chronic renal failure (CRF) in OLTX patients. METHODS Patients receiving an OLTX only from June 1985 through December of 1994 who survived 6 months postoperatively were studied (n=834). Our prospectively collected database was the source of information. Patients were divided into three groups: Controls, no CRF or ESRD, n=748; CRF, sustained serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dl, n=41; and ESRD, n=45. Groups were compared for preoperative laboratory variables, diagnosis, postoperative variables, survival, type of ESRD therapy, and survival from onset of ESRD. RESULTS At 13 years after OLTX, the incidence of severe renal dysfunction was 18.1% (CRF 8.6% and ESRD 9.5%). Compared with control patients, CRF and ESRD patients had higher preoperative serum creatinine levels, a greater percentage of patients with hepatorenal syndrome, higher percentage requirement for dialysis in the first 3 months postoperatively, and a higher 1-year serum creatinine. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis using preoperative and postoperative variables identified that an increase of serum creatinine compared with average at 1 year, 3 months, and 4 weeks postoperatively were independent risk factors for the development of CRF or ESRD with odds ratios of 2.6, 2.2, and 1.6, respectively. Overall survival from the time of OLTX was not significantly different among groups, but by year 13, the survival of the patients who had ESRD was only 28.2% compared with 54.6% in the control group. Patients developing ESRD had a 6-year survival after onset of ESRD of 27% for the patients receiving hemodialysis versus 71.4% for the patients developing ESRD who subsequently received kidney transplants. CONCLUSIONS Patients who are more than 10 years post-OLTX have CRF and ESRD at a high rate. The development of ESRD decreases survival, particularly in those patients treated with dialysis only. Patients who develop ESRD have a higher preoperative and 1-year serum creatinine and are more likely to have hepatorenal syndrome. However, an increase of serum creatinine at various times postoperatively is more predictive of the development of CRF or ESRD. New strategies for long-term immunosuppression may be needed to decrease this complication.


Immunity | 2008

A Modular Analysis Framework for Blood Genomics Studies: Application to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Damien Chaussabel; Charles Quinn; Jing Shen; Pinakeen Patel; Casey Glaser; Nicole Baldwin; Dorothee Stichweh; Derek Blankenship; Lei Li; Indira Munagala; Lynda Bennett; Florence Allantaz; Asuncion Mejias; Monica I. Ardura; Ellen Kaizer; Laurence Monnet; Windy Allman; Henry B. Randall; Diane Johnson; Aimee Lanier; Marilynn Punaro; Knut M. Wittkowski; Perrin C. White; Joseph W. Fay; Goran B. Klintmalm; Octavio Ramilo; A. Karolina Palucka; Jacques Banchereau; Virginia Pascual

The analysis of patient blood transcriptional profiles offers a means to investigate the immunological mechanisms relevant to human diseases on a genome-wide scale. In addition, such studies provide a basis for the discovery of clinically relevant biomarker signatures. We designed a strategy for microarray analysis that is based on the identification of transcriptional modules formed by genes coordinately expressed in multiple disease data sets. Mapping changes in gene expression at the module level generated disease-specific transcriptional fingerprints that provide a stable framework for the visualization and functional interpretation of microarray data. These transcriptional modules were used as a basis for the selection of biomarkers and the development of a multivariate transcriptional indicator of disease progression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Thus, this work describes the implementation and application of a methodology designed to support systems-scale analysis of the human immune system in translational research settings.


Transplantation | 1995

Impact of pretransplant renal function on survival after liver transplantation.

Thomas A. Gonwa; Goran B. Klintmalm; Marlon F. Levy; Linda S. Jennings; Robert M. Goldstein; Bo S. Husberg

To determine the effect of pretransplant liver function on survival following orthotopic liver transplantation and to quantify the effects of cyclosporine administration on long-term renal function in patients undergoing liver transplant, we performed an analysis of a prospectively maintained database. Data from 569 consecutive patients undergoing liver transplantation alone who were treated with CsA for immunosuppression were used for this study. Actuarial graft and patient survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Glomerular filtration rates, serum creatinine, and the use of various immunosuppressives were analyzed for this study. The initial analysis demonstrated that patients presenting for liver transplant with hepatorenal syndrome have a significantly decreased actuarial patient survival after liver transplant at 5 years compared with patients without hepatorenal syndrome (60% vs. 68%, P <0.03). Patients with hepatorenal syndrome recovered their renal function after liver transplant. Patients who had hepatorenal syndrome were sicker and required longer stays in the intensive care unit, longer hospitalizations, and more dialysis treatments after transplantation compared with patients who did not have hepatorenal syndrome. The incidence of end-stage renal disease after liver transplantation in patients who had hepatorenal syndrome was 7%, compared with 2% in patients who did not have hepatorenal syndrome. To more fully examine the effect of pretransplant renal function on post-transplant survival, the non-hepatorenal syndrome patients were divided into quartiles depending upon their pretransplant renal function. The patients with the lowest pretransplant renal function had the same survival as the patients with the highest pretransplant renal function. In addition, there was no increased incidence of acute or chronic rejection in any of the groups. The patients with the lower pretransplant renal function were treated with more azathioprine to maintain renal function and had a negligible decrease in glomerular filtration rate following transplant. Conversely, patients with the highest level of renal function pretransplant had a 40% decline in renal function in the first year, but maintained stable renal function up to 4 years after transplant. We conclude that pretransplant renal function other than hepatorenal syndrome has no effect on patient survival after orthotopic liver transplant. Renal function after liver transplant is stable after an initial decline, despite continued administration of CsA. Use of a CsA-sparing protocol utilizing high doses of azathioprine and lower doses of CsA can maintain renal function in those patients who present with poor renal function before transplantation.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1981

Liver Transplantation with Use of Cyclosporin a and Prednisone

Thomas E. Starzl; Goran B. Klintmalm; Kendrick A. Porter; Shunzaburo Iwatsuki; Gerhard P. J. Schröter

THE difficulties in consistently prolonging survival after orthotopic liver transplantation have been documented by us1 and by Calne.2 In this report we describe a new trial of orthotopic liver tra...


Transplantation | 2006

Combination of voriconazole and caspofungin as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis in solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective, multicenter, observational study.

Nina Singh; Ajit P. Limaye; Graeme N. Forrest; Nasia Safdar; Patricia Muñoz; Kenneth Pursell; Sally Houston; Fernando Rosso; Jose G. Montoya; Pamela R. Patton; Ramon Del Busto; José María Aguado; Robert A. Fisher; Goran B. Klintmalm; Rachel Miller; Marilyn M. Wagener; Russell E. Lewis; Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis; Shahid Husain

Background. The efficacy of the combination of voriconazole and caspofungin when used as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis in organ transplant recipients has not been defined. Methods. Transplant recipients who received voriconazole and caspofungin (n=40) as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis (proven or probable) in a prospective multicenter study between 2003 and 2005 were compared to a control group comprising a cohort of consecutive transplant recipients between 1999 and 2002 who had received a lipid formulation of AmB as primary therapy (n=47). In vitro antifungal testing of Aspergillus isolates to combination therapy was correlated with clinical outcome. Results. Survival at 90 days was 67.5% (27/40) in the cases, and 51% (24/47) in the control group (HR 0.58, 95% CI, 0.30–1.14, P=0.117). However, in transplant recipients with renal failure (adjusted HR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.12–0.85, P=0.022), and in those with A. fumigatus infection (adjusted HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16–0.84, P=0.019), combination therapy was independently associated with an improved 90-day survival in multivariate analysis. No correlation was found between in vitro antifungal interactions of the Aspergillus isolates to the combination of voriconazole and caspofungin and clinical outcome. Conclusions. Combination of voriconazole and caspofungin might be considered preferable therapy for subsets of organ transplant recipients with invasive aspergillosis, such as those with renal failure or A. fumigatus infection.


Liver Transplantation | 2004

Estimation of glomerular filtration rates before and after orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluation of current equations.

Thomas A. Gonwa; Linda W. Jennings; Martin L. Mai; Paul Stark; Andrew S. Levey; Goran B. Klintmalm

The ability to estimate rather than measure the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients before and after liver transplantation would be helpful in estimating risk, dosing drugs, and assessing long‐term toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors. Currently available equations for estimating the GFR have not been validated in either the pre‐ or post‐liver transplant population. We have evaluated the performance of currently used formulas for the estimation of the GFR in this setting. Data were collected prospectively on patients who underwent liver transplantation between 1984 and 2001. GFR per 1.73 m2 was measured by I125 iothalamate in patients at the pretransplant evaluation and at 3 months, 1 year, and yearly posttransplant thereafter. GFR estimated by the Cockcroft‐Gault equation, the Nankivell equation, and the equations from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study (6, 5, and 4 variables) was compared with the measured GFR. Pretransplant GFR was available in 1,447 patients. The mean GFR was 90.7 ± 40.5 mL/min. Values for r and r2 were highest for the MDRD Study 6‐variable equation (0.70 and 0.49, respectively). Only 66% of estimates were within 30% of the measured GFR. At 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years posttransplant, the mean GFR was 59.5 ± 27.1 mL/min, 62.7 ± 27.8 mL/min, and 55.3 ± 26.1 mL/min, respectively. Values for r and r2 for the MDRD Study 6‐variable equations at 1 and 5 years posttransplant were 0.74 (0.55) and 0.76 (0.58), respectively. At these time points, however, only 67% and 64% of the estimated GFR were within 30% of the measured GFR. MDRD Study equations had greater precision than other equations, but the precision was lower than reported for MDRD estimation of GFR in other populations. Better methods for estimating the GFR are required for evaluation of renal function before and after liver transplantation. (Liver Transpl 2004;10:301–309.)


Transplantation | 1991

Long-term survival and renal function following liver transplantation in patients with and without hepatorenal syndrome--experience in 300 patients.

Thomas A. Gonwa; Christine A. Morris; Robert M. Goldstein; Bo S. Husberg; Goran B. Klintmalm

We have retrospectively reviewed the first 308 patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) at our institution to determine the following: 1) To what extent does renal function deteriorate postoperatively? 2) To what extent does renal function recover after OLTX for hepatorenal syndrome (HRS)? 3) What is the survival rate of patients with HRS compared with those without HRS? In non-HRS patients, GFR declined from 97.1 +/- 2.9 cc/min to 56.6 +/- 2.4 cc/min at 6 weeks postoperative, 62.6 +/- 2.6 cc/min at 1 year, and 58.3 +/- 3.5 cc/min at 2 years. In HRS patients, GFR increased from 19.9 +/- 3.6 cc/min to 32.5 +/- 3.1 cc/min at 6 weeks, 45.9 +/- 5.5 cc/min at 1 year, and 37.9 +/- 5.9 cc/min at 2 years. Dosages of cyclosporine were comparable in both groups. There was no difference in perioperative (90-day) mortality. One- and 2-year actuarial survival rates in the non-HRS patients were 87.2% and 82.1%, respectively. The actuarial 1- and 2-year survival rate for the HRS patients was 76.6% (P = NS). Ten percent of HRS patients developed ESRD posttransplant compared with 0.8% of non-HRS patients (P less than 0.005). We conclude that patients with HRS can safely undergo OLTX with acceptable perioperative mortality and good long-term survival. Most HRS patients have return of acceptable renal function. Patients without HRS have a severe decline in GFR posttransplant, which is stable up to 3 years posttransplant.


Clinical Transplantation | 2007

Calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens in solid organ transplantation: focus on improving renal function and nephrotoxicity.

Stuart M. Flechner; J. Kobashigawa; Goran B. Klintmalm

Abstract:  Background:  The calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), cyclosporine and tacrolimus, have had a revolutionary effect on the overall success of renal transplantation through reduction in early immunologic injury and acute rejection rates. However, the CNIs have a significant adverse impact on renal function and cardiovascular disease, and extended long‐term graft survival has not been achieved. The recognition of these effects sparked interest in CNI‐sparing strategies. Strategies to limit CNI exposure include CNI minimization, avoidance, and withdrawal. We sought to review the impact of CNI‐sparing strategies in kidney, liver, and heart transplantation.


Transplantation | 1990

The influence of preservation injury on rejection in the hepatic transplant recipient

Todd K. Howard; Goran B. Klintmalm; Joseph B. Cofer; Bo S. Husberg; Robert M. Goldstein; Thomas A. Gonwa

The records of 215 liver transplant recipients were reviewed and the degree of preservation injury was estimated by the initial aminotransferase levels. This was compared with the incidence of rejection found in the subsequent 30 days. Those with aspartate aminotransferase greater than 2000 U/L were classified as having severe preservation injury while those with ASAT less than 600 U/L were considered to have had minimal preservation injury. There were no significant differences between these groups in recipient age, sex, cold ischemia time, preoperative physical status, panel-reactive antibodies, or cytotoxic crossmatch. The solution used for organ preservation and the donor age were the only factors that were found to be significantly different between the groups. Older donors were more common in the severe preservation injury group. Severe preservation injury was found more frequently in grafts preserved in Eurocollins solution and the group with minimal preservation injury more frequently used Wisconsin solution. There was significantly more rejection seen in the severe preservation injury group (71%) than in the group without preservation injury (33%). Although there was more rejection in the severe preservation injury group, the rejections were not more severe as judged by the need for multiple courses of therapy or the need for OKT3. Recurrent rejection was also not more frequent in either group. Graft survival was worse in the severe preservation injury group, with a significant increase in early graft loss, but no difference in the frequency of chronic rejection. Recovery of graft function was also delayed in the preservation injury group.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2009

ASTS recommended practice guidelines for controlled donation after cardiac death organ procurement and transplantation

David J. Reich; David C. Mulligan; Peter L. Abt; Timothy L. Pruett; Michael Abecassis; Anthony M. D'Alessandro; Elizabeth A. Pomfret; Richard B. Freeman; James F. Markmann; Douglas W. Hanto; Arthur J. Matas; John P. Roberts; Robert M. Merion; Goran B. Klintmalm

The American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) champions efforts to increase organ donation. Controlled donation after cardiac death (DCD) offers the family and the patient with a hopeless prognosis the option to donate when brain death criteria will not be met. Although DCD is increasing, this endeavor is still in the midst of development. DCD protocols, recovery techniques and organ acceptance criteria vary among organ procurement organizations and transplant centers. Growing enthusiasm for DCD has been tempered by the decreased yield of transplantable organs and less favorable posttransplant outcomes compared with donation after brain death. Logistics and ethics relevant to DCD engender discussion and debate among lay and medical communities. Regulatory oversight of the mandate to increase DCD and a recent lawsuit involving professional behavior during an attempted DCD have fueled scrutiny of this activity. Within this setting, the ASTS Council sought best‐practice guidelines for controlled DCD organ donation and transplantation. The proposed guidelines are evidence based when possible. They cover many aspects of DCD kidney, liver and pancreas transplantation, including donor characteristics, consent, withdrawal of ventilatory support, operative technique, ischemia times, machine perfusion, recipient considerations and biliary issues. DCD organ transplantation involves unique challenges that these recommendations seek to address.

Collaboration


Dive into the Goran B. Klintmalm's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert M. Goldstein

Baylor University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marlon F. Levy

Baylor University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas A. Gonwa

Baylor University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Linda W. Jennings

Baylor University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bo S. Husberg

Baylor University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edmund Q. Sanchez

Baylor University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicholas Onaca

Baylor University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge