Goro Shibukawa

Role of para‐esophageal collateral veins in patients with portal hypertension based on the results of endoscopic ultrasonography and liver scintigraphy analysis

Background and Aims: Para‐esophageal collateral veins (para‐ECV) are observed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in patients with portal hypertension. However, the role of para‐ECV in the portal venous system is not clear. To verify the role of para‐ECV in the portal venous system, we investigated the relationship between the development of para‐ECV as determined by EUS, and the portal blood flow ratio (PBFR) as determined by liver scintigraphy using 99mTc‐phytate.

Collateral vessels around the esophageal wall in patients with portal hypertension: comparison of EUS imaging and microscopic findings at autopsy.

BACKGROUND In patients with portal hypertension, EUS reveals the presence of collateral vessels within and outside the esophageal wall such as esophageal varices, periesophageal collateral veins (peri-ECVs), paraesophageal collateral veins (para-ECVs), and perforating veins. This study retrospectively compared radial EUS images of these collateral vessels with histopathologic findings. METHODS Four patients with esophageal varices treated by endoscopic injection sclerotherapy were studied. EUS was performed to evaluate the effects of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy. After endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, the segment of the esophagus from the esophagogastric junction to a point 5 cm proximal to junction was imaged with a 20-MHz radial scanning catheter US probe. Esophageal collateral veins outside the esophageal wall were identified as peri-ECVs (veins lateral to muscularis propria or within adventitia) and para-ECVs (veins lateral and separate from muscularis propria) along with perforating veins (veins connecting extramural collateral veins to submucosal varices). At autopsy, the esophagus with surrounding tissue was removed and cross-sectioned at 1-cm intervals from the esophagogastric junction to a point 5 cm proximal to the junction. Radial EUS images were correlated with histopathologic findings. RESULTS Radial EUS after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy demonstrated peri-ECVs and perforating veins in all cases and para-ECVs in 3 cases. Based on histopathologic findings, veins associated with the esophageal wall were divided into 3 groups: those adjacent to the muscularis propria, veins separated from the wall without contact with the muscularis propria, and veins perforating the muscularis propria. All 3 groups of veins were observed in all cases. These 3 types of veins identified by histopathologic examination corresponded, respectively, to the peri-ECVs, para-ECVs, and perforating veins observed by EUS. CONCLUSION Collateral esophageal veins demonstrated by radial EUS in patients with portal hypertension correspond to collateral veins identified histopathologically. In patients with portal hypertension, EUS is useful for assessment of vascular anatomy around the esophageal wall.

Pancreatobiliary drainage using the EUS-FNA technique: EUS-BD and EUS-PD

The recent progression of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) enables EUS-guided transmural drainage based on the EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy technique. Prior to the development of EUS-guided drainage procedures, the options for treating obstruction of the pancreatobiliary system included surgical drainage, percutaneous drainage using ultrasound and radiological guidance, and endoscopic (non EUS-guidance) transmural drainage. Today, using EUS guidance and dedicated accessories, it is possible to create bilio- or pancreato-digestive anastomosis, EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), and EUS-guided pancreatic drainage (EUS-PD). The recent literature describes that EUS-BD and EUS-PD have acceptable success and complication rates. These procedures are anticipated for use as alternatives to surgery or percutaneous drainage when endoscopic transpapillary procedures fail.

An automated spring-loaded needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided abdominal paracentesis in cancer patients.

AIM To evaluate the feasibility of using an automated spring-loaded needle device for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided abdominal paracentesis (EUS-P) to see if this would make it easier to puncture the mobile and lax gastric wall for EUS-P. METHODS The EUS database and electronic medical records at Fukushima Medical University Hospital were searched from January 2001 to April 2011. Patients with a history of cancer and who underwent EUS-P using an automated spring-loaded needle device with a 22-gauge puncture needle were included. The needle was passed through the instrument channel and advanced through the gastrointestinal wall under EUS guidance into the echo-free space in the abdominal cavity and ascitic fluid was collected. The confirmed diagnosis of malignant ascites included positive cytology and results from careful clinical observation for at least 6 mo in patients with negative cytology. The technical success rate, cytology results and complications were evaluated. RESULTS We found 11 patients who underwent EUS-P with an automated spring-loaded needle device. In 4 cases, ascites was revealed only with EUS but not in other imaging modalities. EUS-P was done in 7 other cases because there was minimal ascitic fluid and no safe window for percutaneous abdominal aspiration. Ascitic fluid was obtained in all cases by EUS-P. The average amount aspirated was 14.1 mL (range 0.5-38 mL) and that was sent for cytological exam. The etiology of ascitic fluid was benign in 5 patients and malignant in 6. In all cases, ascitic fluid was obtained with the first needle pass. No procedure-related adverse effects occurred. CONCLUSION EUS-P with an automated spring-loaded needle device is a feasible and safe method for ascites evaluation.

Two Cases of Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma Diagnosed Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA)

This report describes our experience with two cases that were ultimately diagnosed as retroperitoneal liposarcoma using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Case 1 is that of a 54-year-old woman with chief complaints of nausea and abdominal distention. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large (15 cm diameter) tumor, which was significantly compressing the stomach and apparently occupied the entire left abdominal cavity. Although advanced primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) or retroperitoneal tumor was inferred as the differential diagnosis, a definitive diagnosis was difficult using imaging alone. After EUS-FNA was done, the tumor was diagnosed histopathologically as high-grade liposarcoma. Case 2 is that of a 73-year-old man. Abdominal ultrasonography and CT showed a 6 cm diameter tumor within the pelvic cavity. The tumor had high MRI signal-intensity on both T1 and T2 images. Endorectal EUS showed a hyperechoic mass. The images suggested lipoma or liposarcoma containing lipoma-like components. Myxoid liposarcoma was revealed by subsequent EUS-FNA. Performing EUS-FNA was clinically useful for determining the subsequent therapeutic strategy in these cases where a tumor of unknown origin existed in the retroperitoneum.

Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with a forward-viewing and curved linear-array echoendoscope for small gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions

Background and study aims: It is difficult to perform endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of small gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial lesions (SELs) approximately 10 mm in diameter. This study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA with a forward-viewing and curved linear-array echoendoscope (FVCLA-ES) that has a cap for small SELs. Patients and methods: The study enrolled 8 patients who had small upper GI SELs approximately 10 mm in diameter. To fix the SELs during FNA, a cap device was attached to the scope tip. Results: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) diameter of the SELs was 10.6 mm (2.94). Even small lesions were well targeted for FNA when the FVCLA-ES with a cap device was used. The mean (SD) number of passes was 4.6 (1.59). Adequate samples were obtained from 7 patients (87.5 %) – in 6 (75 %) for cytology and in 4 (50 %) for histologic examination with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. No complication occurred. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in 2 patients and leiomyoma in 2 patients were definitively diagnosed with IHC staining. Conclusions: EUS-FNA with an FVCLA-ES that has a cap device is feasible and safe. This technique is expected to contribute to histologic diagnosis, even in small SELs.

Rare condition of needle tract seeding after EUS-guided FNA for intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma

Background and study aims: We report on a 75-year-old man who was admitted due to pancreatic cystic lesion accompanied by a solid mass with liver metastasis. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was performed on the solid mass, and pathological findings revealed the lesion to be an adenocarcinoma diagnosed as intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC). Approximately 3 months after, a cystic subepithelial lesion appeared in the posterior gastric wall where the EUS-FNA had been performed. We performed EUS-FNA again, which revealed that the cystic mass was IPMC with pathology similar to the original lesion. This is a rare case demonstrating needle tract seeding of EUS-FNA for IPMC.

Efforts to improve the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic tumors.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is widely used to obtain a definitive diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. Good results have been reported for its diagnostic accuracy, with high sensitivity and specificity of around 90%; however, technological developments and adaptations to improve it still further are currently underway. The endosonographic technique can be improved when several tips and tricks useful to overcome challenges of EUS-FNA are known. This review provides various techniques and equipment for improvement in the diagnostic accuracy in EUS-FNA.

Acute inflammation occurring in gastric aberrant pancreas followed up by endoscopic ultrasonography.

We describe a case of gastric aberrant pancreas with acute pancreatitis followed up with subsequent endoscopic ultrasound. A 20-year-old woman known to have aberrant pancreas in the stomach was admitted to our hospital because of severe epigastralgia. Laboratory tests showed slight C reactive protein elevation without hyperamylasemia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a swollen submucosal lesion (SML) to a greater degree compared with the previous findings. Subsequent endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) revealed a swollen lesion of 35 mm in diameter. The internal echo-pattern was more hypoechoic than in the previous EUS. The border between the fourth layer (muscularis propria) and the SML was unclear. The anechoic lumen in the mass, considered as the ductal lumen, was dilated. Based on these results, we diagnosed the patient as having acute inflammation, resembling pancreatitis, in the aberrant pancreas.

Intraductal ultrasonographic anatomy of biliary varices in patients with portal hypertension.

Background and Objectives: The term, portal biliopathy, denotes various biliary abnormalities, such as stenosis and/or dilatation of the bile duct, in patients with portal hypertension. These vascular abnormalities sometimes bring on an obstructive jaundice, but they are not clear which vessels participated in obstructive jaundice. The aim of present study was clear the bile ductal changes in patients with portal hypertension in hopes of establishing a therapeutic strategy for obstructive jaundice caused by biliary varices. Materials and Methods: Three hundred and thirty-seven patients who underwent intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for biliary abnormalities were enrolled. Portal biliopathy was analyzed using IDUS. Results: Biliary varices were identified in 11 (2.7%) patients. IDUS revealed biliary varices as multiple, hypoechoic features surrounding the bile duct wall. These varices could be categorized into one of two groups according to their location in the sectional image of bile duct: epicholedochal and paracholedochal. Epicholedochal varices were identified in all patients, but paracholedochal varices were observed only in patients with extrahepatic portal obstruction. Conclusion: IDUS was useful to characterize the anatomy of portal biliopathy in detail.