Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Grant Logan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Grant Logan.


26th European Conference on Laser Interaction with Matter (ECLIM 2000) | 2001

PHELIX: a petawatt high-energy laser for heavy ion experiments

Markus Roth; Bruno Becker-de Mos; R. Bock; Stefan Borneis; Herbert Brandt; C. Bruske; John A. Caird; E. L. Dewald; C. Haefner; D. H. H. Hoffmann; M.P. Kalachnikov; H.-J. Kluge; Ferenc Krausz; Thomas Kuehl; Grant Logan; D. Marx; Paul Neumayer; P. V. Nickles; M. P. Perry; K. Poppensieker; Irene Reinhard; W. Sandner; Roland A. Sauerbrey; A. Tauschwitz; I. Will

The unique combination of an intense heavy ion beam accelerator and a high energy laser opens the possibility of exploring new physics taking advantage of the synergy of both facilities. A variety of new fields can be addressed with this combination in plasma physics, atomic physics, nuclear- and astro-physics as well as material research. In addition, using CPA-technology, laser pulses with a pulse power of up to a petawatt opens the door to explore the regime of fully relativistic plasmas. Therefore the Gesellschaft fuer Schwerionenforschung is augmenting the current high intensity upgrade of the heavy ion accelerator facility with the construction of PHELIX. Designed with two pulse-generating front ends and send to multiple experimental areas PHELIX will serve as a highly versatile laser system for various applications. In this report, we present the design of the laser system and some key experiments that can be performed with this combination for the first time.


Fusion Engineering and Design | 1995

Contributions of the National Ignition Facility to the development of inertial fusion energy

M. Tobin; Grant Logan; T. Diaz de la Rubia; V. Schrock; K.R. Schultz; R. Tokheim; Mohamed A. Abdou; Roger O. Bangerter

The Department of Energy is proposing to construct the National Ignition Facility (NIF) to embark on a program to achieve ignition and modest gain in the laboratory early in the next century. The NM will use a {ge}1.8-MJ, 0.35-mm laser with 192 independent beams, a fifty-fold increase over the energy of the Nova laser. System performance analyses suggest yields as great as 20 MJ may be achievable. NIF will conduct more than 600 shots per year. The benefits of a micro-fusion capability in the laboratory include: Essential contributions to defense programs, resolution of important Inertial Fusion Energy issues, and unparalleled conditions of energy density for basic science and technology research. We have begun to consider the role the National Ignition Facility will fill in the development of Inertial Fusion Energy. While the achievement of ignition and gain speaks for itself in terms of its impact on developing IFE, we believe there are areas of IFE development, such as fusion power technology, IFE target design and fabrication, and understanding chamber dynamics, that would significantly benefit from NIF experiments. In the area of IFE target physics, ion targets will be designed using the NIF laser, and feasibility of high gain targets will be confirmed. Target chamber dynamics experiments will benefit from x-ray and debris energies that mimic in-IFE-chamber conditions. Fusion power technology will benefit from using single-shot neutron yields to measure spatial distribution of neutron heating, activation, and tritium breeding in relevant materials. IFE target systems will benefit from evaluating low-cost target fabrication techniques by testing such targets on NIF.


Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A | 1999

The role of the National Ignition Facility in energy production from inertial fusion

Joseph D. Kilkenny; E. Michael Campbell; J. D. Lindl; Grant Logan; Wayne R. Meier; L. John Perkins; Jeffrey A. Paisner; Michael H. Key; Howard T. Powell; R. L. McCrory; W. Seka

The 1993 declassification of virtually all inertial confinement fusion (ICF) target information relevant to fusion energy development, and demonstrable successes in the physics and technology related to ICF, have laid the ground work for a development plan for an Inertial Fusion Energy (IFE) programme. The ICF programme, funded by the Defense Program in the USA, has clearly demonstrated there is sufficient confidence in ignition and gain to proceed with construction of the National Ignition Facility, which will test the detailed physics of targets suitable for IFE. In September 1998, the facility was about 40% complete and on schedule and within budget for completion in 2003. X–ray–drive ignition is planned for 2007, followed by direct–drive ignition experiments. The other major elements of an IFE development programme, namely, driver, target factory, and target chamber developments can be investigated separately in affordable programmes. Although much work remains, there are concepts for adequately high driver efficiency and target gain, target cost and target chamber survivability to make an exploratory programme in IFE attractive.


Fusion Technology | 1994

Use of the National Ignition Facility for the development of inertial fusion energy

M. Tobin; Grant Logan; A. Anderson; T. Diaz de la Rubia

The primary purpose of the workshop was to gather input from the inertial confinement fusion (ICF) laboratories, private industry, and universities on the potential use of the NIF to conduct experiments in support of the development of IFE. To accomplish this, we asked the over 60 workshop participants to identify key credibility and development issues for IFE in four areas Target Physics --Issues related to the design and performance of targets for IFE; Chamber Dynamics -- Issues in IFE chambers resulting from the deposition of x-rays and debris; Inertial Fusion Power Technology -- Issues for energy conversion, tritium breeding and processing, and radiation shielding; interactions of neutrons with materials; and chamber design; Target System -- Issues related to automated, high-production-rate manufacture of low-cost targets for IFE, target handling and transport, target injection, tracking, and beam pointing. These topics are discussed in this report.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2010

HIFS VNL Monthly Progress Report Preparation for NDCX-II Project

Grant Logan

HIFAN 1765 HIFS VNL Monthly Progress Report Preparation for NDCX-II Project Grant Logan - NDCX-II mission and constraints Joe Kwan - Project overview, desired beam, acceptance goals, issues John Barnard - Target physics for NDCX-II Matthaeus Leitner - Project plan & engineering implications Alex Friedman - Physics design Joe Kwan - Ion source [Visit B58 test stand, NDCX-I, future site of NDCX-II] Erik Gilson - Neutralized drift line Matthaeus Leitner - alignment and assembly Will Waldron - Pulsed power and other EE Frank Bieniosek - Beam diagnostics Accelerator Fusion Research Division Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of California Berkeley, California 94720 May 2009 This work was supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2006

What product might a renewal of Heavy IonFusion development offerthat competes with methane microbes and hydrogen HTGRs

Grant Logan; E.P. Lee; S.S. Yu; Dick Briggs; J.J. Barnard; A. Friedman; Hong Qin; W.L. Waldron; Mattaheus Leitner; Joe Kwan; E. Henestroza; George J. Caporaso; Wayne R. Meier; Max Tabak; Debbie Callahan; Ralph W. Moir; Per F. Peterson

In 1994 a Fusion Technology journal publication by Logan, Moir and Hoffman described how exploiting unusually-strong economy-of-scale for large (8 GWe-scale) multi-unit HIF plants sharing a driver and target factory among several low cost molten salt fusion chambers {at} 100MWe net power DEMO. This scoping study, at a very preliminary conceptual level, attempts to identify how we might meet the last two great challenges taking advantage of several recent ideas and advances which motivate reconsideration of modular HIF drivers: >60X longitudinal compression of neutralized ion beams using a variable waveform induction module in NDCX down to 2 nanosecond bunches, the proof-of-principle demonstration of fast optical-gated solid state SiC switches by George Caporasos group at LLNL (see Georges RPIA06 paper), and recent work by Ed Lee, John Barnard and Hong Qin on methods for time-dependent correction of chromatic focusing errors in neutralized beams with up to 10 % {Delta}v/v velocity tilt, allowing 5 or more bunches, and shorter bunches, and possibly 40 that would need higher peak beam intensities in order to reduce total driver energy below 1 MJ. In principle, both PLIA and induction accelerators might benefit from multiple short bunches (see June 24, 2005 talk by Logan on multi-pulsing in PLIA accelerators for IFE), although the PLIA approach, because of fixed circuit wave velocities at any z, requires imaginative work-arounds to handle the different bunch velocities required. Georges RPIA06 paper also describes a different type of radial line induction linac that might be considered, but its unclear how the required pulse-to-pulse variable waveforms can be obtained with such pulselines. This initial MathCad analysis explores multi-pulsing in modular solenoid induction linacs (concept shown in Figure 1) considering high-q ECR sources, basic induction acceleration limits assuming affordable agile waveforms, transverse and longitudinal bunch confinement constraints, models to optimize bunch lengths, solenoid fields, core radial builds and switching. Figure 2 below illustrates one linac module for a driver example (not yet optimized) consisting of 40 linacs (20 at each end). Necessarily, this first look invokes many new ideas, but could they potentially meet the above challenges?


Journal of Fusion Energy | 2001

Report of the FESAC Panel on a Burning Plasma Program Strategy to Advance Fusion Energy

Stewart C. Prager; Charles C. Baker; David E. Baldwin; H. L. Berk; R. Betti; James D. Callen; V.S. Chan; B. Coppi; Jill Potkalitsky Dahlburg; Steven Dean; William Dorland; J. F. Drake; Jeffrey P. Freidberg; R.J. Goldston; R.J. Hawryluk; R. D. Hazeltine; E. Bickford Hooper; A. Hubbard; Thomas R. Jarboe; Joseph Johnson; Martin Lampe; J. D. Lindl; Grant Logan; E. Marmar; M.E. Mauel; K.A. McCarthy; William McCurdy; Dale M. Meade; Wayne R. Meier; S. L. Milora

This panel was set up by the U.S. Department of Energys Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee in response to a request from the department to prepare a strategy for the study of burning fusion plasmas. Experimental study of a burning plasma has long been a goal of the U.S. science-based fusion energy program. There is an overwhelming consensus among fusion scientists that we are now ready scientifically, and have the full technical capability, to embark on this step. The fusion community is prepared to construct a facility that will allow us to produce this new plasma state in the laboratory, uncover the new physics associated with the fusion burn, and develop and test new technology essential for fusion power. Given this background, the panel has produced a strategy to enable the United States to proceed with this crucial next step in fusion energy science. The strategy was constructed with awareness that the burning plasma program is only one major component in a comprehensive development plan for fusion energy. A strong core science and technology program focused on fundamental understanding, confinement configuration optimization, and the development of plasma and fusion technologies essential to the realization of fusion energy. The core program will also be essential to the successful guidance and exploitation of the burning plasma program, providing the necessary knowledge base and scientific workforce.


Third International Conference on Solid State Lasers for Application to Inertial Confinement Fusion | 1999

High-energy laser system for HIF research at GSI

Markus Roth; R. Bock; U. N. Funk; M. Geissel; D. H. H. Hoffmann; Thomas Kuehl; Grant Logan; J. Meyer-ter-Vehn; Peter Viktor Nickles; Michael D. Perry; W. Seelig; C. Stoeckl; S. Stoewe; W. Suess

For the development of a heavy ion driven inertial confinement fusion scenario a detailed knowledge of the interaction processes of the ions with the converter material is crucial. As this converter will be predominantly in the plasma state one of the main topics of the plasma physics group at Gesellschaft fuer Schwerionenforschung (GSI) is the interaction of heavy ions with dense hot plasma. Based on the latest result on interaction experiments with laser generated plasma targets presented here and concerning the high current upgrade of GSI a new high energy laser system is proposed. It will serve as a driver for interaction experiments with heavy ions as well as a diagnostic tool for heavy ion generated plasmas. In addition, with the combination of high current heavy ion beams and intense lasers innovative, fundamental research in the field of high energy density physics will be accessible for the first time.


Journal Name: Physical Review Special Topics; Journal Volume: 9; Related Information: Journal Publication Date: 2006 | 2006

Beam Energy Scaling on Ion-Induced Electron Yield from K+ Impacton Stainless Steel

Michel Kireeff Covo; A.W. Molvik; A. Friedman; G. Westenskow; J.J. Barnard; R.H. Cohen; David Peter Grote; Steven M. Lund; P.A. Seidl; Joe W. Kwan; Grant Logan; D. Baca; Frank Bieniosek; C. M. Celata; Vay Jean-Luc; J. Vujic


Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2016

Magnetizing NIF Sub-Scale Capsules For Reaching Ignition Using Laser Energy in the 1 MJ Range

George B. Zimmerman; D. Ho; J. Perkins; G. Kagan; Grant Logan; J. Salmonson; Mark A. Rhodes; Donald Blackfield

Collaboration


Dive into the Grant Logan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wayne R. Meier

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E.P. Lee

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Max Tabak

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roger O. Bangerter

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Friedman

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Henestroza

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George J. Caporaso

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.J. Barnard

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Tobin

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ralph W. Moir

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge