Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J.J. Barnard is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J.J. Barnard.


Physics of Plasmas | 2008

Direct drive heavy-ion-beam inertial fusion at high coupling efficiency

B.G. Logan; L. J. Perkins; J.J. Barnard

Issues with coupling efficiency, beam illumination symmetry, and Rayleigh-Taylor instability are discussed for spherical heavy-ion-beam-driven targets with and without hohlraums. Efficient coupling of heavy-ion beams to compress direct-drive inertial fusion targets without hohlraums is found to require ion range increasing several-fold during the drive pulse. One-dimensional implosion calculations using the LASNEX inertial confinement fusion target physics code shows the ion range increasing fourfold during the drive pulse to keep ion energy deposition following closely behind the imploding ablation front, resulting in high coupling efficiencies (shell kinetic energy/incident beam energy of 16% to 18%). Ways to increase beam ion range while mitigating Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities are discussed for future work.


Physics of Plasmas | 2010

Beam dynamics of the Neutralized Drift Compression Experiment-II, a novel pulse-compressing ion accelerator

A. Friedman; J.J. Barnard; R.H. Cohen; D.P. Grote; Steven M. Lund; W.M. Sharp; A. Faltens; E. Henestroza; J.Y. Jung; J.W. Kwan; E.P. Lee; M. Leitner; B.G. Logan; J.-L. Vay; W.L. Waldron; Ronald C. Davidson; M. Dorf; E.P. Gilson; Igor D. Kaganovich

Intense beams of heavy ions are well suited for heating matter to regimes of emerging interest. A new facility, NDCX-II, will enable studies of warm dense matter at ∼1 eV and near-solid density, and of heavy-ion inertial fusion target physics relevant to electric power production. For these applications the beam must deposit its energy rapidly, before the target can expand significantly. To form such pulses, ion beams are temporally compressed in neutralizing plasma; current amplification factors of ∼50–100 are routinely obtained on the Neutralized Drift Compression Experiment (NDCX) at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. In the NDCX-II physics design, an initial non-neutralized compression renders the pulse short enough that existing high-voltage pulsed power can be employed. This compression is first halted and then reversed by the beam’s longitudinal space-charge field. Downstream induction cells provide acceleration and impose the head-to-tail velocity gradient that leads to the final neutraliz...


Physics of fluids. B, Plasma physics | 1993

Recirculating induction accelerators as drivers for heavy ion fusion

J.J. Barnard; F. Deadrick; A. Friedman; David P. Grote; L. V. Griffith; H. C. Kirbie; V. K. Neil; M. A. Newton; Arthur C. Paul; W.M. Sharp; H. D. Shay; Roger O. Bangerter; A. Faltens; C. G. Fong; David L. Judd; E.P. Lee; L. Reginato; S.S. Yu; T. F. Godlove

A two‐year study of recirculating induction heavy ion accelerators as low‐cost driver for inertial‐fusion energy applications was recently completed. The projected cost of a 4 MJ accelerator was estimated to be about


Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2001

Simulation of heavy ion beams with a semi-Lagrangian Vlasov solver

Eric Sonnendrücker; J.J. Barnard; A. Friedman; David P. Grote; Steve Lund

500 M (million) and the efficiency was estimated to be 35%. The principal technology issues include energy recovery of the ramped dipole magnets, which is achieved through use of ringing inductive/capacitive circuits, and high repetition rates of the induction cell pulsers, which is accomplished through arrays of field effect transistor (FET) switches. Principal physics issues identified include minimization of particle loss from interactions with the background gas, and more demanding emittance growth and centroid control requirements associated with the propagation of space‐charge‐dominated beams around bends and over large path lengths. In addition, instabilities such as the longitudinal resistive instability, beam‐breakup instability and betatron‐orbit instability were found to be controllable with careful design.


Fusion Engineering and Design | 1996

Plasma lens focusing and plasma channel transport for heavy ion fusion

A. Tauschwitz; S.S. Yu; S. Eylon; Roger O. Bangerter; W. P. Leemans; C. Peters; J.O. Rasmussen; L. Reginato; J.J. Barnard; W.M. Sharp

Abstract We introduce the semi-Lagrangian Vlasov method, which computes the distribution function of the particles on a grid in phase space, to beam propagation in a uniform focusing channel. With this new tool, we study halo formation in a mismatched thermal beam, and the evolution of an initial semi-Gaussian beam. For the latter problem comparisons are made with the Particle-In-Cell code WARP.


Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 1998

INDUCTION ACCELERATOR ARCHITECTURES FOR HEAVY-ION FUSION

J.J. Barnard; Roger O. Bangerter; A. Faltens; T.J. Fessenden; A. Friedman; E.P. Lee; B.G. Logan; Steven M. Lund; Wayne R. Meier; W.M. Sharp; S.S. Yu

Abstract The capabilities of adiabatic, current-carrying plasma lenses for the final focus problem in heavy-ion-beam-driven inertial confinement fusion are explored and compared with the performance of non-adiabatic plasma lenses, and with that of conventional quadrupole lenses. A final focus system for a fusion reactor is proposed, consisting of a conventional quadrupole lens to prefocus the driver beams to the entrance aperture of the adiabatic lens, the plasma lens itself, and a high current discharge channel inside the chamber to transport the focused beam to the fusion pellet. Two experiments are described that address the issues of adiabatic focusing, and of transport channel generation and stability for ion beam transport. The test of the adiabatic focusing principle shows a 26-fold current density increase of a 1.5 MeV potassium ion beam during operation of the lens. The lens consist of a discharge of length 300 mm, filled with helium gas at a pressure of 1 Torr and is pulsed with a current between 5 and 15 kA. The investigations of discharge channels for ion beam transport show that preionization of the discharge channels with a UV laser can be an efficient way to direct and stabilize the discharge.


