Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gregory Homan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gregory Homan.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2006

2006 Status Report Savings Estimates for the ENERGY STAR(R) Voluntary Labeling Program

Marla Sanchez; Carrie A. Webber; Richard E. Brown; Gregory Homan

ENERGY STAR(R) is a voluntary labeling program designed to identify and promote energy-efficient products, buildings and practices. Operated jointly by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), ENERGY STAR labels exist for more than thirty products, spanning office equipment, residential heating and cooling equipment, commercial and residential lighting, home electronics, and major appliances. This report presents savings estimates for a subset of ENERGY STAR program activities, focused primarily on labeled products. We present estimates of the energy, dollar and carbon savings achieved by the program in the year 2002, what we expect in 2003, and provide savings forecasts for two market penetration scenarios for the period 2003 to 2020. The target market penetration forecast represents our best estimate of future ENERGY STAR savings. It is based on realistic market penetration goals for each of the products. We also provide a forecast under the assumption of 100 percent market penetration; that is, we assume that all purchasers buy ENERGY STAR-compliant products instead of standard efficiency products throughout the analysis period.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2008

Savings estimates for the United States Environmental Protection Agency?s ENERGY STAR voluntary product labeling program

Marla Sanchez; Richard E. Brown; Gregory Homan; Carrie A. Webber

ENERGY STAR is a voluntary energy efficiency-labeling program operated jointly by the United States Department of Energy and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Since the program inception in 1992, ENERGY STAR has become a leading international brand for energy efficient products. ENERGY STARs central role in the development of regional, national, and international energy programs necessitates an open process whereby its program achievements to date as well as projected future savings are shared with committed stakeholders. Through 2006, US EPA?S ENERGY STAR labeled products saved 4.8 EJ of primary energy and avoided 82 Tg C equivalent. We project that US EPA?S ENERGY STAR labeled products will save 12.8 EJ and avoid 203 Tg C equivalent over the period 2007-2015. A sensitivity analysis examining two key inputs (carbon factor and ENERGY STAR unit sales) bounds the best estimate of carbon avoided between 54 Tg C and 107 Tg C (1993 to 2006) and between 132 Tg C and 278 Tg C (2007 to 2015).


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2010

Calendar Year 2007 Program Benefits for ENERGY STAR Labeled Products

Marla Sanchez; Gregory Homan; Richard E. Brown

ENERGY STAR is a voluntary energy efficiency-labeling program operated jointly by the United States Department of Energy and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Since the program inception in 1992, ENERGY STAR has become a leading international brand for energy efficient products. ENERGY STARs central role in the development of regional, national, and international energy programs necessitates an open process whereby its program achievements to date as well as projected future savings are shared with committed stakeholders. Through 2007, the program saved 7.1 Quads of primary energy and avoided 128 MtC equivalent. The forecast shows that the program is expected to save 21.2 Quads of primary energy and avoid 375 MtC equivalent over the period 2008-2015. The sensitivity analysis bounds the best estimate of carbon avoided between 84 MtC and 172 MtC (1993 to 2007) and between 243 MtC and 519 MtC (2008 to 2015).


Other Information: PBD: 14 May 2004 | 2004

Field power measurements of imaging equipment

Marla McWhinney; Gregory Homan; Richard E. Brown; Judy A. Roberson; Bruce Nordman; John F. Busch

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, electricity use by non-PC commercial office equipment is growing at an annual rate of nearly 5 percent (AEO 2003). To help address this growth in consumption, U.S. EPA periodically updates its ENERGY STAR specifications as products and markets change. This report presents background research conducted to help EPA update the ENERGY STAR specification for imaging equipment, which covers printers, fax machines, copiers, scanners, and multifunction devices (MFDs). We first estimated the market impact of the current ENERGY STAR imaging specification, finding over 90 percent of the current market complies with the specification. We then analyzed a sample of typical new imaging products, including 11 faxes, 57 printers and 19 copiers/MFD. For these devices we metered power levels in the most common modes: active/ready/sleep/off, and recorded features that would most likely affect energy consumption. Our metering indicates that for many products and speed bins, current models consume substantially less power than the current specification. We also found that for all product categories, power consumption varied most considerably across technology (i.e. inkjet vs. laser). Although inkjet printers consumed less energy than laser printers in active, ready and sleep-mode, they consumed more power on average while off, mostly due to the use of external power supplies. Based on these findings, we developed strategies for the ENERGY STAR program to achieve additional energy reductions. Finally, we present an assessment of manufacturers ENERGY STAR labeling practices.


ieee international symposium on sustainable systems and technology | 2009

Assessment of supply chain energy efficiency potentials: A U.S. case study

Eric Masanet; Klaas Jan Kramer; Gregory Homan; Richard E. Brown; Ernst Worrell

This paper summarizes a modeling framework that characterizes the key underlying technologies and processes that contribute to the supply chain energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of a variety of goods and services purchased by U.S. consumers. The framework couples an input-output supply chain modeling approach with “bottom-up” fuel end use models for individual IO sectors. This fuel end use modeling detail allows energy and policy analysts to better understand the underlying technologies and processes contributing to the supply chain energy and GHG “footprints” of goods and services. To illustrate the policy-relevance of this approach, a case study was conducted to estimate achievable household GHG footprint reductions associated with the adoption of best practice energy-efficient supply chain technologies.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2008

EPA ENERGY STAR: Tackling Growth in Home Electronics and Small Appliances

Marla Sanchez; Richard E. Brown; Gregory Homan

Over a decade ago, the electricity consumption associated with home electronics and other small appliances emerged onto the global energy policy landscape as one of the fastest growing residential end uses with the opportunity to deliver significant energy savings. As our knowledge of this end use matures, it is essential to step back and evaluate the degree to which energy efficiency programs have successfully realized energy savings and where savings opportunities have been missed. For the past fifteen years, we have quantified energy, utility bill, and carbon savings for US EPA?s ENERGY STAR voluntary product labeling program. In this paper, we present a unique look into the US residential program savings claimed to date for EPA?s ENERGY STAR office equipment, consumer electronics, and other small household appliances as well as EPA?s projected program savings over the next five years. We present a top-level discussion identifying program areas where EPA?s ENERGY STAR efforts have succeeded and program areas where ENERGY STAR efforts did not successfully address underlying market factors, technology issues and/or consumer behavior. We end by presenting the magnitude of ?overlooked? savings.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2005

Documentation of Calculation Methodology, Input data, and Infrastructure for the Home Energy Saver Web Site

Margaret J. Pinckard; Richard E. Brown; Evan Mills; James Lutz; Mithra Moezzi; Celina Atkinson; Chris Bolduc; Gregory Homan; Katie Coughlin

The Home Energy Saver (HES, http://HomeEnergySaver.lbl.gov) is an interactive web site designed to help residential consumers make decisions about energy use in their homes. This report describes the underlying methods and data for estimating energy consumption. Using engineering models, the site estimates energy consumption for six major categories (end uses); heating, cooling, water heating, major appliances, lighting, and miscellaneous equipment. The approach taken by the Home Energy Saver is to provide users with initial results based on a minimum of user input, allowing progressively greater control in specifying the characteristics of the house and energy consuming appliances. Outputs include energy consumption (by fuel and end use), energy-related emissions (carbon dioxide), energy bills (total and by fuel and end use), and energy saving recommendations. Real-world electricity tariffs are used for many locations, making the bill estimates even more accurate. Where information about the house is not available from the user, default values are used based on end-use surveys and engineering studies. An extensive body of qualitative decision-support information augments the analytical results.


Energy Policy | 2008

Savings estimates for the United States Environmental Protection Agency's ENERGY STAR voluntary product labeling program

Marla Sanchez; Richard E. Brown; Carrie Webber; Gregory Homan


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2002

Energy Use and Power Levels in New Monitors and Personal Computers

Judy A. Roberson; Gregory Homan; Akshay Mahajan; Bruce Nordman; Carrie A. Webber; Richard E. Brown; Marla McWhinney; Jonathan G. Koomey


Energy and Buildings | 2014

Asset rating with the home energy scoring tool

Evan Mills; Norman Bourassa; Leo Rainer; Gregory Homan; Noel Merket; Danny S. Parker; Glenn Dickey; Joan Glickman

Collaboration


Dive into the Gregory Homan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard E. Brown

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marla Sanchez

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Danny S. Parker

University of Central Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carrie A. Webber

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce Nordman

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Evan Mills

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Judy A. Roberson

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marla McWhinney

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris Bolduc

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric Masanet

Northwestern University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge