Bo S. Husberg

Impact of pretransplant renal function on survival after liver transplantation.

To determine the effect of pretransplant liver function on survival following orthotopic liver transplantation and to quantify the effects of cyclosporine administration on long-term renal function in patients undergoing liver transplant, we performed an analysis of a prospectively maintained database. Data from 569 consecutive patients undergoing liver transplantation alone who were treated with CsA for immunosuppression were used for this study. Actuarial graft and patient survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Glomerular filtration rates, serum creatinine, and the use of various immunosuppressives were analyzed for this study. The initial analysis demonstrated that patients presenting for liver transplant with hepatorenal syndrome have a significantly decreased actuarial patient survival after liver transplant at 5 years compared with patients without hepatorenal syndrome (60% vs. 68%, P <0.03). Patients with hepatorenal syndrome recovered their renal function after liver transplant. Patients who had hepatorenal syndrome were sicker and required longer stays in the intensive care unit, longer hospitalizations, and more dialysis treatments after transplantation compared with patients who did not have hepatorenal syndrome. The incidence of end-stage renal disease after liver transplantation in patients who had hepatorenal syndrome was 7%, compared with 2% in patients who did not have hepatorenal syndrome. To more fully examine the effect of pretransplant renal function on post-transplant survival, the non-hepatorenal syndrome patients were divided into quartiles depending upon their pretransplant renal function. The patients with the lowest pretransplant renal function had the same survival as the patients with the highest pretransplant renal function. In addition, there was no increased incidence of acute or chronic rejection in any of the groups. The patients with the lower pretransplant renal function were treated with more azathioprine to maintain renal function and had a negligible decrease in glomerular filtration rate following transplant. Conversely, patients with the highest level of renal function pretransplant had a 40% decline in renal function in the first year, but maintained stable renal function up to 4 years after transplant. We conclude that pretransplant renal function other than hepatorenal syndrome has no effect on patient survival after orthotopic liver transplant. Renal function after liver transplant is stable after an initial decline, despite continued administration of CsA. Use of a CsA-sparing protocol utilizing high doses of azathioprine and lower doses of CsA can maintain renal function in those patients who present with poor renal function before transplantation.

Long-term survival and renal function following liver transplantation in patients with and without hepatorenal syndrome--experience in 300 patients.

We have retrospectively reviewed the first 308 patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) at our institution to determine the following: 1) To what extent does renal function deteriorate postoperatively? 2) To what extent does renal function recover after OLTX for hepatorenal syndrome (HRS)? 3) What is the survival rate of patients with HRS compared with those without HRS? In non-HRS patients, GFR declined from 97.1 +/- 2.9 cc/min to 56.6 +/- 2.4 cc/min at 6 weeks postoperative, 62.6 +/- 2.6 cc/min at 1 year, and 58.3 +/- 3.5 cc/min at 2 years. In HRS patients, GFR increased from 19.9 +/- 3.6 cc/min to 32.5 +/- 3.1 cc/min at 6 weeks, 45.9 +/- 5.5 cc/min at 1 year, and 37.9 +/- 5.9 cc/min at 2 years. Dosages of cyclosporine were comparable in both groups. There was no difference in perioperative (90-day) mortality. One- and 2-year actuarial survival rates in the non-HRS patients were 87.2% and 82.1%, respectively. The actuarial 1- and 2-year survival rate for the HRS patients was 76.6% (P = NS). Ten percent of HRS patients developed ESRD posttransplant compared with 0.8% of non-HRS patients (P less than 0.005). We conclude that patients with HRS can safely undergo OLTX with acceptable perioperative mortality and good long-term survival. Most HRS patients have return of acceptable renal function. Patients without HRS have a severe decline in GFR posttransplant, which is stable up to 3 years posttransplant.

The influence of preservation injury on rejection in the hepatic transplant recipient

The records of 215 liver transplant recipients were reviewed and the degree of preservation injury was estimated by the initial aminotransferase levels. This was compared with the incidence of rejection found in the subsequent 30 days. Those with aspartate aminotransferase greater than 2000 U/L were classified as having severe preservation injury while those with ASAT less than 600 U/L were considered to have had minimal preservation injury. There were no significant differences between these groups in recipient age, sex, cold ischemia time, preoperative physical status, panel-reactive antibodies, or cytotoxic crossmatch. The solution used for organ preservation and the donor age were the only factors that were found to be significantly different between the groups. Older donors were more common in the severe preservation injury group. Severe preservation injury was found more frequently in grafts preserved in Eurocollins solution and the group with minimal preservation injury more frequently used Wisconsin solution. There was significantly more rejection seen in the severe preservation injury group (71%) than in the group without preservation injury (33%). Although there was more rejection in the severe preservation injury group, the rejections were not more severe as judged by the need for multiple courses of therapy or the need for OKT3. Recurrent rejection was also not more frequent in either group. Graft survival was worse in the severe preservation injury group, with a significant increase in early graft loss, but no difference in the frequency of chronic rejection. Recovery of graft function was also delayed in the preservation injury group.

Early enteral nutrition support in patients undergoing liver transplantation

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of early postoperative tube feeding on outcomes of liver transplant recipients. METHODS Fifty transplant patients were randomized prospectively to receive enteral formula via nasointestinal feeding tubes (tube-feeding [TF] group) or maintenance i.v. fluid until oral diets were initiated (control group). Thirty-one patients completed the study. Resting energy expenditure, nitrogen balance, and grip strength were measured on days 2, 4, 7, and 12 after liver transplantation. Calorie and protein intakes were calculated for 12 days posttransplant. RESULTS Tube feeding was tolerated in the TF group (n = 14). The TF patients had greater cumulative 12-day nutrient intakes (22,464 +/- 3554 kcal, 927 +/- 122 g protein) than did the control patients (15,474 +/- 5265 kcal, 637 +/- 248 g protein) (p < .002). Nitrogen balance was better in the TF group on posttransplant day 4 than in the control group (p < .03). There was a rise in the overall mean resting energy expenditure in the first two posttransplant weeks from 1487 +/- 338 to 1990 +/- 367 kcal (p = .0002). Viral infections occurred in 17.7% of control patients compared with 0% of TF patients (p = .05). Although other infections tended to occur more frequently in the control group vs the TF group (bacterial, 29.4% vs 14.3%; overall infections, 47.1% vs 21.4%), these differences were not statistically significant. Early posttransplant tube feeding did not influence hospitalization costs, hours on the ventilator, lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, rehospitalizations, or rejection during the first 21 posttransplant days. CONCLUSIONS Early posttransplant tube feeding was tolerated and promoted improvements in some outcomes and should be considered for all liver transplant patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A pilot study in 20 patients

BACKGROUND Liver transplantation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma yields disappointing results. Most cases recur within 2 years, often in the transplanted liver. METHODS A combination of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and orthotopic liver transplantation was used in 20 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma confined to the liver. Seventeen patients had tumors > 5 cm in greatest diameter, and 11 cases were stage IVA by the TNM classification. Doxorubicin was administered preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively at a dose of 10 mg/m2 weekly, totaling 200 mg/m2. RESULTS Chemotherapy was well tolerated although leukopenia was observed in 70% of patients. Eight patients died, five of recurrent tumor and three of hepatitis B. Three others remain alive 8-22 months after tumor recurrence. One patient had initial tumor recurrence in the allograft. Actuarial survival is 59% and tumor-free survival is 54% at 3 years. For the 17 patients with tumors > 5 cm, overall survival is 63% and tumor-free survival is 49% at 3 years. CONCLUSION The results of this pilot study suggest that neoadjuvant doxorubicin chemotherapy favorably alters the post-transplant survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ten years of liver transplantation: An evolving understanding of late graft loss

BACKGROUND We undertook this study to understand the causes of late graft loss and long-term outcome in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) recipients. METHODS Prospectively collected data of 1174 consecutive OLT in 1045 adult patients who received liver grafts between April 1985 and August 1995 were reviewed. The causes of graft loss, pretransplant patient characteristics, and posttransplant events were analyzed in patients who survived at least 1 year after OLT, in an attempt to establish a link between these factors and graft loss. RESULTS One hundred fifty-nine (17.9%) grafts were lost after the first year. Of these, 132 grafts were lost by death and 27 by retransplantation. Recipients who survived the first year (n=884) had 5- and 10-year survivals of 81.4% and 67.2%, respectively. Death with a functioning graft occurred in 97 (61%) patients. The main causes of late graft loss were recurrent disease (n=48), cardiovascular and cerebral vascular accidents (n=28), infections (n=24), and chronic rejection (n = 15). Pretransplant heart disease and diabetes were found to be significant risk factors for late graft loss due to cardiovascular diseases and cerebral vascular accidents. CONCLUSIONS Survival of OLT patients who live beyond the first posttransplant year is excellent. Some patient characteristics may be associated with late graft loss. Compared with previous reports, this study shows an increased incidence of late graft loss secondary to recurrent diseases, de novo malignancies, cardiovascular diseases, and cerebral vascular accidents. Chronic rejection seems to be a less frequent cause of late graft loss. The prevention of recurrent disease and better immunosuppression may further improve these results.

Is liver transplantation indicated for cholangiocarcinoma

Liver transplantation (OLTx) has been investigated as a mode of therapy for malignancies. The efficacy of OLTx for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has been somewhat controversial. We review the current literature on resective procedures for CCA and show that isolated intrahepatic CCA has a slightly better survival than extrahepatic disease. Results of OLTx for CCA are then reviewed, with specific attention to the experience at our center. Our results demonstrate that 1-year patient survival was 53%, and disease-free survival at 3 years was only 13%. Specific issues pertaining to the timing of OLTx in primary sclerosing cholangitis are then addressed. In summary, we believe that OLTx for known CCA results in a very poor patient survival. Those with incidental CCA found on explant histopathologic evaluation, without lymphatic involvement, may result in acceptable patient survival.

Recurrent Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Is Chronic Rejection Part of the Disease Process?

BACKGROUND The possibility of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) recurrence after liver transplantation has been debated. The aim of this study is to examine whether recurrent PSC and chronic rejection (CR) are different expressions of the same disease process. METHODS One hundred consecutive patients receiving 118 grafts for the diagnosis of PSC were reviewed and placed into three groups: group A, recurrent disease, as evidenced by cholangiographic and pathologic findings with radiographic arterial flow to the liver (n=18; 15.7%); group B, those who developed CR (n=15; 13.0%); and group C, all others (n=82; 71.3%). Cholangiograms and histopathologic specimens were examined in a blinded fashion. RESULTS Demographic factors were similar, except for age, with a significantly younger age and more episodes of rejection in groups A and B (P<0.03). Group A had a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus hepatitis (P=0.008). Five-year graft survivals for A, B, and C were 64.6%, 33.3%, and 76.1%, respectively (P=0.0001), 5-year patient survivals were 76.2%, 66.7%, and 89.1%, respectively (P=0.0001), and repeat transplantation rates were 27.8%, 46.7%, and 8.5%, respectively (P=0.005). Radiographically, 90% of cholangiograms in patients with recurrent disease showed at least multiple intrahepatic strictures. Histopathologically, patients with recurrent disease and CR shared many features. CONCLUSIONS We have described a high incidence of recurrent PSC and CR in patients who received transplants for PSC. Histopathologic analysis suggests that CR and recurrent PSC could represent a spectrum of indistinguishable disease. However, the distinct difference in clinical outcome, as evidenced by an increased repeat transplantation rate and lower graft and patient survival in the CR group, clearly suggests that they are two distinct entities that require very different treatment strategies.

Hepatorenal syndrome : Combined liver kidney transplants versus isolated liver transplant

BACKGROUND As many as 38% of combined liver-kidney transplant (LKTx) procedures performed nationally may be done for the renal diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). This study was designed to compare the national results with those at our medical center and to determine if combined LKTx provides any benefit over isolated liver transplant (LTx) to HRS patients. METHODS Data on 29 combined LKTx and 79 HRS patients at our center were collected and compared with the national data on 414 LKTx and 2442 patients with serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dl receiving isolated LTx from 1988 to 1995. RESULTS United Network of Organ Sharing data revealed 5-year patient survival of 62.2% for LKTx recipients and 50.4% for patients with serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dl receiving isolated LTx (P=0.0001). Our center results demonstrated 5-year patient survival of 48.1% for LKTx patients, 67.1% for HRS patients receiving isolated LTx, and 70.1% for patients with serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dl receiving isolated LTx (P not significant comparing all groups). Intensive care unit status and preoperative dialysis rates were similar in those HRS patients who did and those who did not need future KTx. CONCLUSION National data would suggest a survival benefit of combined LKTx over isolated LTx for those patients with poor renal function, specifically those with HRS, whereas our centers results suggest otherwise. Unfortunately, we could not identify any preoperative risk factors in the HRS patients, or in the broader group of patients with renal insufficiency at our center, that would indicate the need for future renal transplantation. We believe that HRS patients can be successfully managed with isolated LTx.

Simultaneous liver and renal transplantation in man.

Advanced chronic renal failure has been thought of as a contraindication to liver transplantation. We present here seven cases of simultaneous kidney-liver transplant performed for combined end-organ failure. Six of the seven patients are alive with functioning grafts with follow-up of from 6 weeks to 32 months. In one case, the patient chronically rejected his liver graft (treated with successful retransplant) while maintaining good function in his kidney. The rate of acute rejection in the liver transplant was only 37.5% compared with 59.3% in the patients undergoing liver transplant only. There were no obvious rejections observed in the kidney transplants. These cases demonstrate the utility of simultaneous kidney-liver transplant in patients with combined kidney and liver failure. Advanced chronic renal failure should no longer be considered a contraindication to liver transplantation.