Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Eric Masanet is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Eric Masanet.


Environmental Science & Technology | 2011

Grand Challenges for Life-Cycle Assessment of Biofuels

Thomas E. McKone; William W. Nazaroff; Peter Berck; Maximilian Auffhammer; T. Lipman; Margaret S. Torn; Eric Masanet; Agnes Lobscheid; Nicholas J Santero; U. Mishra; A. Barrett; M. Bomberg; Kevin Fingerman; Corinne D. Scown; Bret Strogen; Arpad Horvath

Biofuels are widely touted as viable, albeit not straightforward, alternatives to petroleum-derived fuels. To best determine their utilization, many practitioners turn to life-cycle assessment (LCA) to ascertain the “environmental footprint”. Although parameters such as resource and land use, along with infrastructure, can be incorporated into LCA algorithms, many have noted that the methodological approach still needs careful attention. In this Feature, McKone et al. outline seven grand challenges that need to be engaged and surmounted to provide the best way forward for biofuel use.


Journal of Cleaner Production | 2003

Product recovery with some byte: an overview of management challenges and environmental consequences in reverse manufacturing for the computer industry

Charles David White; Eric Masanet; Christine Meisner Rosen; Sara L. Beckman

Abstract Estimates vary about the rate at which end-of-life computer products have been piling up, but the total population of spent computers is likely to reach into the hundreds of millions. To tackle this mounting solid and hazardous waste problem, policy and business entrepreneurs are promoting product recovery as an environmentally preferable alternative to disposal, and product recovery infrastructure and strategy has begun to develop in recent decades. However, despite some real and theoretical developments in the field, current literature lacks an overall description of the recovery process capable of capturing the essence of end-of-life management challenges for complex, rapidly obsolete, high-tech products like computers and electronics. The absence of this broad frame of reference presents a problem for managers trying to integrate environmentally sound choices into planning and management. Using case research from the computer and electronics industry, in this paper we present a generalized overview of product recovery. The purpose of this paper is two-fold: to describe the recovery of computers as a step-by-step process, and to frame an environmental research agenda for recovery management. With an eye toward generalizing the growing and diversifying practices in reverse manufacturing, we use our description from the computer and electronics industry to highlight broad challenges that managers confront at each stage of the process and to identify environmental dimensions of product recovery management decisions that require additional research.


Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation | 2011

Renewable Energy in the Context of Sustainable Development

Jayant Sathaye; Oswaldo Lucon; Atiq Rahman; John M. Christensen; Fatima Denton; Junichi Fujino; Garvin Heath; Monirul Mirza; Hugh Rudnick; August Schlaepfer; Andrey Shmakin; Gerhard Angerer; Christian Bauer; Morgan Bazilian; Robert J. Brecha; Peter Burgherr; Leon E. Clarke; Felix Creutzig; James A. Edmonds; Christian Hagelüken; Gerrit Hansen; Nathan E. Hultman; Michael Jakob; Susanne Kadner; Manfred Lenzen; Jordan Macknick; Eric Masanet; Yu Nagai; Anne Olhoff; Karen Holm Olsen

See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/phy_fac_pub Part of the Environmental Education Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, Other Environmental Sciences Commons, Sustainability Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons


Environmental Research Letters | 2012

Lifecycle greenhouse gas implications of US national scenarios for cellulosic ethanol production

Corinne D. Scown; William W. Nazaroff; Umakant Mishra; Bret Strogen; Agnes Lobscheid; Eric Masanet; Nicholas J Santero; Arpad Horvath; Thomas E. McKone

The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 set an annual US national production goal of 39.7 billion l of cellulosic ethanol by 2020. This paper explores the possibility of meeting that target by growing and processing Miscanthus giganteus. We define and assess six production scenarios in which active cropland and/or Conservation Reserve Program land are used to grow to Miscanthus. The crop and biorefinery locations are chosen with consideration of economic, land-use, water management and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction objectives. Using lifecycle assessment, the net GHG footprint of each scenario is evaluated, providing insight into the climate costs and benefits associated with each scenario’s objectives. Assuming that indirect land-use change is successfully minimized or mitigated, the results suggest two major drivers for overall GHG impact of cellulosic ethanol from Miscanthus: (a) net soil carbon sequestration or emissions during Miscanthus cultivation and (b) GHG offset credits for electricity exported by biorefineries to the grid. Without these factors, the GHG intensity of bioethanol from Miscanthus is calculated to be 11‐13 g CO2-equivalent per MJ of fuel, which is 80‐90% lower than gasoline. Including soil carbon sequestration and the power-offset credit results in net GHG sequestration up to 26 g CO2-equivalent per MJ of fuel.


Proceedings of the IEEE | 2011

Estimating the Energy Use and Efficiency Potential of U.S. Data Centers

Eric Masanet; Richard E. Brown; Arman Shehabi; Jonathan Koomey; Bruce Nordman

Data centers are a significant and growing component of electricity demand in the United States. This paper presents a bottom-up model that can be used to estimate total data center electricity demand within a region as well as the potential electricity savings associated with energy efficiency improvements. The model is applied to estimate 2008 U.S. data center electricity demand and the technical potential for electricity savings associated with major measures for IT devices and infrastructure equipment. Results suggest that 2008 demand was approximately 69 billion kilowatt hours (1.8% of 2008 total U.S. electricity sales) and that it may be technically feasible to reduce this demand by up to 80% (to 13 billion kilowatt hours) through aggressive pursuit of energy efficiency measures. Measure-level savings estimates are provided, which shed light on the relative importance of different measures at the national level. Measures applied to servers are found to have the greatest contribution to potential savings.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2008

Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the Fruit and Vegetable Processing Industry. An ENERGY STAR Guide for Energy and Plant Managers

Eric Masanet; Ernst Worrell; Wina Graus; Christina Galitsky

The U.S. fruit and vegetable processing industry--defined in this Energy Guide as facilities engaged in the canning, freezing, and drying or dehydrating of fruits and vegetables--consumes over


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2011

Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers

Ernst Worrell; Paul Blinde; Maarten Neelis; Eliane Blomen; Eric Masanet

800 million worth of purchased fuels and electricity per year. Energy efficiency improvement is an important way to reduce these costs and to increase predictable earnings, especially in times of high energy price volatility. There are a variety of opportunities available at individual plants in the U.S. fruit and vegetable processing industry to reduce energy consumption in a cost-effective manner. This Energy Guide discusses energy efficiency practices and energy-efficient technologies that can be implemented at the component, process, facility, and organizational levels. A discussion of the trends, structure, and energy consumption characteristics of the U.S. fruit and vegetable processing industry is provided along with a description of the major process technologies used within the industry. Next, a wide variety of energy efficiency measures applicable to fruit and vegetable processing plants are described. Many measure descriptions include expected savings in energy and energy-related costs, based on case study data from real-world applications in fruit and vegetable processing facilities and related industries worldwide. Typical measure payback periods and references to further information in the technical literature are also provided, when available. Given the importance of water in fruit and vegetable processing, a summary of basic, proven measures for improving plant-level water efficiency are also provided. The information in this Energy Guide is intended to help energy and plant managers in the U.S. fruit and vegetable processing industry reduce energy and water consumption in a cost-effective manner while maintaining the quality of products manufactured. Further research on the economics of all measures--as well as on their applicability to different production practices--is needed to assess their cost effectiveness at individual plants.


Archive | 2013

Assessment of Energy Efficiency Improvement and CO2 Emission Reduction Potentials in the Iron and Steel Industry in China

Ali Hasanbeigi; William R. Morrow; Eric Masanet; Jayant Sathaye; Tengfang Xu

Energy is an important cost factor in the U.S iron and steel industry. Energy efficiency improvement is an important way to reduce these costs and to increase predictable earnings, especially in times of high energy price volatility. There are a variety of opportunities available at individual plants in the U.S. iron and steel industry to reduce energy consumption in a cost-effective manner. This Energy Guide discusses energy efficiency practices and energy-efficient technologies that can be implemented at the component, process, facility, and organizational levels. A discussion of the structure, production trends, energy consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions of the iron and steel industry is provided along with a description of the major process technologies used within the industry. Next, a wide variety of energy efficiency measures are described. Many measure descriptions include expected savings in energy and energy-related costs, based on case study data from real-world applications in the steel and related industries worldwide. Typical measure payback periods and references to further information in the technical literature are also provided, when available. The information in this Energy Guide is intended to help energy and plant managers in the U.S. iron and steel industry reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effective manner while maintaining the quality of products manufactured. Further research on the economics of all measures?and on their applicability to different production practices?is needed to assess their cost effectiveness at individual plants.


Environmental Research Letters | 2014

A hybrid life-cycle inventory for multi-crystalline silicon PV module manufacturing in China

Yuan Yao; Yuan Chang; Eric Masanet

LBNL-XXXX E RNEST O RLANDO L AWRENCE B ERKELEY N ATIONAL L ABORATORY Assessment of Energy Efficiency Improvement and CO 2 Emission Reduction Potentials in the Iron and Steel Industry in China Ali Hasanbeigi, William Morrow, Jayant Sathaye, Eric Masanet, Tengfang Xu Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Department, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA USA May 2012 This study is sponsored by Climate Economics Branch, Climate Change Division of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under Contract No. DE- AC02-05CH11231 with the U.S. Department of Energy.


Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | 2008

Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the Glass Industry. An ENERGY STAR Guide for Energy and Plant Managers

Christina Galitsky; Ernst Worrell; Eric Masanet; Wina Graus

China is the world’s largest manufacturer of multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaic (mc-Si PV) modules, which is a key enabling technology in the global transition to renewable electric power systems. This study presents a hybrid life-cycle inventory (LCI) of Chinese mc-Si PV modules, which fills a critical knowledge gap on the environmental implications of mc-Si PV module manufacturing in China. The hybrid LCI approach combines process-based LCI data for module and poly-silicon manufacturing plants with a 2007 China IO-LCI model for production of raw material and fuel inputs to estimate ‘cradle to gate’ primary energy use, water consumption, and major air pollutant emissions (carbon dioxide, methane, sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxide, and nitrogen oxides). Results suggest that mc-Si PV modules from China may come with higher environmental burdens that one might estimate if one were using LCI results for mc-Si PV modules manufactured elsewhere. These higher burdens can be reasonably explained by the efficiency differences in China’s poly-silicon manufacturing processes, the country’s dependence on highly polluting coal-fired electricity, and the expanded system boundaries associated with the hybrid LCI modeling framework. The results should be useful for establishing more conservative ranges on the potential ‘cradle to gate’ impacts of mc-Si PV module manufacturing for more robust LCAs of PV deployment scenarios.

Collaboration


Dive into the Eric Masanet's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arpad Horvath

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William R. Morrow

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yuan Chang

Central University of Finance and Economics

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arman Shehabi

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jayant Sathaye

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yuan Yao

Northwestern University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lynn Price

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Runze Huang

Northwestern University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joe Cresko

United States Department of Energy

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge