Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Graham D. Pavitt is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Graham D. Pavitt.


Cell | 1992

The chromatin-associated protein H-NS interacts with curved DNA to influence DNA topology and gene expression

Tom Owen-Hughes; Graham D. Pavitt; Diogenes S. Santos; Julie M. Sidebotham; C. S. J. Hulton; Jay C. D. Hinton; Christopher F. Higgins

H-NS is an abundant structural component of bacterial chromatin and influences many cellular processes, including recombination, transposition, and transcription. We have studied the mechanism of action of H-NS at the osmotically regulated proU promoter. The interaction of H-NS with a curved DNA element located downstream of the proU promoter is required for normal regulation of expression. Heterologous curved sequences can replace the regulatory role of the proU curve. Hence, the luxAB and lacZ reporter genes, which differ in the presence or absence of a curve, can indicate very different patterns of transcription. H-NS interacts preferentially with these curved DNA elements in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo the interaction of H-NS with curved DNA participates in the control of plasmid linking number. The data suggest that H-NS-dependent changes in DNA topology play a role in the osmoregulation of proU expression.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2006

Global Translational Responses to Oxidative Stress Impact upon Multiple Levels of Protein Synthesis

Daniel Shenton; Julia B. Smirnova; Julian N. Selley; Kathleen M. Carroll; Simon J. Hubbard; Graham D. Pavitt; Mark P. Ashe; Chris M. Grant

Global inhibition of protein synthesis is a common response to stress conditions. We have analyzed the regulation of protein synthesis in response to oxidative stress induced by exposure to H2O2 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Our data show that H2O2 causes an inhibition of translation initiation dependent on the Gcn2 protein kinase, which phosphorylates the α-subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor-2. Additionally, our data indicate that translation is regulated in a Gcn2-independent manner because protein synthesis was still inhibited in response to H2O2 in a gcn2 mutant. Polysome analysis indicated that H2O2 causes a slower rate of ribosomal runoff, consistent with an inhibitory effect on translation elongation or termination. Furthermore, analysis of ribosomal transit times indicated that oxidative stress increases the average mRNA transit time, confirming a post-initiation inhibition of translation. Using microarray analysis of polysome- and monosome-associated mRNA pools, we demonstrate that certain mRNAs, including mRNAs encoding stress protective molecules, increase in association with ribosomes following H2O2 stress. For some candidate mRNAs, we show that a low concentration of H2O2 results in increased protein production. In contrast, a high concentration of H2O2 promotes polyribosome association but does not necessarily lead to increased protein production. We suggest that these mRNAs may represent an mRNA store that could become rapidly activated following relief of the stress condition. In summary, oxidative stress elicits complex translational reprogramming that is fundamental for adaptation to the stress.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2001

Tight binding of the phosphorylated alpha subunit of initiation factor 2 (eIF2alpha) to the regulatory subunits of guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B is required for inhibition of translation initiation.

Thanuja Krishnamoorthy; Graham D. Pavitt; Fan Zhang; Thomas E. Dever; Alan G. Hinnebusch

ABSTRACT Translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) is a heterotrimeric protein that transfers methionyl-initiator tRNAMet to the small ribosomal subunit in a ternary complex with GTP. The eIF2 phosphorylated on serine 51 of its α subunit [eIF2(αP)] acts as competitive inhibitor of its guanine nucleotide exchange factor, eIF2B, impairing formation of the ternary complex and thereby inhibiting translation initiation. eIF2B is comprised of catalytic and regulatory subcomplexes harboring independent eIF2 binding sites; however, it was unknown whether the α subunit of eIF2 directly contacts any eIF2B subunits or whether this interaction is modulated by phosphorylation. We found that recombinant eIF2α (glutathioneS-transferase [GST]–SUI2) bound to the eIF2B regulatory subcomplex in vitro, in a manner stimulated by Ser-51 phosphorylation. Genetic data suggest that this direct interaction also occurred in vivo, allowing overexpressed SUI2 to compete with eIF2(αP) holoprotein for binding to the eIF2B regulatory subcomplex. Mutations in SUI2 and in the eIF2B regulatory subunit GCD7 that eliminated inhibition of eIF2B by eIF2(αP) also impaired binding of phosphorylated GST-SUI2 to the eIF2B regulatory subunits. These findings provide strong evidence that tight binding of phosphorylated SUI2 to the eIF2B regulatory subcomplex is crucial for the inhibition of eIF2B and attendant downregulation of protein synthesis exerted by eIF2(αP). We propose that this regulatory interaction prevents association of the eIF2B catalytic subcomplex with the β and γ subunits of eIF2 in the manner required for GDP-GTP exchange.


The EMBO Journal | 1999

Conserved bipartite motifs in yeast eIF5 and eIF2Bepsilon, GTPase-activating and GDP-GTP exchange factors in translation initiation, mediate binding to their common substrate eIF2.

Katsura Asano; Thanuja Krishnamoorthy; Lon Phan; Graham D. Pavitt; Alan G. Hinnebusch

In the initiation phase of eukaryotic translation, eIF5 stimulates the hydrolysis of GTP bound to eIF2 in the 40S ribosomal pre‐initiation complex, and the resultant GDP on eIF2 is replaced with GTP by the complex nucleotide exchange factor, eIF2B. Bipartite motifs rich in aromatic and acidic residues are conserved at the C‐termini of eIF5 and the catalytic (ϵ) subunit of eIF2B. Here we show that these bipartite motifs are important for the binding of these factors, both in vitro and in vivo, to the β subunit of their common substrate eIF2. We also find that three lysine‐rich boxes in the N‐terminal segment of eIF2β mediate the binding of eIF2 to both eIF5 and eIF2B. Thus, eIF5 and eIF2Bϵ employ the same sequence motif to facilitate interaction with the same segment of their common substrate. In agreement with this, archaea appear to lack eIF5, eIF2B and the lysine‐rich binding domain for these factors in their eIF2β homolog. The eIF5 bipartite motif is also important for its interaction with the eIF3 complex through the NIP1‐encoded subunit of eIF3. Thus, the bipartite motif in eIF5 appears to be multifunctional, stimulating its recruitment to the 40S pre‐initiation complex through interaction with eIF3 in addition to binding of its substrate eIF2.


Molecular Microbiology | 1990

Protein H1: a role for chromatin structure in the regulation of bacterial gene expression and virulence?

Christopher F. Higgins; Jay C. D. Hinton; C. S. J. Hulton; Tom Owen-Hughes; Graham D. Pavitt; Alexander Seirafi

There has been a recent revival of interest in one of the most abundant Escherichia coli proteins, H1 (also called H‐NS). This protein was first identified many years ago as a major component of the bacterial nucleoid, and has been characterized biochemically by several groups. However, no clear function for the protein emerged from these studies. Our thinking has been transformed by recent findings which complement the biochemistry with genetic data. Several mutations, selected over many years by virtue of their diverse effects on gene expression, have turned out to be allelic and to fall within the structural gene for H1. Bringing together the genetics and the biochemistry has demonstrated that the whole is worth more than the sum of the parts! These findings have far‐reaching implications for the mechanisms by which gene expression is regulated and also, perhaps, for the control of bacterial virulence.


Biochemical Society Transactions | 2005

eIF2B, a mediator of general and gene-specific translational control.

Graham D. Pavitt

eIF2B (eukaryotic initiation factor 2B) is a multisubunit protein that is required for protein synthesis initiation and its regulation in all eukaryotic cells. Mutations in eIF2B have also recently been found to cause a fatal human disease called CACH (childhood ataxia with central nervous system hypomyelination) or VWM (vanishing white matter disease). This review provides a general background to translation initiation and mechanisms known to control eIF2B function, before describing molecular genetic and biochemical analysis of eIF2B structure and function, integrating work from studies of the yeast and mammalian eIF2B proteins.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 1997

Homologous segments in three subunits of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B mediate translational regulation by phosphorylation of eIF2.

Graham D. Pavitt; Weimin Yang; A G Hinnebusch

eIF2B is a five-subunit guanine nucleotide exchange factor that is negatively regulated by phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of its substrate, eIF2, leading to inhibition of translation initiation. To analyze this regulatory mechanism, we have characterized 29 novel mutations in the homologous eIF2B subunits encoded by GCD2, GCD7, and GCN3 that reduce or abolish inhibition of eIF2B activity by eIF2 phosphorylated on its alpha subunit [eIF2(alphaP)]. Most, if not all, of the mutations decrease sensitivity to eIF2(alphaP) without excluding GCN3, the nonessential subunit, from eIF2B; thus, all three proteins are critical for regulation of eIF2B by eIF2(alphaP). The mutations are clustered at both ends of the homologous region of each subunit, within two segments each of approximately 70 amino acids in length. Several mutations alter residues at equivalent positions in two or all three subunits. These results imply that structurally similar segments in GCD2, GCD7, and GCN3 perform related functions in eIF2B regulation. We propose that these segments form a single domain in eIF2B that makes multiple contacts with the alpha subunit of eIF2, around the phosphorylation site, allowing eIF2B to detect and respond to phosphoserine at residue 51. Most of the eIF2 is phosphorylated in certain mutants, suggesting that these substitutions allow eIF2B to accept phosphorylated eIF2 as a substrate for nucleotide exchange.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2005

Global gene expression profiling reveals widespread yet distinctive translational responses to different eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2B-targeting stress pathways

Julia B. Smirnova; Julian N. Selley; Fátima Sánchez-Cabo; Kathleen M. Carroll; A. Alan Eddy; John E. G. McCarthy; Simon J. Hubbard; Graham D. Pavitt; Chris M. Grant; Mark P. Ashe

ABSTRACT Global inhibition of protein synthesis is a hallmark of many cellular stress conditions. Even though specific mRNAs defy this (e.g., yeast GCN4 and mammalian ATF4), the extent and variation of such resistance remain uncertain. In this study, we have identified yeast mRNAs that are translationally maintained following either amino acid depletion or fusel alcohol addition. Both stresses inhibit eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2B, but via different mechanisms. Using microarray analysis of polysome and monosome mRNA pools, we demonstrate that these stress conditions elicit widespread yet distinct translational reprogramming, identifying a fundamental role for translational control in the adaptation to environmental stress. These studies also highlight the complex interplay that exists between different stages in the gene expression pathway to allow specific preordained programs of proteome remodeling. For example, many ribosome biogenesis genes are coregulated at the transcriptional and translational levels following amino acid starvation. The transcriptional regulation of these genes has recently been connected to the regulation of cellular proliferation, and on the basis of our results, the translational control of these mRNAs should be factored into this equation.


Molecular Microbiology | 1992

Expression and mutational analysis of the nucleoid-associated protein H-NS of Salmonella typhimurium

Jay C. D. Hinton; Diogenes S. Santos; Alexander Seirafi; C. S. J. Hulton; Graham D. Pavitt; Christopher F. Higgins

The H‐NS (H1) protein is a major component of bacterial chromatin. Mutations in the hns (osmZ) gene encoding H‐NS are highly pleiotropic, affecting the expression of many unrelated genes in an allele‐specific manner. H‐NS expression was found not to vary with growth phase or growth medium osmolarity. Additionally, 10 independent hns mutations were isolated and characterized. Five of these mutations were the result of an IS10 insertion, each generating a truncated polypeptide. The other five mutations were the same specific deletion of one amino acid, δla46. The various hns mutations exhibited different phenotypes and influenced ONA topology to variable extents. Implications for the mechanism by which H‐NS influences gene expression are discussed.


The EMBO Journal | 2002

Characterization of the minimal catalytic domain within eIF2B: the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor for translation initiation.

Edith Gomez; Sarah S. Mohammad; Graham D. Pavitt

For protein synthesis initiation in eukaryotes, eIF2B is the guanine‐nucleotide exchange factor for eIF2. eIF2B is an essential multi‐subunit factor and a major target for translational control in both yeast and mammalian cells. It was shown previously that the largest eIF2B subunit, eIF2Bϵ, is the only single subunit with catalytic function. Here we report the results of a molecular dissection of the yeast ϵ subunit encoded by GCD6 in which we have identified the catalytic domain. By analysis of a series of N‐terminal deletions in vitro we find that the smallest catalytically active fragment contains residues 518–712 (termed Gcd6p518–712). Further deletion to position 581 (Gcd6p581–712) results in loss of nucleotide exchange function, but eIF2‐binding activity is retained. C‐ terminal deletion of only 61 residues (Gcd6p1–651) results in loss of both functions. Thus Gcd6p518–712 contains two regions that together constitute the catalytic domain of eIF2B. Finally, we show that the catalytic domain can provide eIF2B biological function in vivo when elevated levels eIF2 and tRNAiMet are also present.

Collaboration


Dive into the Graham D. Pavitt's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark P. Ashe

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris M. Grant

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William Rowe

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge