Grant C. Hose

A functional methodology for determining the groundwater regime needed to maintain the health of groundwater-dependent vegetation

In the past, the phrase ‘environmental allocations of water’ has most often been taken to mean allocation of water to rivers. However, it is now accepted that groundwater-dependent ecosystems are an important feature of Australian landscapes and require an allocation of water to maintain their persistence in the landscape. However, moving from this theoretical realisation to the provision and implementation of a field-based management regime is extremely difficult. The following four fundamental questions are identified as being central to the effective management of groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDEs): (1) How do we identify GDEs in the field; put another way, which species or species assemblages or habitats are reliant on a supply of groundwater for their persistence in the landscape; (2) what groundwater regime is required to ensure the persistence of a GDE; (3) how can managers of natural resources (principally water and habitats), with limited time, money and other resources, successfully manage GDEs; and (4) what measures of ecosystem function can be monitored to ensure that management is effective? This paper explicitly addresses these questions and provides a step-by-step theoretical and practical framework for providing answers. In particular, this paper provides an introduction to some of the relevant literature and from this, presents a synthesis, presented in the form of a functional methodology for managing groundwater dependent ecosystems.

Assessing the Need for Groundwater Quality Guidelines for Pesticides Using the Species Sensitivity Distribution Approach

ABSTRACT The water quality needs of groundwater ecosystems are rarely considered. It is currently assumed that water quality guidelines for surface waters will also protect groundwater ecosystems and their fauna, but this assumption has not been tested. The aim of this study is to determine whether water quality guidelines specifically for groundwater ecosystems are needed and to provide a preliminary risk assessment for groundwater ecosystems in Australia. In the absence of sufficient toxicity data for true groundwater fauna, 48–96 h LC50 data for groundwater-dwelling invertebrate orders (e.g., Crustacea, Rotifera) are used as a surrogate and were compared, using Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) curves, to a full suite of surface taxa (including fish, insects, and algae). SSD curves were derived for a range of pesticides previously detected in Australian groundwaters and were fitted using the Burr Type III distribution. Significant differences in the sensitivities of surface and groundwater taxa to Atrazine and Chlorpyrifos were detected, indicating surface water quality guidelines are not always suitable to protect or best manage groundwater ecosystems. Water quality guideline values derived from the SSDs highlighted a significant threat of contamination to groundwater ecosystems from agricultural chemicals. Clearly water quality guidelines specifically for groundwater ecosystems are needed.

Valuation of groundwater-dependent ecosystems: a functional methodology incorporating ecosystem services

Groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDEs) are ecosystems that must have access to groundwater to maintain their ecological structure and function. Rapidly expanding numbers of humans are placing increased demands on groundwater for consumption, industry and agriculture. These demands alter groundwater regimes of GDEs that have evolved over millennia, resulting in the degradation of ecosystem health. As a consequence, the goods and services (ecosystem services) that GDEs provide for humans, which include food production and water purification, are at serious risk of being lost. Effective management of GDEs and their ecosystem services requires prioritisation of the most valuable ecosystems, given that increasing human demands and limited time and money preclude complete protection of all GDEs. Here, we provide an eight-step method for the valuation and initial prioritisation of GDEs. The proposed methodology improves on previous, primarily subjective methods for the valuation of GDEs by employing both economic valuation of the ecosystem services provided by GDEs, and ecological valuation of significant environmental attributes of GDEs. We apply the eight-step method to a hypothetical case study in order to demonstrate its applicability to a catchment containing a range of GDEs of different sizes, each possessing its own suite of threatened taxa. The major benefit of the valuation methodology presented here is that it can be used at three levels of complexity: (1) a full-desktop study, (2) a semi-desktop study requiring stakeholder consultation, and (3) a full field-based study, according to the time and money available for initial prioritisation efforts.

Ecosystem services: An ecophysiological examination

This review aims to discuss ecosystem services, provide illustrative case studies at catchment and local scales and present future research needs. This review discusses the following: (1) Ecosystem services (ES) are those goods and services that are provided by or are attributes of ecosystems that benefit humans. Examples of ES include the timber derived from a forest, the prevention of soil and coastal erosion by vegetation and the amelioration of dryland salinity through prevention of rises in the water table by trees. The provision of ES globally is in decline because of a lack of awareness of the total economic value of ES in the public, policy and political fora. (2) Providing a scientific understanding of the relationships among ecosystem structure, function and provision of ES, plus determining actual economic value of ES, are the central challenges to environmental scientists (including triple-bottom-line economists). (3) Some ES are widely dispersed throughout many different ecosystems. Carbon accumulation in trees and the contribution of biodiversity to ES provision are two examples of highly dispersed attributes common to many ecosystems. In contrast, other ES are best considered within the context of a single defined ecosystem (although they may occur in other ecosystems too). Mangroves as ‘nursery’ sites for juvenile fish is one example. (4) Examples of catchment-scale and local-scale provision of ES are discussed, along with future research issues for the nexus between ES and environmental sciences.

Hyporheic macroinvertebrates in riffle and pool areas of temporary streams in south eastern Australia

The hyporheic zone is an important refuge for invertebrates as surface water recedes in temporary streams. In this study, the structure and functional organisation of hyporheic macroinvertebrate assemblages in pool and dry riffle bed habitats of two episodic streams were compared over summer and winter. Multivariate analyses revealed macroinvertebrate assemblages differed significantly between streams, habitats and seasons. While some seasonal differences were expected, the differences between streams were not, given the similarity and proximity of the catchments, and were due to shifts in the abundance of common taxa. Distinct differences between riffle and pool habitats were evident in both the taxonomic and functional feeding group composition of the assemblages. In particular, riffle habitats contained greater numbers of taxa and individuals and a greater proportion of filter-feeding animals compared to pool habitats. Summer samples also had greater numbers of taxa and individuals and greater proportions of collector-scrapers than winter samples. The relative abundance of functional groups was similar between streams in summer but was more variable in winter. Patterns observed in the taxonomic and functional feeding group structure of the macroinvertebrate assemblages were more characteristic of perennial than episodic streams, despite the absence of regular surface flows. This could be attributed to the relatively constant hyporheic flow in these streams. We suggest that classifications of stream flow should consider hyporheic discharge (not just surface flow) as this clearly influences the stream biota.

Reproducibility of AUSRIVAS rapid bioassessments using macroinvertebrates

Abstract Rapid bioassessments of stream health using macroinvertebrates are particularly useful when information is required quickly or when a large number of sites is to be investigated. The purpose of our study was to examine the effect of small-scale temporal variability (weeks) on rapid bioassessments using the New South Wales AUStralian RIVer Assessment System (AUSRIVAS) protocols. AUSRIVAS provides an assessment of stream condition based on the ratio of the number of taxa collected (observed) at a site, and the number predicted (expected) by a multivariate model. Repeated bioassessments were conducted in both riffle and edge habitats at 2 reference condition sites. Mean ratio of observed to expected number of taxa (O/E-Taxa value) was close to 1 for all sites and times, as expected for reference condition sites. O/E-Taxa values did not vary significantly over 4 to 6 wk, except for riffle samples from one site. Collecting 4 replicate samples increased the consistency of the allocation of sites to categories or bands of biological quality. However, the costs of further replication are likely to outweigh the benefits of using a rapid assessment method. Although tested using the AUSRIVAS rapid bioassessment protocol, these findings have application to other qualitative rapid bioassessment protocols.

Comparison of the fate and toxicity of chlorpyrifos—Laboratory versus a coastal mesocosm system

The widespread use of chlorpyrifos for pest control in urban and rural environments poses a risk of contamination to aquatic environments via runoff, spray drift or spillage. The aim of this study was to assess the fate of chlorpyrifos and its toxicity to common freshwater invertebrates in the laboratory and in stream mesocosms. Chlorpyrifos was rapidly lost from the test systems but the rates of loss varied considerably, such that losses in the mesocosms could not be reliably predicted from the static laboratory studies. This was likely due to the mass transport of chlorpyrifos from the mesocosm via stream flow. Chlorpyrifos was acutely toxic to all invertebrates tested with the cladoceran species (laboratory 48h LC(50) values 0.07-0.10 microg L(-1)) being most sensitive. Despite the differences in the dynamics of chlorpyrifos in the laboratory and mesocosm systems, the sensitivities of the mayfly Atalophlebia australis and the cladoceran Simocephalus vetulus were similar in the 2 systems.

Short-term exposure to aqueous endosulfan affects macroinvertebrate assemblages

The toxicity of the organochlorine pesticide endosulfan to macroinvertebrate assemblages was tested using a system of 24 artificial streams. In separate experiments, the effects of 12- and 48-h exposure to aqueous endosulfan were assessed. No-observed-effect concentrations (NOEC) for endosulfan on macroinvertebrate assemblages were 8.69 and 1.00 microg/L for the 12- and 48-h exposure studies, respectively. In both studies, changes were driven by reduced abundances of the mayfly, Jappa kutera. Algal blooms occurred in the 48-h exposure experiment in streams that received the 6.87 or 30.70 microg/L treatments. These effects occurred at concentrations that might occur as a result of episodic events such as accidental overspray or rainstorms. By establishing a causal link between endosulfan and changes to macroinvertebrate assemblages, this study adds further weight to the hypothesis that endosulfan is a major contributor to changes observed in rivers of the cotton-growing region of New South Wales, Australia during the pesticide spray season.

A meta-analysis comparing the toxicity of sediments in the laboratory and in situ

Sediment toxicity tests in the laboratory are an important part of ecological risk assessments, yet how they relate to sediment toxicity in situ has rarely been explored. Using meta-analysis, we examined differences in the toxicity of sediment tested in the laboratory and in situ. Data from four published studies were subjected to rigorous statistical analyses. Overall, the toxicity of sediments in laboratory tests was substantially less than their toxicity in situ. Differences between laboratory and in situ toxicity, expressed using the log odds ratio effect size, varied significantly among published studies. Effect size increased significantly with increasing sediment toxicity, showing that the more toxic the sediment, the greater the disparity between laboratory and field toxicities. Our findings may not apply to all laboratory/field comparisons; however, we consider that the overlying water in field situations is a significant contributor to this relationship through additional contamination and toxicity. Our findings also have important implications for the use of laboratory tests to assess improvements in sediment quality and remediation, because changes in laboratory toxicity may not reflect the true improvements to sediment quality in situ.

Toxicity of endosulfan to Atalophlebia spp. (Ephemeroptera) in the laboratory, mesocosm, and field

A series of single-species toxicity tests was conducted in the laboratory and in outdoor stream mesocosms. The mayfly nymphs of Atalophlebia spp. (A. av2 and A. av6) were exposed to the organochlorine pesticide endosulfan for either 12- or 48-h periods, with mortality recorded after 96 h. For both exposure periods, the lethal concentration (LC50 and LC 10) values were not significantly different between laboratory and mesocosm single-species tests, suggesting that the absence of natural environmental conditions and biological interactions in laboratory single-species tests did not influence the toxicity of technical endosulfan to Atalophlebia spp. Interpolation of toxicity test data indicates that peak endosulfan concentrations recorded in the rivers during storm events are likely to cause only minimal impact on Atalophlebia spp. populations. This suggests that changes in the abundance of populations observed in the field, if due to total endosulfan alone, are the result of chronic rather than acute exposure.