Gregory Tevelen
Queensland University of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gregory Tevelen.
Journal of The Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials | 2009
J.P. Little; Gregory Tevelen; Clayton J. Adam; John Evans; Mark J. Pearcy
Biological tissues are subjected to complex loading states in vivo and in order to define constitutive equations that effectively simulate their mechanical behaviour under these loads, it is necessary to obtain data on the tissues response to multiaxial loading. Single axis and shear testing of biological tissues is often carried out, but biaxial testing is less common. We sought to design and commission a biaxial compression testing device, capable of obtaining repeatable data for biological samples. The apparatus comprised a sealed stainless steel pressure vessel specifically designed such that a state of hydrostatic compression could be created on the test specimen while simultaneously unloading the sample along one axis with an equilibrating tensile pressure. Thus a state of equibiaxial compression was created perpendicular to the long axis of a rectangular sample. For the purpose of calibration and commissioning of the vessel, rectangular samples of closed cell ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) foam were tested. Each sample was subjected to repeated loading, and nine separate biaxial experiments were carried out to a maximum pressure of 204 kPa (30 psi), with a relaxation time of two hours between them. Calibration testing demonstrated the force applied to the samples had a maximum error of 0.026 N (0.423% of maximum applied force). Under repeated loading, the foam sample demonstrated lower stiffness during the first load cycle. Following this cycle, an increased stiffness, repeatable response was observed with successive loading. While the experimental protocol was developed for EVA foam, preliminary results on this material suggest that this device may be capable of providing test data for biological tissue samples. The load response of the foam was characteristic of closed cell foams, with consolidation during the early loading cycles, then a repeatable load-displacement response upon repeated loading. The repeatability of the test results demonstrated the ability of the test device to provide reproducible test data and the low experimental error in the force demonstrated the reliability of the test data.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine | 2007
Gregory Tevelen; Mark J. Pearcy; Ross Crawford
Abstract Clinical experience shows that removal of the Exeter long-stem femoral component (220 mm, 240 mm, 260 mm) of total hip arthroplasty is extremely difficult, often requiring splitting of the femur. To identify the reason for this, measurements of stem geometry and force required to pull the stems out of the cement mantle were conducted on three original Exeter long-stem and one standard femoral components. All implants required an initial force of approximately 4 kN for release from the cement. The long-stem components then required much larger forces and hence much higher expenditure of energy to pull them clear of the cement. This was attributed to the reverse taper seen on the nominally cylindrical distal section of the long-stem components. Following re-design of the manufacturing process to ensure the taper continued to the implants distal tip, four further implants were tested. These demonstrated the requirement for initial cement release but then required no further energy expenditure similar to the standard stem. This study clearly demonstrated that the original difficulty in removing these long stems was owing to the manufacturing process resulting in a reverse taper on the distal stem. The adoption of recommended manufacturing changes to ensure the taper continues to the distal tip removed this difficulty.
Journal of The Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials | 2010
J.P. Little; Mark J. Pearcy; Gregory Tevelen; John Evans; Clayton J. Adam
Arthroscopy | 2005
David A. Hayes; Mark Watts; Gregory Tevelen; Ross Crawford
Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering | 2005
Ross Crawford; Thomas R. Edwards; Hugh English; Gregory Tevelen
Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation | 2009
J.P. Little; Gregory Tevelen; Clayton J. Adam; John Evans; Mark J. Pearcy
Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation | 2007
Gregory Tevelen; Mark J. Pearcy; Ross Crawford
Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering; School of Engineering Systems | 2006
Kamal Deep; William J. Donnelly; Y. Morar; Nicola Ward; Gregory Tevelen; Kimble Dunster; Ross Crawford
Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering; Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation | 2004
Laurent A. Frossard; Jim Beck; Michael P. Dillon; Gregory Tevelen; Mark Hayne; Peter Condie; Betty Mulder; Nathan J. Stevenson; John Evans