Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Sonia K. Makhija is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Sonia K. Makhija.


BMC Oral Health | 2009

Practices participating in a dental PBRN have substantial and advantageous diversity even though as a group they have much in common with dentists at large

Sonia K. Makhija; Gregg H. Gilbert; D. Brad Rindal; Joshua S. Richman; Daniel J. Pihlstrom; Vibeke Qvist

BackgroundPractice-based research networks offer important opportunities to move recent advances into routine clinical practice. If their findings are not only generalizable to dental practices at large, but can also elucidate how practice characteristics are related to treatment outcome, their importance is even further elevated. Our objective was to determine whether we met a key objective for The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN): to recruit a diverse range of practitioner-investigators interested in doing DPBRN studies.MethodsDPBRN participants completed an enrollment questionnaire about their practices and themselves. To date, more than 1100 practitioners from the five participating regions have completed the questionnaire. The regions consist of: Alabama/Mississippi, Florida/Georgia, Minnesota, Permanente Dental Associates, and Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden). We tested the hypothesis that there are statistically significant differences in key characteristics among DPBRN practices, based on responses from dentists who participated in DPBRNs first network-wide study (n = 546).ResultsThere were statistically significant, substantive regional differences among DPBRN-participating dentists, their practices, and their patient populations.ConclusionAlthough as a group, participants have much in common with practices at large; their substantial diversity offers important advantages, such as being able to evaluate how practice differences may affect treatment outcomes, while simultaneously offering generalizability to dentists at large. This should help foster knowledge transfer in both the research-to-practice and practice-to-research directions.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2006

The Relationship Between Sociodemographic Factors and Oral Health–Related Quality of Life in Dentate and Edentulous Community‐Dwelling Older Adults

Sonia K. Makhija; Gregg H. Gilbert; Michael J. Boykin; Mark S. Litaker; Richard M. Allman; Patricia Sawyer Baker; Julie L. Locher; Christine S. Ritchie

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the associations between sociodemographic factors and oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) in dentate and edentulous community‐dwelling older adults.


Journal of Public Health Dentistry | 2011

Examiner Training and Reliability in Two Randomized Clinical Trials of Adult Dental Caries

David W. Banting; Bennett T. Amaechi; James D. Bader; Peter Blanchard; Gregg H. Gilbert; Christina M. Gullion; Jan Carlton Holland; Sonia K. Makhija; Athena Papas; André V. Ritter; Mabi Singh; William M. Vollmer

OBJECTIVES This report describes the training of dental examiners participating in two dental caries clinical trials and reports the inter- and intra-examiner reliability scores from the initial standardization sessions. METHODS Study examiners were trained to use a modified International Caries Detection and Assessment System II system to detect the visual signs of non-cavitated and cavitated dental caries in adult subjects. Dental caries was classified as no caries (S), non-cavitated caries (D1), enamel caries (D2), and dentine caries (D3). Three standardization sessions involving 60 subjects and 3,604 tooth surface calls were used to calculate several measures of examiner reliability. RESULTS The prevalence of dental caries observed in the standardization sessions ranged from 1.4 percent to 13.5 percent of the coronal tooth surfaces examined. Overall agreement between pairs of examiners ranged from 0.88 to 0.99. An intra-class coefficient threshold of 0.60 was surpassed for all but one examiner. Inter-examiner unweighted kappa values were low (0.23-0.35), but weighted kappas and the ratio of observed to maximum kappas were more encouraging (0.42-0.83). The highest kappa values occurred for the S/D1 versus D2/D3 two-level classification of dental caries, for which seven of the eight examiners achieved observed to maximum kappa values over 0.90. Intra-examiner reliability was notably higher than inter-examiner reliability for all measures and dental caries classifications employed. CONCLUSION The methods and results for the initial examiner training and standardization sessions for two large clinical trials are reported. Recommendations for others planning examiner training and standardization sessions are offered.


International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry | 2013

A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth.

John D. Ruby; Charles F. Cox; Stephen C. Mitchell; Sonia K. Makhija; Papimon Chompu-inwai; Janice Jackson

BACKGROUND Alternatives to vital pulpotomy treatment in primary teeth are being sought because of the high formaldehyde content of traditional formocresol (FC) pulpotomy medicaments. AIM The aim was to compare the clinical and radiographic success of vital pulpotomy treatment in primary molars using 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) versus a 1:5 dilution of Buckleys FC. DESIGN Pulpotomies were performed in primary molars of healthy children between 3 and 10 years old. Sixty-five primary teeth were randomized into two groups that were evaluated for treatment outcomes. Following treatment, the pulp chamber was filled with zinc oxide eugenol (ZnOE) and restored with a stainless steel crown cemented with glass ionomer cement. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were recorded at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS The control (FC) and experimental (NaOCl) groups demonstrated 100% clinical success at 6 and 12 months. The NaOCl group had 86% (19/22) radiographic success at 6 months and 80% (12/15) at 12 months. The FC group had 84% (21/25) radiographic success at 6 months and 90% (9/10) at 12 months. No significant differences were found in the radiographic outcomes between the two groups at 6 and 12 months (Fishers exact test; P=0.574 and P=0.468, respectively). CONCLUSION NaOCl demonstrated clinical and radiographic success comparable to FC.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2007

Association Between Aspects of Oral Health–Related Quality of Life and Body Mass Index in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults

Sonia K. Makhija; Gregg H. Gilbert; Mark S. Litaker; Richard M. Allman; Patricia Sawyer; Julie L. Locher; Christine S. Ritchie

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether underweight, normal‐weight, overweight, and obese older adults differ in aspects of their oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL).


Caries Research | 2014

Characteristics, Detection Methods and Treatment of Questionable Occlusal Carious Lesions: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Sonia K. Makhija; Gregg H. Gilbert; Ellen Funkhouser; James D. Bader; Valeria V. Gordan; D. B. Rindal; Daniel J. Pihlstrom; Vibeke Qvist

Questionable occlusal carious lesions (QOC) can be defined as an occlusal tooth surface with no cavitation and no radiographic radiolucencies, but caries is suspected due to roughness, surface opacities or staining. An earlier analysis of data from this study indicates 1/3 of patients have a QOC. The objective of this report has been to quantify the characteristics of these common lesions, the diagnostic aids used and the treatment of QOC. A total of 82 dentist and hygienist practitioner-investigators from the USA and Denmark in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network participated. When consenting patients presented with a QOC, information was recorded about the patient, tooth, lesion and treatments. A total of 2,603 QOC from 1,732 patients were analyzed. The lesions were usually associated with a fissure, on molars, and varied from yellow to black in color. Half presented with a chalky luster and had a rough surface when examined with an explorer. There was an association between color and luster: 10% were chalky-light, 47% were shiny-dark and 42% were mixtures. A higher proportion of chalky than of shiny lesions were light (22 vs. 9%; p < 0.001). Lesions light in color were less common in adults than in pediatric patients (9 vs. 32%; p < 0.001). Lesions that were chalky and light were more common among pediatric than among adult patients (22 vs. 6%; p < 0.001). This is the first study to investigate characteristics of QOC in routine clinical practice. Clinicians commonly face this diagnostic uncertainty. Determining the characteristics of these lesions is relevant when making diagnostic and treatment decisions.


Journal of the American Dental Association | 2014

Twenty-month follow-up of occlusal caries lesions deemed questionable at baseline : Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Sonia K. Makhija; Gregg H. Gilbert; Ellen Funkhouser; James D. Bader; Valeria V. Gordan; D. Brad Rindal; Vibeke Qvist; Pia Nørrisgaard

BACKGROUND A questionable occlusal caries (QOC) lesion can be defined as an occlusal surface with no radiographic evidence of caries, but caries is suspected because of clinical appearance. In this study, the authors report the results of a 20-month follow-up of these lesions. METHODS Fifty-three clinicians from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network participated in this study, recording lesion characteristics at baseline and lesion status at 20 months. RESULTS At baseline, 1,341 QOC lesions were examined; the treatment that was planned for 1,033 of those at baseline was monitoring (oral hygiene instruction, applying or prescribing fluoride or varnish, or both), and the remaining 308 received a sealant (n = 192) or invasive therapy (n = 116). At the 20-month visit, clinicians continued to monitor 927 (90 percent) of the 1,033 monitored lesions. Clinicians decided to seal 61 (6 percent) of the 1,033 lesions (mean follow-up, 19 months) and invasively treat 45 (4 percent) of them (mean follow-up, 15 months). Young patient age (< 18 years) (odds ratio = 3.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7-6.8) and the lesions being on a molar (odds ratio = 1.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3-2.6) were associated with the clinicians deciding at some point after follow-up to seal the lesion or treat it invasively. CONCLUSIONS Almost all (90 percent) QOC lesions for which the treatment planned at baseline was monitoring still were planned to undergo monitoring after 20 months. This finding suggests that noninvasive management is appropriate for these lesions. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Previous study results from baseline indicated a high prevalence of QOC lesions (34 percent). Clinicians should consider long-term monitoring when making treatment decisions about these lesions.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2011