Journal of Physics: Conference Series | 2010

Ion-beam-driven warm dense matter experiments

F.M. Bieniosek; J.J. Barnard; A. Friedman; E. Henestroza; J.Y. Jung; M. Leitner; S.M. Lidia; B.G. Logan; R.M. More; P. Ni; P.K. Roy; P.A. Seidl; W.L. Waldron

Abstract The approach to heavy-ion-driven inertial fusion studied most extensively in the US uses induction modulators and cores to accelerate and confine the beam longitudinally. The intrinsic peak-current capabilities of induction machines, together with their flexible pulse formats, provide a suitable match to the high peak-power requirement of a heavy-ion fusion target. However, as in the RF case, where combinations of linacs, synchrotrons, and storage rings offer a number of choices to be examined in designing an optimal system, the induction approach also allows a number of architectures, from which choices must be made. We review the main classes of architecture for induction drivers that have been studied to date. The main choice of accelerator structure is that between the linac and the recirculator, the latter being composed of several rings. Hybrid designs are also possible. Other design questions include which focusing system (electric quadrupole, magnetic quadrupole, or solenoid) to use, whether or not to merge beams, and what number of beams to use – all of which must be answered as a function of ion energy throughout the machine. Also, the optimal charge state and mass must be chosen. These different architectures and beam parameters lead to different emittances and imply different constraints on the final focus. The advantages and uncertainties of these various architectures will be discussed.


Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 1998

Numerical simulation of intense-beam experiments at LLNL and LBNL

Steven M. Lund; J.J. Barnard; George D. Craig; A. Friedman; D.P. Grote; H.S. Hopkins; Thomas C. Sangster; W.M. Sharp; S. Eylon; T.J. Fessenden; E. Henestroza; S.S. Yu; I. Haber

Author(s): Bieniosek, F.M.; Ni, P.; Leitner, M.; Roy, P.; More, R.; Barnard, J.J.; Covo, M. Kireeff; Molvik, A.W.; Yoneda, H.


Nuclear Fusion | 2005

Overview of US heavy ion fusion research

B.G. Logan; F.M. Bieniosek; C.M. Celata; E. Henestroza; Joe W. Kwan; E.P. Lee; M. Leitner; P.K. Roy; P.A. Seidl; S. Eylon; J.-L. Vay; W.L. Waldron; S.S. Yu; J.J. Barnard; D.A. Callahan; R.H. Cohen; A. Friedman; David P. Grote; M. Kireeff Covo; Wayne R. Meier; A.W. Molvik; Steven M. Lund; R.C. Davidson; P.C. Efthimion; E.P. Gilson; L R Grisham; Igor D. Kaganovich; Hong Qin; E.A. Startsev; D.V. Rose

We present intense-beam simulations with the WARP code that are being carried out in support of the Heavy-Ion Fusion experimental programs at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL). The WARP code is an electrostatic particle-in-cell code with an extensive hierarchy of simulation capabilities. Two experiments are analyzed. First, simulations are presented on an 80 keV, 2 mA K‘ bent transport channel at LLNL that employs an alternating-gradient lattice of magnetic quadrupoles for beam focusing and electric dipoles for beam bending. Issues on dispersion-induced changes in beam quality on the transition from straight- to bent-lattice sections are explored. The second experiment analyzed is a 2 MeV, 800 mA, driver-scale injector and matching section at LBNL that is based on a K‘ source and an alternating-gradient lattice of electrostatic quadrupoles biased to accelerate, focus, and match the beam. Issues on beam quality, space-charge waves, and beam hollowing are explored. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.


Laser and Particle Beams | 2003

Integrated experiments for heavy ion fusion

J.J. Barnard; L. Ahle; F.M. Bieniosek; C.M. Celata; Ronald C. Davidson; E. Henestroza; A. Friedman; J.W. Kwan; B.G. Logan; E.P. Lee; Steven M. Lund; Wayne R. Meier; G.-L. Sabbi; P.A. Seidl; W.M. Sharp; D.B. Shuman; W.L. Waldron; Hong Qin; S.S. Yu

Significant experimental and theoretical progress has been made in the U.S. heavy ion fusion program on high-current sources, injectors, transport, final focusing, chambers and targets for high energy density physics (HEDP) and inertial fusion energy (IFE) driven by induction linac accelerators. One focus of present research is the beam physics associated with quadrupole focusing of intense, space-charge dominated heavy-ion beams, including gas and electron cloud effects at high currents, and the study of long-distance-propagation effects such as emittance growth due to field errors in scaled experiments. A second area of emphasis in present research is the introduction of background plasma to neutralize the space charge of intense heavy ion beams and assist in focusing the beams to a small spot size. In the near future, research will continue in the above areas, and a new area of emphasis will be to explore the physics of neutralized beam compression and focusing to high intensities required to heat targets to high energy density conditions as well as for inertial fusion energy.

Collaboration


Dive into the J.J. Barnard's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Friedman

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P.A. Seidl

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B.G. Logan

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven M. Lund

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Henestroza

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S.S. Yu

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W.L. Waldron

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronald C. Davidson

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W.M. Sharp

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Leitner

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge