Slobodan Milisavljevic

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy with or without concurrent low-dose daily carboplatin/etoposide for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study.

PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy of concurrent hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX RT) and low-dose daily chemotherapy (CHT) in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1990 and December 1991, 131 patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage III NSCLC, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 50, and no previous therapy were randomly treated as follows: group I, HFX RT with 1.2 Gy twice daily to a total dose of 69.6 Gy (n = 66); and group II, same HFX RT with CHT consisting of 50 mg of carboplatin (CBDCA) and 50 mg of etoposide (VP-16) given on each RT day (n = 65). RESULTS Group II patients had a significantly longer survival time than group I patients, with a median survival of 22 versus 14 months and 4-year survival rates of 23% versus 9% (P = .021). The median time to local recurrence and 4-year local recurrence-free survival rate were also significantly higher in group II than in group I (25 v 20 months and 42% v 19% respectively, P = .015). In contrast, the distant metastasis-free survival rate did not significantly differ in the two groups (P = .33). The two groups showed similar incidence of acute and late high-grade toxicity (P = .44 and .75, respectively). No treatment-related toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION The combination of HFX RT and low-dose daily CBDCA plus VP-16 was tolerable and improved the survival of patients with stage III NSCLC as a result of improved local control.

Initial versus delayed accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study.

PURPOSE To perform a randomized study of the optimal timing of thoracic radiation (RT) as accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy (ACC HFX RT) in combination with concurrent chemotherapy (CHT) in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1988 and 1992, 107 patients were enrolled and 103 were assessable. All patients received ACC HFX RT with 1.5 Gy twice daily to 54 Gy plus concurrent daily carboplatin/etoposide (C/E) (30 mg each) and four sequential cycles of cisplatin/etoposide (PE) (30 mg/m2 and 120 mg/m2, respectively, on days 1 to 3). Group I patients (n = 52) received concurrent chemoradiation at weeks 1 to 4, and group II (n = 51) at weeks 6 to 9. Patients who showed a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) underwent prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) at weeks 16 to 17. RESULTS The median survival time was 34 months in group I and 26 months in group II, and the Kaplan-Meier 5-year survival rates were 30% and 15%, respectively. The difference was almost significant on univariate analysis (P = .052) and was significant on multivariate analysis (P = .027). Group I patients had a significantly higher local control rate than group II patients, but there was no difference between the two groups in distant metastasis rate. There was no difference in the incidence of acute or late grade 3 to 4 toxicity. CONCLUSION Initial administration of thoracic ACC HFX RT with concurrent C/E seems to produce better local control and survival rates than delayed administration.

Role of Radiation Therapy in the Combined-Modality Treatment of Patients With Extensive Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Study

PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin/etoposide (PE) chemotherapy (CHT) with or without accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy (ACC HFX RT) and concurrent daily carboplatin/etoposide (CE) in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 210 patients were treated with three cycles of standard PE. Patients with a complete response (CR) at both the local and distant levels (CR/CR) or a partial response (PR) at the local level and CR at the distant level (PR/CR) received either thoracic ACC HFX RT with 54 Gy in 36 fractions over 18 treatment days in combination with CE followed by two cycles of PE (group 1, n = 55) or an additional four cycles of PE (group 2, n = 54). Patients who experienced less response were treated nonrandomly (groups 3, 4, and 5). All patients with a CR at the distant level received prophylactic cranial irradiation. RESULTS For 206 assessable patients, the median survival time (MST) was 9 months and the 5-year survival rate was 3.4%. Patients in group 1 had significantly better survival rates than those in group 2 (MST, 17 v 11 months; 5-year survival rate, 9.1% v 3.7%, respectively; P =.041). Local control was also better in group 1, but the difference was only marginally not significant (P =.062). There was no difference in distant metastasis-free survival between groups 1 and 2. Acute high-grade toxicity was higher in group 2 than in group 1. CONCLUSION The addition of ACC HFX RT to the treatment of the most favorable subset of patients led to improved survival over that obtained with CHT alone.

HYPERFRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY ALONE FOR CLINICAL STAGE I NONSMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

PURPOSE Among patients with Stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), those treated with conventional radiotherapy show poorer prognosis than those treated by surgery. To improve the prognosis of such patients, we have used hyperfractionated radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1988 and 1993, 49 patients were treated with hyperfractionated radiotherapy with 1.2 Gy twice daily to a total dose of 69.6 Gy. All patients were technically operable, but 29 had medical problems and 20 refused surgery. The median age and Karnofsky Performance Status was 63 years and 90, respectively. No patient received chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Prophylactic mediastinal irradiation was not given. RESULTS The median survival time was 33 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 30%. The rate at 5 years for freedom from each of relapse, local recurrence, mediastinal lymphnode metastasis, and distant metastasis was 41%, 55%, 89%, and 75%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that higher Karnofsky Performance Status score, absence of weight loss before treatment, and T1 stage were associated with better survival, although the T stage became insignificant on multivariate analysis. There were two Grade 3 acute toxicities and three Grade 3 late toxicities, but there was no Grade 4-5 toxicity. CONCLUSION The results of this study compare favorably with those of most previous studies employing conventional fractionation. Further studies on hyperfractionation seem to be warranted for Stage I NSCLC.

CONCURRENT RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH STAGE III NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC): LONG-TERM RESULTS OF A PHASE II STUDY

PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility and activity of concurrent radiochemotherapy in patients with Stage III nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-one patients were treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HfxRT) using 1.2 Gy bid, to a total of 69.6 Gy and concurrent low-dose daily chemotherapy (CHT) consisting of 30 mg of carboplatin (CBDCA) and 30 mg of etoposide (VP-16) given Mondays to Fridays during the RT course. On Saturdays and Sundays during the RT course, CBDCA and VP-16 were both given in a daily dose of 100 mg each. RESULTS Median survival time was 25 months, and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 34% and 29%, respectively. Median relapse-free survival time was 22 months, and 3- and 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 32%, and 29%, respectively. Median time to local recurrence was 24 months and 3- and 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 41% and 38%, respectively. Median time to distant metastasis was 28 months, and 3- and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 44% and 44%, respectively. Acute high-grade (> or = 3) toxicity was mostly hematological (30%), esophageal (15%), and bronchopulmonary (12%). Late high-grade toxicity was infrequent. CONCLUSION This combined radiochemotherapy regimen produced promising results and warrants further studies with more patients before testing it in a prospective randomized fashion.

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent low-dose, daily carboplatin/etoposide with or without weekend carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy in stage III non–small-cell lung cancer: A randomized trial

Abstract Purpose: To investigate whether the addition of weekend chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin/etoposide to hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Hfx RT) and concurrent daily carboplatin/etoposide offers an advantage over the same Hfx RT/daily carboplatin/etoposide. Methods and Materials: A total of 195 patients (Group I, 98; Group II, 97) were treated with either Hfx RT to a total tumor dose of 69.6 Gy via 1.2 Gy b.i.d. fractionation and daily 50 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide during the RT course (Group I) or the same Hfx RT with daily carboplatin/etoposide consisting of 30 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide and with weekend (Saturdays and Sundays) 100 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide during the RT course (Group II). Results: No difference was found regarding median survival time and 5-year survival rates (20 vs. 22 months and 20% vs. 23%; p = 0.57). Median time to local progression was 20 and 19 months, respectively, while 5-year local progression-free survival rates were 28% and 27%, respectively ( p = 0.66). Also, there was no difference regarding either median time to distant metastasis and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (21 vs. 25 months and 29% vs. 34%, p = 0.29). There was no difference in the incidence of various nonhematologic toxicities between the two treatment groups, but patients treated with the weekend CHT had significantly more high-grade (≥ 3) hematologic toxicity ( p = 0.0046). Late high-grade toxicity was not different between the two treatment groups. Conclusion: The addition of weekend carboplatin/etoposide did not improve results over those obtained with Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose, daily carboplatin/etoposide, but it led to a higher incidence of acute high-grade hematologic toxicity.

Concurrent Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy and Low-Dose Daily Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Patients With Early-Stage (I/II) Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Phase II Study

PURPOSE Feasibility and activity of concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy (Hfx RT) and low-dose, daily carboplatin and paclitaxel were investigated in patients with early-stage (I/II) non-small-cell lung cancer in a phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-six patients started their treatment on day 1 with 30 mg/m2 of paclitaxel. Hfx RT using 1.3 Gy bid to a total dose of 67.6 Gy and concurrent low-dose daily carboplatin 25 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 10 mg/m2, both given Mondays through Fridays during the RT course, started from the second day. RESULTS There were 29 complete responses (52%) and 15 partial responses (27%), and 12 patients (21%), experienced stable disease. The median survival time was 35 months, and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 50% and 36%, respectively. The median time to local progression has not been achieved, but 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival rates were 56% and 54%, respectively. The median time to distant metastasis has not been achieved, but 3- and 5- year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 61% and 61%, respectively. The median and 5-year cause-specific survivals were 39 months and 43%, respectively. Acute high-grade (> 3) toxicity was hematologic (22%), esophageal (7%), or bronchopulmonary (7%). No grade 5 toxicity was observed. Late high-grade toxicity was rarely observed (total, 10%). CONCLUSION Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose daily carboplatin/paclitaxel was feasible with low toxicity and effective in patients with stage I/II non-small-cell lung cancer. It should continue to be investigated for this disease.

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy for clinical stage II non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Patients with stage II non-small cell lung cancer who are not suitable for or refuse surgery are treated with radiotherapy, but the results reported so far are not satisfactory. To improve the prognosis of such patients, we have used hyperfractionated radiotherapy. In this paper, we retrospectively analyzed results of the treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 1988 and 1993, 67 patients were treated with hyperfractionated radiotherapy with 1.2 Gy twice daily to a total dose of 69.6 Gy. All patients were technically operable, but 43 had medical problems and 24 refused surgery. The median age and Karnofsky performance status score was 60 and 90 years, respectively. No patient received chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The median follow-up period was 61 months. RESULTS The median survival time and the 5-year survival rate were 27 months and 25% (standard error, SE, 6%), respectively. The 5-year local control rate was 44% (SE,7%). Univariate analysis of prognostic factors revealed that a higher Karnofsky performance status score, weight loss of < or =5% before treatment, and T1 stage were associated with better prognosis, and peripheral location was of borderline significance (P = 0.053). There were two bronchopulmonary and two esophageal acute grade 3 toxicities, and one bronchopulmonary and two esophageal late grade 3 toxicities. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION These results are encouraging and further studies on the use of hyperfractionation seem to be warranted for stage II non-small cell lung cancer.

A phase ii study of concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy and carboplatin/oral etoposide for elderly patients with stage iii non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE To investigate feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent carboplastin/oral etoposide in elderly (> 70 years) patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 1988 and June 1993, a total of 58 patients entered a phase II study. Carboplatin (400 mg/m(2)) was given intravenously on days 1 and 29, and etoposide (50 mg/m(2)) was given orally on days 1-21 and 29-42. Accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy was administered starting on day 1, with a total dose of 51 Gy in 34 fractions over 3.5 weeks. RESULTS In 55 evaluable patients, the complete response rate was 27% and the overall response rate was 65%. For the 55 patients, the median survival time was 10 months, and the 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 45%, 24%, and 9.1%, respectively. The median time until relapse was 8 months and the 1-, 2-, and 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 45%, 20%, and 9.1%, respectively. The median time to local recurrence was 14 months and the 5-year local control rate was 13%; the median time to distant metastasis was 18 months and the 5-year distant metastasis-free rate was 15%. Hematological, esophageal, and bronchopulmonary acute grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed in 22%, 7%, and 4% of the patients, respectively. There was no grade 5 toxicity or late grade > or = 3 toxicity. CONCLUSION Concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy and carboplatin/oral etoposide produced relatively low and acceptable toxicity. The survival results appeared to be comparable to those obtained in nonelderly patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treated by full-dose radiation.

External beam radiation therapy alone for loco-regional recurrence of non-small-cell lung cancer after complete resection

Between January 1982 and June 1993, a total of 61 patients with post-surgical loco-regional recurrence only were treated with external beam radiation therapy only at our institution. Patients were treated with either curative intent [tumor dose (TD) 55-60 Gy in 26-30 fractions] or palliative intent (TD 30 Gy in ten fractions). Median survival time (MST) for all 61 patients is 13 months, and 1-5-year survival rates are 61, 28, 16, 9.8 and 9.8%, respectively. There was a significant difference between high-dose and low-dose RT groups regarding both MST (18 vs. 7 months, respectively) and 1-5-year survival rates (74, 36, 24, 14 and 14% vs. 32, 11, 0, 0 and 0%, respectively) (P = 0.0000). Age, extent of initial surgery, time from initial surgery to documented recurrence were not found to influence survival in the high-dose group and influence of performance status, weight loss and histology were only marginally insignificant. Females did better than males and patients with bronchial stump recurrence only did better than those with non-stump recurrence only. Initial and recurrent staging significantly influenced survival, with patients in early stages doing better than those in advanced stages. External beam RT is an effective tool in the treatment of loco-regional recurrent NSCLC after curative resection. Identification of a favorable subset of patients that may fare better may help optimize treatment in the future by using high-dose, curative RT. Otherwise, unfavorable patients may appropriately be treated with palliative RT.