Gregg Fine

Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients

The development of human cancer is a multistep process characterized by the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations that drive or reflect tumour progression. These changes distinguish cancer cells from their normal counterparts, allowing tumours to be recognized as foreign by the immune system. However, tumours are rarely rejected spontaneously, reflecting their ability to maintain an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1; also called B7-H1 or CD274), which is expressed on many cancer and immune cells, plays an important part in blocking the ‘cancer immunity cycle’ by binding programmed death-1 (PD-1) and B7.1 (CD80), both of which are negative regulators of T-lymphocyte activation. Binding of PD-L1 to its receptors suppresses T-cell migration, proliferation and secretion of cytotoxic mediators, and restricts tumour cell killing. The PD-L1–PD-1 axis protects the host from overactive T-effector cells not only in cancer but also during microbial infections. Blocking PD-L1 should therefore enhance anticancer immunity, but little is known about predictive factors of efficacy. This study was designed to evaluate the safety, activity and biomarkers of PD-L1 inhibition using the engineered humanized antibody MPDL3280A. Here we show that across multiple cancer types, responses (as evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1) were observed in patients with tumours expressing high levels of PD-L1, especially when PD-L1 was expressed by tumour-infiltrating immune cells. Furthermore, responses were associated with T-helper type 1 (TH1) gene expression, CTLA4 expression and the absence of fractalkine (CX3CL1) in baseline tumour specimens. Together, these data suggest that MPDL3280A is most effective in patients in which pre-existing immunity is suppressed by PD-L1, and is re-invigorated on antibody treatment.

Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma have few treatment options after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. In this trial, we assessed treatment with atezolizumab, an engineered humanised immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds selectively to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), in this patient population. METHODS For this multicentre, single-arm, two-cohort, phase 2 trial, patients (aged ≥18 years) with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma whose disease had progressed after previous platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled from 70 major academic medical centres and community oncology practices in Europe and North America. Key inclusion criteria for enrolment were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, measurable disease defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), adequate haematological and end-organ function, and no autoimmune disease or active infections. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour specimens with sufficient viable tumour content were needed from all patients before enrolment. Patients received treatment with intravenous atezolizumab (1200 mg, given every 3 weeks). PD-L1 expression on tumour-infiltrating immune cells (ICs) was assessed prospectively by immunohistochemistry. The co-primary endpoints were the independent review facility-assessed objective response rate according to RECIST v1.1 and the investigator-assessed objective response rate according to immune-modified RECIST, analysed by intention to treat. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to assess whether the objective response rate was significantly higher than the historical control rate of 10% at an α level of 0·05. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02108652. FINDINGS Between May 13, 2014, and Nov 19, 2014, 486 patients were screened and 315 patients were enrolled into the study. Of these patients, 310 received atezolizumab treatment (five enrolled patients later did not meet eligibility criteria and were not dosed with study drug). The PD-L1 expression status on infiltrating immune cells (ICs) in the tumour microenvironment was defined by the percentage of PD-L1-positive immune cells: IC0 (<1%), IC1 (≥1% but <5%), and IC2/3 (≥5%). The primary analysis (data cutoff May 5, 2015) showed that compared with a historical control overall response rate of 10%, treatment with atezolizumab resulted in a significantly improved RECIST v1.1 objective response rate for each prespecified immune cell group (IC2/3: 27% [95% CI 19-37], p<0·0001; IC1/2/3: 18% [13-24], p=0·0004) and in all patients (15% [11-20], p=0·0058). With longer follow-up (data cutoff Sept 14, 2015), by independent review, objective response rates were 26% (95% CI 18-36) in the IC2/3 group, 18% (13-24) in the IC1/2/3 group, and 15% (11-19) overall in all 310 patients. With a median follow-up of 11·7 months (95% CI 11·4-12·2), ongoing responses were recorded in 38 (84%) of 45 responders. Exploratory analyses showed The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) subtypes and mutation load to be independently predictive for response to atezolizumab. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events, of which fatigue was the most common (five patients [2%]), occurred in 50 (16%) of 310 treated patients. Grade 3-4 immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 15 (5%) of 310 treated patients, with pneumonitis, increased aspartate aminotransferase, increased alanine aminotransferase, rash, and dyspnoea being the most common. No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study. INTERPRETATION Atezolizumab showed durable activity and good tolerability in this patient population. Increased levels of PD-L1 expression on immune cells were associated with increased response. This report is the first to show the association of TCGA subtypes with response to immune checkpoint inhibition and to show the importance of mutation load as a biomarker of response to this class of agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma. FUNDING F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Atezolizumab, an Anti–Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Antibody, in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Safety, Clinical Activity, and Immune Correlates From a Phase Ia Study

PURPOSE The objective was to determine the safety and clinical activity of atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), a humanized programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Exploratory biomarkers were analyzed and associated with outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy patients with metastatic RCC, including clear cell (ccRCC; n = 63) and non-clear cell (ncc; n = 7) histologies, received atezolizumab intravenously every 3 weeks. PD-L1 expression was scored at four diagnostic levels (0/1/2/3) that were based on PD-L1 staining on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) with the SP142 assay. Primary end points were safety and toxicity; secondary end points assessed clinical activity per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and immune-related response criteria. Plasma and tissue were analyzed for potential biomarkers of atezolizumab response. RESULTS Grade 3 treatment-related and immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 17% and 4% of patients, respectively, and there were no grade 4 or 5 events. Sixty-three patients with ccRCC were evaluable for overall survival (median, 28.9 months; 95% CI, 20.0 months to not reached) and progression-free survival (median, 5.6 months; 95% CI, 3.9 to 8.2 months), and 62 patients were evaluable for objective response rate (ORR; 15%; 95% CI, 7% to 26%). ORR was evaluated on the basis of PD-L1 IC expression (IC1/2/3: n = 33; 18%; 95% CI, 7% to 35%; and IC0: n = 22; 9%; 95% CI, 1% to 29%). The ORR for patients with Fuhrman grade 4 and/or sarcomatoid histology was 22% (n = 18; 95% CI, 6% to 48%). Decreases in circulating plasma markers and acute-phase proteins and an increased baseline effector T-cell-to-regulatory T-cell gene expression ratio correlated with response to atezolizumab. CONCLUSION Atezolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in patients with metastatic RCC. Correlative studies identified potential predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers. These results have guided ongoing studies and combinations with atezolizumab in RCC.

A phase 1 study of obinutuzumab induction followed by 2 years of maintenance in patients with relapsed CD20-positive B-cell malignancies

This phase 1 study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of obinutuzumab (GA101), a glycoengineered type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody administered as induction followed by 2 years of maintenance. Cohorts of 3 to 6 patients received obinutuzumab (200-2000 mg) intravenously weekly for 4 weeks. Patients with a complete or partial response (or stable disease and clinical benefit) continued to receive obinutuzumab every 3 months, for a maximum of 8 doses. Twenty-two patients with relapsed CD20-positive non-Hodgkin lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia with an indication for treatment and no therapy of higher priority were enrolled. Patients received a median of 4 prior regimens; 86% had received at least 1 rituximab-containing regimen. No dose-limiting or unexpected AEs were observed. Infusion-related reactions were most common (all grades, 73%; grade 3/4, 18%), followed by infection (32%), pyrexia (23%), neutropenia (23%), headache (18%), and nausea (18%). At end of induction, 5 (23%) patients achieved partial responses and 12 (54%) had stable disease. Eight patients received maintenance; best overall response was 32% (6 partial responses/1 complete response). Obinutuzumab induction and maintenance therapy was well tolerated with promising efficacy in this heterogeneous, highly pretreated population and warrants further investigation. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT00576758).

TGFβ attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells

Therapeutic antibodies that block the programmed death-1 (PD-1)–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway can induce robust and durable responses in patients with various cancers, including metastatic urothelial cancer. However, these responses only occur in a subset of patients. Elucidating the determinants of response and resistance is key to improving outcomes and developing new treatment strategies. Here we examined tumours from a large cohort of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who were treated with an anti-PD-L1 agent (atezolizumab) and identified major determinants of clinical outcome. Response to treatment was associated with CD8+ T-effector cell phenotype and, to an even greater extent, high neoantigen or tumour mutation burden. Lack of response was associated with a signature of transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signalling in fibroblasts. This occurred particularly in patients with tumours, which showed exclusion of CD8+ T cells from the tumour parenchyma that were instead found in the fibroblast- and collagen-rich peritumoural stroma; a common phenotype among patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Using a mouse model that recapitulates this immune-excluded phenotype, we found that therapeutic co-administration of TGFβ-blocking and anti-PD-L1 antibodies reduced TGFβ signalling in stromal cells, facilitated T-cell penetration into the centre of tumours, and provoked vigorous anti-tumour immunity and tumour regression. Integration of these three independent biological features provides the best basis for understanding patient outcome in this setting and suggests that TGFβ shapes the tumour microenvironment to restrain anti-tumour immunity by restricting T-cell infiltration.

809OIMMUNE CORRELATES AND LONG TERM FOLLOW UP OF A PHASE IA STUDY OF MPDL3280A, AN ENGINEERED PD-L1 ANTIBODY, IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA (MRCC)

ABSTRACT Aim: PD-L1, which can mediate cancer immune evasion, is broadly expressed in RCC. As RCC can respond to immune-based therapy, blocking PD-L1 represents a strategy to restore tumor-specific T-cell immunity. MPDL3280A, a human mAb containing an engineered Fc-domain, targets PD-L1 to prevent binding to its receptors PD-1 and B7.1 on activated T cells. Interim results showed that MPDL3280A had a manageable safety profile and clinical activity in advanced NSCLC, melanoma and mRCC pts. Here, we report long term follow up and correlative data for the RCC cohort. Methods: mRCC pts were enrolled in a Ph I expansion study. All pts who received MPDL3280A IV q3w at doses of 3-20 mg/kg were evaluable for safety. Pts were treated for ≤ 1 y. Response was assessed by RECIST v1.1. PD-L1 IHC was centrally assessed in tumor biopsies. Results: As of Jan 1, 2014, among 69 mRCC pts evaluable for safety, median age was 61 y and all were ECOG PS 0-1 (48% PS 1). 94% of pts had prior nephrectomy and 87% received prior systemic therapy, including cytokines (39%), VEGF-inhibition (64%) and mTOR inhibitors (26%). Pts received MPDL3280A for a median duration of 7.7 m (0.7-24.3 m). 80% of pts had a treatment-related AE; however, the frequency of G3 related events was 16%, including anemia, dehydration, fatigue and hypophosphatemia (3% each). No related G4 AEs or deaths occurred. Clinical activity was evaluated in 58 pts with clear cell histology dosed prior to Jul 1, 2013; 51 pts (88%) had an evaluable baseline PD-L1 IHC status. The ORR was 14% (8/58 PRs, 95% CI: 6, 25) and the median duration of response was 54 wks (2.7+ to 68.1+ wks). The 24-wk PFS rate was 53% (95% CI: 40, 66). An association was seen between PD-L1 intensity and response to MPDL3280A. Finally, antitumor activity that included immune-related responses was observed in non-clear cell histology pts (n = 10). Updated data including biomarkers will be presented. Conclusions: MPDL3280A was well tolerated, with no treatment-related deaths. Evidence of increased activity was observed in pts with elevated PD-L1. Durable responses and prolonged SD were observed in mRCC pts, warranting further study. Disclosure: D.F. McDermott: has participated in advisory boards for Genentech, BMS and Merck; M. Sznol: has consulted for Immune Design, Merus, Lion Biotechnologies, Kyowa-Kirin, Aztra-Zeneca-Medimmune, BMS, Amgen, Medimmune, Genentech, Symphogen, Nektar, and Anaeropharma; J. Soria: has received honoraria from Genentech and Roche; M.S. Gordon: has served in an advisory/consultant role and has received research funding from Roche/Genentech; O. Hamid: has been a speaker and consultant for Genentech, and research funding has been provided by Genentech; M. Fasso, Y. Wang, J. Bruey and G. Fine: is employed by Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Clinical activity and molecular correlates of response to atezolizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab versus sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma

We describe results from IMmotion150, a randomized phase 2 study of atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) alone or combined with bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) versus sunitinib in 305 patients with treatment-naive metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in intent-to-treat and PD-L1+ populations. Intent-to-treat PFS hazard ratios for atezolizumab + bevacizumab or atezolizumab monotherapy versus sunitinib were 1.0 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69–1.45) and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.82–1.71), respectively; PD-L1+ PFS hazard ratios were 0.64 (95% CI, 0.38–1.08) and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.63–1.67), respectively. Exploratory biomarker analyses indicated that tumor mutation and neoantigen burden were not associated with PFS. Angiogenesis, T-effector/IFN-γ response, and myeloid inflammatory gene expression signatures were strongly and differentially associated with PFS within and across the treatments. These molecular profiles suggest that prediction of outcomes with anti-VEGF and immunotherapy may be possible and offer mechanistic insights into how blocking VEGF may overcome resistance to immune checkpoint blockade.An exploratory randomized controlled clinical trial of renal cell carcinoma identifies molecular patterns distinguishing responders to immune checkpoint blockade alone or combined with angiogenesis inhibitor versus angiogenesis inhibitor alone.

Immune-Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (imRECIST): Refining Guidelines to Assess the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Immunotherapy

Purpose Treating solid tumors with cancer immunotherapy (CIT) can result in unconventional responses and overall survival (OS) benefits that are not adequately captured by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. We describe immune-modified RECIST (imRECIST) criteria, designed to better capture CIT responses. Patients and Methods Atezolizumab data from clinical trials in non-small-cell lung cancer, metastatic urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma were evaluated. Modifications to imRECIST versus RECIST v1.1 included allowance for best overall response after progressive disease (PD) and changes in PD definitions per new lesions (NLs) and nontarget lesions. imRECIST progression-free survival (PFS) did not count initial PD as an event if the subsequent scan showed disease control. OS was evaluated using conditional landmarks in patients whose PFS differed by imRECIST versus RECIST v1.1. Results The best overall response was 1% to 2% greater, the disease control rate was 8% to 13% greater, and the median PFS was 0.5 to 1.5 months longer per imRECIST versus RECIST v1.1. Extension of imRECIST PFS versus RECIST v1.1 PFS was associated with longer or similar OS. Patterns of progression analysis revealed that patients who developed NLs without target lesion (TL) progression had a similar or shorter OS compared with patients with RECIST v1.1 TL progression. Patients infrequently experienced a spike pattern (TLs increase, then decrease) but had longer OS than patients without TL reversion. Conclusion Evaluation of PFS and patterns of response and progression revealed that allowance for TL reversion from PD per imRECIST may better identify patients with OS benefit. Progression defined by the isolated appearance of NLs, however, is not associated with longer OS. These results may inform additional modifications to radiographic criteria (including imRECIST) to better reflect efficacy with CIT agents.

FDG-PET is prognostic and predictive for progression-free survival in relapsed follicular lymphoma: exploratory analysis of the GAUSS study

Abstract An exploratory analysis of 75 follicular lymphoma patients treated with obinutuzumab or rituximab induction therapy (IT) for 4 weeks in the phase II GAUSS study aimed to determine whether positron emission tomography (PET) results could predict progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor response. The proportion of patients with a PFS event (progression or death) was higher in those who were PET-positive after IT (assessed using Deauville five-point scale criteria; 35/52, 67%) than PET-negative (5/20, 25%); the hazard ratio for progression or death was 0.25 (95%CI: 0.01–0.64; p = 0.0018). A significant association was also found when PET results were assessed using International Harmonization Project and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Change between baseline and end of IT in values of standardized uptake value and other PET parameters were associated with PFS and response. Validation of these results in prospective studies of larger cohorts is warranted.

Abstract 2941: Local tumor irradiation combined with α-PDL-1 immune checkpoint inhibition results in local and systemic anti-tumor responses: Successful translation of a mouse model to a human case series

Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2014; April 5-9, 2014; San Diego, CA Introduction: Tumor irradiation induces innate and adaptive immune responses which, rarely, lead to tumor regression at distant sites, the abscopal effect. We have previously demonstrated that immunotherapy including Toll-like-receptor agonists (CpG) and checkpoint inhibitors (anti-CTLA4) both preclinically and clinically ([NCT00185965][1] & [NCT01769222][2]) can significantly increase the rate of systemic, abscopal responses (Kim, Blood 2012 & Brody, JCO 2010). Here we provide the first report of a preclinical murine model and patient case series following local radiation and systemic anti-PD-L1 ([NCT01375842][3]). Methods: Preclinical modeling was performed in a two-tumor, syngenic, A20, lymphoma BALB/c model combining fractionated single tumor radiation and systemic (i.p.) anti-PD-L1. Patients receiving MPDL3280A, a human mAb containing an engineered Fc-domain, as part of the phase 1 clinical trial with mixed responses or asymptomatic progression of disease were eligible for the addition of local radiation therapy. Murine and human immune responses including cell phenotype and function, specifically assessing expression of PD-L1 and production of IFNγ were determined by standard flow cytometry and time of flight mass cytometry (CyTOF). Results: Fractionated radiation delayed tumor growth at the treated site only, and systemic anti-PD-L1 reduced tumor growth rate at both sites, however despite prolonged survival all mice died by day 38 following either monotherapy (radiation or anti-PD-L1). In contrast, combination local fractionated radiation and systemic anti-PD-L1 flattened tumor growth at both the irradiated and un-irradiated site, and prolonged survival with 50% survival at day 48 post-tumor inoculation. Modulation of PD-L1 expression post-radiation and tumor-specific augmentation of IFNγ secretion correlated with the enhanced anti-tumor activity. Five patients including four with solid tumors received fractionated, non-definitive dose radiation with at least stabilization of systemic progression in all patients and a RECIST partial response at systemic sites in 1 patient, notably with a synovial sarcoma. Transient, grade 1-2 inflammatory adverse events (fevers, flu-like symptoms) occurred with no DLTs or serious immune-related toxicities. Modulation of PD-L1 expression, T cell phenotype and IFNγ secretion was observed and updated clinical and immune response will be presented. Conclusion: We provide the first report of combination local radiotherapy with anti-PD-L1 demonstrating synergy in a preclinical model and clinical activity in a limited case series. The magnitude of the immune response and abscopal response rate in mice and humans provides proof-of-concept that anti-PD-L1 may be an equally if not more potent combination immunotherapy with radiation compared to our experience with CpG and/or anti-CTLA4. Citation Format: Idit Sagiv-Barfi, Amanda Rajapaksa, Debra Czerwinski, Serena Chang, Jonathan Hebb, Cariad Chester, Erin Waller, Gregg Fine, Daniel Chen, Marcin Kowanetz, Bryan Irving, Ronald Levy, Holbrook Kohrt. Local tumor irradiation combined with α-PDL-1 immune checkpoint inhibition results in local and systemic anti-tumor responses: Successful translation of a mouse model to a human case series. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2941. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2941 [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00185965&atom=%2Fcanres%2F74%2F19_Supplement%2F2941.atom [2]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01769222&atom=%2Fcanres%2F74%2F19_Supplement%2F2941.atom [3]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01375842&atom=%2Fcanres%2F74%2F19_Supplement%2F2941.atom