Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gregory Belenky is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gregory Belenky.


Nature Reviews Neuroscience | 2008

Sleep as a fundamental property of neuronal assemblies

James M. Krueger; David M. Rector; Sandip Roy; Hans P. A. Van Dongen; Gregory Belenky; Jaak Panksepp

Sleep is vital to cognitive performance, productivity, health and well-being. Earlier theories of sleep presumed that it occurred at the level of the whole organism and that it was governed by central control mechanisms. However, evidence now indicates that sleep might be regulated at a more local level in the brain: it seems to be a fundamental property of neuronal networks and is dependent on prior activity in each network. Such local-network sleep might be initiated by metabolically driven changes in the production of sleep-regulatory substances. We discuss a mathematical model which illustrates that the sleep-like states of individual cortical columns can be synchronized through humoral and electrical connections, and that whole-organism sleep occurs as an emergent property of local-network interactions.


Journal of Sleep Research | 2011

Sleep disorders and work performance: Findings from the 2008 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America poll

Leslie M. Swanson; J. Todd Arnedt; Mark R. Rosekind; Gregory Belenky; Thomas J. Balkin; Christopher L. Drake

Chronic sleep deprivation is common among workers, and has been associated with negative work outcomes, including absenteeism and occupational accidents. The objective of the present study is to characterize reciprocal relationships between sleep and work. Specifically, we examined how sleep impacts work performance and how work affects sleep in individuals not at‐risk for a sleep disorder; assessed work performance outcomes for individuals at‐risk for sleep disorders, including insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and restless legs syndrome (RLS); and characterized work performance impairments in shift workers (SW) at‐risk for shift work sleep disorders relative to SW and day workers. One‐thousand Americans who work 30u2003h per week or more were asked questions about employment, work performance and sleep in the National Sleep Foundation’s 2008 Sleep in America telephone poll. Long work hours were associated with shorter sleep times, and shorter sleep times were associated with more work impairments. Thirty‐seven percent of respondents were classified as at‐risk for any sleep disorder. These individuals had more negative work outcomes as compared with those not at‐risk for a sleep disorder. Presenteeism was a significant problem for individuals with insomnia symptoms, OSA and RLS as compared with respondents not at‐risk. These results suggest that long work hours may contribute to chronic sleep loss, which may in turn result in work impairment. Risk for sleep disorders substantially increases the likelihood of negative work outcomes, including occupational accidents, absenteeism and presenteeism.


Sleep | 2015

Recommended Amount of Sleep for a Healthy Adult: A Joint Consensus Statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society.

Nathaniel F. Watson; M. Safwan Badr; Gregory Belenky; Donald L. Bliwise; Orfeu M. Buxton; Daniel J. Buysse; David F. Dinges; James E. Gangwisch; Michael A. Grandner; Clete A. Kushida; Raman K. Malhotra; Jennifer L. Martin; Sanjay R. Patel; Stuart F. Quan; Esra Tasali; Michael Twery; Janet B. Croft; Elise Maher; Jerome A. Barrett; Sherene M. Thomas; Jonathan L. Heald

ABSTRACTnSleep is essential for optimal health. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and Sleep Research Society (SRS) developed a consensus recommendation for the amount of sleep needed to promote optimal health in adults, using a modified RAND Appropriateness Method process. The recommendation is summarized here. A manuscript detailing the conference proceedings and evidence supporting the final recommendation statement will be published in SLEEP and the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine.


Journal of Theoretical Biology | 2009

A new mathematical model for the homeostatic effects of sleep loss on neurobehavioral performance

Peter McCauley; Leonid V. Kalachev; Amber D. Smith; Gregory Belenky; David F. Dinges; Hans P. A. Van Dongen

The two-process model of sleep regulation makes accurate predictions of sleep timing and duration for a variety of experimental sleep deprivation and nap sleep scenarios. Upon extending its application to waking neurobehavioral performance, however, the model fails to predict the effects of chronic sleep restriction. Here we show that the two-process model belongs to a broader class of models formulated in terms of coupled non-homogeneous first-order ordinary differential equations, which have a dynamic repertoire capturing waking neurobehavioral functions across a wide range of wake/sleep schedules. We examine a specific case of this new model class, and demonstrate the existence of a bifurcation: for daily amounts of wakefulness less than a critical threshold, neurobehavioral performance is predicted to converge to an asymptotically stable state of equilibrium; whereas for daily wakefulness extended beyond the critical threshold, neurobehavioral performance is predicted to diverge from an unstable state of equilibrium. Comparison of model simulations to laboratory observations of lapses of attention on a psychomotor vigilance test (PVT), in experiments on the effects of chronic sleep restriction and acute total sleep deprivation, suggests that this bifurcation is an essential feature of performance impairment due to sleep loss. We present three new predictions that may be experimentally verified to validate the model. These predictions, if confirmed, challenge conventional notions about the effects of sleep and sleep loss on neurobehavioral performance. The new model class implicates a biological system analogous to two connected compartments containing interacting compounds with time-varying concentrations as being a key mechanism for the regulation of psychomotor vigilance as a function of sleep loss. We suggest that the adenosinergic neuromodulator/receptor system may provide the underlying neurobiology.


Accident Analysis & Prevention | 2011

Modelling fatigue and the use of fatigue models in work settings

Drew Dawson; Y. Ian Noy; Mikko Härmä; Torbjörn Åkerstedt; Gregory Belenky

In recent years, theoretical models of the sleep and circadian system developed in laboratory settings have been adapted to predict fatigue and, by inference, performance. This is typically done using the timing of prior sleep and waking or working hours as the primary input and the time course of the predicted variables as the primary output. The aim of these models is to provide employers, unions and regulators with quantitative information on the likely average level of fatigue, or risk, associated with a given pattern of work and sleep with the goal of better managing the risk of fatigue-related errors and accidents/incidents. The first part of this review summarises the variables known to influence workplace fatigue and draws attention to the considerable variability attributable to individual and task variables not included in current models. The second part reviews the current fatigue models described in the scientific and technical literature and classifies them according to whether they predict fatigue directly by using the timing of prior sleep and wake (one-step models) or indirectly by using work schedules to infer an average sleep-wake pattern that is then used to predict fatigue (two-step models). The third part of the review looks at the current use of fatigue models in field settings by organizations and regulators. Given their limitations it is suggested that the current generation of models may be appropriate for use as one element in a fatigue risk management system. The final section of the review looks at the future of these models and recommends a standardised approach for their use as an element of the defenses-in-depth approach to fatigue risk management.


Sleep | 2015

Joint Consensus Statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society on the Recommended Amount of Sleep for a Healthy Adult: Methodology and Discussion

Nathaniel F. Watson; M. Safwan Badr; Gregory Belenky; Donald L. Bliwise; Orfeu M. Buxton; Daniel J. Buysse; David F. Dinges; James E. Gangwisch; Michael A. Grandner; Clete A. Kushida; Raman K. Malhotra; Jennifer L. Martin; Sanjay R. Patel; Stuart F. Quan; Esra Tasali; Michael Twery; Janet B. Croft; Elise Maher; Jerome A. Barrett; Sherene M. Thomas; Jonathan L. Heald

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society recently released a Consensus Statement regarding the recommended amount of sleep to promote optimal health in adults. This paper describes the methodology, background literature, voting process, and voting results for the consensus statement. In addition, we address important assumptions and challenges encountered during the consensus process. Finally, we outline future directions that will advance our understanding of sleep need and place sleep duration in the broader context of sleep health.


Sleep Medicine Reviews | 2013

Deconstructing and reconstructing cognitive performance in sleep deprivation

Melinda L. Jackson; Glenn Gunzelmann; Paul Whitney; John M. Hinson; Gregory Belenky; Arnaud Rabat; Hans P. A. Van Dongen

Mitigation of cognitive impairment due to sleep deprivation in operational settings is critical for safety and productivity. Achievements in this area are hampered by limited knowledge about the effects of sleep loss on actual job tasks. Sleep deprivation has different effects on different cognitive performance tasks, but the mechanisms behind this task-specificity are poorly understood. In this context it is important to recognize that cognitive performance is not a unitary process, but involves a number of component processes. There is emerging evidence that these component processes are differentially affected by sleep loss. Experiments have been conducted to decompose sleep-deprived performance into underlying cognitive processes using cognitive-behavioral, neuroimaging and cognitive modeling techniques. Furthermore, computational modeling in cognitive architectures has been employed to simulate sleep-deprived cognitive performance on the basis of the constituent cognitive processes. These efforts are beginning to enable quantitative prediction of the effects of sleep deprivation across different task contexts. This paper reviews a rapidly evolving area of research, and outlines a theoretical framework in which the effects of sleep loss on cognition may be understood from the deficits in the underlying neurobiology to the applied consequences in real-world job tasks.


Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine | 2015

Recommended amount of sleep for a healthy adult: A joint consensus statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society

Nathaniel F. Watson; M. Safwan Badr; Gregory Belenky; Donald L. Bliwise; Orfeu M. Buxton; Daniel J. Buysse; David F. Dinges; James E. Gangwisch; Michael A. Grandner; Clete A. Kushida; Raman K. Malhotra; Jennifer L. Martin; Sanjay R. Patel; Stuart F. Quan; Esra Tasali; Michael Twery; Janet B. Croft; Elise Maher; Jerome A. Barrett; Sherene M. Thomas; Jonathan L. Heald

Sleep is essential for optimal health. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and Sleep Research Society (SRS) developed a consensus recommendation for the amount of sleep needed to promote optimal health in adults, using a modified RAND Appropriateness Method process. The recommendation is summarized here. A manuscript detailing the conference proceedings and evidence supporting the final recommendation statement will be published in SLEEP and the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine.


European Journal of Neuroscience | 2009

Physiological markers of local sleep

David M. Rector; Jennifer L. Schei; Hans P. A. Van Dongen; Gregory Belenky; James M. Krueger

Substantial evidence suggests that brain regions that have been disproportionately used during waking will require a greater intensity and/or duration of subsequent sleep. For example, rats use their whiskers in the dark and their eyes during the light, and this is manifested as a greater magnitude of electroencephalogram (EEG) slow‐wave activity in the somatosensory and visual cortex during sleep in the corresponding light and dark periods respectively. The parsimonious interpretation of such findings is that sleep is distributed across local brain regions and is use‐dependent. The fundamental properties of sleep can also be experimentally defined locally at the level of small neural assemblies such as cortical columns. In this view, sleep is orchestrated, but not fundamentally driven, by central mechanisms. We explore two physiological markers of local, use‐dependent sleep, namely, an electrical marker apparent as a change in the size and shape of an electrical evoked response, and a metabolic marker evident as an evoked change in blood volume and oxygenation delivered to activated tissue. Both markers, applied to cortical columns, provide a means to investigate physiological mechanisms for the distributed homeostatic regulation of sleep, and may yield new insights into the consequences of sleep loss and sleep pathologies on waking brain function.


Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine | 2015

Joint Consensus Statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society on the Recommended Amount of Sleep for a Healthy Adult: Methodology and Discussion.

Nathaniel F. Watson; M. Safwan Badr; Gregory Belenky; Donald L. Bliwise; Orfeu M. Buxton; Daniel J. Buysse; David F. Dinges; James E. Gangwisch; Michael A. Grandner; Clete A. Kushida; Raman K. Malhotra; Jennifer L. Martin; Sanjay R. Patel; Stuart F. Quan; Esra Tasali; Michael Twery; Janet B. Croft; Elise Maher; Jerome A. Barrett; Sherene M. Thomas; Jonathan L. Heald

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society recently released a Consensus Statement regarding the recommended amount of sleep to promote optimal health in adults. This paper describes the methodology, background literature, voting process, and voting results for the consensus statement. In addition, we address important assumptions and challenges encountered during the consensus process. Finally, we outline future directions that will advance our understanding of sleep need and place sleep duration in the broader context of sleep health.

Collaboration


Dive into the Gregory Belenky's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas J. Balkin

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nancy J. Wesensten

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel P. Redmond

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David R. Thorne

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary H. Kamimori

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Helen C. Sing

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maria L. Thomas

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stanley W. Hall

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David F. Dinges

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge