Gordon Ho

Mechanisms of Human Atrial Fibrillation Initiation Clinical and Computational Studies of Repolarization Restitution and Activation Latency

Background— Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF) initiation are incompletely understood. We hypothesized that rate-dependent changes (restitution) in action potential duration (APD) and activation latency are central targets for clinical interventions that induce AF. We tested this hypothesis using clinical experiments and computer models. Methods and Results— In 50 patients (20 persistent, 23 paroxysmal AF, 7 controls), we used monophasic action potential catheters to define left atrial APD restitution, activation latency, and AF incidence from premature extrastimuli. Isoproterenol (n=14), adenosine (n=10), or rapid pacing (n=36) was then initiated to determine impact on these parameters. Compared with baseline in AF patients, isoproterenol and rapid pacing decreased activation latency (64±14 versus 31±13 versus 24±14 ms; P<0.05), steepened maximum APD restitution slope (0.8±0.7 versus 1.7±0.5 versus 1.1±0.5; P<0.05), and increased AF incidence (12% versus 64% versus 84%; P<0.05). Conversely, adenosine shortened APD (P<0.05), yet increased activation latency (86±27 ms; P=0.002) so that maximum APD restitution slope did not steepen (1.0±0.5; P=NS), and AF incidence was unchanged (10%; P=NS). In controls, no intervention steepened APD restitution or initiated AF. Computational modeling revealed that isoproterenol steepened APD restitution by increased L-type calcium current and decreased activation latency via enhanced rapid delayed potassium reactifier current inactivation, whereas rapid pacing steepened APD restitution via increased cardiac inward potassium rectifier current. Conclusions— Steep APD restitution is a common pathway for AF initiation by isoproterenol and tachycardia via reduced activation latency that enables engagement of steep APD restitution at rapid rates. Modeling suggests that AF initiation from each intervention uses distinct ionic mechanisms. This insight may help design interventions to prevent AF.

Accurate ECG Diagnosis of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias Using Quantitative Analysis: A Prospective Diagnostic and Cost-Effectiveness Study

Quantitative ECG Analysis. Introduction: Optimal atrial tachyarrhythmia management is facilitated by accurate electrocardiogram interpretation, yet typical atrial flutter (AFl) may present without sawtooth F‐waves or RR regularity, and atrial fibrillation (AF) may be difficult to separate from atypical AFl or rapid focal atrial tachycardia (AT). We analyzed whether improved diagnostic accuracy using a validated analysis tool significantly impacts costs and patient care.

Rotors exhibit greater Surface ECG variation during ventricular fibrillation than focal sources due to wavebreak, secondary rotors, and meander

Ventricular fibrillation is a common life‐threatening arrhythmia. The ECG of VF appears chaotic but may allow identification of sustaining mechanisms to guide therapy.

Outcomes of repeated transvenous lead extraction

The outcomes of repeated cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction have not been well studied. We sought to determine the indications, outcomes, and safety of repeated lead extraction procedures.

Successful Ventricular Fibrillation Functional Substrate Ablation via a Single Vascular Access Site

Introduction Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a common cause of sudden cardiac death worldwide. Patients with clinical VF may receive frequent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks and suffer poor quality of life. In patients who fail antiarrhythmic medications and do not have identifiable triggers for VF, such as premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) or monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), there are currently limited options. However, recent work has demonstrated the importance of rotor substrate in maintaining VF, and that suppression of VF may be achieved via substrate ablation using either endocardial basket catheter phase mapping or electrocardiographic imaging to localize VF sources. Prior reported cases were performed with multiple venous and atrial access sheaths to facilitate mapping and ablation. It is unclear, however, if similar efficacy can safely be achieved with limited vascular access and without access to the right ventricle (RV). Additionally, the presence and prevalence of late potentials

Successful ventricular tachycardia ablation in a patient with a biventricular ventricular assist device and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia using bivalirudin

Author(s): Ho, Gordon; Tran, Hao A; Urey, Marcus A; Adler, Eric D; Pretorius, Victor G; Hsu, Jonathan C

Ventricular fibrillation: triggers, mechanisms and therapies.

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a common, life-threatening arrhythmia responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. Due to challenges in safely mapping VF, a comprehensive understanding of its mechanisms remains elusive. Recent findings have provided new insights into mechanisms that sustain early VF. Notably, the central role of electrical rotors and catheter-based ablation of VF rotor substrate have been recently reported. In this article, we will review data regarding four stages of VF: initiation, transition, maintenance and evolution. We will discuss the particular mechanisms for each stage and therapies targeting these mechanisms. We also examine inherited arrhythmia syndromes, including the mechanisms and therapies specific to each. We hope that the overview of VF outlined in this work will assist other investigators in designing future therapies to interrupt this life-threatening arrhythmia.

Mechanisms of Human Atrial Fibrillation InitiationClinical Perspective: Clinical and Computational Studies of Repolarization Restitution and Activation Latency

Background— Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF) initiation are incompletely understood. We hypothesized that rate-dependent changes (restitution) in action potential duration (APD) and activation latency are central targets for clinical interventions that induce AF. We tested this hypothesis using clinical experiments and computer models. Methods and Results— In 50 patients (20 persistent, 23 paroxysmal AF, 7 controls), we used monophasic action potential catheters to define left atrial APD restitution, activation latency, and AF incidence from premature extrastimuli. Isoproterenol (n=14), adenosine (n=10), or rapid pacing (n=36) was then initiated to determine impact on these parameters. Compared with baseline in AF patients, isoproterenol and rapid pacing decreased activation latency (64±14 versus 31±13 versus 24±14 ms; P<0.05), steepened maximum APD restitution slope (0.8±0.7 versus 1.7±0.5 versus 1.1±0.5; P<0.05), and increased AF incidence (12% versus 64% versus 84%; P<0.05). Conversely, adenosine shortened APD (P<0.05), yet increased activation latency (86±27 ms; P=0.002) so that maximum APD restitution slope did not steepen (1.0±0.5; P=NS), and AF incidence was unchanged (10%; P=NS). In controls, no intervention steepened APD restitution or initiated AF. Computational modeling revealed that isoproterenol steepened APD restitution by increased L-type calcium current and decreased activation latency via enhanced rapid delayed potassium reactifier current inactivation, whereas rapid pacing steepened APD restitution via increased cardiac inward potassium rectifier current. Conclusions— Steep APD restitution is a common pathway for AF initiation by isoproterenol and tachycardia via reduced activation latency that enables engagement of steep APD restitution at rapid rates. Modeling suggests that AF initiation from each intervention uses distinct ionic mechanisms. This insight may help design interventions to prevent AF.

Mechanisms of Human Atrial Fibrillation InitiationClinical Perspective

Background— Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF) initiation are incompletely understood. We hypothesized that rate-dependent changes (restitution) in action potential duration (APD) and activation latency are central targets for clinical interventions that induce AF. We tested this hypothesis using clinical experiments and computer models. Methods and Results— In 50 patients (20 persistent, 23 paroxysmal AF, 7 controls), we used monophasic action potential catheters to define left atrial APD restitution, activation latency, and AF incidence from premature extrastimuli. Isoproterenol (n=14), adenosine (n=10), or rapid pacing (n=36) was then initiated to determine impact on these parameters. Compared with baseline in AF patients, isoproterenol and rapid pacing decreased activation latency (64±14 versus 31±13 versus 24±14 ms; P<0.05), steepened maximum APD restitution slope (0.8±0.7 versus 1.7±0.5 versus 1.1±0.5; P<0.05), and increased AF incidence (12% versus 64% versus 84%; P<0.05). Conversely, adenosine shortened APD (P<0.05), yet increased activation latency (86±27 ms; P=0.002) so that maximum APD restitution slope did not steepen (1.0±0.5; P=NS), and AF incidence was unchanged (10%; P=NS). In controls, no intervention steepened APD restitution or initiated AF. Computational modeling revealed that isoproterenol steepened APD restitution by increased L-type calcium current and decreased activation latency via enhanced rapid delayed potassium reactifier current inactivation, whereas rapid pacing steepened APD restitution via increased cardiac inward potassium rectifier current. Conclusions— Steep APD restitution is a common pathway for AF initiation by isoproterenol and tachycardia via reduced activation latency that enables engagement of steep APD restitution at rapid rates. Modeling suggests that AF initiation from each intervention uses distinct ionic mechanisms. This insight may help design interventions to prevent AF.