Gregg H. Gilbert

Dental health attitudes among dentate black and white adults.

OBJECTIVES Blacks and poor persons share a greater burden of oral disease and are less likely to seek dental care on a regular basis. The role of dental attitudes and knowledge of services on this circumstance is unclear. The authors quantified group differences in dental attitudes and knowledge of services and related them to regularity of dental care use. METHODS As part of the baseline phase of The Florida Dental Care Study, a longitudinal study of oral health, 873 respondents who had at least one tooth and who were 45 years or older participated for an interview and a clinical dental examination. Dental care use, seven dental attitudinal constructs, and knowledge of dental services were queried. RESULTS Forty-five percent of respondents reported going to a dentist only when they have a problem, and 17% of respondents had not seen a dentist in more than 5 years. Ten percent of respondents reported that they had at least one permanent tooth removed by someone other than a dentist (typically, the respondent himself). Blacks and poor persons had more negative attitudes toward dental care and dental health and were less knowledgeable of dental services. Multivariate analyses suggested that dental attitudes were important to understanding the use of dental care services for this diverse group of adults, and that race and poverty contributed independently to dental care use even with dental attitudes taken into account. CONCLUSIONS Dental attitudes contribute to race and poverty differences in dental care use among adults. The persistence of race and poverty effects with attitudes taken into account suggests that additional explanatory factors contribute as well. These differences may contribute to more prevalent and severe oral health decrements among the same adults who also are more likely to suffer from other health decrements.

Orofacial pain symptoms: an interaction between age and sex.

&NA; This study investigated sex and age cohort differences in the subjective report of orofacial pain symptoms in a stratified sample of community dwelling adults. The subjects were 724 participants in the Florida Dental Care Study, a longitudinal study of oral health among dentate adults, age 45 and older at baseline. Pain prevalence and subjective ratings were assessed for a range of orofacial pain sites using a standardized telephone interview. The results suggest that the 6‐month prevalence of jaw joint pain (8.3%), face pain (3.1%), toothache pain (12.0%), painful oral sores (15.6%), and burning mouth (1.6%) found in the FDCS sample are similar to United States population estimates. In addition, prevalence for pain when chewing and temperature sensitivity were also reported as 23% and 24% respectively, suggesting that these two seldom documented painful experiences are common. Female respondents reported higher 6‐month prevalence for multiple symptoms and painful oral sores, with trends also observed for female sex as a risk factor for jaw joint pain and face pain, whereas males were more likely to report temperature sensitivity. A higher percentage of females rated their pain as severe enough to impact behavior for jaw joint pain, toothache pain, and painful oral sores. Few overall age effects were found, with the exception of higher prevalence of temperature sensitivity and pain when chewing in the 45–64‐year‐old group, compared to respondents in the 65+ age cohort. However, the most interesting finding was that when sex by age cohort comparisons were made, with the exception of painful oral sores, all significant differences in pain ratings were found within the 45–64‐year‐old cohort and not the 65+ group. This finding clarified inconsistencies found in earlier studies in the orofacial pain literature where sex differences in pain ratings were found in several adult samples of a wide range of ages but not in a sample of older adults.

Orofacial pain symptom prevalence: selective sex differences in the elderly?

&NA; This study investigated sex differences in orofacial pain symptoms in a sample of elderly adults. Furthermore, differences across sex were tested on symptom continuity, overall duration, pain severity, activity reduction, and health care utilization, related to each specific symptom. Telephone interviews were conducted with a stratified random sample of community dwelling older (65+) north Floridians. A total of 5860 households were contacted and screened, with 75.3% participating to the point where their eligibility for the study could be determined. Of the remaining households, 1636 completed the interview. Of the total sample, 17.4% reported experiencing at least one of the four target orofacial pain symptoms (jaw joint pain, face pain, oral sores, burning mouth) during the past year, suggesting that orofacial pain symptoms are common in older adults. Our findings for prevalence of each specific symptom (jaw joint pain, 7.7%; face pain, 6.9%; oral sores, 6.4%; toothache, 12.0%; burning mouth, 1.7%) are similar to those estimated by the 1989 National Health Interview Survey, for the US adult population. Consistent with other epidemiological and clinical studies, we found that females were more likely to report jaw joint pain and face pain than males. In contrast to clinical studies, no differences were found on subjective ratings of pain severity, for any symptom. Differences across sex were most likely to be reported for jaw joint pain related variables, suggesting undetermined sex‐uniqueness for these symptoms. In contrast to previous studies, older females tended to report lower levels of health care utilization than older males. This is the first study to our knowledge that reports orofacial symptom‐specific sex differences among the elderly.

Risk indicators of edentulism, partial tooth loss and prosthetic status among black and white middle-aged and older adults

OBJECTIVES To describe the prevalence and risk indicators of edentulism; to describe the frequencies of wearing removable dentures; to describe the prevalence and risk indicators of fixed prosthetic restorations; to test the hypothesis that fixed prosthetic restorations are most likely to have been placed in persons at lower risk for dental and periodontal diseases, and to test the hypothesis that, with dental disease, dental behaviors, dental attitudes and ability to afford crowns taken into account, blacks are less likely than whites to have received crowns. METHODS The Florida Dental Care Study is a cohort study of subjects 45 years old or older. A telephone screening interview was done as a first stage to identify 5254 subjects who met eligibility requirements and who self-reported whether they were edentulous. In a second stage, a subsample of dentate subjects was contacted after they completed their telephone screening interview. Of these, 873 subjects completed a baseline in-person interview and dental examination. RESULTS A total of 19% of first-stage subjects were edentulous. In a single multiple logistic regression, having a poorer self-rated level of general health was significantly associated with edentulism, as were being poor, older and white. Among the second-stage participants (all of whom were dentate), several prosthetic patterns were observed. For example, a total of 64% of maxillary full denture wearers reported wearing their denture all the time. Participants had also received numerous fixed prosthodontic services. The proportion of subjects with at least one crown varied widely by subject characteristics. CONCLUSIONS A substantial percentage of non-ideal frequencies of wearing removable prostheses was reported, as were prosthesis-related soreness and broken prostheses. Although we expected and observed an association between having a fixed prosthetic crown and periodontal status, dental fillings, dental attitudes and financial resources, a residual association with race suggests that blacks are much less likely to receive prosthetic crowns. The several possible reasons for this circumstance warrant further investigation.

Incidence of Tooth Loss and Prosthodontic Dental Care: Effect on Chewing Difficulty Onset, a Component of Oral Health–Related Quality of Life

Objectives: To quantify incidence of tooth loss, prosthodontic dental restoration, and chewing difficulty onset and the effect of tooth loss and prosthodontic restoration on chewing difficulty onset.

Twenty–Four Month Incidence of Root Caries among a Diverse Group of Adults

Objectives: (1) Describe for a diverse sample the 24–month incidence of root caries, and (2) test its association with a broad range of clinical, behavioral, financial, and sociodemographic factors. Methods: The Florida Dental Care Study was a cohort study of randomly selected subjects who had at least 1 tooth and were 45 years or older at baseline. In–person interviews and clinical examinations were conducted at baseline and 24 months, with 6–monthly telephone interviews between those times; 723 subjects participated for both examinations. A multinomial logistic regression was done to predict whether the subject was in one of four mutually exclusive groups [new root decay only (NDO); new root filling(s) only (NFO); both new decay and new filling(s) (BOTH), or had neither (NONE)]. Results: Thirty–six percent of subjects had at least 1 new root decayed and/or filled surface (DFS); 17% were in the NDO group, 14% in the NFO group, and 5% in the BOTH group. When limited to participants who had a nonzero increment, the mean (SD) DFS was 2.7 (2.9). Baseline clinical condition (presence of root decay, root filling(s), coronal decay, noncarious root defects, number of teeth present, percent of teeth with at least 4 mm of attachment loss) was predictive of moving from the NONE group into the NDO, NFO, or BOTH groups. The addition of behavioral, financial, and sociodemographic factors improved model fit. For example, regular dental attenders were significantly more likely to move from the NONE group into the NFO group, but regular attendance was not associated with a lower probability of moving from the NONE group into the NDO or BOTH groups. Conclusions: Root caries is a substantive dental health problem in this diverse sample of adults. These analyses demonstrate the utility of disaggregating caries incidence into four mutually exclusive groups for predictive models.

Practices participating in a dental PBRN have substantial and advantageous diversity even though as a group they have much in common with dentists at large

BackgroundPractice-based research networks offer important opportunities to move recent advances into routine clinical practice. If their findings are not only generalizable to dental practices at large, but can also elucidate how practice characteristics are related to treatment outcome, their importance is even further elevated. Our objective was to determine whether we met a key objective for The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN): to recruit a diverse range of practitioner-investigators interested in doing DPBRN studies.MethodsDPBRN participants completed an enrollment questionnaire about their practices and themselves. To date, more than 1100 practitioners from the five participating regions have completed the questionnaire. The regions consist of: Alabama/Mississippi, Florida/Georgia, Minnesota, Permanente Dental Associates, and Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden). We tested the hypothesis that there are statistically significant differences in key characteristics among DPBRN practices, based on responses from dentists who participated in DPBRNs first network-wide study (n = 546).ResultsThere were statistically significant, substantive regional differences among DPBRN-participating dentists, their practices, and their patient populations.ConclusionAlthough as a group, participants have much in common with practices at large; their substantial diversity offers important advantages, such as being able to evaluate how practice differences may affect treatment outcomes, while simultaneously offering generalizability to dentists at large. This should help foster knowledge transfer in both the research-to-practice and practice-to-research directions.

Racial Differences in Predictors of Dental Care Use

OBJECTIVE To test five hypotheses that non-Hispanic African Americans (AAs) and non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) differ in responsiveness to new dental symptoms by seeking dental care, and differ in certain predictors of dental care utilization. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING Florida Dental Care Study, comprising AAs and NHWs 45 years old or older, who had at least one tooth, and who lived in north Florida. STUDY DESIGN We used a prospective cohort design. The key outcome of interest was whether dental care was received in a given six-month period, after adjusting for the presence of certain time-varying and fixed characteristics. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS In-person interviews were conducted at baseline and 24 months after baseline, with six-monthly telephone interviews in between. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS African Americans were less likely to seek dental care during follow-up, with or without adjusting for key predisposing, enabling, and oral health need characteristics. African Americans were more likely to be problem-oriented dental attenders, to be unable to pay an unexpected

Health care utilization by older adults in response to painful orofacial symptoms

500 dental bill, and to report postbaseline dental problems. However, the effect of certain postbaseline dental signs and symptoms on postbaseline dental care use differed between AAs and NHWs. Although financial circumstance was predictive for both groups, it was more salient for NHWs in separate NHW and AA regressions. Frustration with past dental care, propensity to use a homemade remedy, and dental insurance were significant predictors among AAs, but not among NHWs. The NHWs were much more likely to have sought care for preventive reasons. CONCLUSIONS Racial differences in responsiveness to new dental symptoms by seeking dental care were evident, as were differences in other predictors of dental care utilization. These differences may contribute to racial disparities in oral health.

Severe tooth loss in older adults as a key indicator of compromised dietary quality.

The purpose of this study was to determine which specific attributes of painful orofacial symptoms serve as predictors of health care utilization in a population based sample of elderly subjects. Furthermore, we documented patterns of health care utilization selection by type of health care provider. To our knowledge, these specific utilization patterns have never before been reported in the pain literature. Telephone interviews were conducted with a stratified random sample of 1636 community dwelling older (65+) north Floridians. A total of 5860 households were contacted and screened, with 75.3% participating to the point where their eligibility for the study could be determined. The percentage of subjects reporting health care utilization for a specific symptom ranged from 62 to 32%. One or more health care visits were reported by at least 50% of those reporting symptoms of toothache pain, facial pain, jaw joint pain and burning mouth in the past 12 months. These rates suggest that elderly individuals are willing and able to seek health care for painful orofacial symptoms. We found that pain intensity was the best predictor of whether an elderly individual utilized health care or not, which suggests that some pain intensity threshold may exist at which health care seeking behavior is initiated. The overall number of visits was not predicted by pain intensity but by other qualities more associated with time or level of dysfunction caused by the symptom. We also found that elderly adults, typically seek care for toothache from a dentist and from physicians for painful orofacial symptoms not associated with the teeth or mouth. These decisions regarding the selection of a health care professional may, in part, be a function of financial and insurance considerations, anatomical site and perception of the role of dentistry in orofacial care.