Gordana Radosavljevic-Asic

Role of Radiation Therapy in the Combined-Modality Treatment of Patients With Extensive Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Study

PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin/etoposide (PE) chemotherapy (CHT) with or without accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy (ACC HFX RT) and concurrent daily carboplatin/etoposide (CE) in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 210 patients were treated with three cycles of standard PE. Patients with a complete response (CR) at both the local and distant levels (CR/CR) or a partial response (PR) at the local level and CR at the distant level (PR/CR) received either thoracic ACC HFX RT with 54 Gy in 36 fractions over 18 treatment days in combination with CE followed by two cycles of PE (group 1, n = 55) or an additional four cycles of PE (group 2, n = 54). Patients who experienced less response were treated nonrandomly (groups 3, 4, and 5). All patients with a CR at the distant level received prophylactic cranial irradiation. RESULTS For 206 assessable patients, the median survival time (MST) was 9 months and the 5-year survival rate was 3.4%. Patients in group 1 had significantly better survival rates than those in group 2 (MST, 17 v 11 months; 5-year survival rate, 9.1% v 3.7%, respectively; P =.041). Local control was also better in group 1, but the difference was only marginally not significant (P =.062). There was no difference in distant metastasis-free survival between groups 1 and 2. Acute high-grade toxicity was higher in group 2 than in group 1. CONCLUSION The addition of ACC HFX RT to the treatment of the most favorable subset of patients led to improved survival over that obtained with CHT alone.

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent low-dose, daily carboplatin/etoposide with or without weekend carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy in stage III non–small-cell lung cancer: A randomized trial

Abstract Purpose: To investigate whether the addition of weekend chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin/etoposide to hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Hfx RT) and concurrent daily carboplatin/etoposide offers an advantage over the same Hfx RT/daily carboplatin/etoposide. Methods and Materials: A total of 195 patients (Group I, 98; Group II, 97) were treated with either Hfx RT to a total tumor dose of 69.6 Gy via 1.2 Gy b.i.d. fractionation and daily 50 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide during the RT course (Group I) or the same Hfx RT with daily carboplatin/etoposide consisting of 30 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide and with weekend (Saturdays and Sundays) 100 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide during the RT course (Group II). Results: No difference was found regarding median survival time and 5-year survival rates (20 vs. 22 months and 20% vs. 23%; p = 0.57). Median time to local progression was 20 and 19 months, respectively, while 5-year local progression-free survival rates were 28% and 27%, respectively ( p = 0.66). Also, there was no difference regarding either median time to distant metastasis and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (21 vs. 25 months and 29% vs. 34%, p = 0.29). There was no difference in the incidence of various nonhematologic toxicities between the two treatment groups, but patients treated with the weekend CHT had significantly more high-grade (≥ 3) hematologic toxicity ( p = 0.0046). Late high-grade toxicity was not different between the two treatment groups. Conclusion: The addition of weekend carboplatin/etoposide did not improve results over those obtained with Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose, daily carboplatin/etoposide, but it led to a higher incidence of acute high-grade hematologic toxicity.

A phase ii study of concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy and carboplatin/oral etoposide for elderly patients with stage iii non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE To investigate feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent carboplastin/oral etoposide in elderly (> 70 years) patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 1988 and June 1993, a total of 58 patients entered a phase II study. Carboplatin (400 mg/m(2)) was given intravenously on days 1 and 29, and etoposide (50 mg/m(2)) was given orally on days 1-21 and 29-42. Accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy was administered starting on day 1, with a total dose of 51 Gy in 34 fractions over 3.5 weeks. RESULTS In 55 evaluable patients, the complete response rate was 27% and the overall response rate was 65%. For the 55 patients, the median survival time was 10 months, and the 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 45%, 24%, and 9.1%, respectively. The median time until relapse was 8 months and the 1-, 2-, and 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 45%, 20%, and 9.1%, respectively. The median time to local recurrence was 14 months and the 5-year local control rate was 13%; the median time to distant metastasis was 18 months and the 5-year distant metastasis-free rate was 15%. Hematological, esophageal, and bronchopulmonary acute grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed in 22%, 7%, and 4% of the patients, respectively. There was no grade 5 toxicity or late grade > or = 3 toxicity. CONCLUSION Concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy and carboplatin/oral etoposide produced relatively low and acceptable toxicity. The survival results appeared to be comparable to those obtained in nonelderly patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treated by full-dose radiation.

External beam radiation therapy alone for loco-regional recurrence of non-small-cell lung cancer after complete resection

Between January 1982 and June 1993, a total of 61 patients with post-surgical loco-regional recurrence only were treated with external beam radiation therapy only at our institution. Patients were treated with either curative intent [tumor dose (TD) 55-60 Gy in 26-30 fractions] or palliative intent (TD 30 Gy in ten fractions). Median survival time (MST) for all 61 patients is 13 months, and 1-5-year survival rates are 61, 28, 16, 9.8 and 9.8%, respectively. There was a significant difference between high-dose and low-dose RT groups regarding both MST (18 vs. 7 months, respectively) and 1-5-year survival rates (74, 36, 24, 14 and 14% vs. 32, 11, 0, 0 and 0%, respectively) (P = 0.0000). Age, extent of initial surgery, time from initial surgery to documented recurrence were not found to influence survival in the high-dose group and influence of performance status, weight loss and histology were only marginally insignificant. Females did better than males and patients with bronchial stump recurrence only did better than those with non-stump recurrence only. Initial and recurrent staging significantly influenced survival, with patients in early stages doing better than those in advanced stages. External beam RT is an effective tool in the treatment of loco-regional recurrent NSCLC after curative resection. Identification of a favorable subset of patients that may fare better may help optimize treatment in the future by using high-dose, curative RT. Otherwise, unfavorable patients may appropriately be treated with palliative RT.

Second Cancers Occurring in Patients With Early Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Chest Radiation Therapy Alone

PURPOSE To investigate the incidence of second cancers occurring in patients with early stage (I/II) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-eight patients had been treated with conventionally fractionated (CF) RT (1982 to 1987), and 116 patients had been treated with hyperfractionated (Hfx) RT (1988 to 1993). Tumor doses were 60 Gy for CF and 69.6 Gy (1.2 Gy bid) for Hfx. RESULTS A total of 26 patients developed second cancers. The cumulative incidence of second cancer was 21.8% (SE, 4.7%) at 5 years and 34.8% (SE, 6.7%) at 10 years. For second lung cancers, it was 6.0% (SE, 2.8%) at 5 years and 14.2% (SE, 5.2%) at 10 years, and for second nonlung cancers, it was 16.3% (SE, 4.2%) at 5 years and 22.2% (SE, 5.7%) at 10 years. The rate of developing second cancer per patient per year was 4.3% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 2.7% to 5.9%), with the rates being 1.4% (CI, 0.5% to 2.3%) for the second lung cancers and 2.8% (CI, 1.5% to 4.1%) for second nonlung cancers. The rate of developing second cancers during the first and second 5-year period after RT (0 to 5 and 5 to 10 years) was 4.3% (CI, 2.4% to 6.2%) and 4.2% (CI, 0.6% to 7.8%), respectively, for all cancers. These rates were 1.0% (CI, 0.1% to 1.9%) and 2.2% (CI, 0% to 4.6%), respectively, for second lung cancers, and 3.2% (CI, 1.6% to 4.8%) and 1.5% (CI, 0% to 3.6%), respectively, for second nonlung cancers. CONCLUSION Long-term survivors after RT alone for early stage NSCLC carry the same risk of developing second cancer, either lung or nonlung, as their counterparts treated surgically when the results of this study are compared with those of the published literature.

Short-term chemotherapy and palliative radiotherapy for elderly patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: A phase II study

Optimal treatment in elderly (> 70 years) with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not known. In order to define it, concurrent short-term chemotherapy (CHT) and palliative radiotherapy (RT) was evaluated in this patient population. Between January 1988 and June 1993, a total of 50 patients entered into a study that used two cycles of carboplatin (CBDCA), 300 mg/m2, days 1 and 29 and oral etoposide, 50 mg/m2, days 1-21 and 29-42. RT was administered with dose of 14 Gy in two fractions given with 1 week split, days 1 and 8. Of 47 patients evaluable for the response, there were three (6%) complete response (CR), and ten (21%) partial response (PR), making the overall response rate of 13 (28%). Response duration ranged 2-8 months (median, 5 months; mean, 5 months). Median survival time (MST) for all 50 patients was 7 months and 1-3 year survival rates were 31, 4.1, and 2%, respectively. There were only nine (19%) patients experiencing hematological grade 3 toxicity, all other CHT-induced toxicity being grade 1 or 2. Of RT-induced high-grade toxicity, grade 3 esophageal was observed in nine (19%) patients while only four (9%) patients experienced grade 3 bronchopulmonary toxicity. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity occurred during this study. Short-course CHT and palliative RT in elderly patients with stage IV NSCLC was well tolerated with mild to moderate toxicity. Together with results obtained this way, they warrant further studies evaluating the effectiveness of this approach and possible CHT- and/or RT-dose escalation in elderly patients with stage IV NSCLC.

Prolonged oral versus high-dose intravenous etoposide in combination with carboplatin for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a randomized trial

In order to investigate whether dose-intensive intravenous (i.v.) etoposide offers an advantage over prolonged oral administration of etoposide when combined with carboplatin (CBDCA), between January, 1991 and December, 1994, 171 patients with metastatic (stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to receive CBDCA, 400 mg/m2, day 1 with either oral etoposide, 50 mg/m2, days 1-21 (group I) or i.v. etoposide, 200 mg/m2, days 1-3 (group II), every 4 weeks for up to six cycles or until tumour progression. Of the patients 168 were fully assessable for response, survival and toxicity. There were three (4%) CR and 16 (19%) PR in group 1, and the overall response rate was 23%. There were four (5%) CR and 12 (14%) PR in group II, and the overall response rate was 19% (P = 0.82). The median survival time (MST) in group I was 8 months, and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 35 and 9.5%, respectively, while the corresponding figures for group II were 7 months, and 31 and 7.1%, respectively (P = 0.40). Both haematological and non-haematological toxicity was significantly more frequent in group II with six (7%) patients in that group dying of treatment-related infection. Intensive i.v. etoposide combined with CBDCA was similar in efficacy to but more toxic than prolonged oral etoposide plus carboplatin and we do not recommend it for further investigation.

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent low-dose, daily carboplatin/etoposide with or without weekend carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized trial

PURPOSE To investigate whether the addition of weekend chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin/etoposide to hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Hfx RT) and concurrent daily carboplatin/etoposide offers an advantage over the same Hfx RT/daily carboplatin/etoposide. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 195 patients (Group I, 98; Group II, 97) were treated with either Hfx RT to a total tumor dose of 69.6 Gy via 1.2 Gy b.i.d. fractionation and daily 50 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide during the RT course (Group I) or the same Hfx RT with daily carboplatin/etoposide consisting of 30 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide and with weekend (Saturdays and Sundays) 100 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide during the RT course (Group II). RESULTS No difference was found regarding median survival time and 5-year survival rates (20 vs. 22 months and 20% vs. 23%; p = 0.57). Median time to local progression was 20 and 19 months, respectively, while 5-year local progression-free survival rates were 28% and 27%, respectively (p = 0.66). Also, there was no difference regarding either median time to distant metastasis and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (21 vs. 25 months and 29% vs. 34%, p = 0.29). There was no difference in the incidence of various nonhematologic toxicities between the two treatment groups, but patients treated with the weekend CHT had significantly more high-grade (> or = 3) hematologic toxicity (p = 0.0046). Late high-grade toxicity was not different between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION The addition of weekend carboplatin/etoposide did not improve results over those obtained with Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose, daily carboplatin/etoposide, but it led to a higher incidence of acute high-grade hematologic toxicity.