Oral Health–Related Quality of Life and Life-Space Mobility in Community-dwelling Older Adults

Sonia K. Makhija; Gregg H. Gilbert; Olivio J. Clay; Jonathan C. Matthews; Patricia Sawyer; Richard M. Allman

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the associations between measures of oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) and life‐space mobility (LSM) in community‐dwelling older adults.


Caries Research | 2016

A Predictive Model for Root Caries Incidence

André V. Ritter; John S. Preisser; Chaitanya P. Puranik; Yunro Chung; James D. Bader; Daniel A. Shugars; Sonia K. Makhija; William M. Vollmer

This study aimed to find the set of risk indicators best able to predict root caries (RC) incidence in caries-active adults utilizing data from the Xylitol for Adult Caries Trial (X-ACT). Five logistic regression models were compared with respect to their predictive performance for incident RC using data from placebo-control participants with exposed root surfaces at baseline and from two study centers with ancillary data collection (n = 155). Prediction performance was assessed from baseline variables and after including ancillary variables [smoking, diet, use of removable partial dentures (RPD), toothbrush use, income, education, and dental insurance]. A sensitivity analysis added treatment to the models for both the control and treatment participants (n = 301) to predict RC for the control participants. Forty-nine percent of the control participants had incident RC. The model including the number of follow-up years at risk, the number of root surfaces at risk, RC index, gender, race, age, and smoking resulted in the best prediction performance, having the highest AUC and lowest Brier score. The sensitivity analysis supported the primary analysis and gave slightly better performance summary measures. The set of risk indicators best able to predict RC incidence included an increased number of root surfaces at risk and increased RC index at baseline, followed by white race and nonsmoking, which were strong nonsignificant predictors. Gender, age, and increased number of follow-up years at risk, while included in the model, were also not statistically significant. The inclusion of health, diet, RPD use, toothbrush use, income, education, and dental insurance variables did not improve the prediction performance.


Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology | 2014

Visual scoring of non cavitated caries lesions and clinical trial efficiency, testing xylitol in caries-active adults

John P. Brown; Bennett T. Amaechi; James D. Bader; Gregg H. Gilbert; Sonia K. Makhija; Juanita Lozano-Pineda; Michael C. Leo; Chuhe Chen; William M. Vollmer

OBJECTIVES To better understand the effectiveness of xylitol in caries prevention in adults and to attempt improved clinical trial efficiency. METHODS As part of the Xylitol for Adult Caries Trial (X-ACT), non cavitated and cavitated caries lesions were assessed in subjects who were experiencing the disease. The trial was a test of the effectiveness of 5 g/day of xylitol, consumed by dissolving in the mouth five 1 g lozenges spaced across each day, compared with a sucralose placebo. For this analysis, seeking trial efficiency, 538 subjects aged 21-80, with complete data for four dental examinations, were selected from the 691 randomized into the 3-year trial, conducted at three sites. Acceptable inter- and intra-examiner reliability before and during the trial was quantified using the kappa statistic. RESULTS The mean annualized noncavitated plus cavitated lesion transition scores in coronal and root surfaces, from sound to carious favoured xylitol over placebo, during the three cumulative periods of 12, 24, and 33 months, but these clinically and statistically nonsignificant differences declined in magnitude over time. Restricting the present assessment to those subjects with a higher baseline lifetime caries experience showed possible but inconsistent benefit. CONCLUSIONS There was no clear and clinically relevant preventive effect of xylitol on caries in adults with adequate fluoride exposure when non cavitated plus cavitated lesions were assessed. This conformed to the X-ACT trial result assessing cavitated lesions. Including non cavitated lesion assessment in this full-scale, placebo-controlled, multisite, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial in adults experiencing dental caries did not achieve added trial efficiency or demonstrate practical benefit of xylitol. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT00393055.

Collaboration


Dive into the Sonia K. Makhija's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregg H. Gilbert

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James D. Bader

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel A. Shugars

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark S. Litaker

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

André V. Ritter

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge